187
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Writing intervention in university students with normal hearing and in those with hearing impairment: can observational learning improve argumentative text writing?

ORCID Icon, , &
Pages 115-123 | Received 29 Jun 2017, Accepted 11 Dec 2017, Published online: 05 Jan 2018

References

  • Swedish Hearing Federation HRF:s annual report. 2007.
  • Pichora-Fuller MK, Kramer SE, Eckert MA, et al. Hearing impairment and cognitive energy: the framework for understanding effortful listening (FUEL). Ear Hear 2016;37:5S–27S.
  • Rijlaarsdam G, Braaksma M, Couzijn M, et al. Observation of peers in learning to write: practice and research. J Writ Res 2008;1:53–83.
  • Braaksma M, Rijlaarsdam G, van den Bergh H, van Hout-Wolters B. Observational learning and its effects on the orchestration of writing processes. Cogn Instr 2004;22:1–36.
  • Raedts M, Rijlaarsdam G, van Waes L, Daems F. Observational learning through video-based models: impact on students' beliefs, task knowledge and writing performances. In: Boscolo P, Hidi S, eds. Studies in writing, volume 19: Writing and Motivation. Oxford: Elsevier; 2007. p. 219–38.
  • Hayes JR, Flower L. Identifying the organisation of the writing process. In Gregg L, Steinberg E, eds. Cognitive processes in writing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1980. p. 3–30.
  • Nippold MA. Later language development. Ages nine through nineteen. Pro Ed; 1988.
  • Piolat A, Roussey J, Olive T, Amada M. Processing time and cognitive effort in revision: effects of error type and working memory capacity. In: Allal L, Chanquoy L, Largy P, eds. Revision: Cognitive and instructional processes. Kluwer Academic Publishers., Dordrecht; 2004. p. 21–38.
  • Johansson V. Developmental Aspects of Text Production in Writing and Speech. Travaux de l’Institut de Linguistique de Lund 48. Ph.D. thesis, Lund University; 2009.
  • Longacre R. Spectrum, profile and constituency structure in text analysis. In: Hattori S, Inoue K, eds. Proceedings of the 13th International Congress of Linguists. Tokyo: CIPL; 1983. p. 1024–27.
  • Piolat A. Planning and text quality among undergraduate students: findings and questions. In Torrance M, Galbraith D, eds. Knowing what to write: Conceptual processes in text production. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press; 1999. p. 121–36.
  • Kellogg RT. Training writing skills. J Writ Res 2008;1:1–26.
  • McCutchen D. Knowledge, processing and working memory. Educ Psychol 2000;35:13–23.
  • Pajares F. Self-efficacy, beliefs, motivation, and achievement in writing: A review of the literature. Read Writ Q 2003;19:139–58.
  • MacArthur CA, Graham S. Writing Research from a Cognitive Perspective. In: MacArthur CA, Graham S and Fitzgerald J, eds. Handbook of Writing Research. 2nd ed. London: The Guilford Press; 2017. p. 24–40.
  • van Waes L, Leijten M, Lindgren E, Wengelin Å. Keystroke Logging in Writing Research. In: MacArthur CA, Graham S, Fitzgerald J, eds. Handbook of Writing Research. 2nd ed. London: The Guilford Press; 2017. p. 410–426.
  • Alamargot D, Chanquoy L. Through the Models of Writing. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2001.
  • McNamara D, Crossley S, McCarthy P. Linguistic features of writing quality. Writ Commun 2010;27:57–86.
  • Woodcock R. Woodcock Reading Mastery Test-Revised. Circle Pines MN: American Guidance Service; 1987.
  • Gaulin C, Campbell T. Procedure for assessing verbal working memory in normal school-age children. Some preliminary data. Percept Mot Skills 1994;79:55–64.
  • Pojhanen A, Sandberg M. Arbetsminnet hos svenska fem-, sju- och nioåriga barn med normal språkutveckling. Student thesis, Lund University, department of Logopedics and Phoniatrics; 1999.
  • MacWhinney B. 2000. The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Malvern D, Richards B, Chipere N, Durán P. Lexical diversity and language development, quantification and assessment. New York: Palgrave MacMillan; 2004.
  • Hunt KW. Syntactic maturity in schoolchildren and adults. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev 1970;35:1–167.
  • R Core Team. 2014. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
  • Pinheiro J, Bates D. 2000. Mixed effects models in S and S plus. New York: Springer Verlag.
  • Gilbertson M, Kamhi A. Novel Word Learning in children with hearing impairment. J Speech Hear Res 1995;38:630–42.
  • Hansson K, Sahlén B, Mäki-Torkko E. Can a ‘single hit’ cause limitations in language development? A comparative study of Swedish children with hearing impairment and children with specific language impairment. Int J Lang Commun Dis 2007;42:307–32.
  • Hansson K, Ibertsson T, Asker-Árnason L, Sahlén B. Phonological processing, grammar and sentence comprehension in older and younger generations of Swedish Children with cochlear implants. Autism Dev Lang Impair 2017;2:1–14.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.