Validity of test stimuli for nasalance measurement in speakers of Jordanian Arabic

References

• Kuehn D, Moller KT. Speech and language issues in the cleft palate population: the state of the art. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2000;37:348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent RD. Hearing and believing: some limits to the auditory–perceptual assessment of speech and voice disorders. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 1996;5:7–23.
   Google Scholar
• Sell D, Harding A, Grunwell P. GOS.SP.ASS.'98: an assessment for speech disorders associated with cleft palate and/or velopharyngeal dysfunction (revised). Int J Lang Commun Disord 1999;34:17–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John A, Sell D, Sweeney T, et al. The cleft audit protocol for speech-augmented: a validated and reliable measure for auditing cleft speech. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2006;43:272–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalston RM, Warren DW. The diagnosis of velopharyngeal inadequacy. Clin Plast Surg 1985;12:685–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon JB. Evaluation of velopharyngeal function. In: Moller KT, Starr CD, eds. Cleft palate: interdisciplinary issues and treatment. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed; 1992. P. 251–310.
   Google Scholar
• Kummer AW. Cleft palate and c raniofacial anomalies: effects on speech and resonance. 3rd ed. Clifton Park, NJ: Cengage Learning; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Kay Elemetrics Corp (now PENTAX Medical). Nasometer II Model 6400/6402 installation, operations, and maintenance manual. Lincoln Park, NJ: Kay Elemetrics Corp.; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Dalston RM. Using simultaneous photodetection and nasometry to monitor velopharyngeal behavior during speech. J Speech Hear Res 1989;32:195–202.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Seaver EJ, Dalston RM. Using simultaneous nasometry and standard audio recordings to detect the acoustic onsets and offsets of speech. J Speech Hear Res 1990;33:358–62.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dalston RM, Seaver EJ. Relative values of various standardized passages in the nasometric assessment of patients with velopharyngeal impairment. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1992;29:17–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalston RM, Warren D, Dalston E. Use of nasometry as a diagnostic tool for identifying patients with velopharyngeal impairment. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1991a;28:184–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalston RM, Warren D, Dalston E. A preliminary investigation concerning the use of nasometry in identifying patients with hyponasality and/or nasal airway impairment. J Speech Hear Res 1991b;34:11–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fletcher SG. Diagnosing speech disorders from cleft palate. New York: Grune & Stratton; 1978. P. 92–157.
   Google Scholar
• Kummer AW, Myer CMI, Smith ME, Shott SR. Changes in nasal resonance secondary to adenotonsillectomy. Am J Otolaryngol 1993;14:285–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweeny T, Sell D. Relationship between perceptual ratings of nasality and nasometry in children/adolescents with cleft palate and/or velopharyngeal dysfunction. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2008;43:265–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardin M, Van Demark D, Morris H, Payne M. Correspondence between nasalance scores and listener judgments of hypernasality and hyponasality. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1992;29:346–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watterson T, McFarlane S, Wright DS. The relationship between nasalance and nasality in children with cleft palate. J Commun Disord 1993;35:13–28.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchinson JM, Robinson KL, Nerbonne MA. Patterns of nasalance in a sample of normal gerontologic subjects. J Commun Disord 1978;11:469–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rochet AP, Rochet BL, Sovis EA, Mielke DL. Characteristics of nasalance in speakers of western Canadian English and French. J Speech Lang Pathol Audio 1998;22:94–103.
   Google Scholar
• Van Doorn J, Purcel A. Nasalance levels in the speech of normal Australian children. Cleft Palate Craniofac J l998;35:287–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litzaw LL, Dalston RM. The effect of gender upon nasalance scores among normal adult speakers. J Commun Disord 1992;25:55–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seaver E, Dalston R, Leeper H, Adams L. A study of nasometric values for normal nasal resonance. J Speech Hear Res 1991;34:715–72.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zajac DJ, Lutz R, Mayo R. Microphone sensitivity as a source of variation in nasalance scores. J Speech Hear Res 1996;39:1228–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zajac DJ, Mayo R. Aerodynamic and temporal aspects of velopharyngeal function in normal speakers. J Speech Hear Res 1996;39:1199–207.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mayo R, Floyd LA, Warren DW, et al. Nasalance and nasal area values: cross-racial study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1996;33:143–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher SG. Contingencies for bioelectronic modification of nasality. J Speech Hear Disord 1972;37:329–46.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fairbanks G. Voice and articulation drillbook. New York: Harper & Row; 1960. P. 127.
   Google Scholar
• Watterson T, Hinton J, McFarlane S. Novel stimuli for obtaining nasalance measures from young children. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1996;33:67–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKay IR, Kummer AW. The McKay-Kummer SNAP Test. Lincoln Park, NJ: Kay Elemetrics Corporation; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Kummer AW. Simplified nasometric assessment procedures (SNAP-R): nasometer test and manual. Pine Brook, NJ: PENTAX Medical. 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Okalidou A, Karathanasi A, Grigoraki E. Nasalance norms in Greek adults. Clin Linguist Phon 2011;25:671–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abou-Elsaad T, Afsah O, Baz H, Mansy A. Evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of Arabic SNAP test for children with hypernasality. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2016;85:99–102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos-Terron MJ, Gonzalez-Landa G, Sanchez-Ruiz I. Normal patterns of nasalance in children who speak Castilian. Rev Espanola Foniatrica 1991;4:71–5.
   Google Scholar
• Nichols AC. Nasalance statistics for two Mexican populations. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1999;36:58–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falé I, Faria IH, Nasometric values for European Potuguese: Preliminary results. Proceedings of the 2nd ISCA Workshop on Experimental Linguistics. Athens, Greece. 2008:85–88.
   Google Scholar
• Mishima K, Sugii A, Yamada T, et al. Dialectal and gender differences in nasalance scores in a Japanese population. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2008;36:8–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prathanee B, Thanaviratananich S, Pongjunyakul A, Rengpatanakij K. Nasalance scores for speech in normal Thai children. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 2003;37:351–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehill TL. Nasalance measures in Cantonese-speaking women. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2001;38:119–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abou-Elsaad T, Quriba A, Baz H, Elkassaby R. Standardization of nasometry for normal Egyptian Arabic speakers. Folia Phoniatr Logop 2013;64:271–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Kassabi RM, Hassan S, Mesallam TA, et al. Standardization of nasalance scores in normal Saudi speakers. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol 2015;40:77–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amayreh MM, Hamdan J, Fareh S. Consonant frequency in Arabic and English. Dirasat, Soc Human Stud (Special Issue) 1999;8;207–20.
   Google Scholar
• Barker DJP, Rose G. Epidemiology in medical practice. London: Churchill Livingstone; 1979. P. 34–5.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher SG, Adams LE, McCutcheon JJ. Cleft palate speech assessment through oral-nasal acoustic measures. In: Bzoch KR, ed. Communicative disorders related to cleft lip and palate. Boston: College Hill Press; 1989. P. 246–57.
   Google Scholar
• Dalston RM, Neiman GS, Gonzalez-Landa G. Nasometric sensitivity and specificity: a cross-dialect and cross-culture study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1993;30:285–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweeney T, Sell D, O’Regan M. Nasalance scores for normal-speaking Irish children. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2004;41:168–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awan SN, Omlor K, Watts CR. Effects of computer system and vowel loading on measures of nasalance. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2011;54:1284–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gildersleeve-Neumann CE, Dalston RM. Nasalance scores in noncleft individuals: why not zero? Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2001;38:106–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar