What Configuration Can Trigger Pro-Environmental Policy Agenda Setting in an Uncertain Social Context: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis Based on the Multiple Streams Framework

References

• Aviv, I. et al., 2021, Social workers as street-level policy entrepreneurs. Public Administration, pp. 1–15. doi:10.1111/padm.12726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baka, J. et al., 2018, Agenda-setting at the energy-water nexus: Constructing and maintaining a policy monopoly in US hydraulic fracturing regulation. Review of Policy Research, 35(3), pp. 439–465. doi:10.1111/ropr.12287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, F. R. and Jones, B. D., 1993, Agendas and Instability in American Politics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
   Google Scholar
• Béland, D., 2016, Kingdon reconsidered: Ideas, interests and institutions in comparative policy analysis. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 18(3), pp. 228–242. doi:10.1080/13876988.2015.1029770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, N. and Lemoine, J., 2014, What VUCA really means for you. Harvard Business Review, 92(1/2), p. 27.
   Google Scholar
• Best, B. et al., 2019, Stakeholder salience in public sector value co-creation. Public Management Review, 21(11), pp. 1707–1732. doi:10.1080/14719037.2019.1619809.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cairney, P., 2020, Understanding Public Policy: Theories and Issues, 2nd ed. (London: Macmillan International Higher Education, Red Globe Press).
   Google Scholar
• Cairney, P. and Jones, M. D., 2016, Kingdon’s multiple streams approach: What is the empirical impact of this universal theory? Policy Studies Journal, 44(1), pp. 37–58. doi:10.1111/psj.12111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capano, G. and Woo, J. J., 2017, Resilience and robustness in policy design: A critical appraisal. Policy Sciences, 50(3), pp. 399–426. doi:10.1007/s11077-016-9273-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cepiku, D. et al., 2020, What drives network effectiveness? A configurational approach. Public Management Review, 23(10), pp. 1479–1503. doi:10.1080/14719037.2020.1764084.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, G. W. and Lin, X. H., 2021, How do online public opinions shape PAS? A “two-stage multiple streams” framework: Based on a case study of comprehensive safety inspections policy of riding sharing services. Journal of Public Management, 18(2), pp. 58–69. (in Chinese). doi:10.16149/j.cnki.23-1523.2021.02.004.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, J. K., 2021, Public values and public participation: A case of collaborative governance of a planning process. The American Review of Public Administration, 51(3), pp. 199–212. doi:10.1177/0275074020956397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobb, W. and Elder, D., 1972, Participation in American Politics: The Dynamics of Agenda-building (Boston: Allynand Bacon).
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, et al., 1972, A Garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(1), pp. 1. doi:10.2307/2392088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai, Y. et al., 2021, Government-led or public-led? Chinese policy agenda setting during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 23(2), pp. 157–175. doi:10.1080/13876988.2021.1878887.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLeo, R. A., 2017, Indicators, agendas and streams: Analysing the politics of preparedness. Policy & Politics, 46(1), pp. 27–45. doi:10.1332/030557317X14974484611316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du, C. D. and Baark, E., 2021, The emergence of environmental policy in China: Multiple streams and the shaping of a technocratic bias. China-An International Journal, 19(4), pp. 32–51. doi:10.1353/chn.2021.0040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easton, D., 1979, A Systems Analysis of Political Life (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
   Google Scholar
• Fiss, P. C., 2011, Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), pp. 393–420. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2011.60263120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flavin, P. and Franko, W., 2017, Government’s unequal attentiveness to citizens’ political priorities. Policy Studies Journal, 45(4), pp. 659–687. doi:10.1111/psj.12184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fontana, G., 2015, Feedback network analysis: An eclectic approach. International Journal of Circuit Theory and Applications, 43(2), pp. 139–173. doi:10.1002/cta.1930.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler, L., 2020, Using the Multiple streams framework to connect policy adoption to implementation. Policy Studies Journal, pp. 12381. doi:10.1111/psj.12381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedlund, J. et al., 2021, Assessing policy issue interdependencies in environmental governance. International Journal of the Commons, 15(1), pp. 82. doi:10.5334/ijc.1060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herweg, N. et al., 2017, The multiple streams framework: Foundations, refinements, and empirical applications. in: C. M. Weible and P. A. Sabatier (Eds) Theories of the Policy Process, 4th ed. (Boulder, CO: Routledge), pp. 17–54.
   Google Scholar
• Hofferbert, R., 1974, The Study of Public Policy (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill).
   Google Scholar
• Ingrams, A., 2018, Democratic transition and transparency reform: An fsQCA analysis of access to information laws in twenty-three countries. Government Information Quarterly, 35(3), pp. 428–436. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2018.05.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, B. D. et al., 2019, Democracy, authoritarianism, and policy punctuations. International Review of Public Policy, 1(1), pp. 7–26. doi:10.4000/irpp.318.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, B. D. and Baumgartner, F. R., 2005, The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
   Google Scholar
• Kingdon, J. W., 1993, How do issues get on public policy agendas?, in: W. Wilson (Ed.) Sociology and the Public Agenda (London: SAGE Publications), pp. 40–50.
   Google Scholar
• Kingdon, J. W., 2014, Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies, 2nd ed. (London: Pearson Education Limited).
   Google Scholar
• Klijn, E. H. and Koppenjan, J. F., 2016, Governance Networks in the Public Sector (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Knaggard, A., 2015, The multiple streams framework and the problem broker. European Journal of Political Research, 54(3), pp. 450–465. doi:10.1111/1475-6765.12097.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koebele, E. A., 2021, When multiple streams make a river: Analyzing collaborative policymaking institutions using the multiple streams framework. Policy Sciences, 54(3), pp. 609–628. doi:10.1007/s11077-021-09425-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koski, C. and Workman, S., 2018, Drawing practical lessons from punctuated equilibrium theory. Policy & Politics, 46(2), pp. 293–308. doi:10.1332/030557318X15230061413778.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner, A. W. and Wanat, J., 1983, Fuzziness and bureaucracy. Public Administration Review, 43(6), pp. 500. doi:10.2307/975917.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, H. and Lu, J. Q., 2018, Legislation for early childhood education: A case study of China. Children and Youth Services Review, 86, pp. 32–41. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.01.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, Y. G., 2018, Toward a pragmatic model of public responsiveness: Implications for enhancing public administrators’ responsiveness to citizen demands. International Journal of Public Administration, 41(2), pp. 159–169. doi:10.1080/01900692.2016.1256305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, L. T. and Wang, S. T., 2021, China’s higher education policy change from 211 project and 985 project to the double-first-class plan: Applying Kingdon’s multiple streams framework. Higher Education Policy, pp. 1–25. doi:10.1057/s41307-021-00234-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, D. W. and Xu, H., 2021, A rational policy decision or political deal? A multiple streams’ examination of the Russia-China natural gas pipeline. Energy Policy, 148, pp. 111973. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111973.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olavarria-Gambi, M., 2016, Agenda and public policy: Evidence from Chile. International Journal of Public Administration, 39(2), pp. 157–172. doi:10.1080/01900692.2014.1003383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. C., 2000, Fuzzy-set Social Science (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. C., 2014, The Comparative Method: Moving beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies (Berkeley: University of California Press).
   Google Scholar
• Rihoux, B. and Ragin, C. C., 2009, Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques (Thousand Oaks: Sage).
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, J., 2017, More than a question of agency: Privatized project implementation, accountabilities, and global environmental governance. Review of Policy Research, 34(1), pp. 10–30. doi:10.1111/ropr.12209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozbicka, P. and Spohr, F., 2016, Organized political forces in multiple streams: Specifying their involvement in the framework. Policy Sciences, 49(1), pp. 55–69. doi:10.1007/s11077-015-9227-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, A. L. and Ingram, H. M., 2019, Social constructions, anticipatory feedback strategies, and deceptive public policy. Policy Studies Journal, 47(2), pp. 206–236. doi:10.1111/psj.12281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, C. Q. and Wagemann, C., 2012, Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences: A Guide to Qualitative Comparative Analysis (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). doi:10.1017/CBO9781139004244.
   Google Scholar
• State Council of China, 2005, Overall National Emergency Plan for Public Emergencies. http://www.gov.cn/yjgl/2005-08/07/content_21048.htm (accessed 12 June 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Teets, J., 2018, The power of policy networks in authoritarian regimes: Changing environmental policy in China. Governance, 31(1), pp. 125–141. doi:10.1111/gove.12280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torfing, J. et al., 2012, Interactive Governance: Advancing the Paradigm (Oxford: Oxford University Press). doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199596751.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• van den Dool, A., 2022, The multiple streams framework in a nondemocracy: The infeasibility of a national ban on live poultry sales in China. Policy Studies Journal, 50(2), pp. 432–452. doi:10.1111/psj.12456.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weible, C. M., 2007, An advocacy coalition framework approach to stakeholder analysis: Understanding the political context of California marine protected area policy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(1), pp. 95–117. doi:10.1093/jopart/muj015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weible, C. M. and Sabatier, P. A., 2017, Theories of the Policy Process, 4th ed. (Boulder, CO: Westview).
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Y. et al., 2019, Assessing China’s human-environment relationship. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 29(8), pp. 1261–1282. doi:10.1007/s11442-019-1658-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, O. R., 2017, Governing Complex Systems: Social Capital for the Anthropocene (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press).
   Google Scholar
• Zahariadis, N., 2003, Ambiguity and Choice in Public Policy: Political Decision Making in Modern Democracies (Washington: Georgetown University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Zahariadis, N., 2015, The shield of Heracles: Multiple streams and the emotional endowment effect. European Journal of Political Research, 54(3), pp. 466–481. doi:10.1111/1475-6765.12072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahariadis, N., 2016, Delphic oracles: Ambiguity, institutions, and multiple streams. Policy Sciences, 49(1), pp. 3–12. doi:10.1007/s11077-016-9243-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L. W. et al., 2021, Street-level bureaucrats as policy entrepreneurs: Action strategies for flexible community governance in China. Public Administration, 99(3), pp. 469–483. doi:10.1111/padm.12730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, Y. Q. and Moy, P., 2007, Parsing framing processes: The interplay between online public opinion and media coverage. Journal of Communication, 57(1), pp. 79–98. doi:10.1111/j.0021-9916.2007.00330.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, X., 2008, Strategy of Chinese policy entrepreneurs in the third sector: Challenges of “Technical Infeasibility.” Policy Sciences, 41(4), pp. 315–334. doi:10.1007/s11077-008-9070-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zohlnhöfer, et al., 2016, Bringing formal political institutions into the multiple streams framework: An analytical proposal for comparative policy analysis. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 18(3), pp. 243–256. doi:10.1080/13876988.2015.1095428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar