References
- Acemoglu, et al., 2008, Political Economy of Mechanisms, Econometrica, 76(3), pp. 619–641. May.
- Alemán and Tsebelis, 2005, The origins of presidential conditional agenda-setting power in Latin America Latin American Research Review. LARR, 40(2), pp. 3-26.
- Baffes, J., et al., 2015, The Great Plunge in Oil Prices: Causes, Consequences and Responses (Washington, DC: World Bank).
- Baranzini, et al., 2017. Carbon pricing in climate policy: Seven reasons, complementary instruments, and political economy considerations, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 8(4), e462. July/August. doi:10.1002/wcc.462
- Boyce, J., 2018, Carbon pricing: Effectiveness and equity. Ecological Economics, 150, pp. 52–61. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.03.030
- Climate Transparency, “Top emitters able to ramp up climate ambition in 2020,” 2019. (https://www.climate-transparency.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Brown-to-Green-Report-2019-International-Press-Release-FINAL.pdf)
- Cámara de Diputados, 2019, “Ley del IEPS”. http://www.diputados.gob.mx/LeyesBiblio/pdf/78_241219.pdf
- Canacem, 2013, Impuestos a los combustibles. “Cámara de Diputados”. Available at http://archivos.diputados.gob.mx/Comisiones_LXII/Hacienda/P/260913/11.pdf
- Canacero, 2016, Suplemento. Industria Siderúrgica (México). Available at http://www.canacero.org.mx/en/assets/suplemento-siderurgia-2016.pdf
- Carbon Market Watch, 2017, Pricing carbon to achieve the Paris goals. Policy Briefing, September, pp.1-12.
- Carl and Fedor, 2016, Tracking global carbon revenues: A survey of carbon taxes versus cap-and-trade in the real world. Energy Policy, 96. September. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2016.05.023
- CEMEX, 2019, Reporte Integrado 2018 (México).
- Cespedes, 2013, “Propuesta de Impuesto Al Carbono: Posicionamiento”. Available at http://www.cespedes.org.mx/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Impuesto-al-carbono-extenso.pdf
- CMM, 2013. Instrumentos económicos para enfrentar el cambio climático (CMM). Available at http://centromariomolina.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/6.-InstrumentosEconmEnfrentarCambioClim%C3%A1tico2.pdf
- Concamin, 2016, “Informe de Resultados 2015-2016”. Available at http://concamin.mx/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Informe-Actividades-2015-2016.pdf
- Consejo para la Transparencia, 2020, “Registros de Agenda Pública”. Available at https://www.infolobby.cl/app/src/index.html#!/busqueda-avanzada/723bdca1-384e-4713-a1d5-2aa2f744e367
- Cook, B., 2010, Arenas of power in climate change policymaking. Policy Studies Journal, 38(3), pp. 465–486. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00370.x
- Cox and Morgenstern, 2002, Epilogue: Latin America’s reactive assemblies and proactive presidents, Chapter. In Legislative Politics in Latin America,edited by Scott Morgenstern and Benito Nacif, 446–68. CambridgeStudies in Comparative Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge UniversityPress, 2002. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511615665.016.
- deLeon, P., 1999, The stages approach in the policy process: What has it done?In Paul A. Sabatier, Theories of the policy process, 1999,Boulder: Westview Press. pp.: 19-32..
- Dolphin, G. G. & Pollitt, M. G. & Newbery, D. G., 2016. “The politicaleconomy of carbon pricing: a panel analysis,” Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1663, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
- Eaton, K., 2000, Review: Parliamentarism versus presidentialism in the policy arena. Comparative Politics, 32(3), pp. 355–376. doi:10.2307/422371
- Elizondo, M.-S. C., 2017, Reforma de la Constitución: La economía política del Pacto por México. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales, 62(230), pp. 21-49.
- EPS, 2019, “Policy simulator”. Available at https://mexico.energypolicy.solutions/scenarios/home
- Ervine, K., 2018, How low can it go? Analysing the political economy of carbon market design and low carbon prices. New Political Economy, 23(6), pp. 690–710. doi:10.1080/13563467.2018.1384454
- Falleti, T. G., 2016, Process tracing of extensive and intensive processes. New Political Economy, 21(5), pp. 455–462. doi:10.1080/13563467.2015.1135550
- Frankhauser, S., et al., 2015. The political economy of passing climate change legislation: Evidence from a survey. Global Environmental Change, 35, pp. 52-61.
- Ginsburg, Cheibub, and Elkins, 2010, Latin American presidentialism in comparative and historical perspective. Texas Law Review, 89, pp. 1707.
- Gulbrandsen, L., et al., 2019. The political roots of divergence in carbon market design. Climate Policy, 19(4), pp. 427–438. doi:10.1080/14693062.2018.1551188
- Gutiérrez, C., 2013, Ajustes Mayores (CCE.) Available at http://www.cce.org.mx/ajustes-mayores/
- Haites, E., 2018, Carbon taxes and greenhouse gas emissions trading systems: What have we learned? Climate Policy, 18(8), pp. 955–966. doi:10.1080/14693062.2018.1492897
- INECC, “Inventario Nacional de Emisiones de Gases y Compuestos de Efecto Invernadero (INEGyCEI)”, Gobierno de México, 2017.
- ICAP, 2020, “Colombia ETS”. 23 June. Available at https://icapcarbonaction.com/en/?option=com_etsmap&task=export&format=pdf&layout=list&systems[]=92
- IPCC, 2018, “Global warming of 1.5 °C. IPCC, WMO, UNEP”. Available at https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/
- Jenkins, J., 2014. Political economy constraints on carbon pricing policies. Energy Policy, 69, pp. 467–477. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2014.02.003
- Jones, 2001, Political institutions and public policy in Argentina, in: Haggard and McCubbins (Eds) Presidents, Parliaments, and Policy (Cambridge: CUP), pp. 149-182.
- Katznelson and Weingast, 2007, Preferences and Situations: Points of Intersection between Historical and Rational Choice Institutionalism (New York: RussellSage Foundation).
- Kuzemko, et al., 2019. New directions in the international political economy of energy. RIPE, 26(1), pp. 1–24.
- Lazarus, R. J., 2009, Super wicked problems and climate change: Restraining the present to liberate the future. Cornell Law Review, 94, pp. 1153–1234.
- Lowi, T., 1972, Four systems of policy, politics, and choice. Public Administration Review 32(4), pp. 298. July-August. doi:10.2307/974990
- Mahoney and Goertz, 2006, A tale of two cultures: Contrasting quantitative and qualitative research. Political Analysis, 14(3), pp. 227–249. doi:10.1093/pan/mpj017
- Markussen and Svendsen, 2005, Industry lobbying and the political economy of GHG trade in the European Union. Energy Policy, 33(2), pp. 245–255. January. doi:10.1016/S0301-4215(03)00238-6
- McAllister, L. K., 2009, The overallocation problem in cap-and-trade: Moving toward stringency. Columbia Journal of Environmental Law, 34(2), pp. 395–445.
- Meckling, J., et al., 2017. Policy sequencing toward decarbonization. Nature Energy, 2(12), pp. 918–922. doi:10.1038/s41560-017-0025-8
- Mehling, M. and Dimantchev, E., 2017, Achieving the Mexican Mitigation Targets: Options for an Effective Carbon Pricing Policy Mix (Bonn, Deutschland: MIT, GIZ, SHCP).
- Metcalf, G. E., 2009, Designing a carbon tax to reduce U.S. Greenhouse gas emissions. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 3(1), pp. 63–83. doi:10.1093/reep/ren015
- Minenergía, 2019, “El PIB minero”. Available at https://www.minenergia.gov.co/analisis-minero
- Moe, E., 2015, Renewable Energy Transformation or Fossil Fuel Backlash: Vested Interests in the Political Economy (London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan UK).
- Narassimhan, et al., 2018. Carbon pricing in practice: A review of existing emissions trading systems. Climate Policy, 18(8), pp. 967–991. doi:10.1080/14693062.2018.1467827
- O’Neill,2013, Vertical linkages and scale in global environmental governance, in: Morin and Orsini (eds), Insights from global environmental governance. SISR, 15, pp. 562–589.
- OECD, 2018, Effective Carbon Rates, Pricing Carbon Emissions through Taxes and Emissions Trading (Paris: OECD Publishing, Paris).
- Osorio, L., 2013, Versión estenográfica, reunión de trabajo CHCP (Ciudad de México: Cámara de Diputados). 2 October.
- Pahle, et al., 2018. Sequencing to ratchet up climate policy stringency. Nature Climate Change, 8(10), pp. 861–867. September. doi:10.1038/s41558-018-0287-6
- Pizer, W., 2002, Combining price and quantity controls to mitigate global climate change. Journal of Public Economics, 85(3), pp. 409–434. doi:10.1016/S0047-2727(01)00118-9
- PMR, 2016, Emissions Trading in Practice: A Handbook on Design and Implementation. CC BY 3.0 IGO (Washington, DC: World Bank).
- PMR, 2017,Propuestas para la transición a un SCE. “Informe 4 Final”. September. Available at https://www.ebpchile.cl/sites/default/files/project/uploads/20170930_Alternativas-de-Diseño-y-Medidas-para-Sistema-Integral-de-IPC_-Inf-N°4.pdf
- PMR, “Project implementation status report, 2019”. Available at https://www.thepmr.org/system/files/documents/2019%20Colombia%20PMR%20Project%20Implementation%20Status%20Report.pdf
- Presidencia de la República, 2013, “Iniciativa de Decreto”. Available at http://www.diputados.gob.mx/PEF2014/ingresos/03_liva.pdf
- PwC, 2017, “The long view: How will the global economic order change by 2050?”. February. Available at https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/world-2050/assets/pwc-the- world-in-2050-full-report-feb-2017.pdf
- Rafaty, R., 2018, Perceptions of corruption, political distrust, and the weakening of climate policy. Global Environmental Politics, 18(3), pp. 106–129. doi:10.1162/glep_a_00471
- Reboulen, J., 2017, Siderurgia perdería competitividad. “El Financiero”. 14 November. Available at http://www.elfinanciero.com.mx/monterrey/siderurgia-perderia-competitividad-con-bonos-de-carbon.html
- Rodríguez and Santacruz, 2015, “Coaliciones legislativas ganadorasen la Cámara de Diputados de México en la LXII Legislatura(2012-2015),” Tla-melaua, 2016, 9(39): 32-56.
- Rousseau, I., 2017, The new social management regulation of energy projects in Mexico. RevistaMexicana De CP, 62(230), pp.197-219.
- Santiso, C., 2004, Legislatures and budget oversight in Latin America: Strengthening public finance accountability in emerging economies. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 4(2), p. 47–76. doi:10.1787/budget-v4-art9-en
- Santiso, C., 2009, Political Economy of Government Auditing: Financial Governance and Rule of Law in Latin America and Beyond (London: Routledge).
- Santos, Perez-Liñán, and Garcia-Montero, 2013, Presidential control of the legislative agenda in Latin America. Revista de CienciaPolítica, 34(3), pp. 511–536. December.
- Schmalensee and Stavins, 2017, lessons learned from three decades of experience with cap and trade. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 11(1), pp. 59–79. doi:10.1093/reep/rew017
- Secretaría de Economía, “Perfil de mercado del hierro-acero”. Available at https://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/419274/Perfil_Hierro_y_el_Acero_2018__T_.pdf
- Senado de la República, 2013, “Listado de votaciones”. Available at http://www.senado.gob.mx/index.php?watch=36&sm=2&ano=2&tp=O&np=1&lg=62&id=1843
- SHCP, 2018, “Estadísticas de FinanzasPúblicas”. http://www.shcp.gob.mx/POLITICAFINANCIERA/FINANZASPUBLICAS/Estadisticas_Oportunas_Finanzas_Publicas/Paginas/unica2.aspx
- Skovgaard, et al., 2019. Mapping and clustering the adoption of carbon pricing policies: What polities price carbon and why? Climate Policy, 19(9), pp. 1173–1185. doi:10.1080/14693062.2019.1641460
- Stavins, R., 2019, Carbon taxes vs. Cap and trade: Theory and practice, harvard project on climate agreements. Discussion Paper ES 19-9. Available at https://seors.unfccc.int/applications/seors/attachments/get_attachment?code=TJQGYTI096K3J33ANM1HDWYEU51VRXNC
- Steinberg, P., 2015, Can we generalize from case studies? Global Environmental Politics, 15(3), pp. 152–175. doi:10.1162/GLEP_a_00316
- Stevens, D., 2019, The influence of the fossil fuel and emission‐intensive industries on the stringency of mitigation policies. Environmental Policy and Governance, 29(4), pp. 249–312. doi:10.1002/eet.1853
- UNFCCC, “UN Climate Change Annual Report 2018,” 2019. (https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/UN-Climate-Change-Annual-Report-2018.pdf).
- Stiglitz, J. and Stern, N., 2017, Report of the High-Level Commission on Carbon Price (Washington, DC: IBRD, World Bank).
- UNFCCC, 2015, “Mexico INDC”. 30 March. http://www4.unfccc.int/submissions/INDC/Published%20Documents/Mexico/1/MEXICO%20INDC%2003.30.2015.pdf
Interviews
- Alarcón, S., Director of Carbon Trust Mexico, March 2017, Mexico City.
- Cervera, L., General Director,Concamin, August 2017, Mexico City.
- Climate Action Tracker, “Comparability of effort,” 2020, (https://climateactiontracker.org/methodology/comparability-of-effort/)
- Escalona, V., Subdirector of Mitigation Policy, Semarnat, July 2017, Mexico City.
- Guterres, A., 2 December 2019, “Remarks at opening ceremony of UN Climate Change Conference COP25”. (https://www.un.org/sg/en/content/sg/speeches/2019-12-02/remarks-opening-ceremony-ofcop25).
- Interviewee 1, August 2016, Mexico City.
- Interviewee 2, April 2017, Mexico City.
- Interviewee 3, April 2017, Mexico City.
- Kraft, M., 2017, Environmental Policy and Politics (New York: Routledge).
- Lo, A Y., “National development and carbon trading: the symbolism of Chinese climate capitalism,” Eurasian Geography and Economics, 2015,56:2,111-126, DOI: 10.1080/15387216.2015.1062731 2 56 22-126
- Muñoz, P., Carlos, General Director of Revenue Policy, SHCP, August 2016, Mexico City.
- Nieto, I., Director of Sectoral Models of the National Institute for the Ecology and Climate Change, June 2018 (telephone interview).
- Prada, A., Office of the Technical Vice Minister, Minhacienda, (phone interview) June 2020.
- The World Bank Group, 2019, State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2018 (Washington, DC: World Bank). May.
- Videgaray, Luis. 2013. “Decisión final sobre reforma hacendaria latienen legisladores,” Excélsior, 18 de septiembre de. (http://www.excelsior.com.mx/nacional/2013/09/18/919309).