Accuracy of subtraction fractional flow reserve with computed tomography in identifying early revascularization in patients with coronary artery disease

References

• Coenen A, Lubbers MM, Kurata A, et al. Fractional flow reserve computed from noninvasive CT angiography data: diagnostic performance of an on-site clinician-operated computational fluid dynamics algorithm. Radiology. 2015;274(3):674–683. doi:10.1148/radiol.14140992.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavoosi A, Kadoya Y, Chong AY, et al. Utility of FFRCT in Patients with Chest Pain. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2023;25(8):427–434. doi:10.1007/s11883-023-01117-y.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rudzinski PN, Kruk M, Debski M, et al. Can the application of fractional flow reserve computed tomography in high-risk patients with chronic coronary syndrome obviate downstream diagnostic invasive coronary procedures? J Thorac Imaging. 2023;38(5):W77–W78. doi:10.1097/RTI.0000000000000727.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Koo B-K, Erglis A, Doh J-H, et al. Diagnosis of ischemia-causing coronary stenoses by noninvasive fractional flow reserve computed from coronary computed tomographic angiograms. Results from the prospective multicenter DISCOVER-FLOW (Diagnosis of Ischemia-Causing Stenoses Obtained Via Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58(19):1989–1997. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2011.06.066.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang CX, Liu CY, Lu MJ, et al. CT FFR for ischemia-specific CAD with a new computational fluid dynamics algorithm: a chinese multicenter study. JACC Cardiovascular Imaging. 2020;13(4):980–990. doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.06.018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas PS, De Bruyne B, Pontone G, et al. 1-year outcomes of FFRCT-guided care in patients with suspected coronary disease: the PLATFORM study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68(5):435–445. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2016.05.057.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nørgaard BL, Hjort J, Gaur S, et al. Clinical use of coronary CTA-derived FFR for decision-making in stable CAD. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;10(5):541–550. doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.11.025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang CX, Qiao HY, Zhang XL, et al. Functional CAD-RADS using FFRCT on therapeutic management and prognosis in patients with coronary artery disease. Eur Radiol. 2022;32(8):5210–5221. doi:10.1007/s00330-022-08618-5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vavere AL, Arbab-Zadeh A, Rochitte CE, et al. Coronary artery stenoses: accuracy of 64-detector row CT angiography in segments with mild, moderate, or severe calcification–a subanalysis of the CORE-64 trial. Radiology. 2011;261(1):100–108. doi:10.1148/radiol.11110537.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mickley H, Veien KT, Gerke O, et al. Diagnostic and clinical value of FFR(CT) in stable chest pain patients with extensive coronary calcification: the FACC study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022;15(6):1046–1058. doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2021.12.010.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fujimoto S, Kawasaki T, Kumamaru KK, et al. Diagnostic performance of on-site computed CT-fractional flow reserve based on fluid structure interactions: comparison with invasive fractional flow reserve and instantaneous wave-free ratio. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019;20(3):343–352. doi:10.1093/ehjci/jey104.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kawaguchi YO, Fujimoto S, Kumamaru KK, et al. The predictive factors affecting false positive in on-site operated CT-fractional flow reserve based on fluid and structural interaction. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2019;23:100372. doi:10.1016/j.ijcha.2019.100372.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yoshioka K, Tanaka R, Muranaka K. Subtraction coronary CT angiography for calcified lesions. Cardiol Clin. 2012;30(1):93–102. doi:10.1016/j.ccl.2011.10.004.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fuchs A, Kühl JT, Chen MY, et al. Subtraction CT angiography improves evaluation of significant coronary artery disease in patients with severe calcifications or stents-the C-Sub 320 multicenter trial. Eur Radiol. 2018;28(10):4077–4085. doi:10.1007/s00330-018-5418-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamaguchi T, Ichikawa K, Takahashi D, et al. A New Contrast Enhancement Protocol for Subtraction Coronary Computed Tomography Requiring a Short Breath-Holding Time. Acad Radiol. 2017;24(1):38–44. doi:10.1016/j.acra.2016.08.025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leipsic J, Abbara S, Achenbach S, et al. SCCT guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of coronary CT angiography: a report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2014;8(5):342–358. doi:10.1016/j.jcct.2014.07.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ, et al. Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;15(4):827–832. doi:10.1016/0735-1097(90)90282-t.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiao J, Li S, Yang H, et al. Subtraction improves the accuracy of coronary ct angiography in patients with severe calcifications in identifying moderate and severe stenosis: a multicenter study. Acad Radiol. 2023;30(12):2801–2810. doi:10.1016/j.acra.2022.11.033.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Takagi H, Leipsic JA, McNamara N, et al. Trans-lesional fractional flow reserve gradient as derived from coronary CT improves patient management: ADVANCE registry. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2022;16(1):19–26. doi:10.1016/j.jcct.2021.08.003.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kamo Y, Fujimoto S, Nozaki YO, et al. Incremental diagnostic value of CT fractional flow reserve using subtraction method in patients with severe calcification: A pilot study. J Clin Med. 2021;10(19):4398. doi:10.3390/jcm10194398.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hlatky MA, De Bruyne B, Pontone G, et al. Quality-of-life and economic outcomes of assessing fractional flow reserve with computed tomography angiography: PLATFORM. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66(21):2315–2323. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2015.09.051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doris MK, Otaki Y, Arnson Y, et al. Non-invasive fractional flow reserve in vessels without severe obstructive stenosis is associated with coronary plaque burden. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2018;12(5):379–384. doi:10.1016/j.jcct.2018.05.003.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ilic I, Timcic S, Odanovic N, et al. Serial stenosis assessment-can we rely on invasive coronary physiology. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023;10:1172906. doi:10.3389/fcvm.2023.1172906.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fuchs A, Kühl JT, Chen MY, et al. Feasibility of coronary calcium and stent image subtraction using 320-detector row CT angiography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2015;9(5):393–398. doi:10.1016/j.jcct.2015.03.016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwan AC, Gransar H, Tzolos E, et al. The accuracy of coronary CT angiography in patients with coronary calcium score above 1000 Agatston Units: comparison with quantitative coronary angiography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2021;15(5):412–418. doi:10.1016/j.jcct.2021.03.007.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gulati M, Levy PD, Mukherjee D, et al. 2021 AHA/ACC/ASE/CHEST/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR guideline for the evaluation and diagnosis of chest pain: A report of the american college of cardiology/american heart association joint committee on clinical practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;78(22):e187–e285. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2021.07.053.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar