440
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
From the Forthcoming Special Issue “Climate Action through Policy Expansion and/or Dismantling: Country-Comparative Insights” Guest Edited by Andrew J. Jordan, Simon Schaub and Jale Tosun

Do Political Institutions Influence the Dismantling of Fossil Fuel Subsidies? Lessons from the OECD Countries and a Comparative Analysis of Canadian and German Production Subsidies

&
Received 28 Mar 2023, Accepted 05 Mar 2024, Published online: 09 Apr 2024

References

  • Andersen, M. S., 2019, The politics of carbon taxation: How varieties of policy style matter. Environmental Politics, 28(6), pp. 1084–1104. doi:10.1080/09644016.2019.1625134
  • Bauer, M. W. and Knill, C., 2012, Understanding policy dismantling: An analytical framework, in: M. W. Bauer, A. Jordan, C. Green-Pedersen, and A. Héritier Eds Dismantling Public Policy: Preferences, Strategies, and Effects (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 30–51.
  • BCE, I. G. 16 June October 2006. Option für Langfristigen Bergbau Erhalten. Available at https://igbce.de/igbce/presse/medieninformationen/option-fuer-langfristigen-bergbau-erhalten-20530 ( accessed 22 June 2023).
  • Bell, A. and Jones, K., 2015, Explaining fixed effects: Random effects modeling of time-series cross-sectional and panel data. Political Science Research and Methods, 3(1), pp. 133–153. doi:10.1017/psrm.2014.7
  • Bernstein, S. and Hoffmann, M., 2019, Climate politics, metaphors and the fractal carbon trap. Nature Climate Change, 9(12). pp. 919–925. doi:10.1038/s41558-019-0618-2
  • Böhmelt, T., Böker, M., and Ward, H., 2016, Democratic inclusiveness, climate policy outputs, and climate policy outcomes. Democratization, 23(7), pp. 1272–1291. doi:10.1080/13510347.2015.1094059
  • Brauers, H., Oei, P.-Y., and Walk, P., 2020, Comparing coal phase-out pathways: The United Kingdom’s and Germany’s diverging transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 37. pp. 238–253. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2020.09.001
  • Canada. Natural Resources Canada, 2021, Energy Fact Book: 2021-2022, (Ottawa: Natural Resources Canada, 2015).
  • Canada, Parliament, 17 May 2022, House of commons debates, 44th Parl, 1st Sess, Vol 151, No 073. Available at https://www.ourcommons.ca/DocumentViewer/en/44-1/house/sitting-73/hansard#Int-11693375 (accessed 22 March 2023).
  • Cheon, A., Urpelainen, J., and Lackner, M., 2013, Why do governments subsidize gasoline consumption? An empirical analysis of global gasoline prices, 2002–2009. Energy Policy, 56, pp. 382–390. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2012.12.075
  • Compston, H. and Bailey, I., 2013, Climate policies and anti-climate policies. Open Journal of Political Science, 3(4), pp. 146–157. doi:10.4236/ojps.2013.34021
  • Corkal, V. and Gass, P., 2020, Unpacking Canada’s Fossil Fuel Subsidies [Online], International Institute for Sustainable Development. Available at https://www.iisd.org/articles/unpacking-canadas-fossil-fuel-subsidies-faq#canada ( Accessed 13 February 2023).
  • Corkal, V., Gass, P., and Levin, J., 2020, Canada’s Federal Fossil Fuel Subsidies in 2020 (Geneva: International Institute for Sustainable Development).
  • Driscoll, D., 2021, Drivers of carbon price adoption in wealthy democracies: International or domestic forces? Socius, 7, pp. 1–11.
  • Fails, M. D., 2022, What types of political regimes subsidize fuel consumption? The Extractive Industries and Society, 9. pp. 101037. doi:10.1016/j.exis.2021.101037
  • Federal Government of Germany, 2007, Gesetz zur Finanzierung der Beendigung dessubventionierten Steinkohlenbergbaus zum Jahr 2018 (Steinkohlefinanzierungsgesetz) [Hard Coal Funding Act], entered into force. ( Accessed 20 December 2007). Berlin.
  • Federal Government of Germany, 11 July 2011, Gesetzes zur Änderung des Steinkohlefinanzierungsgesetzes [Amendment to the Hard Coal Funding Act], Berlin
  • Finnegan, J. J., 2022, Institutions, climate change, and the foundations of long-term policymaking. Comparative Political Studies, 55(7), pp. 1198–1235. doi:10.1177/00104140211047416
  • Finnegan, J. J., 2023, Changing prices in a changing climate: Electoral competition and fossil fuel taxation. Comparative Political Studies, 56(8), pp. 1257–1290. doi:10.1177/00104140221141853
  • Furnaro, A., 2022, The last subsidy: Regulating devaluation in the German coal phase-out. New Political Economy, 28(2), pp. 190–205. doi:10.1080/13563467.2022.2084523
  • G20, 2017, Germany’s effort to phase out and rationalise its fossil-fuel subsidies – A report on the G20 peer-review of inefficient fossil-fuel subsidies that encourage wasteful consumption in Germany.
  • G20 Heads of State and Government, 2009, Pittsburgh Summit – Leaders’ Statement (Pittsburgh).
  • Gençsü, I., 2019, G20 Coal Subsidies: Germany (London: Overseas Development Institute).
  • Gravey, V. and Jordan, A., 2016, Does the European Union have a reverse gear? Policy dismantling in a hyperconsensual polity. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(8), pp. 1180–1198. doi:10.1080/13501763.2016.1186208
  • Gronow, A., Ylä-Anttila, T., Carson, M., and Edling, C., 2019, Divergent neighbors: Corporatism and climate policy networks in Finland and Sweden. Environmental Politics, 28(6), pp. 1061–1083. doi:10.1080/09644016.2019.1625149
  • Gürtler, K., Postpischil, R., and Quitzow, R., 2019, The dismantling of renewable energy policies: The cases of Spain and the Czech Republic. Energy Policy, 133, pp. 110881. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2019.110881
  • Herpich, P., Brauers, H., and Oei, P.-Y., 2018, An Historical Case Study on Previous Coal Transitions in Germany (Berlin: IDDRI and Climate Strategies).
  • Hoechle, D., 2007, Robust standard errors for panel regressions with cross-sectional dependence. The Stata Journal, 7(3), pp. 281–312. doi:10.1177/1536867X0700700301
  • IG BCE, 6 February 2007, Endlich Einigung Erreicht, Available at https://igbce.de/igbce/presse/medieninformationen/endlich-einigung-erreicht-20366 ( Accessed 22 June 2023).
  • IISD and OECD, 2022, Fossil Fuel Subsidy Tracker [Online]. International Institute for Sustainable Development & Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Available at https://fossilfuelsubsidytracker.org ( Accessed 20 July 2022).
  • Jacobs, A. M., 2011, Governing for the Long Term: Democracy and the Politics of Investment, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • Jordan, A., Bauer, M. W., and Green-Pedersen, C., 2013, Policy dismantling. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(5), pp. 795–805. doi:10.1080/13501763.2013.771092
  • Karapin, R., 2016, Political Opportunities for Climate Policy, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • Krane, J., 2018, Political enablers of energy subsidy reform in Middle Eastern oil exporters. Nature Energy, 3(7), pp. 547–552. doi:10.1038/s41560-018-0113-4
  • Kyle, J., 2018, Local corruption and popular support for fuel subsidy reform in Indonesia. Comparative Political Studies, 51(11), pp. 1472–1503. doi:10.1177/0010414018758755
  • Lecours, A. and Béland, D., 2022, Federalism and the politics of oil and gas pipelines in Canada (Alberta) and the United States (Texas). Politics & Policy, 50(3), pp. 487–502. doi:10.1111/polp.12468
  • Leipprand, A. and Flachsland, C., 2018, Regime destabilization in energy transitions: The German debate on the future of coal. Energy Research & Social Science, 40, pp. 190–204. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2018.02.004
  • Lindvall, J., 2017, Reform Capacity (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
  • Mahdavi, P., Martinez-Alvarez, C. B., and Ross, M. L., 2022, Why do governments tax or subsidize fossil fuels? The Journal of Politics, 4, 84(4), pp. 2123–2139. doi:10.1086/719272
  • Martin, C. J. and Swank, D., 2012, The Political Construction of Business Interests: Coordination, Growth and Equality (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • McCulloch, N., Natalini, D., Hossain, N., and Justino, P., 2022, An exploration of the association between fuel subsidies and fuel riots. World Development, 157, pp. 105935. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.105935
  • Meckling, J., Lipscy, P. Y., Finnegan, J. J., and Metz, F., 2022, Why nations lead or lag in energy transitions. Science, 378(6615), pp. 31–33. doi:10.1126/science.adc9973
  • Mildenberger, M., 2020, Carbon Captured: How Business and Labor Control Climate Politics, (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press).
  • OECD, 2022, OECD Inventory of Support Measures for Fossil Fuels, (Paris: OECD).
  • Oei, P.-Y., Brauers, H., and Herpich, P., 2020, Lessons from Germany’s hard coal mining phase-out: Policies and transition from 1950 to 2018. Climate Policy, 20(8), pp. 963–979. doi:10.1080/14693062.2019.1688636
  • Pesaran, M. H., 2021, General diagnostic tests for cross-sectional dependence in panels. Empirical Economics, 60(1), pp. 13–50. doi:10.1007/s00181-020-01875-7
  • Plescia, C. and Kritzinger, S., 2022, When marriage gets hard: Intra-coalition conflict and electoral accountability. Comparative Political Studies, 55(1), pp. 32–59. doi:10.1177/00104140211024307
  • Pollex, J. and Lenschow, A., 2020, Many faces of dismantling: Hiding policy change in non-legislative acts in EU environmental policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 27(1), pp. 20–40. doi:10.1080/13501763.2019.1574869
  • Reitzenstein, A. and Popp, R., 2019, The German Coal Commission: A Role Model for Transformative Change? (London: E3G).
  • Renn, O. and Marshall, J. P., 2016, Coal, nuclear and renewable energy policies in Germany: From the 1950s to the “energiewende.” Energy Policy, 99, pp. 224–232. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2016.05.004
  • Rentier, G., Lelieveldt, H., and Kramer, G. J., 2019, Varieties of coal-fired power phase-out across Europe. Energy Policy, 132, pp. 620–632. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2019.05.042
  • Rentschler, J. and Bazilian, M., 2017a, Policy monitor—Principles for designing effective fossil fuel subsidy reforms. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 11(1), pp. 138–155. doi:10.1093/reep/rew016
  • Rentschler, J. and Bazilian, M., 2017b, Reforming fossil fuel subsidies: Drivers, barriers and the state of progress. Climate Policy, 17(7), pp. 891–914. doi:10.1080/14693062.2016.1169393
  • Schaub, S., Tosun, J., Jordan, A., and Enguer, J., 2022, Climate policy ambition: Exploring a policy density perspective. Politics and Governance, 10(3), pp. 226–238. doi:10.17645/pag.v10i3.5347
  • Schunck, R., 2013, Within and between estimates in random-effects models: Advantages and drawbacks of correlated random effects and hybrid models. The Stata Journal, 13(1), pp. 65–76. doi:10.1177/1536867X1301300105
  • Skovgaard, J. and van Asselt, H. Eds, 2018, The Politics of Fossil Fuel Subsidies and Their Reform, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
  • Spiegel, 20.January 2007, Steinkohle-Streit – Tausende Kumpel bangen um ihre Jobs.
  • Steinberg, P. F. and Vandeveer, S. D., 2012, Comparative Environmental Politics (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
  • Storchmann, K., 2005, The rise and fall of German hard coal subsidies. Energy Policy, 33(11), pp. 1469–1492. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2004.01.006
  • Viens, N., 2022, Racing to the last barrel: Linking oil and gas industry interests to climate inaction in Canada. Energy Research & Social Science, 91, pp. 102748. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2022.102748
  • Williams, N., 25 July 2023, Canada releases framework to phase out inefficient fossil fuel subsidies, Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/markets/commodities/canada-releases-framework-phase-out-inefficient-fossil-fuel-subsidies-2023-07-24/
  • Wooders, P., Zinecker, A., and Steenblik, R., 2019, Measuring Fossil Fuel Subsidies in the Context of the Sustainable Development Goals (Nairobi: UN Environment).
  • Wood, G., Finnegan, J. J., Allen, M. L., Allen, M. M. C., Cumming, D., Johan, S., Nicklich, M., Endo, T., Lim, S., and Tanaka, S., 2019, The comparative institutional analysis of energy transitions. Socio-Economic Review, 18(1), pp. 257–294. doi:10.1093/ser/mwz026
  • Wooldridge, J. M., 2002, Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).