Compared to What? The Multiple Meanings of Comparative Policy Analysis

References

• Agranoff, R. and Radin, B. A., 1991, The comparative case study approach in public administration, in Perry, J., editor. Research in Public Administration, 1(1), pp. 203–231.
   Google Scholar
• Bardach, E., 1977, The Implementation Game: What Happens after a Bill Becomes a Law (Cambridge: MIT Press).
   Google Scholar
• Bleiklie, I., Goggin, M. L. and Rothmayr, C. (Eds), 2004, Comparative Biomedical Policy: Governing Assisted Reproductive Technologies (New York: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Bovens, M., ‘T Hart, P. and Peters, B. G. (Eds), 2001, Success and Failure in Public Governance: A Comparative Analysis (Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar).
   Google Scholar
• Cook, T. D., 2014, Generalizing causal knowledge in the policy sciences: External validity as a task of both multiattribute representation and multiattribute extrapolation. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 33(2), pp. 527–536. doi:10.1002/pam.21750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cyr, A. and deLeon, P., 1975, Comparative policy analysis. Policy Sciences, 6(4), pp. 375–384. doi:10.1007/BF00142380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick, J., Goggin, M., Heikkila, T., Klingner, D., Machado, J. and Martell, C., 2011, A new look at comparative public administration: Trends in research and an agenda for the future. Public Administration Review, 71(6), pp. 821–830. doi:10.1111/puar.2011.71.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortun, M. and Schweber, S. S., 1993, Scientists and the legacy of World War II: The case of operations research (OR). Social Studies of Science, 23(4), pp. 595–642. doi:10.1177/030631293023004001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldhamer, H., 1978, The Adviser (New York: Elsevier).
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P. A. (Ed), 1989, The Political Power of Economic Ideas: Keynesianism across Nations (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Hatry, H. P., 1971, Status of PPBS in local and state governments in the United States. Policy Sciences, 2(2), pp. 177–189. doi:10.1007/BF01411222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hitch, C., 1953, Sub-optimization in operations problems. Journal of the Operations Research Society of America, 1(3), pp. 87–99. doi:10.1287/opre.1.3.87
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogwood, B. and Gunn, L., 1984, Policy Analysis in the Real World (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Jones, B. D. and Baumgartner, F. R., 2005, The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
   Google Scholar
• Kangas, O. E., Niemelä, M. and Varjonen, S., 2014, When and why do ideas matter? The influence of framing on opinion formation and policy change. European Political Science Review, 6(1), pp. 73–92. doi:10.1017/S1755773912000306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiser, L. L. and Ostrom, E., 1982, Three worlds of Action: A metatheoretical synthesis of institutional rational choice, in: E. Ostrom (Ed) Strategies of Political Inquiry (Beverly Hills: Sage), pp. 179–222.
   Google Scholar
• Lasswell, H. D., 1971, A Pre-View of the Policy Sciences (New York: American Elsevier).
   Google Scholar
• Lee, C. K. and Strang, D., 2006, The international diffusion of public-sector downsizing: Network emulation and theory-driven learning. International Organization, 60(4), pp. 883–909. doi:10.1017/S0020818306060292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S., Aos, S., Drake, E., Pennucci, A., Miller, M. and Anderson, L., 2012, Return on investment: Evidence-based options to improve statewide outcomes. Olympia: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Marmor, T. R., 2017, Comparative studies and the drawing of policy lessons: Describing, explaining, evaluating, and predicting. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 19(4), pp. 313–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, P. J., 1981, Hints for crafting alternative policies. Policy Analysis, 7(2), pp. 227–244.
   Google Scholar
• Meltsner, A. J., 1976, Policy Analysis in the Bureaucracy (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press).
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E., 1990, Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action (New York: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Pressman, J. L. and Wildavsky, A., 1973, Implementation: how Great Expectations in Washington are Dashed in Oakland; Or, Why It’s Amazing that Federal Programs Work at All.. (Berkeley: University of California Press).
   Google Scholar
• Radin, B. A., 2013, Beyond Machiavelli: Policy Analysis Reaches Midlife (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Radin, B. A., 2016, Policy analysis and advising decisionmakers: Don’t forget the decisionmaker/client. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 18(3), pp. 290–301. doi:10.1080/13876988.2016.1175191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radin, B. A., 2017a, Reflections on a half century of policy analysis, in: M. Brans, I. Geva-May and M. Howlett (Eds) Routledge Handbook of Comparative Policy Analysis (London: Rutledge), pp. 85–99.
   Google Scholar
• Radin, B. A., 2017b, Book review. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 19(1), pp. 87–89. doi:10.1080/13876988.2017.1286018
   Google Scholar
• Real-Dato, J., 2009, Mechanisms of policy change: A proposal for a synthetic explanatory framework. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 11(1), pp. 117–143. doi:10.1080/13876980802648268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P. and Jenkins-Smith, H., 1988, An advocacy coalition model of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning. Policy Sciences, 21(2–3), pp. 129–168. doi:10.1007/BF00136406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P. A., 1986, Top-down and bottom-up approaches to implementation research: A critical analysis and suggested synthesis. Journal of Public Policy, 6(1), pp. 21–48. doi:10.1017/S0143814X00003846
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, A. and Ingram, H., 1988, Systematically pinching ideas: A comparative approach to policy design. Journal of Public Policy, 8(1), pp. 61–80. doi:10.1017/S0143814X00006851
   Google Scholar
• Shadish, W. R., Chacón-Moscoso, S. and Sánchez-Meca, J., 2005, Evidence-based decision making: Enhancing systematic reviews of program evaluation results in Europe. Evaluation, 11(1), pp. 95–109. doi:10.1177/1356389005053196
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, R., 2001, Scaling down: Subnational comparative method. Studies in Comparative International Development, 36(1), pp. 93–110. doi:10.1007/BF02687586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, D., 2004, Transfer agents and global networks in the ‘transnationalization’ of policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(3), pp. 545–566. doi:10.1080/13501760410001694291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strang, D. and Meyer, J. W., 1993, Institutional conditions for diffusion. Theory and Society, 22(4), pp. 487–5ll. doi:10.1007/BF00993595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vining, A. R. and Weimer, D. L., 1998, Informing institutional design: Strategies for comparative cumulation. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 1(1), pp. 39–60. doi:10.1080/13876989808412615
   Google Scholar
• Vining, A. R. and Weimer, D. L., 2016, The challenges of fractionalized property rights in public‐private hybrid organizations: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Regulation & Governance, 2(10), pp. 161–178. doi:10.1111/rego.12086
   Google Scholar
• Vining, A. R. and Weimer, D. L., 2017, Policy analysis: A valuable skill for public administrators, in: J. C. N. Raadschelders and R. Stillman II (Eds) Foundations of Public Administration (Irvine, CA: Melvin and Leigh), pp. 162–176.
   Google Scholar
• Weimer, D. L., 1993, The current state of design craft: Borrowing, tinkering, and problem solving. Public Administration Review, 53(2), pp. 110–120. doi:10.2307/976703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weimer, D. L. (Ed), 1997, The Political Economy of Property Rights: Institutional Change and Credibility in the Reform of Centrally Planned Economies (New York: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Weimer, D. L., 2008, Theories of and in the policy process. Policy Studies Journal, 36(4), pp. 489–495. doi:10.1111/psj.2008.36.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weimer, D. L., 2009, Making education research more policy analytic, in: G. Sykes, B. Schneider and D. N. Plank (Eds) Handbook of Education Policy Research (New York: Routledge), pp. 93–100.
   Google Scholar
• Weimer, D. L., 2012, The universal and the particular in policy analysis and training. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 14(1), pp. 1–8. doi:10.1080/13876988.2011.646819
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weimer, D. L. and Vining, A. R., 2017, Policy Analysis: Concepts and Practice, 6th ed. (New York: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Wildavsky, A., 1969, Rescuing policy analysis from PPBS. Public Administration Review, 29(2), pp. 189–202. doi:10.2307/973700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar