Mind the Gap? Comparing De Facto and De Jure Expert Authority of International Public Administrations in Financial and Agricultural Policy

References

• AAPOR. 2016, Standard Definitions. Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys (Washington, DC: American Association for Public Opinion Research). Available at https://www.aapor.org/AAPOR_Main/media/publications/Standard-Definitions20169theditionfinal.pdf (accessed 15 May 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Alter, K. J., Helfer, L. R., and Madsen, M. R., 2016, How context shapes the authority of international courts. Law and Contemporary Problems, 79(1), pp. 1–36. doi:https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2574233
   Google Scholar
• Atfield, M. and Miller, G., 1984, Sources of bureaucratic influence: Expertise and agenda control. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 28(4), pp. 701–730. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002784028004006
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, M. N., 2002, Eyewitness to a Genocide: The United Nations and Rwanda (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, M. N. and Finnemore, M., 2004, Rules for the World. International Organizations in Global Politics (Cornell: Cornell University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, M. and Ege, J., 2016, Bureaucratic autonomy of international organizations’ secretariats. Journal of European Public Policy, Taylor & Francis, 23(7), pp. 1019–1037. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1162833
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, M., Ege, J., and Schomaker, R., 2019, The challenge of administrative internationalization: Taking stock and looking ahead. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(11), pp. 904–917. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2018.1522642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, S., 2008, Bureaucratic authority and the implementation of international treaties: Evidence from two convention secretariats, in: J. Joachim, B. Reinalda, and B. Verbeek (Eds) International Organizations and Implementation: Enforcers, Managers, Authorities? (London: Routledge), pp. 62–74.
   Google Scholar
• Bayerlein, L., et al., 2020b, Singing together or apart? Comparing policy agenda dynamics within international organizations. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2020.1813031
   Google Scholar
• Bayerlein, L., Knill, C., and Steinebach, Y., 2020a, A Matter of Style. Organizational Agency in Global Public Policy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Bendor, J., Taylor, S., and Gaalen, R. V., 1985, Bureaucratic expertise versus legislative authority: A model of deception and monitoring in budgeting. American Political Science Review, 79(4), pp. 1041–1060. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/1956247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benz, A., Corcaci, A., and Doser, J. W., 2016, Unravelling multilevel administration. Patterns and dynamics of administrative co-ordination in European governance. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(7), pp. 999–1018. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1162838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, J., 2014, Governing Failure: Provisional Expertise and the Transformation of Global Development Finance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Broome, A. and Seabrooke, L., 2015, Shaping policy curves. Cognitive authority in transnational capacity building. Public Administration, 93(4), pp. 956–972. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busch, P. and Liese, A., 2017, The authority of international public administrations, in: M. W. Bauer, C. Knill and S. Eckhardt (Eds) International Bureaucracy. Challenges and Lessons for Public Administration Research (London, Palgrave Macmillan), pp. 97–122. doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-94977-9_5
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, J. 2020, Expert knowledge and policymaking: A multi-disciplinary research agenda. Policy and Politics, 1–17. doi:https://doi.org/10.1332/030557320X15898190680037
   Google Scholar
• Cockfield, A. J., 2006, The rise of the OECD as informal “World Tax Organization” through national responses to E-Commerce tax challenges. Yale Journal of Law & Technology, 8(1), pp. 136–187. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/yjolt8&div=6&g_sent=1&collection=journals
   Google Scholar
• Doberstein, C., 2017, Whom do bureaucrats believe? A randomized controlled experiment testing perceptions of credibility of policy research. The Policy Studies Journal, 45(2), pp. 384–405. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccleston, R. and Woodward, R., 2014, Pathologies in international policy transfer: The case of the OECD tax transparency initiative. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 16(3), pp. 216–229. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2013.854446
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ecker-Ehrhardt, M., 2012, “But the UN said so … “: International organisations as discursive authorities. Global Society, 26(4), pp. 451–471. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2012.710596
   Google Scholar
• Eckhard, S. and Ege, J., 2016, International bureaucracies and their influence on policy-making: A review of empirical evidence. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(7), pp. 960–978. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1162837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckhard, S. and Parizek, M., 2020, Policy implementation by international organizations: A comparative analysis of strengths and weaknesses of national and international staff. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2020.1813032
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, M. S. and Senger, S., 2015, Listening to advice: Assessing the external impact of IMF article IV consultations of the United States, 2010-2011. International Studies Perspectives, 16(3), pp. 312–326. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/insp.12059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egeberg, M. and Trondal, J., 2009, National agencies in the european administrative space: Government driven, commission driven or networked? Public Administration, 87(4), pp. 779–790. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01779.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, R. B., 1990, On the concept of authority in political philosophy, in: J. Raz (Ed) Authority (New York: New York University Press), pp. 55–91.
   Google Scholar
• Gailmard, S. and Patty, J. W., 2007, Slackers and zealots: Civil service, policy discretion, and bureaucratic expertise. American Journal of Political Science, 51(4), pp. 873–889. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00286.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goritz, A. et al., 2020, International public administrations – Digital authorities in global climate governance? Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice (forthcoming).
   Google Scholar
• Green, J., 2014, Rethinking Private Authority: Agents and Entrepreneurs in Global Environmental Governance (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Gutner, T. and Thompson, A., 2010, The politics of IO performance : A framework. Review of International Organizations, 5, pp. 227–248. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-010-9096-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanrieder, T., 2015, WHO orchestrates? Coping with competitors in global health, in: K. W. Abbott et al. (Ed.) International Organizations as Orchestrators (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 191–213.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, D. G. et al., 2006, Delegation and Agency in International Organizations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Heinzel, M. et al., 2020, Birds of a feather? The determinants of impartiality perceptions of the IMF and the World Bank. Review of International Political Economy, Routledge, pp. 1–25. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2020.1749711
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L. et al., 2017, Measuring International Authority: A Postfunctionalist Theory of Governance (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L. and Marks, G., 2015, Delegation and pooling in international organizations. Review of International Organizations, 10(3), pp. 305–328. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-014-9194-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurd, I., 2008, Theories and tests of international authority, in: I. Hurd and B. Cronin (Eds) The UN Security Council and the Politics of International Authority (London: Routledge), pp. 23–40.
   Google Scholar
• Knill, C. and Bauer, M., 2016, Policy-making by international public administrations: Concepts, causes and consequences. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(7), pp. 949–959. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1168979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krisch, N., 2017, Liquid authority in global governance. International Theory, 9(2), pp. 237–260. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971916000269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kropp, S. and Kuhlmann, S., 2013, Wissen und Expertise in Politik und Verwaltung. Eine zusammenfassende Einleitung, in: S. Kropp and S. Kuhlmann (Eds) Dms – Der Moderne Staat (dms-Sonderheft(1/2013)).
   Google Scholar
• Lake, D. A., 2010, Rightful rules: Authority, order, and the foundations of global governance. International Studies Quarterly, 54(3), pp. 587–613. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2010.00601.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liese, A., Herold, J., Feil, H., and Busch, P., 2017., Explaining the Expert Authority of International Bureaucracies. Paper presented at the ECPR General Conference, 6-9 September, Oslo, Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Littoz-Monnet, A., 2017, Expert knowledge as a strategic resource: International bureaucrats and the shaping of bioethical standards. International Studies Quarterly, 61(3), pp. 584–595. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqx016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, X., Stoutenborough, J., and Vedlitz, A., 2017, Bureaucratic expertise, overconfidence, and policy choice. Governance, 30(4), pp. 705–725. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozgercin, K., 2012, Seeing like the BIS on capital rules: Institutionalising self-regulation in global finance. New Political Economy, 17(1), pp. 97–116. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2011.569020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sending, O. J., 2017, Recognition and liquid authority. International Theory, 9(2), pp. 311–328. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971916000282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharman, J. C., 2008, International organizations and the implementation of new financial regulations by blacklisting, in: J. Joachim, B. Reinalda, and B. Verbeek (Eds) International Organizations and Implementation: Enforcers, Managers, Authorities? (London: Routledge), pp. 48–61.
   Google Scholar
• Strassheim, H. and Canzler, W., 2019, New forms of policy expertise, in: D. Simon et al. (Ed.) Handbook on Science and Public Policy (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar), pp. 243–266.
   Google Scholar
• Tallberg, J. et al., 2016, The performance of international organizations: A policy output approach. Journal of European Public Policy, Taylor & Francis, 23(7), pp. 1077–1096. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1162834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viehoff, D., 2016, Authority and expertise. Journal of Political Philosophy, 24(4), pp. 406–426. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jopp.12100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, M., 1980, Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, 5th ed. (Tübingen: Mohr).
   Google Scholar
• Woods, N., 2006, The Globalizers. The IMF, the World Bank, and Their Borrowers (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Yesilkagit, K. and Van Thiel, S., 2008, Political influence and bureaucratic autonomy. Public Organization Review, 8(2), pp. 137–153. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-008-0054-7
   Google Scholar
• Zürn, M., 2018, A Theory of Global Governance: Authority, Legitimacy, and Contestation (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Zürn, M., Tokhi, A., and Binder, M., 2020, The International Authority Database (IAD). Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar