“It Feels Like Temporary accommodation”: The Impact of Antisocial Behaviour Interventions on Alleged Perpetrators” Feelings of Ontological Security in Social Housing

References

• Atkinson, P., and D. Silverman. 1997. “Kundera’s Immortality: The Interview Society and the Invention of the Self.” Qualitative Inquiry 3 (3): 304–325. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780049700300304.
   Google Scholar
• Bollo, C. 2022. “Designed for Home: Opportunities for Enhanced Ontological Security in Permanent Supportive Housing Apartments.” Journal of Interior Design 47 (4): 49–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/joid.12235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond-Taylor, S. 2016. “Domestic Surveillance and the Troubled Families Programme: Understanding Relationally and Constraint in the Homes of Multiple Disadvantaged Families.” People, Place and Society 10 (3): 207–224. https://doi.org/10.3351/ppp.0010.0003.0003.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2013. “Ten Fundamentals of Qualitative Research.” In Successful qualitative research: a practical guide for beginners. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, K. 2014. “Beyond Protection: ‘The vulnerable’ in the Age of Austerity.” In Social Policies and Social Control: New Perspectives on the ‘Not-So-Big Society’, edited by M. Harrison and T. Sanders, 39–52. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, K. 2015. Vulnerability & Young People: Care and Social Control in Policy and Practice. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, K. 2019. “Vulnerability and Child Sexual Exploitation: Towards an Approach Grounded in Life Experiences.” Critical Social Policy 39 (4): 622–642. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018318824480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, K. J. 2013. “The Developing Habitus of the Anti-Social Behaviour Practitioner: From Expansion in Years of Plenty to Surviving the Age of Austerity.” Journal of Law and Society 40 (3): 375–402. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6478.2013.00631.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burney, E. 2005. Making people behave: anti-social behaviour politics and policy. Devon: Willan Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. 2016. “Rethinking Vulnerability and Resistance.” In Vulnerability in Resistance, edited by J. Butler, Z. Gambetti, and L. Sabsay, 13–27. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, K. 2024. “‘I Feel so trapped’: Women’s Experiences of Antisocial Behaviour Intervention in Social Housing.” Journal of Gender Studies [Online]. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2024.2315047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, J., A. Golten, R. Jackson, and R. Evans. 2016. Accessing and Sustaining Social Tenancies: Exploring Barriers to Homelessness Prevention. Wales: Shelter Cymru.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, H. 2010. “Looking Again at Discipline and Gender: Theoretical Concerns and Possibilities in the Study of Anti-Social Behaviour Initiatives.” Social Policy & Society 9 (1): 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746409990212.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, H. 2013. “Housing the Vulnerable Subject: The English Context.” In Vulnerability: Reflections on a New Ethical Foundation for Law and Politics, edited by M. A. Fineman and A. Grear, 107–123. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, H., and D. Cowan. 2006. “Labelling: Constructing Definitions of Antisocial Behaviour?” In Housing, Urban Governance and Antisocial Behaviour, edited by J. Flint, 57–78. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, H., B. Edgeworth, and C. Hunter. 2018. “Introducing Precarisation: Contemporary Understandings of Law and the Insecure Home.” In Law and the Precarious Home: Social Legal Perspective Son the Home in Insecure Times, edited by H. Carr, B. Edgeworth, and C. Hunter, 1–20. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Cheshire, L., and S. Buglar. 2015. “Anti-Social or Intensively Social?: The Local Context of Neighbour Disputes and Complaints Amongst Social Housing Tenants.” Housing Studies 31 (6): 729–748. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2015.1122743.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K. 1991. “Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics and Violence Against Women of Colour.” Stanford Law Review 43 (6): 1241–1299. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039.
   Google Scholar
• Crossley, S. 2018. “The UK’s Troubled Families Programme: Delivering Social Justice?” Social Inclusion 6 (3): 301–309. https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v6i3.1514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwyer, P. 2004. “Creeping Conditionality in the UK: From Welfare Rights to Conditional Entitlements.” The Canadian Journal of Sociology 29 (2): 265–287. https://doi.org/10.1353/cjs.2004.0022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwyer, P. 2016. “Citizenship, Conduct and Conditionality: Sanction and Support in the 21st-century UK Welfare State.” In Social Policy Review 28: Analysis and Debate in Social Policy, 2016, edited by M. Fenger, J. Hudson, and C. Needham. Bristol: Bristol University Press 41–62 , chapter 003.
   Google Scholar
• Emmel, N., and K. Hughes. 2010. “‘Recession, it’s All the Same to Us son’: The Longitudinal Experience (1999 – 2010) of Deprivation.” Twenty-First Century Society 5 (2): 171–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450141003783413.
   Google Scholar
• Fineman, M. A. 2013. “Equality, Autonomy, and the Vulnerable Subject in Law and Politics.” In Vulnerability: Reflections on a New Ethical Foundation for Law and Politics, edited by M. A. Fineman and A. Grear, 13–29. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick, S., and H. Pawson. 2014. “Ending Security of Tenure for Social Renters: Transitioning to ‘Ambulance service’ Social Housing?” Housing Studies 29 (5): 597–615. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2013.803043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick, S., and B. Watts. 2017. “Competing Visions: Security of Tenure and the Welfarisation of English Social Housing.” Housing Studies 38 (8): 1021–1038. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2017.1291916.
   Google Scholar
• Flint, J. 2018. “Encounters with the Centaur State: Advanced Urban Marginality and the Practices and Ethics of Welfare Sanctions Regimes.” Urban Studies 56 (1). 249–265. [Online]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098017750070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox O’Mahoney, L. 2007. Conceptualising Home: Theories, Laws and Policies. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. 1991. Modernist and Self Identity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilson, E. 2016. “Vulnerability and Victimization: Rethinking Key Concepts in Feminist Discourses on Sexual Violence.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 42 (1): 71–98. https://doi.org/10.1086/686753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill Collins, P., and S. Bilge. 2016. Intersectionality. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hiscock, R., A. Kearns, S. MacIntyre, and A. Ellawaym. 2001. Ontological security and psycho-social benefits from the home: qualitative evidence on issues of tenure. Housing, Theory and Society 18(1–2): 50–66.
   Google Scholar
• Hoggett, J., and E. Frost. 2018. “The Troubled Families Programme and the Problems of Success.” Social Policy & Society 17 (4): 523–534. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746417000148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, C. 2006. “The Changing Legal Framework: From Landlords to Agents of Social Control.” In Housing, Urban Governance and Antisocial Behaviour, edited by J. Flint, 137–154. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, C., J. Nixon, and S. Shayer. 2000. Neighbour Nuisance, Social Landlords and the Law. Coventry: The Chartered Institute of Housing.
   Google Scholar
• Johnstone, C. 2016. “After the ASBO: Extending Control Over Young people’s Use of Public Space in England and Wales.” Critical Social Policy 36 (4): 716–726. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018316651943.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, A., N. Pleace, D. Quilgards, and D. Sanderson. 2006. Addressing Antisocial Behaviour: An Independent Review of Shelter Inclusion Project. London: Shelter Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kreiczer-Levy, S. 2014. “Intergenerational Relations and the Family Home.” Law and Ethics of Human Rights 8 (1): 131–160. https://doi.org/10.1515/lehr-2014-0004.
   Google Scholar
• Kuran, C. H. A., C. Morsut, B. I. Kruke, M. Krüger, L. Segnestam, K. Orru, T. O. Nævestad, et al. 2020. “Vulnerability and Vulnerable Groups from an Intersectionality Perspective.” International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 50 (1): 101826–101828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101826.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, J. 2007. “Analysing Qualitative Longitudinal Research in Evaluations.” Social Policy & Society 6 (4): 545–556. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746407003880.
   Google Scholar
• Mackenzie, C. 2013. “The Importance of Relational Autonomy and Capabilities for an Ethics of Vulnerability.” In Vulnerability: New Essays in Ethics and Feminist Philosophy, edited by C. Mackenzie, W. Rodgers, and S. Dodds, 34–60. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mackenzie, S., J. Bannister, J. Flint, S. Parr, A. Millie, and J.Fleetwood. 2010. The drivers of perceptions of antisocial behaviour. London: The Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Madden, D., and P. Marcuse. 2016. In Defense of Housing. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, C., D. Habibis, L. Burns, and H. Pawson. 2019. Social Housing Legal Responses to Crime and Anti-Social Behaviour. Melbourne: Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, J. 2002. Qualitative Researching. 2nd ed. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• McNeill, J. 2014. “Regulating Social Housing: Expectations for Behaviour of Tenants.” In Social Policies and Social Control: New Perspectives on the ‘Not-So-Big Society’, edited by M. Harrison and T. Sanders, 181–195. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meers, J. 2021. “Home As an Essentially Contested Concept and Why This Matters.” Housing Studies: 1–18. [Online]. Accessed February 15, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2021.1893281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, A., K. Hulse, and H. Pawson. 2017. “Long-Term Private Renters: Perceptions of Security and Insecurity.” Journal of Sociology 53 (3): 653–669. https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783317707833.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neale, B. 2019. What Is Qualitative Longitudinal Research?. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Nixon, J., and S. Parr. 2006. “Anti-Social Behaviour: Voices from the Front Line.” In Housing, Urban Governance and Antisocial Behaviour, edited by J. Flint, 79–98. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oakley, A. 1981. “Interviewing Women: A Contradiction in Terms.” In Doing Feminist Research, edited by H. Roberts, 30–61. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ormston, R., L. Spencer, M. Barnard, and D. Snape. 2014. “The Foundations of Qualitative Research.” In Qualitative Research Practice, edited by J. Ritchie, J. Lewis, C. M. Nicholls, and R. Ormston, 1–26. 2nd ed. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Plage, S., E. Kuskoff, P. Cameron, A. Clarke, C. Ablaza, and F. Perales. 2023. “Longing for a Forever Home: Ontological Insecurity Is Collectively Produced in Fixed-Term Supportive Housing for Families.” Housing Theory & Society 40 (3): 394–410. https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2023.2173287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power, E. 2023. “Insecure Housing and the Ongoing Search for Ontological Security: How Low-Income Older Women Cope.” Housing Theory & Society 40 (2): 170–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2022.2118370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power, E. R., and C. Gillon. 2020. “Performing the ‘Good tenant’.” Housing Studies 37 (3): 459–482. [Online]. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2020.1813260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resolve. 2023. About Us. [Online]. Resolve. Accessed January 23, 2024. https://www.resolveuk.org.uk/about-us/the-resolve-team.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, D., and L. Walshaw. 2014. “Security of Tenure in Social Housing in England.” Social Policy & Society 13 (1): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746413000183.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, A., D. E. Keene, P. Schlesinger, A. K. Groves, and K. M. Blankenship. 2021. ““I Don’t Know What Home Feels Like anymore”: Residential Spaces and the Absence of Ontological Security for People Returning from Incarceration.” Social Science and Medicine 272:113734. [Online]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113734.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. 2003. Longitudinal Qualitative Research: Analysing Change Through Time. Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, P. 1990. A Nation of Homeowners. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shelter. 2019. Tenancy Exchanges, [Online]. Shelter England. Accessed October 27, 2020. https://england.shelter.org.uk/housing_advice/council_housing_association/tenancy_exchanges.
   Google Scholar
• Stonehouse, D., G. Threlkeld, and J. Theobald. 2021. “Homelessness Pathways and the Struggle for Ontological Security.” Housing Studies 36 (7): 1047–1066. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2020.1739234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts, M. J., and H. G. Bohle. 1993. “The Space of Vulnerability: The Causal Structure of Hunger and Famine.” Progress in Human Geography 17 (1): 43–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/030913259301700103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts, B., and S. Fitzpatrick. 2018. Welfare Conditionality. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Woodhall-Melnik, J., S. Hamilton-Wright, N. Daoud, F. I. Matheson, J. R. Dunn, and P. O’Campo. 2016. “Establishing Stability: Exploring the Meaning of ‘Home’ for Women Who Have Experienced Intimidate Partner Violence.” Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 32 (2): 253–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-016-9511-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar