The Integration and Coordination of Public Policies: A Systematic Comparative Review

References

• 6, Perri, 2004, Joined-up government in the western world in comparative perspective: A preliminary literature review and exploration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(1), pp. 103–138. doi:10.1093/jopart/muh006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• 6, Perri, 2013, Housing policy in the risk archipelago: Toward anticipatory and holistic government. Housing Studies, 13(3), pp. 347–375. doi:10.1080/02673039883326.
   Google Scholar
• 6, Perri, Leat, D., Setzler, K. and Stoker, G. 2002. Towards Holistic Governance: The New Reform Agenda (Basingstoke: Palgrave).
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, R., Boyne, G. A., Law, J. and Walker, R. M., 2009, Centralization, organizational strategy, and public service performance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(1), pp. 57–80. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogdanor, V. (Ed), 2005, Joined-Up Government (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., 1984, Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Tast (Cambridge: Harvard University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Braun, D., 2008, Organising the political coordination of knowledge and innovation policies. Science and Public Policy, 35(4), pp. 227–239. doi:10.3152/030234208X287056.
   Google Scholar
• Candel, J. J. L. and Biesbroek, R., 2016, Toward a processual understanding of policy integration. Policy Sciences, 49(3), pp. 211–231. doi:10.1007/s11077-016-9248-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey, G., McLoughlin, P. and Crammond, B. 2015, Implementing joined‐up government: lessons from the Australian social inclusion agenda. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 74(2), pp. 176–186. doi:10.1111/aupa.2015.74.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casado-Asensio, J. and Steurer, R., 2016, Bookkeeping rather than climate policy making: National mitigation strategies in Western Europe. Climate Policy, 16(1), pp. 88–108. doi:10.1080/14693062.2014.980211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cejudo, G. M. and Michel, C. L., 2017, Addressing fragmented government action: Coordination, coherence, and integration. Policy Sciences, 50, pp. 745–767. doi:10.1007/s11077-017-9281-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow, D. S. L., Humphrey, C. and Moll, J., 2007, Developing whole of government accounting in the UK: Grand claims, practical complexities and suggested future research agenda. Financial Accountability & Management, 23(1), pp. 27–54. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0408.2007.00418.x.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., Fimreite, A. L. and Laegreid, P., 2007, Reform of the employment and welfare administrations - the challenges of co-coordinating Diverse Public Organizations. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 73(3), pp. 389–408. doi:10.1177/0020852307081149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, T. and Laegreid, P., 2007, The whole-of-government approach to public sector reform. Public Administration Review, 67(6), pp. 1059–1066. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00797.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, H., Hedges, L. V. and Valentine, J. C., 2009, The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis (New York: Russell Sage Foundation).
   Google Scholar
• Davies, J. S., 2009, The limits of joined-up-government: Towards a political analysis. Public Administration, 87(1), pp. 80–96. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2008.01740.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S. and Tinkler, J., 2006, New public management is dead—Long live digital-era governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(3), pp. 467–494. doi:10.1093/jopart/mui057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckerberg, K. and Nilsson, M., 2013, Environmental Policy Integration in Practice: Shaping Institutions for Learning (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Exadaktylos, T. and Radaelli, C. M., 2009, Research design in European studies: The case of Europeanization. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 47(3), pp. 507–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giessen, L. and Krott, M., 2009, Forestry joining integrated programmes? A question of willingness, ability and opportunities. Allgemeine Forst- Und Jagdzeitung, 180(5–6), pp. 94–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, E. R., Shipan, C. R. and Volden, C., 2013, The diffusion of policy diffusion research in political science. British Journal of Political Science, 43(3), pp. 673–701. doi:10.1017/S0007123412000415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenacre, M. and Blasius, J., 2006, Multiple Correspondence Analysis and Related Methods (Boca Raton: CRC Press).
   Google Scholar
• Hou, Y. and Brewer, G. A., 2010, Substitution and supplementation between co-functional policy instruments: Evidence from state budget stabilization practices. Public Administration Review, 70(6), pp. 914–924. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02223.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, A., Gleeson, D., Legge, D. and Lin, V., 2015, Governance and policy capacity in health development and implementation in Australia. Policy and Society, 34(3), pp. 229–245. doi:10.1016/j.polsoc.2015.11.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hull, A., 2008, Policy integration: What will it take to achieve more sustainable transport solutions in cities? Transport Policy, 15(2), pp. 94–103. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.10.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jochim, A. E. and May, P. J., 2010, Beyond subsystems: Policy regimes and governance. Policy Studies Journal, 38(2), pp. 303–326. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00363.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, A. and Lenschow, A., 2010, Environmental policy integration: A state of the art review. Environmental Policy and Governance, 20(3), pp. 147–158. doi:10.1002/eet.v20:3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavanagh, D. and Richards, D., 2001, Departmentalism and joined-up government. Parliamentary Affairs, 54(1), pp. 1–18. doi:10.1093/pa/54.1.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keiser, L. R. and Meier, K. J., 1996, Policy design, bureaucratic incentives, and public management: The case of child support enforcement. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 6(3), pp. 337–364. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024316.
   Google Scholar
• Knoepfel, P., Larrue, C. and Varone, F., 2011, Public Policy Analysis (Bristol: The University of Bristol, The Policy Press).
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K., 2013, Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (Los Angeles, CA: Sage).
   Google Scholar
• Lægreid, P. and Rykkja, L. H., 2015, Hybrid collaborative arrangements: The welfare administration in Norway – Between hierarchy and network. Public Management Review, 17(7), pp. 960–980. doi:10.1080/14719037.2015.1029349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laffan, B. and O’Mahony, J., 2007, Managing Europe from an irish perspective: Critical junctures and the increasing formalization of the core executive in Ireland. Public Administration, 85(1), pp. 167–188. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00639.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lafferty, W. and Hovden, E., 2003, Environmental policy integration: Towards an analytical framework. Environmental Politics, 12(3), pp. 1–22. doi:10.1080/09644010412331308254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Roux, B. and Rouanet, H., 2010, Multiple Correspondence Analysis (Los Angeles: Sage).
   Google Scholar
• Leibfried, S. and Pierson, P. (Eds), 1995, European Social Policy: Between Fragmentation and Integration. Washington: Brookings Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Lenschow, A., 2002, Environmental Policy Integration: Greening Sectoral Policies in Europe (London: Earthscan).
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, J., 2011, The search for coordination: The case of the central policy review staff and social policy planning, 1971-77. Social Policy & Administration, 45(7), pp. 770–787. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9515.2011.00793.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maggetti, M., 2015, Knowledge progress in comparative political science, in: D. Braun and M. Maggetti (Eds) Comparative Politics: Theoretical and Methodological Challenges (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar), pp. 154–185.
   Google Scholar
• Maggetti, M. and Gilardi, F., 2016, Problems (and solutions) in the measurement of policy diffusion mechanisms. Journal of Public Policy, 36(1), pp. 87–107. doi:10.1017/S0143814X1400035X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matland, R. E., 1995, Synthesizing the implementation literature: The ambiguity-conflict model of policy implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 5(2), pp. 145–174.
   Google Scholar
• Mawson, J. and Hall, S., 2013, Joining it up locally? Area regeneration and holistic government in England. Regional Studies, 34(1), pp. 67–74. doi:10.1080/00343400050005899.
   Google Scholar
• May, P. J., Jochim, A. E. and Sapotichne, J., 2011, Constructing homeland security: An anemic policy regime. Policy Studies Journal, 39(2), pp. 285–307. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00408.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, P. J., Jones, B. D., Beem, B. E., Neff-Sharum, E. A. and Poague, M. K., 2005, Policy coherence and component-driven policymaking: Arctic policy in Canada and the United States. Policy Studies Journal, 33(1), pp. 37–63. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2005.00091.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, P. J., Sapotichne, J. and Workman, S., 2006, Policy coherence and policy domains. Policy Studies Journal, 34(3), pp. 381–403. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2006.00178.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, M. W., 1987, Learning from experience: Lessons from policy implementation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 9(2), pp. 171–178. doi:10.3102/01623737009002171.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, M., 2005, Learning, frames, and environmental policy integration: The case of Swedish energy policy. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 23(2), pp. 207–226. doi:10.1068/c0405j.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson, M. and Eckerberg, K., 2007, Environmental Policy Integration in Practice: Shaping Institutions for Learning (London: Earthscan).
   Google Scholar
• Oberthür, S., 2009, Interplay management: Enhancing environmental policy integration among international institutions. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 9(4), pp. 371–391. doi:10.1007/s10784-009-9109-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Office, C., 1999, Modernising Government, Vol. Cm 4310 (London: HMSO).
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, N. C. and Wargo, L., 1994, The dilemma of planning in large-scale public organizations: The case of the United States Navy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 4(4), pp. 469–491.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, S., Frere, M., Healey, L. and Humphreys, C., 2011, A whole of government strategy for family violence reform. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 70(2), pp. 131–142. doi:10.1111/aupa.2011.70.issue-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchirico, J. N., Eagle, J., Palumbi, S. and Thompson, B. H., 2009, Comprehensive planning, dominant-use zones, and user rights: A new area in ocean governance. Bulletin of Marine Sciences, 2, pp. 273–285.
   Google Scholar
• Sang, N., Birnie, R. V., Geddes, A., Bayfield, N. G., Midgley, J. L., Shucksmith, D. M. and Elston, D., 2005, Improving the rural data infrastructure: The problem of addressable spatial units in a rural context. Land Use Policy, 22(2), pp. 175–186. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2003.08.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaffrin, A., Sewerin, S. and Seubert, S., 2015, Toward a comparative measure of climate policy output. Policy Studies Journal, 43(2), pp. 257–282. doi:10.1111/psj.12095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schout, A. and Jordan, A., 2005, Coordinated European governance: Self‐organizing or centrally steered? Public Administration, 83(1), pp. 201–220. doi:10.1111/padm.2005.83.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Signoretta, P. and Craglia, M., 2002, Joined-up government in practice: A case study of children’s needs in sheffield. Local Government Studies, 28(1), pp. 59–76. doi:10.1080/714004127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, J. and Harden, A., 2008, Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8(1), pp. 1. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-8-45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tosun, J. and Lang, A., 2017, Policy integration: Mapping the different concepts. Policy Studies, 38(6), pp. 553–570. doi:10.1080/01442872.2017.1339239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tosun, J. and Workman, S., 2017, Struggle and triumph in fusing policy process and comparative research, in: C. M. Weible and P. Sabatier ed. Theories of the Policy Process (Boulder, CO: Westview Press), pp. 329–362.
   Google Scholar
• Trein, P., 2015, Co-evolution of policy sectors: Health care and public health in five countries, Doctoral thesis, Department of Political, Historical and International Studies, University of Lausanne.
   Google Scholar
• Trein, P., 2017, Coevolution of policy sectors: A comparative analysis of health care and public health. Public Administration, 95(3), pp. 744–758. doi:10.1111/padm.2017.95.issue-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ugland, T. and Veggeland, F., 2006, Experiments in food safety policy integration in the European Union. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 44(3), pp. 607–624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urwin, K. and Jordan, A., 2008, Does public policy support or undermine climate change adaptation? Exploring policy interplay across different scales of governance. Global Environmental Change, 18(1), pp. 180–191. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Schendelen, R., 2002, Machiavelli in Brussels: The Art of Lobbying the EU (Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Varone, F., Nahrath, S., Aubin, D. and Gerber, J.-D., 2013, Functional regulatory spaces. Policy Sciences, 46(4), pp. 311–333. doi:10.1007/s11077-013-9174-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, M. and Driessen, P. P. J., 2010, Environmental policy integration: The role of policy windows in the integration of noise and spatial planning. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 28(6), pp. 1120–1134. doi:10.1068/c0997.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weible, C. M. and Sabatier, P. eds, 2017, Theories of the Policy Process (Boulder, CO: Westview Press).
   Google Scholar