183
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Self-evaluation of communication experiences after laryngectomy (SECEL): translation and psychometric properties in European Portuguese

, , , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 66-72 | Received 06 Apr 2018, Accepted 28 Apr 2019, Published online: 20 May 2019

References

  • Mantsopoulos K, Psychogios G, Bohr C, et al. Primary surgical treatment of T3 glottic carcinoma: long-term results and decision-making aspects. Laryngoscope. 2012;122:2723–2727.
  • Evitts PM, Kasapoglu F, Demirci U, et al. Communication adjustment of patients with a laryngectomy in Turkey: analysis by type of surgery and mode of speech. Psychol Health Med. 2011;16:650–660.
  • Rogers SN, Ahad SA, Murphy AP. A structured review and theme analysis of papers published on 'quality of life' in head and neck cancer: 2000–2005. Oral Oncol. 2007;43:843–868.
  • Ojo B, Genden EM, Teng MS, et al. A systematic review of head and neck cancer quality of life assessment instruments. Oral Oncol. 2012;48:923–937.
  • Francis DO, Daniero JJ, Hovis KL, et al. Voice-related patient-reported outcome measures: a systematic review of instrument development and validation. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017;60:62–88.
  • Blood GW. Development and assessment of a scale addressing communication needs of patients with laryngectomies. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 1993;2:82–90.
  • Aaronson N, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, et al. The European organization for research and treatment cancer QLQ-C30 A quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Nat Cancer Inst. 1993;85:365–376.
  • Jacobson B, Johnson A, Grywalski C, et al. The voice handicap index (VHI): development and validation. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 1997;6:66–70.
  • Hogikyan N, Sethuraman G. Validation of an instrument to measure voice-related quality of life (V-RQOL). J Voice. 1999;13:557–569.
  • Schindler A, Mozzanica F, Brignoli F, et al. Reliability and validity of the Italian self-evaluation of communication experiences after laryngeal cancer questionnaire. Head Neck. 2013;35(11):1606–1615.
  • Fahl GB, Goulart BN. Transcultural adaptation of the self-evaluation of communication experiences after laryngectomy (SECEL) instrument into Brasilian Portuguese. Audio Commun Res. 2016;21:1–9.
  • Finizia C, Bergman B, Lindstrom J. A cross-sectional validation study of self-evaluation of communication experiences after laryngeal cancer - a questionnaire for use in the voice rehabilitation of laryngeal cancer patients. Acta Oncol. 1999;38:573–580.
  • Finizia C, Palmé C, Bergman B. A longitudinal study of the Swedish self-evaluation of communication experiences after laryngeal cancer questionnaire in patients treated for laryngeal cancer. Acta Oncologica. 2002;41:262–268.
  • Johansson M, Rydén A, Finizia C. Self-evaluation of communication experiences after laryngeal cancer – a longitudinal questionnaire study in patients with laryngeal cancer. BMC Cancer. 2008;27:8–80.
  • Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25:3186–3191.
  • Franic DM, Bothe K. Psychometric evaluation of condition-specific instruments used to assess health-related quality of life, attitudes, and related constructs in stuttering. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2008;17:60–80.
  • Franic DM, Bramlett RE, Bothe AC. Psychometric evaluation of disease specific quality of life instruments in voice disorders. J Voice. 2005;19:300–315.
  • World Medical Association (WMA). World medical association Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Bull World Health Org. 2001;79(4):373–374.
  • World Health Organization (WHO). Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. Psychol Med. 1998;28:551–558.
  • Pimentel FL. Qualidade de vida do doente oncológico [Quality of life of the patient with cancer]. University of Porto: PhD dissertation, 2003.
  • MacCallum RC, Widaman KF, Zhang S, et al. Sample size in factor analysis. Psychol Methods. 1999;4:84–91.
  • Nunnally JC, Bernstein AH. Psychometric theory. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw Hill Series in Psychology, 1994.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.