Towards Good Enough Measurement – Sick Leave Statistics as a Case of the Measurement Challenges in Comparative Public Performance

References

• Afonso, A., Schuknecht, L. and Tanzi, V., 2005, Public sector efficiency: An international comparison. Public Choice, 123(3–4), pp. 321–347. doi:10.1007/s11127-005-7165-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almeida, C., Braveman, P., Gold, M. R., Szwarcwald, C. L., Ribeiro, J. M., Miglionico, A., Millar, J. S., Porto, S., Costa, N. D. R., Rubio, V. O., Segall, M., Starfield, B., Travassos, C., Uga, A., Valente, J. and Viacava, F., 2001, Methodological concerns and recommendations on policy consequences of the World Health Report 2000. The Lancet, 357, pp. 1692–1697. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04825-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altbach, P. G., 2010, November 11, The state of the rankings. Available at http://www.insidehighered.com/views/2010/11/11/altbach (accessed 7 December 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, M., 2008, The good governance agenda: Beyond indicators without theory. Oxford Development Studies, 36(4), pp. 379–407. doi:10.1080/13600810802455120
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, M., Hay, R. and Myers, J., 2010, Can governance indicators make sense? Towards a new approach to sector-specific measures of governance. Oxford Development Studies, 38(4), pp. 391–410. doi:10.1080/13600818.2010.524696
   Google Scholar
• Arndt, C., 2008, The politics of governance ratings. International Public Management Journal, 11(3), pp. 275–297. doi:10.1080/10967490802301278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arndt, C. and Oman, C., 2006, Uses and Abuses of Governance Indicators (Paris: Development Centre of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development).
   Google Scholar
• Bierla, I., Huver, B. and Richard, S., 2013, New evidence on absenteeism and presenteeism. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(7), pp. 1536–1550. doi:10.1080/09585192.2012.722120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ed) (BKA), 2011, Fehlzeiten 2011 und Gesundheitsförderung im Bundesdienst. Daten und Fakten. Available at http://www.bka.gv.at/DocView.axd?CobId=36433 (accessed 14 January 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek, 2005, Berekening Van Verzuim. NVS Standaard Voor Verzuimregistratie: nationale Verzuimstatistiek (Den Haag: Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek (CBS)). Available at http://www.cbs.nl/NR/rdonlyres/412FAADD-209E-4511-8B1A-EFF4A8A89AB2/0/2007verzuimstandaard.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cristofoli, D., Turrini, A. and Valotti, G., 2011, Coming back soon: Assessing the determinants of absenteeism in the public sector. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 13(1), pp. 75–89. doi:10.1080/13876988.2011.538542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erkkilä, T., 2015. Global governance indices as policy instruments: Actionability, transparency and comparative policy analysis. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, pp. 1–21. doi:10.1080/13876988.2015.1023052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Institute of Public Administration (EIPA). 2006, The Common Assessment Framework (CAF). Improving An Organisation through Self-assessment – CAF 2006. Available at http://www.eipa.eu/en/pages/show/&tid=102 (accessed 7 December 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Freistein, K., 2015, Effects of indicator use: A comparison of poverty measuring instruments at the world bank. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, pp. 1–16. doi:10.1080/13876988.2015.1023053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gormley, W. T. and Weimer, D. L., 1999, Organizational Report Cards (Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Gosselin, E., Lemyre, L. and Corneil, W., 2013, Presenteeism and absenteeism: Differentiated understanding of related phenomena. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 18(1), pp. 75–86. doi:10.1037/a0030932
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, C. and Van Dooren, W., 2013, Regional Benchmarking of Public Administration Performance. Towards a Construction of an International Comparable Dataset (Antwerpen: SBOV).
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C., 2007, Public service management by numbers: Why does it vary? Where has it come from? What are the gaps and the puzzles? Public Money & Management, 27(2), pp. 95–102. doi:10.1111/pmam.2007.27.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C., Dixon, R. and Beeston, C., 2008, Rating the rankings: Assessing international rankings of public service performance. International Public Management Journal, 11(3), pp. 298–328. doi:10.1080/10967490802301286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonker, -J.-J., 2012, Countries Compared on Public Performance : A Study of Public Sector Performance in 28 Countries (The Hague: The Netherlands Institute for Social Research/SCP).
   Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A. and Mastruzzi, M., 2006, Governance Matters V: governance Indicators for 1996–2005 (Washington, D.C: World Bank).
   Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A. and Mastruzzi, M., 2009, Governance Matters VIII: aggregate and Individual Governance Indicators, 1996–2008 (Washington, DC: World Bank).
   Google Scholar
• Langbein, L. and Knack, S., 2010, The worldwide governance indicators: Six, one, or none? Journal of Development Studies, 46(2), pp. 350–370. doi:10.1080/00220380902952399
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luts, M., Van Dooren, W. and Bouckaert, G., 2008. Internationale rangschikkingen gerangschikt. Available at https://lirias.kuleuven.be/handle/123456789/204162 ( accessed 5 June 2012).
   Google Scholar
• OECD, 2011, Government at a Glance 2011 (Paris: OECD).
   Google Scholar
• OECD, 2013, Government at a Glance 2013 (Paris: OECD).
   Google Scholar
• Osterkamp, R. and Röhn, O., 2007, Being on sick leave: Possible explanations for differences of sick-leave days across countries. CESifo Economic Studies, 53(1), pp. 97–114. doi:10.1093/cesifo/ifm005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, J. L., 2012, How can we improve our science to generate more usable knowledge for public professionals? Public Administration Review, 72(4), pp. 479–482. doi:10.1111/puar.2012.72.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., 2008, Time, Policy, Management: Governing with the Past (Oxford ; New York: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., 2011, ‘Moderation in all things’: International comparisons of governance quality. Financial Accountability & Management, 27(4), pp. 437–457. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0408.2011.00532.x
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. (Ed), 2013, Context in Public Policy and Management: The Missing Link? (Cheltenham, UK ; Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar).
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., Bouckaert, G. and Van Dooren, W. (Eds), 2009, Measuring Government Activity (Paris: OECD).
   Google Scholar
• Raidt, T., 2009, PISA: Katalysator im bildungspolitischen Paradigmenwechsel. Dimensionen des Wertewandels im Bildungswesen (Düsseldorf: Heinrich-Heine-Universität).
   Google Scholar
• Van de Walle, S., 2006, The state of the world’s bureaucracies. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 8(4), pp. 437–448. doi:10.1080/13876980600971409
   Google Scholar
• Van de Walle, S., 2009, International comparisons of public sector performance. Public Management Review, 11(1), pp. 39–56. doi:10.1080/14719030802493254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Walle, S., Sterck, M., Van Dooren, W. and Bouckaert, G., 2004, What you see is not necessarily what you get. Een verkenning van de mogelijkheden en moeilijkheden van internationale vergelijkingen van publieke sectoren op basis van indicatoren (No. D/2004/10107/011). (Leuven: Instituut voor de Overheid).
   Google Scholar
• Van Dooren, W., 2009, A politico-administrative agenda for progress in social measurement: Reforming the calculation of government’s contribution to GDP. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 11(3), pp. 309–326. doi:10.1080/13876980903220751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dooren, W., De Caluwe, C. and Lonti, Z., 2012, How to measure public administration performance. Public Performance & Management Review, 35(3), pp. 489–508. doi:10.2753/PMR1530-9576350306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar