Territorial revisions to increase cohesion policy funding from the EU: the case of the new member states

References

• Alesina, A., Easterly, W., & Matuszeski, J. (2011). Artificial states. Journal of the European Economic Association, 9(2), 246–277. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1542-4774.2010.01009.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashmarina, S. I., & Murzagalina, G. M. (2021). Entrepreneurila potential of Russian regions: Comparative assessment and development prospects. Proceedings of the Economic systems in the New Era: Stable Systems in an Unstable World, 160, 33–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60929-0_5
   Google Scholar
• Bachtler, J., Begg, I., Charles, D., & Polverari, L. (2017). The long-term effectiveness of EU Cohesion Policy. In J. Bachtler, J. P. Berkowitz, S. Hardy, & T. Muravska (Eds.), EU Cohesion Policy: Reassessing performance and direction (pp. 11–20). Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Bachtler, J., & Gorzelak, G. (2007). Reforming EU Cohesion Policy: A reappraisal of the performance of the structural funds. Policy Studies, 28(4), 309–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442870701640682
   Google Scholar
• Barca, F. (2009). Agenda for a reformed Cohesion Policy: A place-based approach to meeting European Union challenges and expectations. European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, P. (2019). The reform of European Cohesion Policy or how to couple the streams successfully. Journal of European Integration, 41(2), 147–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2018.1553964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, S. O., Egger, P. H., & von Ehrlich, M. (2010). Going NUTS: The effect of EU structural funds on regional performance. Journal of Public Economics, 94(9-10), 578–590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charron, N. (2016). Explaining the allocation of regional structural funds: The conditional effect of governance and self-rule. European Union Politics, 17(4), 638–659. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116516658135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coppola, G., Destefanis, S., Marinuzzi, G., & Tortorella, W. (2020). European Union and nationally based cohesion policies in the Italian regions. Regional Studies, 54(1), 83–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2018.1447099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dall'Erba, S., & Fang, F. (2017). Meta-analysis of the impact of European Union structural funds on regional growth. Regional Studies, 51(6), 822–832. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2015.1100285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Rynck, S., & McAleavey, P. (2001). The cohesion deficit in structural fund policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 8(4), 541–557. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760110064384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doran, J., & Jordan, D. (2013). Decomposing European NUTS2 regional inequality from 1980 to 2009: National and European policy implications. Journal of Economic Studies, 40(1), 22–38. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443581311283484
   Google Scholar
• Easterly, W., & Levine, R. (1997). Africa’s growth tragedy: Policies and ethnic divisions. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(4), 1203–1250. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355300555466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Englebert, P., Tarango, S., & Carter, M. (2002). Dismemberment and suffocation: A contribution to the debate on African boundaries. Comparative Political Studies, 35(10), 1093–1118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414022379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commision. (2009). EU budget 2008. Financial report. 1 October. Brussels: Publications Office. https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/about_the_european_commission/eu_budget/fin_report_08_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2021). Cohesion in Europe towards 2050: Eighth report on economic, social and territorial cohesion. Directorate-general for regional and urban policy. Inforegio – Eighth report on economic, social and territorial cohesion (europa.eu)
   Google Scholar
• European Council. (1999). Presidence conclusions – Berlin, 24 and 25 March 1999. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/21081/berlin-european-council-presidency-conclusions.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Court of Auditors. (2019). Rapid case review allocation of Cohesion Policy funding to member states for 2021-2027. https://www.eca.europa.eu/lists/ecadocuments/rcr_cohesion/rcr_cohesion_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Union. (2003). Regulation (EC) No. 1059 of the European Parliament and of the Council. EUR-Lex. http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2003/1059/oj
   Google Scholar
• European Union. (2008). Consolidated version of the treaty on the functioning of the European Union – Part three: Union policies and internal actions – Title XVIII: Economic, social and territorial cohesion – Article 174 (ex Article 158 TEC). EUR-Lex. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A12008E174
   Google Scholar
• European Union. (2016). Commission regulation (EU), 2066. EUR-Lex. http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/2066/oj
   Google Scholar
• European Union. (2020). Council regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2093 of 17 December 2020 laying down the multiannual financial framework for the years 2021 to 2027. EUR-Lex. http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2020/2093/oj
   Google Scholar
• European Union. (2021a). The EU’s 2021-2027 long-term Budget and NextGenerationEU. Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• European Union. (2021b). Regulation (EU) 1060 of the European Parliament and of the council. EUR-Lex. http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2021/1060/oj
   Google Scholar
• European Union. (2021c). Commission implementing decision (EU), 1130. EUR-Lex. http://data.europa.eu/eli/dec_impl/2021/1130/oj
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. (2022). History of NUTS. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/nuts/history
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. (2023). Database. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database
   Google Scholar
• Fratesi, U., & Wishlade, F. G. (2017). The impact of European Cohesion Policy in different contexts. Regional Studies, 51(6), 817–821. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2017.1326673
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagliardi, L., & Percoco, M. (2017). The impact of European Cohesion Policy in urban and rural regions. Regional Studies, 51(6), 857–868. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1179384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giordano, B. (2017). Exploring the role of the ERDF in regions with specific geographical features: Islands, mountainous and sparsely populated areas. Regional Studies, 51(6), 869–879. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1197387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giordano, B. (2021). Post-Brexit regional economic development policy in the UK? Some enduring lessons from European Union Cohesion Policy. European Urban and Regional Studies, 28(1), 26–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776420970624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Government of the Republic of Croatia. (2019). Gov't launches changes to country's statistical subdivision. https://vlada.gov.hr/news/gov-t-launches-changes-to-country-s-statistical-subdivision/25178
   Google Scholar
• Hedley, T. P. (1998). Measuring public sector effectiveness using private sector methods. Public Productivity & Management Review, 21(3), 251–258. https://doi.org/10.2307/3380857
   Google Scholar
• International Labour Office. (2018). Rural-urban labour statistics. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/—dgreports/—stat/documents/meetingdocument/wcms_636038.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ivanov, L. (2017). NUTS II regions of Bulgaria. (Technical report.) Inter-ministerial working group on the development of options for the redrawing of Bulgarian NUTS level 2 boundaries. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321162634_NUTS_II_Regions_of_Bulgaria
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, P. M., & Brown, C.V. (2003). Ekonomie veřejného sektoru [Economics of Public Sector]. Eurolex Bohemia.
   Google Scholar
• Jestl, S., & Römisch, R. (2020). On the economic effects of a reallocation of EU cohesion policy expenditures. (wiiw Working Paper, No. 183). The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies (wiiw). http://hdl.handle.net/10419/240626
   Google Scholar
• Komorowski, Ł., Mróz, A., & Stanny, M. (2021). The spatial pattern of the absorption of Cohesion Policy funds in Polish rural areas. Land, 10(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10010026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leibenstein, H. (1966). Allocative efficiency vs. “X-Efficiency”. The American Economic Review, 36(3), 392–415.
   Google Scholar
• MacMillan, M. (2003). Paris 1919: Six months that changed the world. Random House Trade Paperbacks.
   Google Scholar
• Maza, A., & Villaverde, J. (2011). EU regional convergence and policy: Does the concept of region matter? Journal of Policy Modeling, 33(6), 889–900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2011.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, P., & Ortega-Argilés, R. (2021). EU Cohesion Policy: The past, the present and the future. In D. Rauhut, F. Sielker, & A. Humer (Eds.), EU Cohesion Policy and spatial governance: Territorial, economic and social challenges (pp. 17–26). Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Mendez, C., & Bachtler, J. (2011). Administrative reform and unintended consequences: An assessment of the EU Cohesion Policy ‘audit explosion’. Journal of European Public Policy, 18(5), 746–765. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2011.586802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mrak, M., Richter, S., & Szemlér, T. (2015). Cohesion policy as a function of the EU Budget: A perspective from the CEE member states. (wiiw Research Report, No. 400). The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies (wiiw). http://hdl.handle.net/10419/204172
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2009). Regions matter: Economic recovery, innovation and sustainable growth. OECD.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2021). Decentralisation and regionalisation in Bulgaria: Towards balanced regional development. (Multi-level Governance Studies). OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/b5ab8109-en
   Google Scholar
• Okov, S. (2018). Bulgaria may redraw regional borders to maintain flow of EU Cash. (Politics). Bloomberg. https://web.archive.org/web/20180228190530/https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-02-26/bulgaria-may-redraw-regional-borders-to-maintain-flow-of-eu-cash
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Pose, A., & Courty, J. (2018). Regional lobbying and structural funds: Do regional representation offices in Brussels deliver? Regional & Federal Studies, 28(2), 199–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2018.1441828
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Pose, A., & Novak, K. (2013). Learning processes and economic returns in European Cohesion policy. Investigaciones Regionales, 25, 7–26.
   Google Scholar
• Royuela, V., & López-Bazo, E. (2020). Understanding the process of creation of European identity – The role of Cohesion Policy. Investigaciones Regionales – Journal of Regional Research, 46(1), 51–70. https://doi.org/10.38191/iirr-jorr.20.003
   Google Scholar
• Scotti, F., Flori, A., & Pammolli, F. (2022). The economic impact of structural and Cohesion Funds across sectors: Immediate, medium-to-long term effects and spillovers. Economic Modelling, 111, 105833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2022.105833
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sielker, F., Rauhut, D., & Humer, A. (2021). EU Cohesion Policy and European spatial governance: An introduction to territorial, economic and social challenges. In D. Rauhut, F. Sielker, & A. Humer (Eds.), EU Cohesion Policy and spatial governance: Territorial, economic and social challenges (pp. 1–16). Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Solís-Baltodano, M. J., Giménez-Gómez, J. M., & Peris, J. E. (2022). Distributing the European structural and investment funds from a conflicting claims approach. Review of Regional Research, 42(1), 23–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10037-021-00164-9
   Google Scholar
• Surubaru, N. C. (2017). Administrative capacity or quality of political governance? EU Cohesion Policy in the new Europe, 2007–13. Regional Studies, 51(6), 844–856. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1246798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vukovic, D., Jovanovic, A., Zakic, N., & Vukotic, S. (2011). Nomenclature of statistical territorial units: Possibilities of application in Serbia. Journal of the Geographical Institute Jovan Cviji?, SASA, 61(2), 11–24. https://doi.org/10.2298/IJGI1102011V
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2009). World development report 2009: Reshaping economic geography. World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Zimakov, A. V., & Popov, E. V. (2021). EU Cohesion Policy 2021–2027: New tools to foster European integration? In S. I. Ashmarina, J. Horák, J. Vrbka, & P. Šuleř (Eds.), Economic systems in the new era: Stable systems in an unstable world (pp. 148–156). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar