Reliability and validity evidence of the Assessment of Language Use in Social Contexts for Adults (ALUSCA)

References

• Bloodstein O, Bernstein Ratner N. A handbook on stuttering. 6th ed. Clifton Park: Delmar; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Guitar B. Stuttering: an integrated approach to its nature and treatment. 4th ed. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Manning W. Clinical decision making in fluency disorders. 3rd ed. Clifton Park: Delmar; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro D. Stuttering intervention: a collaborative journey to fluency freedom. 2nd ed. Austin (TX): PRO-ED Inc.; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein RN. Stuttering: a psycholinguistic perspective. In: Curlee R, Siegel G, editors. Nature and treatment of stuttering: new directions. Needham (MA): Allyn & Bacon; 1997. p. 99–127.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein NE. Are there constraints on childhood disfluency? J Fluency Disord. 1981;6:341–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloodstein O. Some empirical observations about early stuttering: a possible link to language development. J Commun Disord. 2006;39:185–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell P, Au-Yeung J. Syntactic determinants of stuttering in the spontaneous speech of normally fluent and stuttering children. J Fluency Disord. 1995;20:317–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell P. Assessment of some contemporary theories of stuttering that apply to spontaneous speech. Contemp Issues Commun Sci Disord. 2004;31:123–140.
   Google Scholar
• Logan K, Conture EG. Length, grammatical complexity, and rate differences in stuttered and fluent conversational utterances of children who stutter. J Fluency Disord. 1995;20:35–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ntourou K, Conture EG, Lipsey MW. Language abilities of children who stutter: a meta-analytical review. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2011;20:163–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Postma A, Kolk H. The covert repair hypothesis: prearticulatory repair processes in normal and stuttered disfluencies. J Speech Hear Res. 1993;36:472–487.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wingate M. The structure of stuttering: a psycholinguistic analysis. New York (NY): Springer-Verlag; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Owens RE. Language development: an introduction. 8th ed. Boston: Pearson; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss A, Zebrowski P. The narrative productions of children who stutter: a preliminary view. J Fluency Disord. 1994;19:39–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell RL, Grizzle KL. Assessing child and adolescent pragmatic language competencies: toward evidence-based assessments. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2008;11:59–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews G, Cutler J. Stuttering therapy: the relationship between changes in symptom level and attitudes. J Speech Hear Disord. 1974;38:312–319.
   Google Scholar
• Brutten G, Shoemaker D. Speech situation checklist. Carbondale (IL): Speech Clinic: Southern Illinois University; 1974.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson W, Darley F, Spriestersbach D. Form 14: Stutterers’ self-ratings of reactions to speech situations. Diagnostic manual in speech corrections. New York: Harper and Brothers; 1952.
   Google Scholar
• Ornstein A, Manning W. Self-efficacy scaling by adult stutterers. J Commun Disord. 1985;18:313–320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley J, Riley GD, Maguire G. Subjective screening of stuttering severity, locus of control and avoidance: research edition. J Fluency Disord. 2004;29:51–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanner DC, Belliveau W, Seibert G. Pragmatic stuttering intervention for adolescents and adults. Oceanside (CA): Academic Communication Associates; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Woolf G. The assessment of stuttering as struggle, avoidance, and expectancy. Br J Disord Commun. 1967;2:158–171.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wright L, Ayre A. WASSP: the Wright and Ayre stuttering self-rating profile. Winslow: Bicester; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Yaruss JS, Quesal RW. Overall Assessment of the Speaker’s Experience of Stuttering (OASES): documenting multiple outcomes in stuttering treatment. J Fluency Disord. 2006;31:90–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer E, Packman A, Onslow M, et al. A preliminary investigation of the impact of stuttering on language use. Clin Linguist Phonetics. 2005;19:191–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer E, Packman A, Onslow M, et al. The effect of stuttering on communication: a preliminary investigation. Clin Linguist Phon. 2009;23:473–488.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASHA. Definitions of communication disorders and variations [Relevant Paper] [Internet]. 1993 [cited 2017 June 17]. Available from: www.asha.org/policy.
   Google Scholar
• Silverman S, Ratner N. Syntactic complexity, fluency, and accuracy of sentence imitation in adolescents. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1997;40:95–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brundage S, Bothe A, Lengeling AK, et al. Comparing judgments of stuttering made by students, clinicians, and highly experienced judges. J Fluency Disord. 2006;31:271–283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cream A, Onslow M, Packman A, et al. Protection from harm: the experience of adults after therapy with prolonged-speech. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2003;38:379–395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss A. Why we should consider pragmatics when planning treatment for children who stutter. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2004;35:34–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummings L. Pragmatic disorders. In: Capone A, Lo Piparo F, Carapezza M, editors. Perspectives in pragmatics, philosophy & psychology. Dordrecht: Springer; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Lynn M. Determination and quantification of content validity. Nurs Res. 1986;35:382–385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn LR, Ward G. The handbook of pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• WHO. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Perry A, Morris M, Unsworth C, et al. Therapy outcome measure for allied health practitioners in Australia: the AusTOMs. Int J Qual Heal Care. 2004;16:285–291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant JS, Davis LL. Selection and use of content experts for instrument development. Res Nurs Health. 1997;20:269–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman L. Using tests in counseling. 2nd ed. Pacific Palisades (CA): Goodyear Publishing; 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Crichton N. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). J Clin Nurs. 2001;10:697–706.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasson D, Arnetz BB. Validation and findings comparing VAS vs. likert scales for psychosocial measurements. Int Electron J Health Educ. 2005;8:178–192.
   Google Scholar
• Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jesus LMT, Valente ARS, Hall A. Is the Portuguese version of the passage “The North Wind and the Sun” phonetically balanced?. J Int Phon Assoc. 2015;45:1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leon AC, Davis LL, Kraemer HC. The role and interpretation of pilot studies in clinical research. J Psychiatr Res. 2011;45:626–629.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing research: generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. 9th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Hair Jr JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, et al. Multivariate data analysis. 7th ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Kundel HL, Polansky M. Measurement of observer agreement. Radiology. 2003;228:303–308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewart H, Summers S. The pragmatic profile of everyday communication skills – adults. Windsor, Berkshire: NFER-Nelson; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Wiig EH, Semel E, Secord WA. Clinical evaluation of language fundamentals Fifth Edition (CELF-5). Minneapolis (MN): Pearson; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Bland JM, Altman DG. Cronbach's alpha. BMJ. 1997;314:572.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schilling LS, Dixon JK, Knafl KA, et al. Determining content validity of a self-report instrument for adolescents using a heterogeneous expert panel. Nurs Res. 2007;56:361–366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field A. Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics: and sex and drugs and rock “n” roll. London: Sage Publication; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Kline RB. Beyond significance testing: reforming data analysis methods in behavioral research. Washington (DC): American Psychological Association; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Vaz S, Falkmer T, Passmore AE, et al. The case for using the repeatability coefficient when calculating test–retest reliability. PLoS One. 2013;8:e73990.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins WG. Measures of reliability in sports medicine and science. Sports Med. 2000;30:1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hymes D. Models of the interaction of language and social setting. J Soc Issues. 1967;23:8–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis DM. The relation of repetitions in the speech of young children to certain measures of language maturity and situational factors: parts II & III. J Speech Disord. 1940;5:235–246.
   Google Scholar
• Meyers SC, Freeman FJ. Mother and child speech rate as a variable in stuttering and disfluency. J Speech Hear Res. 1985;28:436–444.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meyers SC, Freeman FJ. Interruptions as a variable in stuttering and disfluency. J Speech Hear Res. 1985;28:428–425.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ninio A, Snow C. The development of pragmatics: learning to use language appropriately. In: Bhatia KT, Ritchie WC, editors. Handbook of language acquisition. New York: Academic Press; 1999. p. 347–383.
   Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5). 5th ed. Washington (DC): American Psychiatric Publishing; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Manning W, Beck JG. Personality dysfunction in adults who stutter: another look. J Fluency Disord. 2013;38:184–192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alm PA. Stuttering in relation to anxiety, temperament, and personality: review and analysis with focus on causality. J Fluency Disord. 2014;40:5–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beilby JM, Byrnes ML, Yaruss JS. Acceptance and commitment therapy for adults who stutter: psychosocial adjustment and speech fluency. J Fluency Disord. 2012;37:289–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuthbert BN. Social anxiety disorder: trends and translational research. Biol Psychiatry. 2002;153:1367–1368.
   Google Scholar
• Stein MB, Ken YM. Disability and quality of life in social phobia: epidemiological findings. Am J Psychiatry. 2000;157:1606–1613.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer MB. Research design and issues of validity. In: Reis HT, Judd CM, editors. Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press; 2000. p. 3–16.
   Google Scholar
• American Educational Research Association (AERA). The standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington (DC): American Educational Research Association (AERA); 2014.
   Google Scholar