References
- Claasen, N. C. W. (1997). Cultural differences, politics and test bias in South Africa. European Review of Applied Psychology, 47, 297–307.
- Coetzee, M. A., & Vosloo, H.N. (2000). Manual for the Differential Aptitude Tests Form K. Pretoria: HSRC Government of South Africa. Employment Equity Act (Act 55 of 1998). Author
- Fouche, F.A., & Verwey, F.A. (1978). Manual for the Senior Aptitude Tests. Pretoria: HSRC.
- Foxcroft, C., Paterson, H., le Roux, N., & Herbst, D. (2004). Psychological assessment in South Africa: A needs analysis. Pretoria: HSRC.
- Foxcroft, C., & Roodt, G. (2005). An Introduction to Psychological Assessment in the South African Context. (2nd ed.). Cape Town: Oxford University Press.
- Hattrup, K. (2003). Review of the Differential Aptitude Test. Mental Measurements Yearbook, 15, 302–304.
- Nzimande, B. (1995). To Test or not to Test? Paper Presented at the Congress of Psychometrics for Psychologist and Personnel Practitioners, Pretoria.
- Owen, K. (1991). Test Bias: The Validity of the Junior Aptitude Tests (JAT) for Various Population Groups in South Africa Regarding Constructs Measured. South African Journal of Psychology, 21, 112–118.
- Patel, A. B. (2004). The Influence of Mode Testing (Computer Based vs. Paper & pencil) on Anxiety and Test Performance. Unpublished Master's Dissertation, Wits University, Johannesburg, South Africa.
- Sehlapelo, M., & Terre Blanche, M. (1996). Psychometric Testing in South Africa: Views from above and below. Psychology in Society, 21, 49–59.
- Trochim, W. M. K. (2006). Research methods and Knowledge Base. Retrieved from http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/reliable.php 03/10/06
- Van De Vijver, A. J. R. & Rothman, S. (2004). Assessment in Multicultural Groups: The South African Case. South African Journal of Industrial Psychology, 30, 1–7.
- Wheeler, J.J. (1999). Norms for the DAT-K (Draft Report). In M.A. Coetzee & H. N. Vosloo, Manual forthe Differential Aptitude Test Form K. Pretoria: HSRC.