“The House with the Red Roof:” A Migrant-Owned Apartment in Japan and the Surrounding Relations of a “Society with Houses”

References

• Aalbers, M. B., and R. Deurloo. 2003. “Concentrated and Condemned? Residential Patterns of Immigrants from Industrial and Non-Industrial Countries in Amsterdam.” Housing, Theory & Society 20 (4): 197–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/14036090310018932.
   Google Scholar
• Adianto, J., and R. T. Gabe. 2022. “Alternative Housing Priorities for Low-Income Migrants in Jakarta, Indonesia.” International Journal of Urban Sciences 27 (1): 93–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2022.2072939.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, H. S. 2015. “Explanations for Special Neighbourhood Preferences Among Ethnic Minorities.” Housing, Theory & Society 32 (2): 196–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2015.1012593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashwin, S., and J. Utrata. 2020. “Masculinity Restored? Putin’s Russia and Trump’s America.” Contexts 19 (2): 16–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536504220920189.
   Google Scholar
• Attwood, L. 2012. “Privatisation of Housing in Post-Soviet Russia: A New Understanding of Home?” Europe-Asia Studies 64 (5): 903–928. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2012.681243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balampanidis, D. 2020. “Housing Pathways of Immigrants in the City of Athens: From Homelessness to Homeownership. Considering Contextual Factors and Human Agency.” Housing, Theory & Society 37 (2): 230–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2019.1600016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boccagni, P. 2014. “What’s in a (Migrant) House? Changing Domestic Spaces, the Negotiation of Belonging and Home-Making in Ecuadorian Migration.” Housing, Theory & Society 31 (3): 277–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2013.867280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brereton, D. P. 2005. “House Society and Practice Theories Illuminate American Campsteads.” Anthropological Theory 5 (2): 135–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499605053990.
   Google Scholar
• Buchli, V. 2013. An Anthropology of Architecture. London: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474214179.
   Google Scholar
• Carsten, J. 1995. “The Substance of Kinship and the Heat of the Hearth: Feeding, Personhood, and Relatedness Among Malays in Pulau Langkawi.” American Ethnologist 22 (2): 223–241. https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.1995.22.2.02a00010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carsten, J., and S. Hugh-Jones. 1995. “Introduction: About the House: Lévi-Strauss and Beyond.” In About the House: Lévi-Strauss and Beyond, edited by J. Carsten and S. Hugh-Jones, 1–46. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cassiman, A. 2008. “Home and Away: Mental Geographies of Young Migrant Workers and Their Belonging to the Family House in Northern Ghana.” Housing, Theory & Society 25 (1): 14–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/14036090601151210.
   Google Scholar
• Chétima, M. 2019. “Modern Houses, Conspicuous Consumption, and Elite–Villager Interfaces in the Mandara Highlands.” Journal of Asian and African Studies 54 (1): 136–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021909618794988.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debnar, M. 2016. Migration, Whiteness, and Cosmopolitanism: Europeans in Japan. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Demireva, N., and W. Zwysen. 2021. “Ethnic Enclaves, Economic and Political Threat: An Investigation with the European Social Survey.” Frontiers in Sociology 6 (660378). https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2021.660378.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, M. 1966. Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, M. 1991. “The Idea of a Home: A Kind of Space.” Social Research 58 (1): 287–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukumoto, T. 2021. “The Contrasting Enclaves Between Korean Oldcomers and Newcomers.” In Ethnic Enclaves in Contemporary Japan, edited by Y. Ishikawa, 71–98. Singapore, Republic of Singapore: Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-6995-5_4.
   Google Scholar
• Gillespie, S. D. 2000. “Toponymic Groups and House Organization: The Nahuas of Northern Velacruz.” In Beyond Kinship: Social and Material Reproduction in House Societies, edited by R. A. Joyce and S. D. Gillespie, 22–52. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Golovina, K. 2017. Nihon ni Kurasu Roshiajin Josei no Bunkajinruigaku: Iju, Kokusai Kekkon, Jinseizukuri. Tokyo, Japan: Akashi Shoten.
   Google Scholar
• Golovina, K. 2020. “Walking, Cleaning, and “Kinning:” Material Practice of Grave-Caring Among Russian-Speaking Migrants in Japan.” Japanese Review of Cultural Anthropology 21 (2): 315–355. https://doi.org/10.14890/jrca.21.1_315.
   Google Scholar
• Golovina, K. 2022. “Moving House in Migrant Narratives: The Morphology of Housing Pathways from an Anthropological Perspective.” Housing Studies 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2022.2057932.
   Google Scholar
• González-Ruibal, A. 2006. “House Societies Vs. Kinship-Based Societies: An Archaeological Case from Iron Age Europe.” Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 25 (1): 144–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaa.2005.09.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grohmann, S. 2021. “Responsible Parasites: The Ethics of Small-Scale Property Investment in the UK.” Housing, Theory & Society 38 (4): 456–475. https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2020.1853225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iglesias-Pascual, R. 2019. “Social Discourse, Housing Search and Residential Segregation: The Social Determinants of Recent Economic Migrants’ Residential Mobility in Seville.” Housing Studies 34 (7): 1163–1188. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2018.1520817.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Immigration Services Agency of Japan. 2022. “Residential Statuses.” Accessed October 15, 2022. https://www.moj.go.jp/isa/applications/status/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• Inaba, Y. 2010. “Nikkei Burajirujin Haken Rōdōsha no Jūtaku Mondai to Haikei Jijō.” Urban Housing Sciences 68: 27–30. https://doi.org/10.11531/uhs.2010.68_27.
   Google Scholar
• Ishikawa, Y., ed. 2021. Ethnic Enclaves in Contemporary Japan. Singapore, Republic of Singapore: Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-6995-5.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, V., N. G. Balgoa, and B. A. Yamamoto. 2021. The Politics of International Marriage in Japan. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kopytoff, I. 1986. “The Cultural Biography of Things: Commoditization as Process.” In The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective, edited by A. Appadurai, 64–92. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Larionescu, A. L. J. 2012. “‘Migrants’ Housing in the Homeland. A Case Study of the Impact of Migration on a Rural Community. The Village of Marginea, Romania.” Journal of Comparative Research in Anthropology and Sociology 3 (2): 81–95.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, I. 2016. Migration, Settlement, and the Concepts of House and Home. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315866802.
   Google Scholar
• Lévi-Strauss, C. [1975] 1999. The Way of the Masks, Trans. S. Modelski. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lozanovska, M. 2019. Migrant Housing: Architecture, Dwelling, Migration. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Meen, G., K. Gibb, C. Leishman, and C. Nygaard. 2016. “Path Dependence, the Spatial Distribution of Immigrant Communities and the Demand for Housing.” In Housing Economics, edited by G. Meen, K. Gibb, C. Leishman, and C. Nygaard, 217–242. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-47271-7_9.
   Google Scholar
• Mora, S. 2022. “Community’s House and Symbolic Dwelling: A Perspective on Power.” Humans 2 (1): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/humans2010001.
   Google Scholar
• Mukhina, V. 2013. “Migration Policies and Cross-National Marriage in Japan: Routes to Settlement.” International Journal of Social and Cultural Studies VI:77–93.
   Google Scholar
• Murayama, K., and J. Nagayasu. 2021. “Toward Coexistence of Immigrants and Local People in Japan: Implications from Spatial Assimilation Theory.” Sustainability 13 (7): 3849. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073849.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann, I. B., K. Haugevik, and J. H. Sande Lie. 2019. “Kinship in International Relations: Introduction and Framework.” In Kinship in International Relations, edited by K. Haugevik and I. B. Neumann, 1–20. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429507267-1.
   Google Scholar
• Özüekren, A. S. 2003. “Ethnic Concentration at the Neighbourhood Block Level: Turks in a Greater Stockholm Suburb (1989 and 1999).” Housing, Theory & Society 20 (4): 172–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/14036090310021460.
   Google Scholar
• Portes, A., and R. D. Manning. 2006. “The Immigrant Enclave: Theory and Empirical Examples.” In Inequality Classic Readings in Race, Class, and Gender, edited by D. B. Grusky and S. Szelenyi, 47–67. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, S., and M. Satsangi. 2021. ““The Bad Landlord”: Origins and Significance in Contemporary Housing Policy and Practice.” Housing, Theory & Society 38 (4): 496–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2020.1833080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandstrom, A. R. 2000. “Lévi-Strauss: Maison and Société à Maisons.” In Beyond Kinship: Social and Material Reproduction in House Societies, edited by R. A. Joyce and S. D. Gillespie, 53–72. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, D. 1990. American Kinship: A Cultural Account. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Sugasawa, T., and K. Harano. 2022. A Field Experiment on Discrimination Against Foreigners in the Rental Housing Market in Japan Examining the 23 Wards of Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4192485.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, S., and S. Fujii. 2020. “Kōteki Jūtaku Danchi ni Okeru Gaikokujin Shūjū no Jittai to Torikumi ni Kansuru Kenkyū.” Journal of the City Planning 55 (3): 954–961. https://doi.org/10.11361/journalcpij.55.954.
   Google Scholar
• Waterson, R. 1995. “Houses and Hierarchies in Island Southeast Asia.” In About the House: Lévi-Strauss and Beyond, edited by J. Carsten and S. Hugh-Jones, 47–68. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607653.002.
   Google Scholar
• Woodward, S. 2015. “Object Interviews, Material Imaginings and ‘Unsettling’ Methods: Interdisciplinary Approaches to Understanding Materials and Material Culture.” Qualitative Research 16 (4): 359–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794115589647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zolin, R., A. Chang, and P. Steffens. 2014. “Ethnic Enclave Lifecycle: A Case Study of Chinese Restaurants in South East Queensland.” In Australian Centre for Entrepreneurship Research Exchange Conference 2014 Proceedings, edited by P. Davidsson, 1225–1243. Australia: QUT.
   Google Scholar