Perceived listening effort in children with hearing loss: listening to a dysphonic voice in quiet and in noise

References

• von Lochow H, Lyberg-Ahlander V, Sahlen B, et al. The effect of voice quality and competing speakers in a passage comprehension task: perceived effort in relation to cognitive functioning and performance in children with normal hearing. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2018;43(1):32–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattys SL, Davis MH, Bradlow AR, et al. Speech recognition in adverse conditions: a review. Lang Cognitive Proc. 2012;27(7–8):953–978.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rönnberg J. Cognition in the hearing impaired and deaf as a bridge between signal and dialogue: a framework and a model. Int J Audiol. 2003;42(Suppl 1):S68–S76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rönnberg J, Lunner T, Zekveld A, et al. The Ease of Language Understanding (ELU) model: theoretical, empirical, and clinical advances. Front Syst Neurosci. 2013;7:31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rönnberg J, Rudner M, Foo C, et al. Cognition counts: a working memory system for ease of language understanding (ELU). Int J Audiol. 2008;47(Suppl 2):S99–S105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rönnberg J, Rudner M, Lunner T, et al. When cognition kicks in: working memory and speech understanding in noise. Noise Health. 2010;12(49):263–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rönnberg J, Rudner M, Lunner T. Comments from Dr. Jerker Rönnberg, Mary Rudner, Thomas Lunner. [Peer commentary on “listening effort and fatigue: what exactly are we measuring? A British Society of Audiology Cognition in Hearing Special Interest Group ‘white paper’,” by Ronan McGarrigle, Kevin J. Munro, Piers Dawes, Andrew J. Stewart, David R. Moore, Johanna G. Barry, & Sygal Amitay]. Int J Audiol. 2014;53:433–445.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Lochow H, Lyberg-Ahlander V, Sahlen B, et al. The effect of voice quality and competing speakers in a passage comprehension task: performance in relation to cognitive functioning in children with normal hearing. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2018;43(1):11–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyberg Åhlander V, Brännström KJ, Sahlén BS. On the interaction of speakers' voice quality, ambient noise and task complexity with children's listening comprehension and cognition. Front Psychol. 2015;6:871.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyberg Åhlander V, Pelegrin Garcia D, Whitling S, et al. Teachers’ voice use in teaching environments: a field study using ambulatory phonation monitor. J Voice. 2014;28(6):841 e5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritzell B. Voice disorders and occupation. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 1996;21(1):7–12.
   Google Scholar
• Lyberg-Åhlander V, Rydell R, Fredlund P, et al. Prevalence of voice disorders in the general population, based on the stockholm public health cohort. J Voice. 2018;33(6):900–905.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitling S, Lyberg-Åhlander V, Rydell R. Long-time voice accumulation during work, leisure, and a vocal loading task in groups with different levels of functional voice problems. J Voice. 2017;31(2):246.e1–246.e10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brännström KJ, Holm L, Lyberg Åhlander V, et al. Children’s subjective ratings and opinions of typical and dysphonic voice after performing a language comprehension task in background noise. J Voice. 2015;29(5):624–630.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore BC. Perceptual consequences of cochlear hearing loss and their implications for the design of hearing aids. Ear Hear. 1996;17(2):133–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore BC. Dead regions in the cochlea: conceptual foundations, diagnosis, and clinical applications. Ear Hear. 2004;25(2):98–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore BC. The role of temporal fine structure processing in pitch perception, masking, and speech perception for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired people. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2008;9(4):399–406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore BC, Glasberg B, Schlueter A. Detection of dead regions in the cochlea: relevance for combined electric and acoustic stimulation. Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2010;67:43–50.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Crandell CC, Smaldino JJ. Classroom acoustics for children with normal hearing and with hearing impairment. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2000;31(4):362–370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leibold LJ, Hillock-Dunn A, Duncan N, et al. Influence of hearing loss on children's identification of spondee words in a speech-shaped noise or a two-talker masker. Ear Hear. 2013;34(5):575–584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter M, Gendolla GH, Wright RA. Chapter five – Three decates of research on motivational intensity theory: what we have learned about effort and what we still don't know. Adv Motiv Sci. 2016;3:149–186.
   Google Scholar
• Brehm JW, Self EA. The intensity of motivation. Annu Rev Psychol. 1989;40:109–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohlenforst B, Zekveld AA, Lunner T, et al. Impact of stimulus-related factors and hearing impairment on listening effort as indicated by pupil dilation. Hear Res. 2017;351:68–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connolly DM, Dockrell JE, Shield BM, et al. Adolescents’ perceptions of their school’s acoustic environment: the development of an evidence based questionnaire. Noise Health. 2013;15(65):269–280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brännström KJ, Johansson E, Vigertsson D, et al. Lyberg-Åhlander V. How children perceive the acoustic environment of their school. Noise Health. 2017;87:84–94.
   Google Scholar
• McGarrigle R, Munro KJ, Dawes P, et al. Listening effort and fatigue: what exactly are we measuring? A British Society of Audiology Cognition in Hearing Special Interest Group ‘white paper’. Int J Audiol. 2014;53(7):433–440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semel EM, Wiig EH, Secord WA, et al. Clinical evaluation of language fundamentals. 4th ed. Bloomington (MN): Pearson Assessment; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Whitling S, Rydell R, Åhlander L. V. Design of a clinical vocal loading test with long-time measurement of voice. J Voice. 2015;29(2):261–227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holube I, Fredelake S, Vlaming M, et al. Development and analysis of an International Speech Test Signal (ISTS). Int J Audiol. 2010;49(12):891–903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TolvanData. Visual sort and rate – Visor. Electronic source; [cited 2020 July 8]. Available from: http://www.tolvan.com/index.php?page=/visor/visor.php. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Thorwall K. Godnattsagor om Anders, nästan 4. Stockholm: Rabén & Sjögren; 1974.
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler D. WISC-IV Integrated. Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children – Fourth edition – Integrated [Manual]. London: Pearson Assessment; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Brännström KJ, Kastberg T, von Lochow H, et al. The influence of voice quality on sentence processing and recall performance in school-age children with normal hearing. Speech Lang Hear. 2018;21(1):1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Brännström KJ, von Lochow H, Lyberg-Åhlander V, et al. The influence of voice quality and multi-talker babble noise on sentence processing and recall performance in school children using cochlear implant and/or hearing aids. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2018;44(2):87–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyake A, Friedman NP, Emerson MJ, et al. The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “Frontal Lobe” tasks: a latent variable analysis. Cogn Psychol. 2000;41(1):49–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahlén B, Reuterskiold-Wagner C, Nettelbladt U, et al. Non-word repetition in children with language impairment-pitfalls and possibilities. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 1999;34(3):337–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hick CB, Tharpe AM. Listening effort and fatigue in school-age children with and without hearing loss. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2002;45(3):573–584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarampalis A, Kalluri S, Edwards B, et al. Objective measures of listening effort: effects of background noise and noise reduction. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2009;52(5):1230–1240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser S, Gagne JP, Alepins M, et al. Evaluating the effort expended to understand speech in noise using a dual-task paradigm: the effects of providing visual speech cues. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2010;53(1):18–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosselin PA, Gagne JP. Older adults expend more listening effort than young adults recognizing audiovisual speech in noise. Int J Audiol. 2011;50(11):786–792.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackersie CL, Cones H. Subjective and psychophysiological indexes of listening effort in a competing-talker task. J Am Acad Audiol. 2011;22(2):113–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brännström KJ, Kastberg T, von Lochow H, et al. The influence of voice quality on sentence processing and recall performance in school-age children with normal hearing. Speech Lang Hear. 2018;21(1):1–9. E-pub ahead of print)
   Google Scholar
• Brännström KJ, Karlsson E, Waechter S, et al. Listening effort: order effects and core executive functions. J Am Acad Audiol. 2018;29(8):734–747.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brännström KJ, von Lochow H, Lyberg Åhlander V, et al. Immediate passage comprehension and encoding of information into long-term memory in children with normal hearing: the effect of voice quality and multitalker babble noise. Am J Audiol. 2018;27(2):231–237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar