Work-related communicative profile of radio broadcasters: a case study

References

• Vilkman E. Occupational safety and health aspects of voice and speech professions. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2004;56:220–253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vilkman E. Voice problems at work: a challenge for occupational safety and health arrangement. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2000;52:120–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verdolini K, Ramig LO. Review: occupational risks for voice problems. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2001;26:37–46.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cantarella G, Iofrida E, Boria P, et al. Ambulatory phonation monitoring in a sample of 92 call center operators. J Voice. 2014;28:393.e1–393.e6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rantala L, Haataja K, Vilkman E, et al. Practical arrangements and methods in the field examination and speaking style analysis of professional voice users. Scand J Log Phon. 1994;19:43–54.
   Google Scholar
• Cantor Cutiva LC, Puglisi G, Astolfi A, et al. Four-day follow-up study on the self-reported voice condition and noise condition of teachers: relationship between vocal parameters and classroom acoustics. J Voice. 2017;31:120.e1–120.e8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray S. Basement membrane zone injury in vocal nodules. In: Gauffin J, Hammarberg B, editors. Vocal fold physiology. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group, Inc; 1991. p. 21–27.
   Google Scholar
• Bottalico P, Graetzer S, Hunter E. Effects of voice style, noise level, and acoustic feedback on objective and subjective voice evaluations. J Acoust Soc Am. 2015;138:EL498–EL503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantor Cutiva LC, Vogel I, Burdorf A. Voice disorders in teachers and their associations with work-related factors: a systematic review. J Commun Disord. 2013;46:143–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vilkman E. Occupational risk factors and voice disorders. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 1996;21:137–141.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cantor Cutiva LC, Burdorf A. Work-related determinants of voice complaints among school workers: an eleven-month follow-up study. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2016;25:590–597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottalico P, Graetzer S, Hunter E. Effects of speech style, room acoustics, and vocal fatigue on vocal effort. J Acoust Soc Am. 2016;139:2870–2879.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Medeiros AM, Barreto SM, Assunção AÁ. Voice disorders (dysphonia) in public school female teachers working in Belo Horizonte: prevalence and associated factors. J Voice. 2008;22:676–687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantor Cutiva LC, Burdorf A. Effects of noise and acoustics in schools on vocal health in teachers. Noise Health. 2015;17:17–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehto L, Laaksonen L, Vilkman E, et al. Changes in objective acoustic measurements and subjective voice complaints in call center customer-service advisors during one working day. J Voice. 2008;22:164–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brumm H, Zollinger SA. The evolution of the Lombard effect: 100 years of psychoacoustic research. Behaviour. 2011;148:1173–1198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane H, Tranel B. The Lombard sign and the role of hearing in speech. J Speech Hear Res. 1971;14:677–709.
   Google Scholar
• Bottalico P. Speech adjustments for room acoustics and their effects on vocal effort. J Voice. 2017;31:392.e1–392.e12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouserhal RE, Macdonald EN, Falk TH, et al. Variations in voice level and fundamental frequency with changing background noise level and talker-to-listener distance while wearing hearing protectors: a pilot study. Int J Audiol. 2016;55:S13–S20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ofcom. Audio content consumption in selected countries worldwide 2016, by device. Which of the following do you do at least once a week?: In: Statista – The Statistics Portal; n.d. New York (NY): Statista Inc. [August 25, 2017]; Available from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/198799/weekly-listening-to-the-radio-music-on-a-hi-fi-in-selected-countries/.
   Google Scholar
• Zenith N. Average daily time spent listening to the radio per individual in the United States from 2010 to 2018 (in minutes). Statista – The Statistics Portal. New York (NY): Statista Inc. [August 25, 2017]; Available from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/186897/average-radio-use-per-person-in-the-us-since-2002/.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch E, Kil J. Compounds for the prevention and treatment of noise-induced hearing loss. Drug Discov Today. 2005;10:1291–1298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McBride D, Williams S. Audiometric notch as a sign of noise induced hearing loss. Occup Environ Med. 2001;58:46–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Occupational noise exposure; Occupational Safety and Health Standards Occupational Health and Environmental Control. Washington (DC): Occupational Safety and Health Administration (Department of Labor); 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Lindblad A, Rosenhall U, Olofsson Å, et al. Tinnitus and other auditory problems–occupational noise exposure below risk limits may cause inner ear dysfunction. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e97377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatzakis N, Karatzanis A, Helidoni M, et al. Excessive noise levels are noted in kindergarten classrooms in the island of Crete. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014;271:483–487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothman KJ. Epidemiology. An introduction. New York: Oxford University Press; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Fairbanks G. The Rainbow passage. In: Fairbanks G, editor. Voice and articulation drillbook. New York: Harper & Row; 1960. p. 127.
   Google Scholar
• Boersma P, Weenink D. Praat: doing phonetics by computer (Version 6.0.31). 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrand CT. Harmonics-to-noise ratio: an index of vocal aging. J Voice. 2002;16:480–487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yumoto E, Gould WJ, Baer T. Harmonics-to-noise ratio as an index of the degree of hoarseness. J Acoust Soc Am. 1982;71:1544–1550.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yumoto E, Sasaki Y, Okamura H. Harmonics-to-noise ratio and psychophysical measurement of the degree of hoarseness. J Speech Hear Res. 1984;27:2–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hunter EJ, Titze IR. Quantifying vocal fatigue recovery: dynamic vocal recovery trajectories after a vocal loading exercise. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2009;118:449–460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillenbrand JM. Acoustic analysis of voice: a tutorial. Perspect Speech Sci Orofac Disord. 2011;21:31–43.
   Google Scholar
• Boersma P, editor. Accurate short-term analysis of the fundamental frequency and the harmonics-to-noise ratio of a sampled sound. Proceedings of the institute of phonetic sciences. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization. ISO 11904-2: determination of sound immission from sound sources placed close to the ear – part 2: technique using a manikin. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization; 2004. p. 16.
   Google Scholar
• Kampstra P. Beanplot: a boxplot alternative for visual comparison of distributions. J Stat Softw. 2008;28(1):1–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Titze I, Svec J, Popolo P. Vocal dose measures: quantifying accumulated vibration exposure in vocal fold tissues. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2003;46:919–932.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novak A, Dlouha O, Capkova B, et al. Voice fatigue after theater performance in actors. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 1991;43:74–78.
   Google Scholar
• Stemple JC, Stanley J, Lee L. Objective measures of voice production in normal subjects following prolonged voice use. J Voice. 1995;9:127–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelfer MP, Andrews ML, Schmidt CP. Effects of prolonged loud reading on selected measures of vocal function in trained and untrained singers. J Voice. 1991;5:158–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelchner LN, Lee L, Stemple JC. Laryngeal function and vocal fatigue after prolonged reading in individuals with unilateral vocal fold paralysis. J Voice. 2003;17:513–528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laukkanen A, Ilomäki I, Leppänen K, et al. Acoustic measures and self-reports of vocal fatigue by female teachers. J Voice. 2008;22:283–289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remacle A, Garnier M, Gerber S, et al. Vocal change patterns during a teaching day: Inter-and intra-subject variability. J Voice. 2017;32(1):57–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajasudhakar R, Savithri S. Effects of teaching and voice rest on acoustic voice characteristics of female primary school teachers. JAIISH. 2010;29:198–203.
   Google Scholar
• Cohler DK. Broadcast journalism: a guide for the presentation of radio and television news. Englewood Cliff: Prentice Hall; 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Koufman JA, Blalock PD. Vocal fatigue and dysphonia in the professional voice user: Bogart-bacall syndrome. Laryngoscope. 1988;98:493–498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trompette N, Chatillon J. Survey of noise exposure and background noise in call centers using headphones. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2012;9:381–386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel JA, Broughton K. Assessment of the noise exposure of call centre operators. Ann Occup Hyg. 2002;46:653–661.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong O, Kerr MJ, Poling GL, et al. Understanding and preventing noise-induced hearing loss. Dis Mon. 2013;59:110–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durch JS, Joellenbeck LM, Humes LE. Noise and military service: implications for hearing loss and tinnitus. Washington (DC): National Academies Press; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Kujawa SG, Liberman MC. Adding insult to injury: cochlear nerve degeneration after “temporary” noise-induced hearing loss. J Neurosci. 2009;29:14077–14085.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization. ISO/TR 3352. Acoustics – Assessment of noise with respect to its effect on the intelligibility of speech. Geneve: International Organization for Standardization; 1974.
   Google Scholar
• Bottalico P, Ipsaro Passione I, Graetzer S, et al. Evaluation of the starting point of the Lombard effect. Acta Acust United Acust. 2017;103:169–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lombard E. Le signe de I’elevation de la voix. Annals Maladiers Oreille. Larynx, Nez Pharynx. 1911;37:101–119.
   Google Scholar
• Södersten M, Granqvist S, Hammarberg B, et al. Vocal behavior and vocal loading factors for preschool teachers at work studied with binaural DAT recordings. J Voice. 2002;16:356–371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westcott M. Acoustic shock injury (ASI). Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 2006;126:54–58.
   Google Scholar