State-led Gentrification and the Changing Geography of Market-oriented Housing Policies

References

• Aalbers, M. B. 2004. “Promoting Home Ownership in a Social-rented City: Policies, Practices and Pitfalls.” Housing Studies 19 (3): 483–495.10.1080/0267303042000204340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aalbers, M. B. 2011. “The Revanchist Renewal of Yesterday’s City of Tomorrow.” Antipode 43 (5): 1696–1724.10.1111/anti.2011.43.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aalbers, M. B., and B. Christophers. 2014. “Centring Housing in Political Economy.” Housing, Theory and Society 31 (4): 373–394.10.1080/14036096.2014.947082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aalbers, M. B., J. van Loon, and R. Fernandez. 2017. “The Financialization of a Social Housing Provider.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, in press.
   Google Scholar
• AFWC (Amsterdam Federation of Housing Associations). 2008. Jaarboek 2008 [Yearbook 2008]. Amsterdam: Amsterdamse Federatie van Woningcorporaties.
   Google Scholar
• AFWC (Amsterdam Federation of Housing Associations). 2016. Jaarbericht 2016. Amsterdam in Cijfers 2016 [Annual note 2016. Amsterdam in Figures 2016]. Amsterdam: Amsterdamse Federatie van Woningcorporaties.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, R., and S. Musterd. 2005. “Area-based Policies: A Critical Appraisal.” Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie 96 (4): 377–389.10.1111/tesg.2005.96.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson, R., and L. M. Turner. 2014. “Segregation, Gentrification, and Residualisation: From Public Housing to Market-driven Housing Allocation in Inner City Stockholm.” International Journal of Housing Policy 14 (1): 3–29.10.1080/14616718.2013.872949
   Google Scholar
• Boelhouwer, P., and H. Priemus. 2014. “Demise of the Dutch Social Housing Tradition: Impact of Budget Cuts and Political Changes.” Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 29 (2): 221–235.10.1007/s10901-013-9387-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolt, G. S., D. Phillips, and R. Van Kempen. 2010. “Housing Policy, (De)Segregation and Social Mixing: An International Perspective.” Housing Studies 25 (2): 129–135.10.1080/02673030903564838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boterman, W. R., and W. P. C. van Gent. 2014. “Housing Liberalisation and Gentrification: The Social Effects of Tenure Conversions in Amsterdam.” Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie 105 (2): 140–160.10.1111/tesg.2014.105.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner, N., J. Peck, and N. Theodore. 2010. “Variegated Neoliberalization: Geographies, Modalities, Pathways.” Global Networks 10 (2): 182–222.10.1111/glob.2010.10.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridge, G., T. Butler, and L. Lees, eds. 2012. Mixed Communities: Gentrification by Stealth?. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• CBS. 2014. “Woningvoorraad naar eigendom; regio, 2006–2012 [Housing tenure per region, 2006–2012].” Accessed 21 November 2016. http://statline.cbs.nl/Statweb/publication/?DM=SLNL&PA=71446ned&D1=0-10&D2=0&D3=a&HDR=G2&STB=G1,T&VW=T.
   Google Scholar
• De Souza Briggs, X., S. J. Popkin, and J. Goering. 2010. Moving to Opportunity. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195393712.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Doling, J., and R. Ronald. 2010. “Home Ownership and Asset-based Welfare.” Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 25 (2): 165–173.10.1007/s10901-009-9177-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D66, VVD, and SP. 2014. Amsterdam is van iedereen. Coalitieakkoord 2014–2018 [Amsterdam belongs to everybody. Coalition agreement 2014–2018]. Amsterdam: D66 [social democrat party], VVD [conservative liberal party] and SP [socialist party].
   Google Scholar
• Florida, R. L. 2002. The Rise of the Creative Class: And How It’s Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Forrest, R., and Y. Hirayama. 2015. “The Financialisation of the Social Project: Embedded Liberalism, Neoliberalism and Home Ownership.” Urban Studies 52 (2): 233–244.10.1177/0042098014528394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forrest, R., and A. Murie. 1983. “Residualization and Council Housing: Aspects of the Changing Social Relations of Housing Tenure.” Journal of Social Policy 12 (4): 453–468.10.1017/S0047279400013088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galster, G. C. 2012. “The Mechanism(s) Of Neighbourhood Effects: Theory, Evidence, and Policy Implications.” In Neighbourhood Effects Research: New Perspectives, edited by M. Van Ham, D. Manley, N. Bailey, L. Simpson, and D. Maclennan, 23–56. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gemeente Amsterdam. 2009. Woonvisie Amsterdam [Housing Vision Amsterdam]. Amsterdam: Gemeente Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Gemeente Amsterdam. 2013. Amsterdam Maakt Mogelijk [Amsterdam Enables]. Gemeente Amsterdam: Ruimte voor stedelijke ontwikkeling. Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Hackworth, J. 2002. “Postrecession Gentrification in New York City.” Urban Affairs Review 37 (6): 815–843.10.1177/107874037006003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackworth, J. 2003. “Public Housing and the Rescaling of Regulation in the USA.” Environment and Planning A 35 (3): 531–549.10.1068/a35117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackworth, J., and N. Smith. 2001. “The Changing State of Gentrification.” Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie 92 (4): 464–477.10.1111/tesg.2001.92.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamnett, C., and W. Randolph. 1984. “The Role of Landlord Disinvestment in Housing Market Transformation: An Analysis of the Flat Break-up Market in Central London.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 259–279.10.2307/622233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. 1989. “From Managerialism to Entrepreneurialism: The Transformation in Urban Governance in Late Capitalism.” Geografiska Annaler Series B. Human Geography 3–17.10.2307/490503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochstenbach, C. 2015. “Stakeholder Representations of Gentrification in Amsterdam and Berlin: A Marginal Process?” Housing Studies 30 (6): 817–838.10.1080/02673037.2014.979770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochstenbach, C., and W. R. Boterman. 2015. “Intergenerational Support Shaping Residential Trajectories: Young People Leaving Home in a Gentrifying City.” Urban Studies. Online First. doi:0042098015613254.
   Google Scholar
• Hochstenbach, C., and W. P. C. van Gent. 2015. “An Anatomy of Gentrification Processes: Variegating Causes of Neighbourhood Change.” Environment and Planning A 47 (7): 1480–1501.10.1177/0308518X15595771
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huisman, C. J. 2016. “A Silent Shift? The Precarisation of the Dutch Rental Housing Market.” Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 31 (1): 93–106.10.1007/s10901-015-9446-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HV Amsterdam, AFWC, and Gemeente Amsterdam. 2015. Samenwerkingsafspraken periode juli 2015 t/m december 2019 [Cooperation agreements for the period July 2015 to December 2019]. Amsterdam: Huurdersvereniging Amsterdam, Amsterdamse Federatie Woningcorporaties and Gemeente Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• HV Amsterdam, AFWC, and Gemeente Amsterdam. 2016. Uitwerking Samenwerkingsafspraken [Elaboration Cooperation agreements]. Amsterdam: Huurdersvereniging Amsterdam, Amsterdamse Federatie Woningcorporaties and Gemeente Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Kadi, J., and S. Musterd. 2015. “Housing for the Poor in a Neo-liberalising Just City: Still Affordable, but Increasingly Inaccessible.” Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie 106 (3): 246–262.10.1111/tesg.2015.106.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadi, J., and R. Ronald. 2016. “Undermining Housing Affordability for New Yorks Low-income Households: The Role of Policy Reform and Rental Sector Restructuring.” Critical Social Policy 36 (2): 265–288.10.1177/0261018315624172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemeny, J. 2001. “Comparative Housing and Welfare: Theorising the Relationship.” Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 16 (1): 53–70.10.1023/A:1011526416064
   Google Scholar
• Kleinhans, R. 2004. “Social Implications of Housing Diversification in Urban Renewal: A Review of Recent Literature.” Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 19 (4): 367–390.10.1007/s10901-004-3041-5
   Google Scholar
• Kleinhans, R., and A. Kearns. 2013. “Neighbourhood Restructuring and Residential Relocation: Towards a Balanced Perspective on Relocation Processes and Outcomes.” Housing Studies 28 (2): 163–176.10.1080/02673037.2013.768001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lees, L. 2008. “Gentrification and Social Mixing: Towards an Inclusive Urban Renaissance?” Urban Studies 45 (12): 2449–2470.10.1177/0042098008097099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lennartz, C., R. Arundel, and R. Ronald. 2016. “Younger Adults and Homeownership in Europe through the Global Financial Crisis.” Population, Space and Place 22 (8): 823–835.10.1002/psp.v22.8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKee, K. 2012. “Young People, Homeownership and Future Welfare.” Housing Studies 27 (6): 853–862.10.1080/02673037.2012.714463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieboer, N., and V. Gruis. 2014. “Shifting Back-changing Organisational Strategies in Dutch Social Housing.” Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 29 (1): 1–13.10.1007/s10901-012-9329-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostendorf, W., S. Musterd, and S. De Vos. 2001. “Social Mix and the Neighbourhood Effect. Policy Ambitions and Empirical Evidence.” Housing Studies 16 (3): 371–380.10.1080/02673030120049724
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peck, J. 2012. “Recreative City: Amsterdam, Vehicular Ideas and the Adaptive Spaces of Creativity Policy.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 36 (3): 462–485.10.1111/ijur.2012.36.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peck, J., and A. Tickell. 2002. “Neoliberalizing Space.” Antipode 34 (3): 380–404.10.1111/anti.2002.34.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popkin, S. J., B. Katz, M. K. Cunningham, K. D. Brown, J. Gustafson, and M. A. Turner. 2004. A Decade of HOPE VI: Research Findings and Policy Challenges. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Posthumus, H. 2013. “Displacement Myths: The Real and Presumed Effects of Forced Relocations Resulting from Urban Renewal.” PhD diss., Utrecht University, Utrecht.
   Google Scholar
• Ronald, R. 2008. The Ideology of Home Ownership. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230582286
   Google Scholar
• Ronald, R., and K. Dol. 2011. “Housing in the Netherlands before and after the Global Financial Crisis.” In Housing Markets and the Global Financial Crisis: The Uneven Impact on Households, edited by R. Forrest and N. M. Yip, 93–112. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Sampson, R. J., J. D. Morenoff, and T. Gannon-Rowley. 2002. “Assessing ‘Neighborhood Effects’: Social Processes and New Directions in Research.” Annual Review of Sociology 28: 443–478.10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, T. 2009. “Missing Marcuse: On Gentrification and Displacement.” City 13 (2–3): 292–311.10.1080/13604810902982250
   Google Scholar
• Slater, T. 2013. “Your Life Chances Affect Where You Live: A Critique of the ‘Cottage Industry’ of Neighbourhood Effects Research.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 37 (2): 367–387.10.1111/ijur.2013.37.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, N. 1996. The New Urban Frontier: Gentrification and the Revanchist City. London: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, N. 2002. “New Globalism, New Urbanism: Gentrification as Global Urban Strategy.” Antipode 34 (3): 427–450.10.1111/anti.2002.34.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uitermark, J. 2003. “‘Social Mixing’ and the Management of Disadvantaged Neighbourhoods: The Dutch Policy of Urban Restructuring Revisited.” Urban Studies 40 (3): 531–549.10.1080/0042098032000053905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uitermark, J. 2009. “An in Memoriam for the Just City of Amsterdam.” City 13 (2–3): 347–361.10.1080/13604810902982813
   Google Scholar
• Uitermark, J. 2014. “Integration and Control: The Governing of Urban Marginality in Western Europe.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 38 (4): 1418–1436.10.1111/ijur.2014.38.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uitermark, J., J. W. Duyvendak, and R. Kleinhans. 2007. “Gentrification as a Governmental Strategy: Social Control and Social Cohesion in Hoogvliet, Rotterdam.” Environment and Planning A 39 (1): 125–141.10.1068/a39142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uitermark, J., C. Hochstenbach, and W. van Gent. 2017. “The Statistical Politics of Exceptional Territories.” Political Geography 57: 60–70. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2016.11.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Heijden, H. 2002. “Social Rented Housing in Western Europe: Developments and Expectations.” Urban Studies 39 (2): 327–340.10.1080/00420980120102993
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Duijne, R. and R. Ronald. 2016. “The Unraveling of Amsterdam’s Unitary Rental Market.” Centre for Urban Studies Working Paper Series No.19.
   Google Scholar
• Van Gent, W. P. C. 2013. “Neoliberalization, Housing Institutions and Variegated Gentrification: How the ‘Third Wave’ Broke in Amsterdam.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 37 (2): 503–522.10.1111/ijur.2013.37.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Ham, M., D. Manley, N. Bailey, L. Simpson, and D. Maclennan, eds. 2012. Neighbourhood Effects Research: New Perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wiebes, E., and E. van der Burg. 2014. “Woningmarkt moet van het slot.” Het Parool, January 20. Accessed 21 November 2016. http://vvdamsterdam.nl/article/4428/Woningmarkt-moet-van-het-slot/.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, W. J. 1987. The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass, and Public Policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Woon Amsterdam. 2015. Overspannen of Ontspannen? [Overstrained or Relaxed?] Amsterdam: Makelaarsvereniging Amsterdam, Amsterdamse Federatie Woningcorporaties and Gemeente Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar