The Transformative Potential of Everyday Life: Shared Space, Togetherness, and Everyday Degrowth in Housing

References

• Aalbers, M. B. 2016. The Financialization of Housing: A Political Economy Approach. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K. 2007. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barca, S. 2019. “The Labor (s) of Degrowth.” Capitalism Nature Socialism 30 (2): 207–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/10455752.2017.1373300.
   Google Scholar
• Beros, C., and E. Rafailaki. 2005. “Housing Morphology in Manchester: Bentley House Estate.” Vivacity 2020. http://www.vivacity2020.co.uk/Members/wp6-case-study-documents/BentleyHouseRedbricks.pdf/view/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• Binnie, J., J. Holloway, S. Millington, and C. Young. 2007. “Mundane Geographies: Alienation, Potentialities, and Practice.” Environment and Planning A 39 (3): 515–520. https://doi.org/10.1068/a39131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blokland, T. 2017. Community as Urban Practice. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. 2006. “Posthuman, All Too Human: Towards a New Process Ontology.” Theory, Culture & Society 23 (7–8): 197–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276406069232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. 2019. “A Theoretical Framework for the Critical Posthumanities.” Theory, Culture & Society 36 (6): 31–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276418771486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brighenti, A. M. 2010. “On Territorology: Towards a General Science of Territory.” Theory, Culture & Society 27 (1): 52–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276409350357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christophers, B. 2018. The New Enclosure: The Appropriation of Public Land in Neoliberal Britain. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Cucca, R., and M. Friesenecker. 2022. “Potential and Limitations of Innovative Housing Solutions in Planning for Degrowth: The Case of Vienna.” Local Environment 27 (4): 502–516. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2021.1872513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Certeau, M. 1984. The Practice of Everyday Life. Translated by Rendall S. Berkeley. CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• DeLanda, M. 2015. “The New Materiality.” Architectural Design 85 (5): 16–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.1948.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLanda, M. 2016. Assemblage Theory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Demaria F., F. Schneider, F. Sekulova and J. Martinez-Alier. 2013. “What is Degrowth? From an Activist Slogan to a Social Movement.” Environmental Values 22(2):191–215. https://doi.org/10.3197/096327113X13581561725194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubois, A., and L. E. Gadde. 2002. “Systematic Combining: An Abductive Approach to Case Research.” Journal of Business Research 55 (7): 553–560. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(00)00195-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easthope, H., E. Power, D. Rogers, and R. Dufty-Jones. 2020. “Thinking Relationally About Housing and Home.” Housing Studies 35 (9): 1493–1500. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2020.1801957.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escobar, A. 2008. Territories of Difference: Place, Movements, Life, Redes. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foley, R. 2011. “Performing Health in Place: The Holy Well as a Therapeutic Assemblage.” Health & Place 17 (2): 470–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.11.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1980. Power/Knowledge. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, N. J., and P. Alldred. 2017. Sociology and the New Materialism: Theory, Research, Action. London: SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526401915.
   Google Scholar
• Gabriel, M., and K. Jacobs. 2008. “The Post-Social Turn: Challenges for Housing Research.” Housing Studies 23 (4): 527–540. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673030802101666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gherardi, S. 2019. How to Conduct a Practice-Based Study: Problems and Methods. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons, J. 2020. “‘Placing’ the Relation of Social Media Participation to Neighborhood Community Connection.’ Journal of Urban Affairs 42 (8): 1262–1277. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2020.1792311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson-Graham, J. K. 2006. Postcapitalist Politics. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gurney, C. 2021. “Ontological Security. A Term of Contradictions.” Housing Studies Association. July 20. https://www.housing-studies-association.org/articles/318-ontological-security-a-term-of-contradictions.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvis, H. 2019. “Sharing, Togetherness and Intentional Degrowth.” Progress in Human Geography 43 (2): 256–275. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132517746519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kallis, G., V. Kostakis, S. Lange, B. Muraca, S. Paulson, and M. Schmelzer. 2018. “Research on Degrowth.” Annual Review of Environment and Resources 43 (1): 291–316. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-102017-025941.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leaney, S. 2020. “The Council Estate and ‘Being Placed’: Everyday Resistances to the Stigmatization of Community.” Housing, Theory & Society 37 (4): 383–399. https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2019.1624387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, H. 2014. The Critique of Everyday Life. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Lloveras, J., A. P. Marshall, G. Warnaby, and A. Kalandides. 2021. “Mobilising Sense of Place for Degrowth? Lessons from Lancashire’s Anti-Fracking Activism.” Ecological Economics 183:106754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106754.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloveras, J., L. Quinn, and C. Parker. 2018. “Reclaiming Sustainable Space: A Study of Degrowth Activists.” Marketing Theory 18 (2): 188–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593117732458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockyer, J. 2017. “Community, Commons, and Degrowth at Dancing Rabbit Ecovillage.” Journal of Political Ecology 24 (1): 519–542. https://doi.org/10.2458/v24i1.20890.
   Google Scholar
• Madden, D., and P. Marcuse. 2016. In Defense of Housing: The Politics of Crisis. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Martella, F., and M. Enia. 2021. “Towards an Urban Domesticity. Contemporary Architecture and the Blurring Boundaries Between the House and the City.” Housing, Theory & Society 38 (4): 402–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2020.1789211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massey, D. 2005. For Space. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• McFarlane, C. 2011. “The City as Assemblage: Dwelling and Urban Space.” Environment & Planning D 29 (4): 649–671. https://doi.org/10.1068/d4710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKee, K., J. Muir, and T. Moore. 2017. “Housing Policy in the UK: The Importance of Spatial Nuance.” Housing Studies 32 (1): 60–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2016.1181722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mol, A. 2002. The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moran, J. 2004. “Housing, Memory and Everyday Life in Contemporary Britain.” Cultural Studies 18 (4): 607–627. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950238042000232253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nancy, J.-L. 1991. The Inoperative Community. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, A., and F. Schneider, eds. 2019. Housing for Degrowth: Principles, Models, Challenges, and Opportunities. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, R., and J. Flint. 2009. “(In) Formalization and the Civilizing Process: Applying the Work of Norbert Elias to Housing-Based Anti-Social Behaviour Interventions in the UK.” Housing, Theory & Society 26 (3): 159–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/14036090802057422.
   Google Scholar
• Rapoport, A. 2000. “Theory, Culture and Housing.” Housing, Theory & Society 17 (4): 145–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/140360900300108573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rees, A. 2015. “Avoiding Collapse: An Agenda for de-Growth and Re-Localisation.” In Reconsidering Localism, edited by S. Davoudi and A. Madanipour, 193–215. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315818863-10.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, G. 2016. Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to Researching with Visual Materials. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, P. 1986. Social Theory and the Urban Question. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schmid, B. 2020. Making Transformative Geographies: Lessons from Stuttgart’s Community Economy. Bielefeld, DE: transcript Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, F., G. Kallis, and J. Martinez-Alier. 2010. “Crisis or opportunity? Economic degrowth for social equity and ecological sustainability. Introduction to this special issue.” Journal of Cleaner Production 18 (6): 511–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.01.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silver, J. 2018. “From Homes to Assets: Housing Financialisation in Greater Manchester.” Working Paper. Sheffield: Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, T. S., and L. Reid. 2018. “Which ‘Being’ in Wellbeing? Ontology, Wellness and the Geographies of Happiness.” Progress in Human Geography 42 (6): 807–829. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132517717100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soaita, A. M. 2022. “Everyday Activism: Private Tenants Demand Right to Home.” Housing Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2022.2036329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørvoll, J., and B. Bengtsson. 2020. “Autonomy, Democracy and Solidarity. The Defining Principles of Collaborative Civil Society Housing and Some Mechanisms That May Challenge Them.” Urban Research & Practice 13 (4): 390–410. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2019.1573267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steele, W., and C. Keys. 2015. “Interstitial Space and Everyday Housing Practices.” Housing, Theory & Society 32 (1): 112–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2014.938866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandeventer, J. S., C. Cattaneo, and C. Zografos. 2019. “A Degrowth Transition: Pathways for the Degrowth Niche to Replace the Capitalist-Growth Regime.” Ecological Economics 156:272–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.10.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandeventer, J. S., and J. Lloveras. 2021. “Organizing Degrowth: The Ontological Politics of Enacting Degrowth in OMS.” Organization 28 (3): 358–379. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508420975662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, H. F. 2017. “On Geography and Encounter: Bodies, Borders, and Difference.” Progress in Human Geography 41 (4): 451–471. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132516645958.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar