Compensatory viewing training improves practical fitness to drive of subjects with impaired vision

References

• International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 2001, Book 2001.http://www3.who.int/icf/icftemplate.cfm.
   Google Scholar
• Colenbrander A, Kooijman AC, Looijestijn PL, Welling JA, van der Wildt GJ. The functional vision score. A coordinated scoring system for visual impairments, disabilities and handicaps. In: Kooijman AC et al., editors. Low vision – research and new developments in rehabilitation. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 1994; 552–561.
   Google Scholar
• Brouwer WH. Attention and driving, a cognitive neuropsychological approach. In: Zimmermann P, Leclercq M, editors. Applied Neurospsychology of Attention. Hove, UK: Psychology Press, 2002; 223–248.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson CA, Keltner JL. Incidence of visual field loss in 20,000 eyes and its relationship to driving performance. Arch Ophthalmol. 1983;101:371–375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lövsund P, Hedin A, Törnros J. Effects on driving performance of visual field defects: A driving simulator study. Accident Analysis and Prevention. 1991;23:331–342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCloskey LW, Koepsell TD, Wolf ME, Buchner DM. Motor vehicle collision injuries and sensory impairments of older drivers. Age Ageing. 1994;23:267–273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin GS, Bandeen-Roche RK, Huang GH, Munoz B, Schein OD, Fried LP, West SK. The association of multiple visual impairments with self-reported visual disability: SEE project. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:64–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szlyk JP, Fishman GA, Severing K, Alexander KR, Viana M. Evaluation of driving performance in patients with juvenile macular dystrophies. Archiv Ophthalmol. 1993;111: 207–212. Szlyk JP, Pizzimenti CE, Fishman GA, Kelsch R, Wetzel LC, Kagan S, Ho K. A comparison of driving in older subjects with and without age- related macular degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995;113:1033–1040.
   Google Scholar
• Szlyk JP, Seiple W, Viana M. Relative effects of age and compromised vision on driving performance. Hum Factors. 1995;37:430–436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood JM, Troutbeck R. Effect of restriction of the binocular visual field on driving performance. Ophthal Physiol Opt. 1992;12:291–298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood JM, Troutbeck R. Effect of visual impairment on driving. Hum Factors. 1994;36:476–487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood JM. How do visual status and age impact on driving performance as measured on a closed circuit driving track? Ophthal Physiol Opt. 1999;19:34–40.
   Google Scholar
• Wood JM, Dique T, Troutbeck R. The effect of artificial visual impairment on functional visual fields and driving performance. Clin Vis Sci. 1994;8:563–575.
   Google Scholar
• Huss C. Training the low vision driver. In: Stuen C, Arditi A, Horowitz A, Lang MA, Rosenthal B, Seidman K, editors. Vision Rehabilitation: Assessment, Intervention and Outcomes. Selected Papers from Vision ’99: International Conference on Low Vision, July 1999. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger Publishers b.v., 2000; 268–270.
   Google Scholar
• Szlyk JP, Seiple W, Laderman DJ, Kelsch R, Ho K, McMahon T. Use of bioptic amorphic lenses to expand the visual field in patients with peripheral loss. Optom Vis Sci. 1998;75:518–524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szlyk JP, Seiple W, Laderman DJ, Kelsch R, Stelmack J, McMahon T. Measuring the effectiveness of bioptic telescopes for persons with central vision loss. J Rehab Res Dev. 2000;37:101–108.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kelleher DK. Driving with low vision. Vis Impairm Blind. 1979;73:345–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross FL. The use of computers in occupational therapy for visual- scanning training. Am J Occ Ther. 1992;46:314–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zihl J. Visual scanning behavior in patients with homonymous hemianopia. Neuropsychologia. 1995;33:287–303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouwer WH, Ponds RWHM. Driving competence in older persons. Disability and Rehabilitation. 1994;3:149–161.
   Google Scholar
• Council Directive 91/439/EEC of 29 July 1991 on driving licenses. Official Journal of the European Communities, L237, vol.34, 24 August 1991. Ed. L-2985 Luxembourg: Office for official publications of the European Communities, http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/en/consleg/pdf/1991/en_1991L0439_do_001.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ball K. Enhancing mobility in the elderly: Attentional interventions for driving. In: Dollinger SMC, DiLalla LF, editors. Assessment and Intervention Issues Across the Life Span. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 1997; 267–292.
   Google Scholar
• Ball K, Owsley C. Identifying correlates of accident involvement for the older driver. Hum Factors. 1991;33:583–595.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball K, Owsley C, Sloane ME, Roenker DL, Bruni JR. Visual attention problems as a predictor of vehicle crashes in older drivers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993;34:3110–3123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball KK, Beard BL, Roenker DL, Miller RL, Griggs DS. Age and visual search: Expanding the useful field of view. J Opt Soc Am [A]. 1988;5:2210–2219.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coeckelbergh TRM. Effect of compensatory viewing strategies on practical fitness to drive in subjects with visual field defects caused by ocular pathology. Groningen, The Netherlands: University of Groningen, 2002. Available at: http://www.ub.rug.nl/eldoc/dis/medici ne/t.r.m.coeckelbergh/.
   Google Scholar
• Tant MLM. Visual performance in Homonymous Hemianopia: Assessment, Training and Driving. Groningen, The Netherlands: University of Groningen, 2002. Available at: http://www.ub.rug.nl/ eldoc/dis/ppsw/m.l.m.tant/.
   Google Scholar
• Coeckelbergh TRM, Kooijman AC, Brouwer WH, Cornelissen FW. Improving driving performance of persons with visual field defects: Results of a pilot study. In: Gale AG, editor. Vision in Vehicles VII. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science Ltd., 1999;119–127.
   Google Scholar
• Kooijman AC, Coeckelbergh TRM, Brouwer WH, Cornelissen FW. Relationship between vision and driving performance in subjects with visual field defects. In: Stuen C, Arditi A, Horowitz A, Lang MA, Rosenthal B, Seidman KR, editors. Vision Rehabilitation, Assessment, Intervention and Outcomes. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger, 2000;253–255.
   Google Scholar
• Coeckelbergh TRM, Kooijman AC, Brouwer WH, Cornelissen FW. Effect of compensatory viewing strategies on driving performance in subjects with visual field defects. In: Stuen C, Arditi A, Horowitz A, Lang MA, Rosenthal B, Seidman KR, editors. Vision Rehabilitation, Assessment, Intervention and Outcomes. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger, 2000;256–259.
   Google Scholar
• Coeckelbergh TRM, Brouwer WH, Cornelissen FW, Kooijman AC. Training compensatory viewing strategies: Feasibility and effect on practical fitness to drive in subjects with visual field defects. Visual Impairment Research. 2001;3:67–83.
   Google Scholar
• Tant MLM, Brouwer WH, Cornelissen FW, Kooijman AC. Prediction and evaluation of driving and visuo-spatial performance in homonymous hemianopia after compensational training. Visual Impairment Research. 2001;3:133–145.
   Google Scholar
• Coeckelbergh TRM, Brouwer WH, Cornelissen FW, Kooijman AC. The effect of visual field defects on eye movements and the practical fitness to drive. Vision Research. 2002;42:669–677.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tant MLM, Bouma JM, Kooijman AC, Cornelissen FW, Brouwer WH. Visual rehabilitation in Homonymous Hemianopia and related disorders. In: Brouwer W, van Zomeren E, Berg I, Bouma A, de Haan E, editors. Cognitive Rehabilitation, a Clinical Approach. Amsterdam: Boom, 2002;223–254.
   Google Scholar
• Tant MLM, Kuks JBM, Kooijman AC, Cornelissen FW, Brouwer WH. Grey scales uncover similar attentional effects in homonymous hemianopia and visual hemi-neglect. Neuropsychologia. 2002;40:1474–1481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tant MLM, Cornelissen FW, Kooijman AC, Brouwer WH. Hemianopic visual field defects elicit hemianopic scanning. Vision Research. 2002;42:1337–1346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coeckelbergh TRM, Brouwer WH, Cornelissen FW, Van Wolffelaar P, Kooijman AC. The effect of visual field defects on driving performance: A driving simulator study. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:1509–1516.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tant MLM, Brouwer WH, Cornelissen FW, Kooijman AC. Driving and visuospatial performance in people with hemianopia. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. 2002;5:419–437.
   Google Scholar
• Coeckelbergh TRM, Brouwer WH, Cornelissen FW, Kooijman AC. Predicting Practical Fitness to Drive in Subjects with Visual Field Defects caused by Ocular Pathology. Human Factors (submitted).
   Google Scholar
• Coeckelbergh TRM, Cornelissen FW, Brouwer WH, Kooijman AC. Age-related changes in the functional visual field: Further evidence for an inverse age by eccentricity effect. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2004; 95:11–18.I. De Raedt R, Ponjaert-Kristoffersen The relationship between cognitive/neuropsychological factors and car driving performance in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000;48:1664–1668.
   Google Scholar
• Withaar FK. Divided attention and driving: The effects of aging and brain injury. University of Groningen: The Netherlands, 2000; PhD thesis.
   Google Scholar
• Kappé B, van Winsum W, van Wolffelaar P. A cost-effective driving simulator. In: Gauriat MP, Kemeny A, editors. DSC2002. Proceedings of the 7th Driving Simulator Conference 11–13 Sep 2002; Paris, France. Arcueil: INRETS, 2002; 123–134. http://dsc2002.inrets.fr/.
   Google Scholar
• Coeckelbergh TRM. PDM, a measure of distribution in the AFOV test. Effect of Compensatory Viewing Strategies on Practical Fitness to Drive in Subjects with Visual Field Defects Caused by Ocular Pathology. Groningen, The Netherlands: University of Groningen, 2002. Available at: http://www.ub.rug.nl/eldoc/dis/medicine/t.r.m.coeckelbergh/:155–165.
   Google Scholar
• Tant MLM. Assessing visual search in the AFOV test. Visual Performance in Homonymous Hemianopia: Assessment, Training and Driving. Groningen, The Netherlands: University of Groningen, 2002. Available at: http://www.ub.rug.nl/eldoc/dis/ppsw/ m.l.m.tant/:179–187.
   Google Scholar
• Kerkhoff G, Schaub J, Zihl J. Die Anamnese zerebral bedingter Sehstorungen. Nervenarzt. 1990;61:711–718.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zihl J. Rehabilitation of Visual Disorders After Brain Injury. Hove, East Sussex: Psychology Press Ltd., 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Tant MLM. A Visuo-spatial test battery. Visual Performance in Homonymous Hemianopia: Assessment, Training and Driving. Groningen, The Netherlands: University of Groningen, 2002. Available at: http://www.ub.rug.nl/ eldoc/dis/ppsw/m.l.m.tant/:52–67.
   Google Scholar
• Ball K, Rebok GW. Evaluating the driving ability of older adults. J Applied Geront. 1994;13:20–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marron JA, Bailey IL. Visual factors and orientation-mobility performance. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1982;59:413–426.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Long RG, Rieser JJ, Hill EW. Mobility in individuals with moderate visual impairments. J Vis Impairment Blind. 1990;84:111–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuyk T, Elliott JL. Visual factors and mobility in persons with age- related macular degeneration. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1999;36:303–312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black A, Lovie-Kitchin JE, Woods RL, Arnold N, Byrnes J, Murrish J. Mobility performance with retinitis pigmentosa. Clin Exp Optom. 1997; 80:1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Turano KA, Geruschat DR, Stahl JW, Massof RW. Perceived visual ability for independent mobility in persons with retinitis pigmentosa. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999;40:865–877.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuyk T, Elliott JL, Fuhr PS. Visual correlates of mobility in real world settings in older adults with low vision. Optom Vis Sci. 1998;75:538–547.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haymes S, Guest D, Heyes A, Johnston A. Mobility of people with retinitis pigmentosa as a function of vision and psychological variables. Optom Vis Sci. 1996;73:621–637.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geruschat DR, Turano KA, Stahl JW. Traditional measures of mobility performance and retinitis pigmentosa. Optom Vis Sci. 1998;75:525–537.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szlyk JP, Alexander KR, Severing K, Fishman GA. Assessment of driving performance in patients with retinitis pigmentosa. Arch Ophthalmol. 1992;110:1709–1713.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball K, Owsley C, Sloane ME, Roenker DL, Bruni JR. Visual attention problems as a predictor of vehicle crashes in older drivers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993;34:3110–3123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornelissen FW, Bootsma A, Kooijman AC. Object perception by visually impaired people at different light levels. Vision Res. 1995;35:161–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owsley C, McGwin G Jr, Ball K. Vision impairment, eye disease, and injurious motor vehicle crashes in the elderly. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 1998;5:101–113.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vos JJ, Riemersma JBJ. On the behavior in traffic of a homonymous hemianope. Ophthalmologia. 1976; 173:427–428.
   Google Scholar
• Warmink HH, de Jong PTVM, Kempeneers MA. Hemianopsia is no absolute contra-indication for driving. [Abstract]. Book of Abstracts of the XXVIIIth International Congress of Ophthalmology, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Schulte T, Strasburger H, Muller-Oehring EM, Kasten E, Sabel BA. Automobile driving performance of brain-injured patients with visual field defects. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 1999; 78:136–142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar