Hearing and phonetic criteria in voice measurement: Clinical applications

References

• Lombard E. Le signe de l’élévation de la voix. Ann. Maladies Oreille Larynx. 1911; 37: 101–19
   Google Scholar
• Fairbanks G. Selective vocal effects of delayed auditory feedback. J Speech Hear Disord. 1955; 20: 333–46
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Xu Y, Larson CR, Bauer JJ, Hain TC. Compensation for pitch-shifted and auditory feedback during the production of Mandarin tone sequences. J Acoust Soc Am. 2004; 116: 1168–78
   Google Scholar
• Nelson DA, Stanton ME, Freyman RL. A general equation describing frequency discrimination as a function of frequency and sensation level. J Acoust Soc Am. 1983; 73: 2117–2123
   Google Scholar
• Boring EG. Sensation and perception in the history of experimental psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts Inc.; 1942. See page 340 for Vance TF, 1914.
   Google Scholar
• Wier CC, Jesteadt W, Green DM. Frequency discrimination as a function of frequency and sensation level. J Acoust Soc Am. 1977; 61: 178–84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore BCJ, Glasberg BR, Peters RW. Relative dominance of individual partials in determining the pitch of complex tones. J Acoust Soc Am. 1985; 75: 550–61
   Google Scholar
• Klumpp RG, Eady HR. Some measurements of interaural time difference thresholds. J Acoust Soc Am. 1956; 28: 859–60
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer RC, Vail VJ, Guo CG. Required number of tokens to determine representative voice perturbation values. J Speech Hear Res. 1995; 38: 1261
   Google Scholar
• Scherer RC, Druker DG, Titze IR. Electroglottography and direct measurement of vocal fold contact area. In: Vocal fold physiology. Vol 2. Philadelphia: Raven Press; 1998. p. 279–91.
   Google Scholar
• Maddieson I. Patterns of sounds. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1984
   Google Scholar
• Wells J. SAMPA Phonetic Alphabet. In: Fourcin AJ, Harland G, Barry W, Hazan V, editors. Speech input and output assessment, multilingual methods and standards. Ellis Horwood Books, 1989 ( available from url:http://www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/home/sampa).
   Google Scholar
• Needham J. Science and civilisation in China. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1962
   Google Scholar
• Kuttner FA. Prince Chu Tsai-Yu's life and work. Ethnomusicology 1975;19:162–206.
   Google Scholar
• Buder EJ. Acoustic analysis of voice quality. Voice quality measurement, RJ Kent, MJ Ball. Singular (Thompson Learning), San Diego 2000
   Google Scholar
• Baken RJ, Orlikoff RF. Clinical measurement of speech and voice2nd ed. Singular (Thompson Learning), San Diego 2000
   Google Scholar
• Abberton ERM, Howard DM, Fourcin AJ. Laryngographic assessment of normal voice: a tutorial. Clin Linguist Phon. 1989; 3: 281–96
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess W. Pitch determination of speech signals: algorithms and devices. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg 1983
   Google Scholar
• Naylor PA, Kounoudes A, Gudnason J, Brookes M. Estimation of glottal closure instants in voiced speech using the DYPSA algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech and Language Processing. 2007;15:34–43 .
   Google Scholar
• Horii Y. Fundamental frequency perturbation observed in sustained phonation. J Speech Hear Res. 1979; 22: 5–19
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Titze IR, Horii Y, Scherer RC. Some technical considerations in voice perturbation measurements. J Speech Hear Res. 1987; 30: 252–60
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Klatt DH. Discrimination of fundamental frequency contours in synthetic speech: implications for models of pitch perception. J Acoust Soc Am. 1983; 53: 8–16
   Google Scholar
• ‘tHart J. Differential sensitivity to pitch distance, particularly in speech. J Acoust Soc Am. 1981; 65: 811–21
   Google Scholar
• ‘tHart J, Collier R, Cohen A. A perceptual study of intonation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1990
   Google Scholar
• Fourcin AJ. Laryngographic assessment of phonatory function. ASHA Reports. 1981; 11: 116–27
   Google Scholar
• Stevens SS, Volkman J, Newman EB. A scale for the measurement of the psychological magnitude of pitch. J Acoust Soc Am. 1957; 54: 377–411
   Google Scholar
• Ptok M, Iven C, Jessen M, Schemmle C. Objektiv gemessene Stimmlippenschwingungsirregularitat vs. subjektiver Eindruck der Rauigkeit. Zeitschrift HNO. 2006; 54: 132–36
   Google Scholar
• Howard DM. Variation of electrolaryngographically derived closed quotient for trained and untrained adult singers. J Voice. 1995; 9: 163–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abberton E. Phonetic considerations in the design of voice assessment material. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2005; 30: 175–180
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• The Principles of the International Phonetic Association. London: International Phonetic Association; 1949.
   Google Scholar
• Handbook of the International Phonetic Association. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Denes PB. On the statistics of spoken English. J Acoust Soc Am. 1963; 35: 892–904
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tubach JP, Boe LJ. Un corpus de transcription phonétique (300,000 phones); constitution et exploitation statistique. Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Télécommunications, Télécom Paris, Paris 1990, 90 D 002
   Google Scholar
• Shannon C, Weaver W. The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press, Champaign 1949; 20
   Google Scholar
• Carding P. Evaluating voice therapy, measuring the effectiveness of treatment. Whurr Publishers, London, Philadelphia 2000
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson BH, Johnson A, Grywalski C, Silbergleit A, Jacobson G, Benninger MS. The Voice Handicap Index (VHI): development and validation. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 1997; 6: 66–70
   Google Scholar
• Wilson JA, Webb A, Carding PN, Steen IN, MacKenzie K, Deary IJ. The Voice Symptom Scale and the Voice Handicap Index (VHI): a comparison of structure and content. Clin Otolaryngol. 2004; 2: 169–74
   Google Scholar
• Fulljames N, Harris S. Voice outcome measures: correlations with patients’ assessment of their condition and the effectiveness of voice therapy. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2006; 31: 23–35
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• World Health Organization. The economics of health and disease. WHO Chron. 1971;25:20–4.
   Google Scholar
• ICF International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001 ( available from url:http://www3.who.int/icf/icf/icftemplate.cfm).
   Google Scholar
• Hirano M. Clinical examination of voice. Springer-Verlag, New York 1981
   Google Scholar