References
- Baldoli, R. and Radaelli, C., 2018, Evidence-based policy and the precautionary principle: Friends or foes? in: S. Giordano, J. Harris, and L. Piccirillo (Eds) The Freedom of Scientific Research: Bridging the Gap between Science and Society (Manchester: Manchester University Press), pp. 213–219.
- Baumgartner, F. R., Berry, J. M., Hojnacki, M., Kimball, D. C., and Leech, B. L., 2009, Lobbying and Policy Change. Who Wins, Who Loses, and Why (Chicago and London: Chicago University Press).
- Béland, D., and Cox, R. H., 2016, Ideas as coalition magnets: coalition building, policy entrepreneurs, and power relations. Journal Of European Public Policy, 23(3), pp. 428-445. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2015.1115533
- Binderkrantz, A. S., 2005, Interest groups strategies: Navigating between privileged access and strategies of pressure. Political Studies, 53(4), pp. 694–715. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2005.00552.x
- Binderkrantz, A. S., Christiansen, P. M., and Pedersen, H. H., 2015, Interest group access to the bureaucracy, parliament, and the media. Governance, 28(1), pp. 95–112. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12089
- Bolleyer, N. and Weiler, F., 2018, Why group are politically active: An incentive-theoretical approach. Comparative Political Studies, 51(12), pp. 1628–1660. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414018758758
- Buena, A., 2013, Issues, preferences and ties: Determinants of EU interest groups’ preference attainment in the environmental policy area. Journal of Public Policy, 20(4), pp. 552–570. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2012.726467
- Buonanno, L. A., 2017, The new trade deals and the mobilisation of civil society organizations: Comparing EU and US responses. Journal of European Integration, 39(7), pp. 795–809. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2017.1371711
- Conrad, M., 2016, The ECI’s contribution to the emergence of a European public sphere, in: M. Conrad, A. Knaut, and K. Böttger (Eds) Bridging the Gap? Opportunities and Constraints of the European Citizens’ Initiative (Baden-Baden: Nomos), pp. 64–80.
- De Bièvre, D., Poletti, A., Hanegraaff, M., and Beyers, J., 2016, International institutions and interest mobilization: The WTO and lobbying in EU and US trade policy. Journal of World Trade, 50(2), pp. 289–312.
- de Waele, H. C. F. J. A. and Mastenbroek, E., 2018, Fulfilling high hopes? The legitimacy potential of the European citizens’ initiative. Open Political Science, 1(1), pp. 75–92. doi:https://doi.org/10.1515/openps-2018-0004
- De Wilde, P., 2011, No polity for old politics? A framework for analyzing the politicization of European integration. Journal of European Integration, 33(5), pp. 559–575. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2010.546849
- De Wilde, P. and Zürn, M., 2012, Can the politicization of European integration be reversed? Journal of Common Market Studies, 50(s1), pp. 137–153. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2011.02232.x
- Dür, A. and Mateo, G., 2012, Who lobbies the European Union? National interest groups in a multilevel polity. Journal of European Public Policy, 19(7), pp. 969–987. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2012.672103
- European Commission, 2017a, Annex to the Communication from the Commissionon the European Citizen’s Initiative “Ban Glyphosate and Protect People and the Environment from Toxic Pesticides” (Strasbourg: European Commission).
- European Commission, 2017b, Communication from the Commission on the European Citizens’ Initiative “Ban Glyphosate and Protect People and the Environment from Toxic Pesticides” (Strasbourg: European Commission).
- European Parliament, 2017, European Parliament Resolution of 24 October 2017 on the Draft Commission Implementing Regulation Renewing the Approval of the Active Substance Glyphosate in Accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council Concerning the Placing of Plant Protection Products on the Market, and Amending the Annex to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 (D053565-01 – 2017/2904(RSP)) (Strasbourg: European Parliament).
- Feindt, P.H., Schwindenhammer, S., and Tosun, J., 2020, Issue politicization and policy change in agri-food policy: a comparative theoretical perspective, Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, forthcoming.
- Fraussen, B., Beyers, J., and Donas, T., 2015, The expanding core and varying degrees of insiderness: Institutionalized interest group involvement through advisory councils. Political Studies, 63(3), pp. 569–588. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12112
- Gamson, W. A. and Modigliani, A., 1989, Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95(1), pp. 1–37. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/229213
- Greenwood, J., 2019, The European Citizens’ initiative: Bringing the EU closer to its citizens? Comparative European Politics, 17(6), pp. 940–956. doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-018-0138-x
- Hall, P. A., 1997, The role of interests, institutions, and ideas in the comparative political economy of the industrialized nations, in: M. Lichbach and A. Zuckerman (Eds) Comparative Politics. Rationality, Culture, and Structure (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 174–207.
- Heclo, H., 1994, Ideas, interests, and institutions, in: L. Dodd and C. Jillson (Eds) The Dynamics of American Politics. Approaches and Interpretations (Boulder: Westview Press), pp. 366–392.
- Heikkila, T., Berardo, R., Weible, C. M., and Yi, H., 2019, A comparative view of advocacy coalitions: Exploring shale development politics in the United States, Argentina, and China. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 21(2), pp. 151–166. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2017.1405551
- Herring, R. and Paarlberg, R., 2016, The political economy of biotechnology. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 8(1), pp. 397–416. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-100815-095506
- Holyoke, T. T., 2003, Choosing battlegrounds: Interest groups lobbying across multiple venues. Political Research Quarterly, 56(3), pp. 325–336. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290305600307
- Jones, M. D., McBeth, M. K., and Shanahan, E. A., 2014, Introducing the narrative policy framework, in: M. D. Jones, E. A. Shanahanand, and M. K. McBeth (Eds) The Science of Stories: Applications of the Narrative Policy Framework in Public Policy Analysis (New York: Palgrave McMillan), pp. 1–25.
- Klüver, H., 2013, Lobbying in the European Union: Interest Groups, Lobbying Coalitions and Policy Change (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
- Kriesi, H., Tresch, A., and Jochum, M., 2007, Going public in the European Union. Action repertoires of Western European collective political actors. Comparative Political Studies, 40(1), pp. 48–73. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414005285753
- Kurzer, P. and Cooper, A., 2013, Biased or not? Organized interests and the case of EU food information labeling. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(5), pp. 722–740. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2012.751703
- Lax, J. R. and Phillips, J. H., 2012, The democratic deficit in the states. American Journal of Political Science, 56(1), pp. 148–166. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00537.x
- Legge, J. S. and Durant, R. F., 2010, Public opinion, risk assessment, and biotechnology: Lessons from attitudes toward genetically modified foods in the European Union. Review of Policy Research, 27(1), pp. 59–76. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2009.00427.x
- Lowery, D., 2007, Why do organized interests lobby? A multi-goal, multi-context theory of lobbying. Polity, 39(1), pp. 29–54. doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.polity.2300077
- Lowery, D. and Gray, V., 2004, A neopluralist perspective on research on organized interests. Political Research Quarterly, 57(1), pp. 163–175. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/3219843
- Mahoney, C., 2007, Networking vs. allying: The decision of interest groups to join coalitions in the US and the EU. Journal of European Public Policy, 14(3), pp. 366–383. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760701243764
- Marchetti, R. and Pianta, M., 2012, Global social movement networks and the politics of change, in: P. Utting, M. Pianta, and A. Ellersiek (Eds) Global Justice Activism and Policy Reform in Europe (London: Routledge), pp. 115–134.
- McBeth, M. K., Jones, M. D., and Shanahan, E. A., 2014, The narrative policy framework, in: P. A. Sabatier and C. M. Weible (Eds) Theories of the Policy Process (Boulder: Westview Press), pp. 225–266.
- Mühlböck, M. and Tosun, J., 2018, Responsiveness to different national interests: Voting behaviour on genetically modified organisms in the council of the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies, 56(2), pp. 385–402. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12609
- National Council of Austria, 2019, Sitzung des Nationalrates am 2. Juli 2019 (84/NRSITZ) (Vienna: National Council of Austria).
- Rasmussen, A., Mäder, L. K., and Reher, S., 2018, With the little help for the people? The role of public opinion in Advocacy success. Comparative Political Studies, 51(2), pp. 139–164. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414017695334
- Rebière, P. and Mavoori, H., 2020, The Bayer–Monsanto fusion: Countering brand tarnishment and rebuilding reputation. Journal of Business Strategy, 41(1), pp. 27–37. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/JBS-10-2018-0185
- Risse, T., 2015, Introduction, in: T. Risse (Ed.) European Public Spheres: Politics Is Back (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 1–28.
- Rothmayr, C. and Varone F., 2009, Direct Legislation in North-America and Europe: Promoting or Restricting biotechnology? Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 11 (4), pp. 425–449
- Schneider, A. and Ingram, H., 1993, Social construction of target populations: Implications for politics and policy. American Political Science Review, 87(2), pp. 334–347. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2939044
- Sharma, P., and Daugbjerg, C., 2020, Politicisation and coalition magnets in policy making: A comparative study of food sovereignty and agricultural reform in Nepal and Ecuador. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, forthcoming.
- Stimson, J. A., Mackuen, M. B., and Erikson, R. S., 1995, Dynamic Representation. The American Political Science Review, 89(3), pp. 543–565. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2082973
- Stone, D. A., 2002, Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making (New York: Norton).
- Tosun, J., 2013, How the EU handles uncertain risks: Understanding the role of the precautionary principle. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(10), pp. 1517–1528. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2013.834549
- Tosun, J. and Hartung, U., 2018, Decentralising competences in multi-level systems: Insights from the regulation of genetically modified organisms. West European Politics, 41(3), pp. 803–823. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2017.1395253
- Tosun, J., Lelieveldt, H., and Wing, T. S., 2019, A case of ‘muddling through’? The politics of renewing glyphosate authorization in the European Union. Sustainability, 11(2), pp. 1–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020440
- Van den Broek, T. A., Ehrenhard, M. L., Langley, D. J., and Groen, A. J., 2012, Dotcauses for sustainability: Combining activism and entrepreneurship. Journal of Public Affairs, 12(3), pp. 214–223. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.1435
- Varone, F., Ingold, K., and Jourdain, C., 2017, Defending the status quo across venues and coalitions: Evidence from California interest groups. Journal of Public Policy, 37(1), pp. 1–26. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X16000179
- Wesseler, J. and Kalaitzandonakes, N., 2019, Present and future EU GMO policy, in: L. Dries, W. Heijman, R. Jongeneel, K. Purnhagen, and J. Wesseler (Eds) EU Bioeconomy Economics and Policies: Volume II (Cham: Palgrave Macmillan), pp. 245–256.
- Woźniak, E., Zimny, T., and Twardowski, T., 2020, Agri-biotechnology: Legal and economic aspects of using GMOs in EU, in: C. Keswani (Ed.) Bioeconomy for Sustainable Development (Singapore: Springer), pp. 21–41.