Identifying Corruption Risk: A Comparison of Bulgaria and the Czech Republic

References

• Ahmed, M. and Biskup, R., 2016, Anti-Corruption Risk Assessment, [Online]. Available at http://insights.ethisphere.com/anti-corruption-risk-assessment/ (accessed 2 February 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Andvig, J. C., 2012. Public Procurement and Organized Crime – illustrated with Examples from Bulgaria, Italy and Norway. (Oslo: Norwegian Institute of International Affairs).
   Google Scholar
• Anerchiarico, F., 2010. Protecting integrity at the local level: The role of anticorruption and public management networks. Crime Law and Social Change, 53(1), pp. 79–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bank, W., 2015. Worldwide Governance Indicators’, [ Online] Available at http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/index.aspx#home/
   Google Scholar
• Becker, G. and Stigler, G., 1974. Law enforcement, malfeasance and the compensation of enforcers. Journal of Legal Studies, 3(1), pp. 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beeri, I. and Navot, D., 2013. Local political corruption: Potential structural malfunction at the central-local, local-local and intra-local levels. Public Management Review, 15(5), pp. 712–739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benito, B., Guillamon, M. D. and Bastida, F., 2015. Determinants of urban political corruption in local governments. Crime Law and Social Change, 63(3–4), pp. 191–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkovich, I., 2016. The corrupted Industry and the wagon-wheel effect: A cross-country exploration of the effect of government corruption on public service effectiveness. Administration and Society, 48(5), pp. 559–579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bobonis, G. J., Fuertes, L. R. C. and Schwabe, R., 2016. Monitoring corruptible politicians. American Economic Review, 106(8), pp. 2371–2405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caiden, G., 2003, The burden on our backs; corruption in Latin America. In proceeding of VIII Congreso Internacional del CLAD sobre la Reforma del Estado y de la Administración Pública, Panamá, 28-31 Oct. 2003. [ Online] http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/clad/clad0047701.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Caiden, G. and Caiden, N., 1997. Administrative corruption. Public Administration Review, 37(3), pp. 301–309.
   Google Scholar
• Carbone, T. and Tippett, D., 2004. Project risk management using the project risk FMEA. Engineering Management Journal, 16(4), pp. 28–35.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, E. and Woo, J., 2011. Liberal reform, political corruption and socio-economic impacts in Asia and Eastern Europe. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 52(3), pp. 181–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordis, A. S. and Milyo, J., 2016. Measuring public corruption in the United States: Evidence from administrative records of federal prosecutions. Public Integrity, 18(2), pp. 127–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coxson, S. L., 2009. Assessment of Armenian local government corruption potential. Public Administration and Development, 29(3), pp. 193–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dan, S., 2015. The new public management is not that bad after all: Evidence from Estonia, Hungary and Romania. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 44E(2015), pp. 57–73.
   Google Scholar
• Dan, S. and Pollit, C., 2016. NPM can work: An optimistic review of the impact of new public management reforms in Central and Eastern Europe. Public Management Review, 15(9), pp. 1305–1332.
   Google Scholar
• Doig, A., 2014. Roadworks ahead? Addressing fraud, corruption and conflict of interest in English local government. Local Government Studies, 40(5), pp. 670–686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dos Santos, F. R. S. and Cabral, S., 2008. FMEA and PMBOK applied to project risk management. JISTEM Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management, 5(2), pp. 347–364.
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat, 2014, Gini coefficient of equivalised disposable income. [ Online] Available at http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/tgm/table.do?tab=table&language=en&pcode=tessi190 (accessed 2 February 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Fard, B. R. and Hassanpour, H., 2016. Reviewing the strategies of dealing with corruption in the Europe union countries with regulatory systém of the group of states against corruption (Greco). Journal of Politics and Law, 9(5), pp. 47–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazekas, M. and Toth, I. J., 2016. From corruption to state capture: A new analytical framework with empirical applications from Hungary. Political Research Quarterly, 69(2), pp. 320–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorta, A., 1998. Minimising Corruption Some Lessons from the Literature. (Sydney: ICAC).
   Google Scholar
• Hertie School of Governance, 2014m, 2014. The Governance Report, [ Online] Available at http://www.governancereport.org/home/the-2014-report/ (accessed 2 February 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Islam, M. A., 2014. Bribery and corruption in Australian local councils. Public Money and Management, 34(6), pp. 441–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jimenez, F., Villoria, M. and Quseda, M. G., 2012. Badly designed institutions, informal rules and perverse incentives: Local government corruption in Spain. Lex Localis – Journal of Local Selfgovernment, 10(4), pp. 363–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jong sun, J. and Khagram, S., 2005. A comparative study of inequality and corruption. American Sociological Review, 70(1), pp. 136–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karippacheril, G. T. and Beschel, P. R. 2014, Measuring corruption risk using big public procurement data in Central and Eastern Europe, World Bank Governance for Development, [ Online]. Available at http://blogs.worldbank.org/governance/measuring-corruption-risk-using-big-public-procurement-data-central-eastern-europe (accessed 2 February 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S., Kim, H. J. and Lee, H., 2009. An institutional analysis of an e-government system for anticorruption: The case of OPEN. Government Information Quarterly, 26(1), pp. 42–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhlmann, S. and Jäkel, T., 2013. Competing, collaborating or controlling? Comparing benchmarking in European local government. Public Money & Management, 33(4), pp. 269–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langr, I., 2014. Systémová korupce jako empirický výzkum: Případ města Liberec. Středoevropské Politické Studie, 16(1), pp. 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Li, X. J., 2016. Measuring local corruption in China: A cautionary tale. Journal of Chinese Political Science, 21(1), pp. 21–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linhartová, V. and Volejniková, R., 2015. Quantifying corruption at a subnational level. E+M Ekonomie a Management, 18(2), pp. 25–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masters, A. B. and Graycar, A., 2016. Making corruption disappear in local government. Public Integrity, 18(1), pp. 42–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDevitt, A., 2011. Corruption risk assessment topic guide in gateway corruption assessment toolbox, transparency international, [ Online]. Available at http://gateway.transparency.org/files/uploads/Corruption_Risk_Assessment_Topic_Guide.pdf (accessed 2 February 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Melgar, N., Rossi, M. and Smith, T., 2010. The perception of corruption. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 22(1), pp. 120–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mungiu-Pippidi, A., et al., 2013. Volume 1: controlling Corruption in Europe. (Berlin: Barbara Budrych Publishers).
   Google Scholar
• Mungiu-Pippidi, A., et al., 2015. Volume 3: government Favouritism in Europe. (Berlin: Barbara Budrych publisher).
   Google Scholar
• Navot, D., Reingewertz, Y. and Cohen, N., 2016. Speed or greed? High wages and corruption among public servants. Administration and Society, 48(5), pp. 580–601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nemec, J., Nemec, M. and Basteková, A., 2014. Corruption in sport: Czech and Slovak football. In Proceeding Political sciences, law, finance, economics and tourism, Vol I. International scientific conferences on social sciences and arts SGEM, Sofia: STEF92 Technology ltd, pp. 67–73.
   Google Scholar
• Nemec, J., Orviska, M. and Lavson, C., 2016. The role of accountability arrangements in social innovations: Evidence from the UK and Slovakia. The NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, IX(1), pp. 73–95.
   Google Scholar
• Nye, J. S., 1967. Corruption and political development: A cost-benefit analysis. American Political Science Review, 61(2), pp. 417–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olken, B. A., 2007. Monitoring corruption: Evidence from a field experiment in Indonesia. Journal of Political Economy, 115(2), pp. 200–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orviska, M., Caplanova, A., Medved, J. and Hudson, J., 2006. A cross-section approach to measuring the shadow economy. Journal of Policy Modeling, 28(7), pp. 713–724.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palguta, J. and Pertold, F., 2017. Manipulation of procurement contracts: Evidence from the introduction of discretionary thresholds. American Economic Journal-Economic Policy, 9(2), pp. 293–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavlovska-Hilaiel, S., 2015. The EU´s losing battle against corruption in Bulgaria. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 7(2), pp. 199–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persson, A., Rothstein, B. and Teorell, J., 2013. Why anticorruption reforms fail – systemic corruption as a collective action problem. Governance: An Institutional Journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions, 26(3), pp. 449–471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. and Bouckaert, G., 2011. Public Management Reform, a Com-Parative Analysis: new Public Management, Governance, and the Neo-Weberian State, 3rd ed. (Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Popova, M., 2012. Why doesn´t the Bulgarian Judiciary prosecute corruption. Problems of Post-Communism, 59(5), pp. 35–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pucek, M., 2014. Vedou vyšší výdaje na úředníka k nižšímu riziku korupce? Analýza českých krajů. Ekonomický časopis, 62(2), pp. 150–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qusada, M. G., Jimenez-Sanchez, F. and Villorila, M., 2013. Building local integrity systems in Southern Europe: The case of urban local corruption in Spain. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 79(4), pp. 618–637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Racoviat, M., 2011. Europeanization and effective democracy in Romania and Bulgaria. Romanian Journal of Political Science, 11(1), pp. 28–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Republica Bulgaria National Statistical Institute, 2014. Education in Bulgaria 2014/2015, 2014. (Sofia: National Statistical Institute).
   Google Scholar
• Sicakova-Beblava, E. and Beblavy, M., 2016. Using government manifestos to analyse the political salience and shape of anti-corruptionpolicies in the Czech Republic and Slovakia. Policy Studies, 37(4), pp. 295–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarantino, A. and Cernauskas, D., 2009. Risk Management in Finance: six Sigma and Other Next Generation Techniques. (Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley&Sons).
   Google Scholar
• Transparency International, 2014. Corruption Perceptions Index – Results 2015, [ Online]. Available at https://www.transparency.org/cpi2015/results (accessed 2 February 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Transparency International, 2015. Corruption Perceptions Index – Results 2014, [ Online]. Available at https://www.transparency.org/cpi2014/results
   Google Scholar
• Transparency International Czech republic. 2016. Maps of corruption. [ Online]. Available at https://www.transparency.cz/mapa-pripadu/ (accessed 2 February 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Veselý, A., 2012. Institucionalizace neodpovědnosti, efektivity, nebo konformity? Reformy organizací veřejných služeb v teorii akontability. Sociologický Časopis, 48(4), pp. 757–784.
   Google Scholar
• Walton, G. W., 2016. Gramsci´ s activists: How local civil society is shaped by the anti-corruption industry, political society and translocal encounters. Political Geography, 53, pp. 10–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar