https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4432-718X
References
- Brodkin, E. Z. 2013. Street-level organizations and the welfare state, in: E. Z. Brodkin and G. Marston (Eds) Work and the Welfare State: Street-level Organizations and Workfare Politics (Washington, DC: Georgetown Univ. Press), pp. 17–34.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2017, Annual Surveillance Report of Drug-Related Risks and Outcomes—United States, 2017, Surveillance Special Report 1. Available at www.cdc.gov/drugoverdose/pdf/pubs/2017-cdc-drug-surveillance-report.pdf
- Cohen, D. K., Moffitt, S. L., and Goldin, S., 2007, Policy and practice: The dilemma. American Journal of Education, 113(4), pp. 515–548. doi:10.1086/518487.
- Evans, T. and Hupe, P. L. (Eds.), 2020, Discretion and the Quest for Controlled Freedom (Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan).
- Gassner, D. and Gofen, A., 2018, Street-level management: A clientele-agent perspective on implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28(4), pp. 551–568. doi:10.1093/jopart/muy051.
- Gofen, A., Sella, S., and Gassner, D., 2019, Levels of analysis in street-level bureaucracy research, in: P. Hupe (Ed.) Research Handbook on Street-Level Bureaucracy. The Ground Floor of Government in Context (Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing), pp. 336–350
- Harrits, G. S. and Møller, M. Ø., 2014, Prevention at the front line: How home nurses, pedagogues, and teachers transform public worry into decisions on special efforts. Public Management Review, 16(4), pp. 447–480. doi:10.1080/14719037.2013.841980.
- Hill, M. and Hupe, P., 2002, Implementing Public Policy: Governance in Theory and in Practice (London, UK: Sage Publications).
- Lipsky, M., 2010, Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Service (New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation).
- Lotta, G. S., Implementação de políticas públicas: O impacto dos fatores relacionais e organizacionais sobre a atuação dos burocratas de nível de rua no Programa Saúde da Família, Doctoral dissertation, Universidade de São Paulo, 2010.
- Maynard-Moody, S. and Musheno, M., 2000, State Agent or Citizen Agent: Two Narratives of Discretion, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(2), pp. 329–358. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024272
- McKim, A., 2017, Addicted to Rehab: Race, Gender, and Drugs in the Era of Mass Incarceration (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press).
- N.Y. Office of Addiction Services and Supports, 2020, January. Statewide Comprehensive Plan 2020-2024. Available at www.oasas.ny.gov
- Schneider, A. and Ingram, H., 1993, Social construction of target populations: Implications for politics and policy. American Political Science Review, 87(2), pp. 334–347. doi:10.2307/2939044.
- Soss, J., 1999, Lessons of welfare: Policy design, political learning, and political action. American Political Science Review, 93(2), pp. 363–380. doi:10.2307/2585401.
- United States Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Title 21 Controlled Substances Act – 21 CFR 823 (G)(2), “Registration Requirements”.
- United States Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Title 42 (42 CFR 8.12) Federal Opioid Treatment Standards –42 CFR 8.655, “Practitioner Patient Limit Increase During Emergency Situations”.
- United States Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), 2017, October. 2017 National Drug Threat Assessment. DEA-DCT-DIR-040-17. Available at www.dea.gov/documents/2017/10/01/2017-national-drug-threat-assessment