12,676
Views
59
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Introduction

Policy Change in Comparative Contexts: Applying the Advocacy Coalition Framework Outside of Western Europe and North America

, , &

References

  • Ainuson, K., 2009, An advocacy coalition approach to water policy change in Ghana: A look at belief systems and policy oriented learning. Journal of African Studies and Development, 1(2), pp. 16–27.
  • Arnold, F. E., 2003, Native forest policy in Chile: Understanding sectoral process dynamics in a country with an emerging economy. International Forestry Review, 5(4), pp. 317–328. doi:10.1505/IFOR.5.4.317.22662
  • Beverwijk, J., 2005, The Genesis of a System: Coalition Formation in Mozambican Higher Education, 1993–2003, (The Netherlands: CHEPS/UT).
  • Beverwijk, J., Goedegebuure, L. and Huisman, J., 2008, Policy change in Nascent subsystems: Mozambican higher education policy 1993–2003. Policy Sciences, 41, pp. 357–377. doi:10.1007/s11077-008-9072-0
  • Bulkeley, H., 2000, Discourse coalitions and the Australian climate change policy network. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 18(6), pp. 727–748. doi:10.1068/c9905j
  • Cairney, P., 2012, Understanding Public Policy: Theories and Issues, (New York, NY: Palgrave).
  • Capano, G., 2009, Understanding policy change as an epistemological and theoretical problem. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 11, pp. 7–31. doi:10.1080/13876980802648284
  • Capano, G. and Howlett, M., 2009, Introduction: The determinants of policy change: Advancing the debate. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 11(1), pp. 1–5. doi:10.1080/13876980802648227
  • Carter, N., 2001, The Politics of the Environment: Ideas, Activism, Policy, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • Carvalho, G. O., 2001, Metallurgical development in the Caraja’s area: A case study of the evolution of environmental policy formation in Brazil. Society and Natural Resources, 14, pp. 127–143. doi:10.1080/089419201300000535
  • Chen, P., 2003, Advocating online censorship. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 62(2), pp. 41–64. doi:10.1111/1467-8497.00324
  • Christopoulos, D. and Ingold, K., 2011, Distinguishing between political brokerage & political entrepreneurship. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 10, pp. 36–42. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.01.006
  • Dressel, B., 2012, Targeting the public purse: Advocacy coalitions and public finance in the Philippines. Administration & Society, 44(6 Suppl), pp. 65S–84S. doi:10.1177/0095399712460055
  • Easton, D., 1971, The Political System: An Inquiry Into the State of Political Sciences, 2nd ed. (New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf, Inc).
  • Elliott, C. and Schlaepfer, R., 2001, The advocacy coalition framework: Application to the policy process for the development of forest certification in Sweden. Journal of European Public Policy, 8(4), pp. 642–661. doi:10.1080/13501760110064438
  • Farquharson, K., 2003, Influencing policy transnationally: Pro- and anti-tobacco global advocacy networks. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 62(4), pp. 80–92. doi:10.1111/j..2003.00351.x
  • Feldman, E. J., Heidenheimer, A.J., Heclo, H., Adams, C.T., Smith, T.A., Hayward, J., Watson, M., 1978, Comparative public policy: Field or method? Comparative Politics, 10(2), pp. 287–305. doi:10.2307/421650
  • Francesch-Huidobro, M. and Mai, Q., 2012, Climate advocacy coalitions in Guangdong, China. Administration & Society, 44, pp. 43S–64S. doi:10.1177/0095399712460068
  • Freeman, G. P., 1985, National styles and policy sectors: Explaining structured variation. Journal of Public Policy, 5(4), pp. 467–496. doi:10.1017/S0143814X00003287
  • Gupta, K., 2012, Comparative public policy: Using the comparative method to advance our understanding of the policy process. Policy Studies Journal, 40(S1), pp. 11–26. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2012.00443.x
  • Gupta, K., 2014, A Comparative Policy Analysis of Coalition Strategies: Case Studies of Nuclear Energy and Forest Management in India. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 16(4), pp. 356–372. doi:10.1080/13876988.2014.886812
  • Han, H., Swedlow, B. and Unger, D., 2014, Policy Advocacy Coalitions as Causes of Policy Change in China? Analyzing Evidence from Contemporary Environmental Politics. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 16(4), pp. 313–334. doi:10.1080/13876988.2013.857065
  • Henry, A. D., 2011, Ideology, power, and the structure of policy networks. Policy Studies Journal, 39(3), pp. 361–383. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00413.x
  • Henry, A. D. and Dietz, Th., 2011, Information, networks, and the complexity of trust in commons governance. International Journal of the Commons, 5(2), pp. 188–212.
  • Henry, A. D. and Dietz, Th., 2012, Understanding environmental cognition. Organization & Environment, 25(3), pp. 238–258. doi:10.1177/1086026612456538
  • Hogl, K., 2000, The Austrian domestic forest policy community in change? Impacts of the globalisation and Europeanisation of forest politics. Forest Policy and Economics, 1, pp. 3–13.
  • Holmes, T. and Scoones, I., 2001, Participatory environmental processes: Experiences from North and South, in: Deliberative Democracy and Citizen Empowerment. International Institute of Environment and Empowerment. International Institute for Environment and Development, Sustainable Agriculture Programme.
  • Howlett, M. and Cashore, B., 2009, The dependent variable problem in the study of policy change: Understanding policy change as a methodological problem. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 11(1), pp. 33–46. doi:10.1080/13876980802648144
  • Hsu, S., 2005, Advocacy coalitions and policy change on nuclear power utilization in Taiwan. The Social Science Journal, 42, pp. 215–229. doi:10.1016/j.soscij.2005.03.002
  • Ingold, K., 2011, Network structures within policy processes: Coalitions, power, and brokerage in Swiss climate policy. Policy Studies Journal, 39(3), pp. 435–459. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00416.x
  • Ingold, K. and Varone, F., 2011, Treating policy brokers seriously: Evidence from the climate policy. Journal of Public Administration Research Theory (JPART), 22, pp. 319–346.
  • Jang, J. H. and Han, C. H., 2010, Advocacy Coalitions in Regulating Big Business in South Korea: Change of Chaebols Holding Company Policy. Korea Observer, 41(2), pp. 161–188.
  • Jenkins-Smith, H., Nohrstedt, D., Weible, C. and Sabatier, P., 2014, The advocacy coalition framework: Foundations, evolution, and ongoing research, in: P. Sabatier and C. Weible (Eds) Theories of the Policy Process, 3rd ed. (Boulder, CO: Westview Press), pp. 183–223.
  • John, P., 1998, Analyzing Public Policy, (New York, NY: Cassell).
  • Jones, B. D. and Baumgartner, F. R., 2012, From there to here: Punctuated equilibrium to the general punctuation thesis to a theory of government information processing. Policy Studies Journal, 40(1), pp. 1–20. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00431.x
  • Kickert, W., 2003, Beneath consensual corporatism: Traditions of governance in the Netherlands. Public Administration, 81(1), pp. 119–140. doi:10.1111/1467-9299.00339
  • Kim, S., 2003, Irresolvable cultural conflicts and conservation/development arguments: Analysis of Korea’s Saemangeum project. Policy Sciences, 36, pp. 125–149. doi:10.1023/A:1024866323901
  • Kim, P. S., 2012, Advocacy coalitions and policy change: The case of South Korea’s Saemangeum project. Administration & Society, 44, pp. 85S–103S. doi:10.1177/0095399712460078
  • Kingiri, A. N., 2011, Conflicting advocacy coalitions in an evolving modern biotechnology regulatory subsystem: Policy learning and influencing Kenya’s regulatory policy process. Science and Public Policy, 38(3), pp. 199–211. doi:10.3152/030234211X12924093660273
  • Kingiri, A. N., 2014, Comparative Strategic Behavior of Advocacy Coalitions and Policy Brokers: The Case of Kenya’s Biosafety Regulatory Policy. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 16(4), pp. 373–395. doi:10.1080/13876988.2014.942569
  • Kübler, D., 2001, Understanding policy change with the advocacy coalition framework: An application to Swiss drug policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 8(4), pp. 623–641. doi:10.1080/13501760110064429
  • Lahat, L., 2011, How can leaders’ perceptions guide policy analysis in an era of governance? Policy Sciences, 44(2), pp. 135–155.
  • Laudan, L., 1977, Progress and Its Problems: Towards a Theory of Scientific Growth, (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press).
  • Leifeld, P., 2013, Reconceptualizing major policy change in the advocacy coalition framework: A discourse network analysis of German Pension politics. Policy Studies Journal, 41(1), pp. 169–198. doi:10.1111/psj.12007
  • Li, W., 2012, Advocating environmental interests in China. Administration & Society, 44(6 Suppl), pp. 26S–42S. doi:10.1177/0095399712460079
  • Lindvall, J. and Rothstein, B., 2006, Sweden: The fall of the strong state. Scandinavian Political Studies, 29(1), pp. 47–63. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9477.2006.00141.x
  • Marfo, E. and McKeown, J. P., 2013, Negotiating the supply of legal timber to the domestic market in Ghana: Explaining policy change intent using the advocacy coalition framework. Forest Policy and Economics, 32, pp. 23–31. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2012.12.007
  • McDougal, M. S., 1952, The comparative study of law for policy purposes: Value clarification as an instrument of democratic world order. The Yale Law Journal, 61, pp. 915–946. doi:10.2307/793456
  • Montefrio, M., 2014, State versus Indigenous Peoples’ Rights: Comparative Analysis of Stable System Parameters, Policy Constraints and the Process of Delegitimation. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 16(4), pp. 335–355. doi:10.1080/13876988.2014.938912
  • Montefrio, M. and Sonnenfeld, D. A., 2011, Forests, fuel, or food? Competing coalitions and biofuels policy making in the Philippines. The Journal of Environment & Development, 20(1), pp. 27–49. doi:10.1177/1070496510394321
  • Nagel, P., 2006, Policy games and venue shopping: Working the stakeholder interface to broker policy change in Rehab services. Australian Journal of Policy Analysis, 65(4), pp. 3–16.
  • Nohrstedt, D. and Weible, C. M., 2010, The logic of policy change after crisis: Proximity and subsystem interaction. Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy, 1(2), pp. 1–32. doi:10.2202/1944-4079.1035
  • Ortmann, S., 2012, Policy advocacy in a competitive authoritarian regime: The growth of civil society and agenda setting in Singapore. Administration & Society, 44(6 Suppl), pp. 13S–25S. doi:10.1177/0095399712460080
  • Parsons, W., 1995, Public Policy: An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Policy Analysis, (Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar).
  • Rommetvedt, H., 2005, Norway: Resources count, but votes decide? From neo-corporatist representation to neo-pluralist parliamentarism. West European Politics, 28(4), pp. 740–763. doi:10.1080/01402380500216674
  • Runkle, K., LaFollette, S. and Alamu, J., 2013, Public health policy options for Improving well-Water Quality in West Point, Liberia. World Medical & Health Policy, 5(4), pp. 304–323. doi:10.1002/wmh3.73
  • Sabatier, P. A., 1988, An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy Sciences, 21, pp. 129–168. doi:10.1007/BF00136406
  • Sabatier, P. A., 1998, The advocacy coalition framework: Revisions and relevance for Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 5(1), pp. 98–130. doi:10.1080/13501768880000051
  • Sabatier, P. A., 1999, Fostering the development of policy theory, in: P. A. Sabatier (Ed) Theories of the Policy Process, (Boulder, CO: Westview Press), pp. 261–276.
  • Sabatier, P. A. and Jenkins-Smith, H., 1993, Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach, (Boulder, CO: Westview Press).
  • Sabatier, P. A. and Jenkins-Smith, H., 1999, The advocacy coalition framework: An assessment, in: P. A. Sabatier (ed) Theories of the Policy Process, (Boulder, CO: Westview Press), pp. 117–166.
  • Sabatier, P. A. and Weible, C. M., 2007, The advocacy coalition framework: Innovations and clarifications, in: P. A. Sabatier (Ed) Theories of the Policy Process, 2nd ed. (Boulder, CO: Westview Press), pp. 189–222.
  • Santa, E. D., 2013, The politics of implementing Philippine tourism policy: A policy network and advocacy coalition framework approach. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 18(8), pp. 913–933. doi:10.1080/10941665.2012.717958
  • Sato, H., 1999, The advocacy coalition framework and the policy process analysis: The case of smoking control in Japan. Policy Studies Journal, 27(1), pp. 28–44. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.1999.tb01951.x
  • Schattschneider, E. E., 1960, The Semi-Sovereign People, (New York, NY: Holt).
  • Scott, I., 2012, Analyzing advocacy issues in Asia. Administration and Society, 44, pp. 4S–12S. doi:10.1177/0095399712460081
  • Simon, H. A., 1996, The Sciences of the Artificial, 3rd ed. (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press).
  • Steinberg, P. F., 2003, Understanding policy change in developing countries: The spheres of influence framework. Global Environmental Politics, 3(1), pp. 11–32. doi:10.1162/152638003763336365
  • Tewari, D. D., 2001, Is commercial forestry sustainable in South Africa? The changing institutional and policy needs. Forest Policy and Economics, 2, pp. 333–353. doi:10.1016/S1389-9341(01)00028-4
  • Villamor, G. B., 2006, The rise of protected area policy in the Philippine forest policy: An analysis from the perspective of Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF). Forest Policy and Economics, 9(2), pp. 162–178. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2005.04.003
  • Weible, C. M. and Nohrstedt, D., 2012, The advocacy coalition framework: Coalitions, learning, and policy change, in: E. Araral, S. Fritzen, M. Howlett, M. Ramesh, and X. Wu (Eds) Handbook of Public Policy, (New York, NY: Routledge).
  • Weible, C. M. and Sabatier, P. A., 2005, Comparing policy networks: Marine protected areas in California. The Policy Studies Journal, 33(2), pp. 181–201. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2005.00101.x
  • Weible, C. M., Sabatier, P. A., Jenkins-Smith, H. C., Nohrstedt, D., Henry, A. D. and deLeon, P., 2011, A quarter century of the advocacy coalition framework: An introduction to the special issue. Policy Studies Journal, 39(3), pp. 349–360. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00412.x
  • Weible, C. M., Sabatier, P. A. and McQueen, K., 2009, Themes and variations: Taking stock of the advocacy coalition framework. Policy Studies Journal, 37(1), pp. 121–140. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2008.00299.x
  • Zafonte, M. and Sabatier, P. A., 2004, Short-term versus long-term coalitions in the policy process: Automotive pollution control, 1963–1989. The Policy Studies Journal, 32(1), pp. 75–107. doi:10.1111/j.0190-292X.2004.00054.x

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.