Policy Analysis of Instrument Design: How Policy Design Affects Policy Constituency

References

• Berry, L., 1990, The Market Penetration of Energy-efficiency Programs, No. ORNL/CON-299 (TN, USA: Oak Ridge National Lab).
   Google Scholar
• Böhringer, C., Carbone, J. C., and Rutherford, T. F., 2012, Efficiency and equity implications of alternative instruments to reduce carbon leakage. Oldenburg Discussion Papers in Economics, 346(12). University of Oldenburg, Department of Economics, Oldenburg. Available at http://hdl.handle.net/10419/105032
   Google Scholar
• Bromley, D. W., 1990, The ideology of efficiency: Searching for a theory of policy analysis. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 19(1), pp. 86–107. doi:10.1016/0095-0696(90)90062-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, A. L., 2011, Policy feedbacks and the impact of policy designs on public opinion. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 36(6), pp. 961–973. doi:10.1215/03616878-1460542
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capano, G. and Howlett, M., 2020, The knowns and unknowns of policy instrument analysis: Policy tools and the current research agenda on policy mixes. SAGE Open, 10(1), pp. 215824401990056. doi:10.1177/2158244019900568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cigler, B. A., 1981, Organizing for local energy management: Early lessons. Public Administration Review, 41(4), pp. 470–479. doi:10.2307/975709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• City of Tallahassee, 2020a, Energy-efficiency loans - Residential customers. Available at https://www.talgov.com/you/you-products-home-loans.aspx
   Google Scholar
• City of Tallahassee, 2020b, ENERGY STAR appliance rebates for your home. Available at https://talgov.com/you/you-products-home-es-rebates.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• City of Tallahassee, 2020c, Free home energy audit. Available at https://www.talgov.com/you/you-products-home-energy-audit.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Craig, C. A. and Allen, M. W., 2014, Enhanced understanding of energy ratepayers: Factors influencing perceptions of government energy efficiency subsidies and utility alternative energy use. Energy Policy, 66, pp. 224–233. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deslatte, A. and Swann, W. L., 2016, Is the price right? Gauging the marketplace for local sustainable policy tools. Journal of Urban Affairs, 38(4), pp. 581–596. doi:10.1111/juaf.12245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drehobl, A. and Ross, L., 2016, Lifting the high energy burden in America’s largest cities: How energy efficiency can improve low income and underserved communities. Available at http://aceee.org/node/3078?id=5244
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, M. L., 2018, Public perceptions of energy policies: Predicting support, opposition, and nonsubstantive responses. Energy Policy, 117, pp. 348–357. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2018.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feiock, R. C., Lubell, M., and Lee, I. W., 2014, The political market framework and policy change. Working papger, Local Government Research Lab. Available at https://localgov.fsu.edu/sites/g/files/upcbnu1196/files/Politcal_Market__Policy_Change_2010_5_16_ML.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Feiock, R. C., Tavares, A. F., and Lubell, M., 2008, Policy instrument choices for growth management and land use regulation. Policy Studies Journal, 36(3), pp. 461–480. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2008.00277.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feiock, R. C., Yi, H., Richards, K., and Zeben, J. V., 2018, Politics and Policy Instrument Choice. Edward Elgar Environmental Law Encyclopedia (Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing).
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F. and Miller, G. J. (Eds), 2017, Handbook of Public Policy Analysis: Theory, Politics, and Methods (Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis Group).
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, D. R., Waggle, J., and Leifeld, P., 2013, Where does political polarization come from? Locating polarization within the US climate change debate. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(1), pp. 70–92. doi:10.1177/0002764212463360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gromet, D. M., Kunreuther, H., and Larrick, R. P., 2013, Political ideology affects energy-efficiency attitudes and choices. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(23), pp. 9314–9319. doi:10.1073/pnas.1218453110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grover, D. and Daniels, B., 2017, Social equity issues in the distribution of feed-in tariff policy benefits: A cross sectional analysis from England and Wales using spatial census and policy data. Energy Policy, 106, pp. 255–265. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2017.03.043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, C., Bond, C. A., and Narayanan, A., 2015, The Adoption of New Smart-grid Technologies: Incentives, Outcomes, and Opportunities (Santa Monica, California: Rand Corporation).
   Google Scholar
• Hanssen, F., May, R., van Dijk, J., and Rød, J. K., 2018, Spatial multi-criteria decision analysis tool suite for consensus-based siting of renewable energy structures. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 20(3), pp. 1840003. doi:10.1142/S1464333218400033
   Google Scholar
• Hernández, D. and Bird, S., 2010, Energy burden and the need for integrated low‐income housing and energy policy. Poverty & Public Policy, 2(4), pp. 5–25. doi:10.2202/1944-2858.1095
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hirzel, A. and Guisan, A., 2002, Which is the optimal sampling strategy for habitat suitability modelling. Ecological Modelling, 157(2–3), pp. 331–341. doi:10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00203-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoetker, G., 2007, The use of logit and probit models in strategic management research: Critical issues. Strategic Management Journal, 28(4), pp. 331–343. doi:10.1002/smj.582
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoicka, C. E., Parker, P., and Andrey, J., 2014, Residential energy efficiency retrofits: How program design affects participation and outcomes. Energy Policy, 65, pp. 594–607. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Homsy, G. C., 2018, Unlikely pioneers: Creative climate change policymaking in smaller US cities. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 8(2), pp. 121–131. doi:10.1007/s13412-018-0483-8
   Google Scholar
• Homsy, G. C., Liu, Z., and Warner, M. E., 2019, Multilevel governance: Framing the integration of top-down and bottom-up policymaking. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(7), pp. 572–582. doi:10.1080/01900692.2018.1491597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howlett, and Ramesh, M., 2003, Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems (Toronto: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, M., 2009, Governance modes, policy regimes and operational plans: A multi-level nested model of policy instrument choice and policy design. Policy Sciences, 42(1), pp. 73–89. doi:10.1007/s11077-009-9079-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howlett, M., 2018, Matching policy tools and their targets: Beyond nudges and utilty maximisation in policy design. Policy & Politics, 46(1), pp. 101–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howlett, M., 2019, Challenges in applying design thinking to public policy: dealing with the varieties of policy forumlation and their vicissitudes. Policy & Politics, 48(1), pp. 49–65(17). https://doi.org/10.1332/030557319X15613699681219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howlett, M., Mukherjee, I., and Rayner, J., 2014, The elements of effective program design: A two-level analysis. Politics and Governance, 2(2), pp. 1-12. Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/2559
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, M. and Ramesh, M., 1993, Patterns of policy instrument choice: Policy styles, policy learning and the privatization experience. Review of Policy Research, 12(1–2), pp. 3–24. doi:10.1111/j.1541-1338.1993.tb00505.x
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, S., 2017, The politics of urban climate change policy: Toward a research agenda. Urban Affairs Review, 53(2), pp. 362–380. doi:10.1177/1078087416649756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, A. P., Meier, K. J., and Carroll, K. M., 2018, Forty acres and a mule: Housing programs and policy feedback for African-Americans. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 6(4), pp. 612–630. doi:10.1080/21565503.2016.1234962
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, A., Bauer, M. W., and Green-Pedersen, C., 2013, Policy dismantling. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(5), pp. 795–805. doi:10.1080/13501763.2013.771092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinbaum, D. G. and Klein, M., 2010, Survival Analysis, Vol. 3 (New York: Springer).
   Google Scholar
• Kontokosta, C. E., Reina, V. J., and Bonczak, B., 2020, Energy cost burdens for low-income and minority households: evidence from energy benchmarking and audit data in five us cities. Journal Of The American Planning Association, 86(1),89-105. doi:10.1080/01944363.2019.1647446
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause, R. M., Hawkins, C. V., Park, A. Y., and Feiock, R. C., 2019, Drivers of policy instrument selection for environmental management by local governments. Public Administration Review, 79(4), pp. 477–487. doi:10.1111/puar.13025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause, R. M., Hawkins, C. V., Park, Angela Y. S., and Feiock, R. C., 2019, Drivers of policy instrument selection for environmental management by local governments. Public Administration Review, 79(4), pp. 477–487. doi: 10.1111/puar.2019.79.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowi, T. J., 1964, American business, public policy, case-studies, and political theory. World Politics, 16(4), pp. 677–715. doi:10.2307/2009452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubell, M., Feiock, R. C., and De La Cruz, E. E. R., 2009, Local institutions and the politics of urban growth. American Journal of Political Science, 53(3), pp. 649–665. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00392.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matisoff, D. C., 2008, The adoption of state climate change policies and renewable portfolio standards: Regional diffusion or internal determinants? Review of Policy Research, 25(6), pp. 527–546. doi:10.1111/j.1541-1338.2008.00360.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mettler, S. and Sorelle, M., 2014, Policy feedback theory, in: P. A. Sabatier and C. M. Weible (Eds) Theories of the Policy Process, pp. 183-224. (Boulder Colorado: Westview Press).
   Google Scholar
• Newig, J., Challies, E., Jager, N. W., Kochskaemper, E., and Adzersen, A., 2018, The environmental performance of participatory and collaborative governance: A framework of causal mechanisms. Policy Studies Journal, 46(2), pp. 269–297. doi:10.1111/psj.12209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noonan, D. S., Hsieh, L. H. C., and Matisoff, D., 2015, Economic, sociological, and neighbor dimensions of energy efficiency adoption behaviors: Evidence from the US residential heating and air conditioning market. Energy Research & Social Science, 10, pp. 102–113. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2015.07.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, B., 2001, The Politics of Policy Instruments Handbook of Policy Instruments. Salamon, L. (ed.) (New York: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Pierce, J. J., Siddiki, S., Jones, M. D., Schumacher, K., Pattison, A., and Peterson, H., 2014, Social construction and policy design: A review of past applications. Policy Studies Journal, 42(1), pp. 1–29. doi:10.1111/psj.12040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pivo, G., 2014, Unequal access to energy efficiency in US multifamily rental housing: Opportunities to improve. Building Research & Information, 42(5), pp. 551–573. doi:10.1080/09613218.2014.905395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powers, T. L., Swan, J. E., and Lee, S. D., 1992, Identifying and understanding the energy conservation consumer: A macromarketing systems approach. Journal of Macromarketing, 12(2), pp. 5–15. doi:10.1177/027614679201200202
   Google Scholar
• Reames, T. G., 2016, A community-based approach to low-income residential energy efficiency participation barriers. Local Environment, 21(12), pp. 1449–1466. doi:10.1080/13549839.2015.1136995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rigby, E., 2007, Same policy area, different politics: How characteristics of policy tools alter the determinants of early childhood education policy. Policy Studies Journal, 35(4), pp. 653–669. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2007.00241.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salamon, L., 2001, Handbook of Policy Instruments (New York: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Sanchirico, C. W., 2000, Taxes versus legal rules as instruments for equity: A more equitable view. The Journal of Legal Studies, 29(2), pp. 797–820. doi:10.1086/468094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, A. and Ingram, H., 1993, Social construction of target populations: Implications for politics and policy. American Political Science Review, 87(2), pp. 334–347. doi:10.2307/2939044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharp, E. B., 1990, Urban Politics and Administration: From Service Delivery to Economic Development (Addison-Wesley Longman Ltd).
   Google Scholar
• Smith, S. R. and Ingram, H., 2002, Policy tools and democracy, in: The Tools of Government: A Guide to the New Governance, (Oxford University Press New York), pp. 565–584.
   Google Scholar
• Strbac, G., 2008, Demand side management: Benefits and challenges. Energy Policy, 36(12), pp. 4419–4426. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theodori, G. L. and Luloff, A. E., 2002. Position on environmental issues and engagement in proenvironmental behaviors. Society & Natural Resources, 15, pp. 471–482. doi:10.1080/08941920290069128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torfing, J. and Ansell, C., 2017, Strengthening political leadership and policy innovation through the expansion of collaborative forms of governance. Public Management Review, 19(1), pp. 37–54. doi:10.1080/14719037.2016.1200662
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Energy Information Administration, 2015, One in three U.S. households faced challenges in paying energy bills in 2015. Available at https://www.eia.gov/consumption/residential/reports/2015/energybills/.
   Google Scholar
• Weimer, D. L., 2005, Institutionalizing neutrally competent policy analysis: Resources for promoting objectivity and balance in consolidating democracies. Policy Studies Journal, 33(2), pp. 131–146. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2005.00098.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weimer, D. L. and Vining, A. R., 2017, Policy Analysis: Concepts and Practice (New York: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Wicki, M., Fesenfeld, L., and Bernauer, T., 2019, In search of politically feasible policy-packages for sustainable passenger transport: Insights from choice experiments in China, Germany, and the USA. Environmental Research Letters, 14(8), pp. 084048. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab30a2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfram, M., Van Der Heijden, J., Juhola, S., and Patterson, J., 2019, Learning in urban climate governance: Concepts, key issues and challenges. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 21(1), pp. 1–15. doi:10.1080/1523908X.2018.1558848
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Tang, and Feiock, 2020, Closing the gap or widening the divide: The impacts of E-governance technologies on equity in public service delivery. Public Administration Review. forthcoming.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, X. and Chen, C. F., 2019, Energy efficiency and energy justice for US low-income households: An analysis of multifaceted challenges and potential. Energy Policy, 128, pp. 763–774. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2019.01.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi, H. and Feiock, R. C., 2012, Policy tool interactions and the adoption of state renewable portfolio standards. Review of Policy Research, 29(2), pp. 193–206. doi:10.1111/j.1541-1338.2012.00548.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zelner, B. A., 2009, Using simulation to interpret results from logit, probit, and other nonlinear models. Strategic Management Journal, 30(12), pp. 1335–1348. doi:10.1002/smj.783
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, S. and Noonan, D. S., 2019, Justice implications of clean energy policies and programs in the United States: A theoretical and empirical exploration. Sustainability, 11(3), pp. 807. doi:10.3390/su11030807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar