Punishment justifications in rape cases: a community study

References

• Ajzen, I. (2001). Nature and operation of attitudes. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 27–58.10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (2005). The influence of attitudes on behavior. In D. Albarracin, B. T. Johnson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes (pp. 173–221). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Andenæs, J. (1997). Alminnelig strafferett [Common criminal law] (4th ed.). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Applegate, B. K., Cullen, F. T., Turner, M. G., & Sundt, J. L. (1996). Assessing public support for three-strikes-and-you’re-out laws: Global versus specific attitudes. Criminology & Penology, 42, 517–534.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, T., Metcalfe, C. F., Berenblum, T., Aviv, G., & Gertz, M. (2015). Examining public preferences for the allocation of resources to rehabilitative versus punitive crime policies. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 26, 448–462.10.1177/0887403414521462
   Google Scholar
• Balvig, F. (2006). Danskernes syn på straf (The Danish view on punishment]. Advokatsamfundet. Retrieved from http://www.nsfk.org/Portals/0/Archive/Hovedrapport_final_fra_advokatsamfundet.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bechhofer, L., & Parrot, A. (1991). What is acquaintance rape? In L. Bechhofer & A. Parrot (Eds.), Acquaintance rape: The hidden crime (pp. 9–25). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Bennice, J. A., & Resick, P. A. (2003). Marital rape: History, research, and practice. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 4, 228–246.10.1177/1524838003004003003
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blumstein, A., & Cohen, J. (1987). Characterizing criminal careers. Science, 237, 985–991.10.1126/science.237.4818.985
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bondeson, U. V. (2005). Perceptions of criminal justice policy in Scandinavia. In U. V. Bondeson (Ed.), Crime and Justice in Scandinavia (pp. 427–444). København: Forlaget Thomson.
   Google Scholar
• Borgating Lagmanssrett. (2016). LB-2015-85818. Retrieved from https://lovdata.no/dokument/LBSTR/avgjorelse/lb-2015-85818?q=mdma
   Google Scholar
• Brillon, Y. (1988). Punitiveness, status and ideology in three Canadian provinces. In N. Walker & M. Hough (Eds.), Public attitudes to sentencing. Surveys from five countries (pp. 84–110). Aldershot: Gower Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Carlsmith, K. M. (2006). The roles of retribution and utility in determining punishment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 437–451.10.1016/j.jesp.2005.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsmith, K. M. (2008). On justifying punishment: The discrepancy between words and actions. Social Justice Research, 21, 119–137.10.1007/s11211-008-0068-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsmith, K. M., Darley, J. M., & Robinson, P. H. (2002). Why do we punish?: Deterrence and just deserts as motives for punishment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 284–299.10.1037/0022-3514.83.2.284
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsmith, K. M., Wilson, T. D., & Gilbert, D. T. (2008). The paradoxical consequences of revenge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1316–1324.10.1037/a0012165
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, G., & Einat, T. (2015). The relationship between criminology studies and punitive attitudes. European Journal of Criminology, 12, 169–187.10.1177/1477370814551211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christie, N. (1982). Pinens begrensning [Limits to Pain]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Cullen, F. T., Clark, G. A., Cullen, J. B., & Mathers, R. A. (1985). Attribution, salience, and attitudes toward criminal sanctioning. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 12, 305–331.10.1177/0093854885012003003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, T. S. (1994). Voldtekt – En sammensatt forbrytelse. I T. S. Dahl (Ed.), Pene Piker Haiker Ikke: Artikler om Kvinnerette, Strafferett og Velferdsstat (pp. 199–225). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Darley, J. M., Carlsmith, K. M., & Robinson, P. H. (2000). Incapacitation and just deserts as motives for punishment. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 659–683.10.1023/A:1005552203727
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dullum, J., & Ugelvik, T. (2011). Introduction. Exceptional prisons, exceptional societies? In J. Dullum & T. Ugelvik (Eds.), Penal exceptionalism?: Nordic prison policy and practice (pp. 1–9). Oxon: Routledge
   Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1995/2014). Attitude strength, attitude structure, and resistance to change. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 413–432). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elklit, A. (2002). Attitudes toward rape victims – An empirical study of the attitudes of Danish website visitors. Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention, 3, 73–83.10.1080/140438502762467218
   Google Scholar
• Enns, P. K. (2014). The public's increasing punitiveness and its influence on mass incarceration in the United States. American Journal of Political Science, 58, 857–872.10.1111/ajps.2014.58.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evjetun, P. (2007). Forbrytelse & Straff. – Betydningen av Moralsk Forargelse for Straffeutmåling [Crime & punishment – The role of moral outrage for delivery of punishment] ( Unpublished master’s thesis in psychology). Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim.
   Google Scholar
• Finkel, N. J., Maloney, S. T., Valbuena, M. Z., & Groscup, J. (1996). Recidivism, proportionalism, and individualized punishment. American Behavioral Scientist, 39, 474–487.10.1177/0002764296039004010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, K. A., Nobles, M. R., & Piquero, A. R. (2009). Gender, crime victimization and fear of crime. Security Journal, 22, 24–39.10.1057/sj.2008.13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartnagel, T. F., & Templeton, L. J. (2012). Emotions about crime and attitudes to punishment. Punishment & Society, 14, 452–474.10.1177/1462474512452519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauge, R. (1996). Straffens Begrunnelser. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Hogue, T. E., & Peebles, J. (1997). The influence of remorse, intent and attitudes toward sex offenders on judgements of a rapist. Psychology, Crime & Law, 3, 249–259.10.1080/10683169708410821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holbrook, A. L., Krosnick, J. A., & Pfent, A. (2008). The causes and consequences of response rates in surveys by the news media and government contractor survey research firms. In J. M. Lepkowski, C. Tucker, J. M. Brick, E. de Leeuw, L. Japec, P. J. Lavrakas, … R. L. Sangster (Eds.), Advances in telephone survey methodology (pp. 499–678). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hough, M., & Roberts, J. (1998). Attitudes to punishment: Findings from the British Crime Survey. London: Home Office, Research and Statistics Directorate.
   Google Scholar
• Indermaur, D., Roberts, L., Spiranovic, C., Mackenzie, G., & Gelb, K. (2012). A matter of judgement: The effect of information and deliberation on public attitudes to punishment. Punishment & Society, 14, 147–165.10.1177/1462474511434430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, H., Hughes, J. G., & Ireland, J. L. (2007). Attitudes towards sex offenders and the role of empathy, locus of control and training: A comparison between a probationer police and general public sample. The Police Journal, 80, 28–54.10.1350/pojo.2007.80.1.28
   Google Scholar
• de Keijser, J. W., & Elffers, H. (2009). Cross-jurisdictional differences in punitive public attitudes. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 15, 47–62.10.1007/s10610-008-9089-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Keijser, J. W., van der Leeden, R., & Jackson, J. L. (2002). From moral theory to penal attitudes and back: A theoretically integrated modeling approach. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 20, 317–335.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0798
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, L. B., Oswald, M. E., Stucki, I., & Gollwitzer, M. (2010). A closer look at eye for an eye: Laypersons’ punishment decisions are primarily driven by retributive motives. Social Justice Research, 23, 99–116.10.1007/s11211-010-0113-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleck, G., & Jackson, D. B. (2016, March). Does crime cause punitiveness? Crime & Delinquency, online before print.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, A. C., & Sherman, S. J. (2010). Perceived entitativity and the black-sheep effect: When will we denigrate negative ingroup members? The Journal of Social Psychology, 150, 211–225.10.1080/00224540903366388
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandracchia, J. T., Shaw, L. B., & Morgan, R. D. (2013). What’s with the attitude? Changing attitudes about criminal justice issues. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 40, 95–113.10.1177/0093854812459474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marques, J. M., Yzerbyt, V. Y., & Leyens, J.-P. (1988). The “black sheep effect”: Extremity of judgements towards ingroup members as a function of group identification. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 1–16.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, E. K., Taft, C. T., & Resick, P. A. (2007). A review of marital rape. Aggression & Violent Behavior, 12, 329–347.10.1016/j.avb.2006.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Justice and Police. (1997–1998). Om Kriminalomsorgen. Stortingsmelding Number 27.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Justice and Police. (2007–2008). Punishment that works (straff som virker). Stortingsmelding Number 37.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Justice and Police. (2008). Fra ord til handling. Bekjempelse av voldtekt krever handling. Norges Offentlige Utredninger, 4.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Justice and Public Security. (2012–2014). Handlingsplan mot voldtekt. Handlingsplan.
   Google Scholar
• Norwegian Government. (2005–2009). Plattform for regjeringssamarbeidet mellom Arbeiderpartiet, Sosialistisk Venstreparti og Senterpartiet 2005–2009. Retrieved from http://www.regjeringen.no/upload/kilde/smk/rap/2005/0001/ddd/pdfv/260512-regjeringsplatform.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., Wegener, D. T., & Fabrigar, L. R. (1997). Attitudes and attitude change. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 609–647.10.1146/annurev.psych.48.1.609
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piquero, A. R., Paternoster, R., Pogarsky, G., & Loughran, T. (2011). Elaborating the individual deterrence component in deterrence theory. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 7, 335–360.10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-102510-105404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prislin, R., Wood, W., & Pool, G. J. (1998). Structural consistency and the deduction of novel from existing attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 66–89.10.1006/jesp.1997.1343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rambøl, A. H., & Sørenes, K. M. (2016, August 5). Vil ha mildere straffer [Wants more lenient punishment]. Klassekampen. Retrieved from http://www.klassekampen.no/article/20160805/ARTICLE/160809965
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, J. V. (2003). Public opinion and mandatory sentencing. A review of international findings. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 30, 483–508.10.1177/0093854803253133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, J. V. (2007). Public confidence in criminal justice in Canada: A comparative and contextual analysis. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 49, 153–184.10.3138/RN84-2371-2482-MR06
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, J. V., Stalans, L. J., Indermaur, D., & Hough, M. (2003). Penal populism and public opinion. Lessons from five countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Røed, R. (2016, August 3). Tre menn frikjent for gruppevoldtekt i Hallingdal – Men må betale erstatning [Three men found not guilty in gang rape case in Hallingdal – but they have to pay restitution]. VG. Retrieved from http://www.vg.no/nyheter/innenriks/voldtekt/tre-menn-frikjent-for-gruppevoldtekt-i-hallingdal-men-maa-betale-erstatning/a/23755803/
   Google Scholar
• Røed, R., Sandvær, H., & Huuse, C. (2016, August 3). Gjengvoldtekt-frifinnelse skaper sterke reaksjoner: «Noe er riv ruskende galt i det norske rettsystemet» [Not guilty verdict in gang-rape case creates strong reactions: «Something is very wrong in the Norwegian Criminal Justice System»). VG. Retrieved from http://www.vg.no/nyheter/innenriks/voldtekt/noe-er-riv-ruskende-galt-med-det-norske-rettssystemet/a/23756052/
   Google Scholar
• Rohde, H. K. (2016, August 8). Hvem har ansvaret for at situasjonen er farlig? [Who’s responsible for making the situation dangerous?]. Dagbladet. Retrieved from https://www.dagbladet.no/kultur/hvem-har-ansvaret-for-at-situasjonen-er-farlig/60364253
   Google Scholar
• Ryberg, J., & Roberts, J. V. (2014). Introduction: Exploring the normative significance of public opinion for state punishment. In J. Ryberg & J. V. Roberts (Eds.), Popular punishment: On the normative significance of public opinion (pp. 1–13). Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199941377.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Sexual Offences Act (2003). Retrieved from http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/42
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Norway. (2006). Løslatelser, etter anstalttid og type lovbrudd. 2006 [Releases, after type of prison and offences. 2006]. Retrieved from http://www.ssb.no/a_krim_tab/tab/tab-2008-03-14-60.html
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Norway. (2008). Anmeldte Lovbrudd, 2007 (Rettet 16.5.2008). Nedgang i Vinningskriminalitet [Reported offences 2007. Decrease in proceeds of crime]. Retrieved from http://www.ssb.no/lovbrudda/
   Google Scholar
• Stene, R. J. (2001). Seksualforbrytelser – Skjebner i rettsystemet [Sexual offences – Destinies in the criminal justice system]. Samfunnsspeilet, 3. Retrieved from https://www.ssb.no/sosiale-forhold-og-kriminalitet/artikler-ogpublikasjoner/seksualforbrytelser-skjebner-i-rettsystemet
   Google Scholar
• Storberget, K. (2007). Voldtekt skal oppklares. Retrieved from http://www.regjeringen.no/nb/dep/jd/dep/Justisminister_Knut_Storberget/taler_artikler/2007/Voldtekt-skal-oppklares.html?id=476258
   Google Scholar
• Straffeloven (2005). Almindelig Borgerlig Straffelov.
   Google Scholar
• Strelan, P., & van Prooijen, J.-W. (2013). Retribution and forgiveness: The healing effects of punishing for just deserts. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 544–553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2014). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Essex: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Thoresen, S., & Hjemdal, O. K. (Red.) (2014). Vold og voldtekt i Norge. En nasjonal forekomststudie av vold i et livsløpsperspektiv [Violence and rape in Norway. A national prevalence study of violence across the life course]. Oslo: Nasjonalt kunnskapssenter om vold og traumatisk stress.
   Google Scholar
• Tieger, T. (1981). Self-rated likelihood of raping and the social perception of rape. Journal of Research in Personality, 15, 147–158.10.1016/0092-6566(81)90014-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, N., & Hough, M. (1988). Introduction: Developments in methods and perspectives. In N. Walker & M. Hough (Eds.), Public attitudes to sentencing. Surveys from five countries (pp. 1–15). Aldershot: Gower Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Whatley, M. A. (2005). The effect of participant sex, victim dress, and traditional attitudes on causal judgements for marital rape victims. Journal of Family Violence, 20, 191–200.10.1007/s10896-005-3655-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zamble, E., & Kalm, K. L. (1990). General and specific measures of public attitudes toward sentencing. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 22, 327–337.10.1037/h0078918
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimring, F. E., & Hawkins, G. (1995). Incapacitation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar