Scripting Deliberative Policy-Making: Dramaturgic Policy Analysis and Engagement Know-How

References

• Audit Scotland, 2013, Improving Community Planning in Scotland (Edinburgh: Audit Scotland).
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, M., Newman, J. and Sullivan, H., 2007, Power, Participation and Political Renewal: Case Studies in Public Participation (Bristol: The Policy Press).
   Google Scholar
• Blaikie, N. W. H., 2009, Designing Social Research. The Logic of Anticipation (Cambridge, UK; Malden, MA: Polity).
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M., 2012, Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age (Cambridge: Polity Press).
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K., 2006, Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis (London: SAGE).
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. and Bryant, A. (Eds), 2007, The Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory (Los Angeles; London: Sage).
   Google Scholar
• Colebatch, H. K., 2005, Policy analysis, policy practice and political science. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 64(3), pp. 14–23. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8500.2005.00448.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colebatch, H. K. (Ed), 2006a, The Work of Policy: An International Survey (Lanham, MD: Lexington Books).
   Google Scholar
• Colebatch, H. K., 2006b, What work makes policy? Policy Sciences, 39, pp. 309–321. doi:10.1007/s11077-006-9025-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colebatch, H. K., 2009, Policy (Maidenhead: Open University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, E. and Smith, G., 2012, Organizing deliberation: The perspectives of professional participation practitioners in Britain and Germany. Journal of Public Deliberation, 8(1), pp. 1–39, Article 3.
   Google Scholar
• Czarniawska, B., 2008, Shadowing and Other Techniques for Doing Fieldwork in Modern Societies (Malmö: Liber and Copenhagen Business School Press).
   Google Scholar
• Durose, C., 2007, Beyond ‘street level bureaucrats’: Re‐interpreting the role of front line public sector workers. Critical Policy Studies, 1(2), pp. 217–234. doi:10.1080/19460171.2007.9518520
   Google Scholar
• Durose, C., 2011, Revisiting Lipsky: Front-line work in UK local governance. Political Studies, 59(4), pp. 978–995. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2011.00886.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelman, M. J., 1985, The Symbolic Uses of Politics (Urbana: University of Illinois Press).
   Google Scholar
• Edelman, M. J., 1988, Constructing the Political Spectacle (Chicago; London: University of Chicago Press).
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, O., 2014. Transformative practices: The political work of public engagement practitioners, PhD Thesis, University of Edinburgh, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Felt, U. and Fochler, M., 2010, Machineries for making publics: Inscribing and de-scribing publics in public engagement. Minerva, 48(3), pp. 219–238. doi:10.1007/s11024-010-9155-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, F., 2000, Citizens, Experts, and the Environment: The Politics of Local Knowledge (Durham, NC; London: Duke University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F., 2003, Reframing Public Policy: Discursive Politics and Deliberative Practices (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F., 2009, Democracy and Expertise: Reorienting Policy Inquiry (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F. and Forester, J. (Eds), 1993, The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning (Durham, NC; London: Duke University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F. and Gottweis, H., 2012, The Argumentative Turn Revisited: Public Policy as Communicative Practice (Durham, NC; London: Duke University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B., 1998, Rationality and Power: Democracy in Practice (Chicago; London: University of Chicago Press).
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B., 2001, Making Social Science Matter. Why Social Inquiry Fails and How it Can Succeed Again (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J., 1993, Practice stories: The priority of practical judgement, in: F. Fischer and J. Forester (Eds) The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning (Durham and London: Duke University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J., 1999, The Deliberative Practitioner. Encouraging Participatory Planning Processes (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J., 2009, Dealing with Differences: Dramas of Mediating Public Disputes (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 1980, Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977 (New York: Pantheon).
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 1982, The subject and power, in: H. L. Dreyfus and P. Rabinow (Eds) Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, R., 2008, Learning by meeting. Critical Policy Studies, 2(1), pp. 1–24. doi:10.1080/19460171.2008.9518529
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, R., Griggs, S. and Boaz, A., 2011, The practice of policy making. Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 7(2), pp. 127–136. doi:10.1332/174426411X579180
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, R. and Sturdy, S. (Eds), 2014, Knowledge in Policy: Embodied, Inscribed, Enacted (Bristol: The Policy Press).
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, T. and Peck, E., 2007, Performing governance: A partnership board dramaturgy. Public Administration, 85(4), pp. 907–929. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00683.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fung, A. and Wright, E. O., 2003, Deepening Democracy: Institutional Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance (London; New York: Verso).
   Google Scholar
• Geertz, C., 1973, The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays (New York: Basic Books).
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G. and Strauss, A. L., 1967, The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research (Chicago; New York: Aldine Pub. Co).
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E., 1971, The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life (Middlesex: Pelican Books).
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E., 1983, The interaction order: American sociological association, 1982 presidential address. American Sociological Review, 48(1), pp. 1–17. doi:10.2307/2095141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodin, R. E., 2008, Innovating Democracy: Democratic Theory and Practice After the Deliberative Turn (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. A., 2005, Setting the stage: A dramaturgy of policy deliberation. Administration & Society, 36(6), pp. 624–647. doi:10.1177/0095399704270586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. A. and Wagenaar, H. (Eds), 2003, Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Hendriks, C. M. and Carson, L., 2008, Can the market help the forum? Negotiating the commercialization of deliberative democracy. Policy Sciences, 41(4), pp. 293–313. doi:10.1007/s11077-008-9069-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innes, J. E. and Booher, D. E., 2010, Planning with Complexity: An Introduction to Collaborative Rationality for Public Policy (Abingdon; New York: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Involve. 2005. People & Participation. How to Put Citizens at the Heart of Decision-Making. London: Involve. Available at http://www.involve.org.uk/ (accessed 1 March 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Law, J., 1994, Organizing Modernity (Oxford: Blackwell).
   Google Scholar
• Li, T. M., 2007, Practices of assemblage and community forest management. Economy and Society, 36(2), pp. 263–293. doi:10.1080/03085140701254308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M., 1980, Street Level Bureaucracy (New York: Russell Sage Foundation).
   Google Scholar
• Lowndes, V., Pratchett, L. and Stoker, G., 2006, Locality Matters: Making Participation Count in Local Politics (London: Institute for Public Policy Research).
   Google Scholar
• Mahendran, K. and Cook, D., 2007. Participation and Engagement in Politics and Policy Making. Scottish Executive Social Research. Available at http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2007/01/23145406/0 (accessed 12 January 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Maynard-Moody, S. and Musheno, M. C., 2003, Cops, Teachers, Counselors: Stories from the Front Lines of Public Service (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press).
   Google Scholar
• Moore, A., 2012, Following from the front: Theorizing deliberative facilitation. Critical Policy Studies, 6(2), pp. 146–162. doi:10.1080/19460171.2012.689735
   Google Scholar
• Morley, L., 2006, Hidden transcripts: The micropolitics of gender in Commonwealth universities. Womens Studies International Forum, 29(6), pp. 543–551. doi:10.1016/j.wsif.2006.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosse, D., 2011, Politics and ethics: Ethnographies of expert knowledge and professional identities, in: C. Shore,S. Wright and D. Però (Eds) Policy Worlds. Anthropology and the Analysis of Contemporary Power (New York; Oxford: Berghahn Books).
   Google Scholar
• Newman, J., 2012, Working the Spaces of Power: Activism, Neoliberalism and Gendered Labour (London; New York: Boomsbury Academic).
   Google Scholar
• Newman, J. and Clarke, J., 2009, Publics, Politics and Power: Remaking the Public in Public Services (Los Angeles, CA; London: Sage).
   Google Scholar
• Nicolini, D., 2009, Zooming in and out: Studying practices by switching theoretical lenses and trailing connections. Organization Studies, 30(12), pp. 1391–1418. doi:10.1177/0170840609349875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. P. (Ed), 2010, The New Public Governance? Emerging Perspectives on the Theory and Practice of Public Governance (London; New York: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Pieczka, M. and Escobar, O., 2013, Dialogue and science: Innovation in policy-making and the discourse of public engagement in the UK. Science and Public Policy, 40(1), pp. 113–126. doi:10.1093/scipol/scs073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rein, M., 1983, From Policy to Practice (Basigstoke: The MacMillan Press).
   Google Scholar
• Schatz, E. (Ed), 2009, Political Ethnography: What Immersion Contributes to the Study of Politics (Chicago; London: Chicago University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Sandercock, L. and Attili, G., 2012, Multimedia and urban narratives in the planning process, in: F. Fischer and H. Gottweis (Eds) The Argumentative Turn Revisited: Public Policy as Communicative Practice (Durham, NC; London: Duke University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. R., 2002, The Site of the Social: A Philosophical Account of the Constitution of Social Life and Change (University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Schon, D. A., 1983, The Reflective Practitioner : How Professionals Think in Action (Aldershot: Ashgate).
   Google Scholar
• Schon, D. and Rein, M., 1994, Frame Reflection. Toward the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies (New York: Basic Books).
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. C., 1998, Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed (New Haven, CT; London: Yale University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair, S., 2008, Dilemmas of Community Planning: Lessons From Scotland. Public Policy and Administration, 23(4), pp. 373–390.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D. E. (Ed), 2006, Institutional Ethnography as Practice (Lanham; Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers).
   Google Scholar
• Smith, G., 2009, Democratic Innovations: Designing Institutions for Citizen Participation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Shore, C., Wright, S. and Però, D. (Eds), 2011, Policy Worlds. Anthropology and the Analysis of Contemporary Power (New York; Oxford: Berghahn Books).
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, H. and Lowndes, V., 2004, Like a horse and carriage or a fish on a bicycle: How well do local partnerships and public participation go together? Local Government Studies, 30(1), pp. 51–73. doi:10.1080/0300393042000230920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagenaar, H., 2004, Knowing” the rules: Administrative work as practice. Public Administration Review, 64(6), pp. 643–656. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00412.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagenaar, H., 2011, Meaning in Action: Interpretation and Dialogue in Policy Analysis (New York; London: M.E. Sharpe).
   Google Scholar
• Wagenaar, H. and Cook, S. D. N., 2003, Understanding policy practices: Action, dialectic and deliberation in policy analysis, in: M. A. Hajer and H. Wagenaar (Eds) Deliberative Policy Analysis. Understanding Governance in the Network Society (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Weimer, D. L., 2012, The universal and the particular in policy analysis and training. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 14(1), pp. 1–8. doi:10.1080/13876988.2011.646819
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenger, E., 1998, Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity (Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Williams, P., 2012, Collaboration in Public Policy and Practice: Perspectives on Boundary Spanners (Bristol: The Policy Press).
   Google Scholar
• Yanow, D., 1996, How Does a Policy Mean?: Interpreting Policy and Organizational Actions (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Yanow, D., 1999, Conducting Interpretive Policy Analysis (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage).
   Google Scholar
• Yanow, D., 2009, Dear author, dear reader: The third hermeneutic in writing and reviewing ethnography, in: E. Schatz (Ed) Political Ethnography: What Immersion Brings to the Study of Power (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
   Google Scholar
• Yanow, D. and Schwartz-Shea, P., 2012, Interpretive Approaches to Research Design: Concepts and Processes (New York: Routledge).
   Google Scholar