The Influence of Mode of Test Administration on Test Performance

References

• Bain, P. (2002). Computer anxiety and mental models of first time adult computer users (Unpublished master's thesis). University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blankstein, K. R., & Toner, B. B. (1987). Influence of social-desirability responding on the Sarason Test Anxiety Scale: Implications for selection of subjects. Psychological Reports, 61, 63–69.
   Google Scholar
• Bozionelos, N. (2004). Socio-economic background and computer use: The role of computer anxiety and computer experience in the relationship. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 61, 725–746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brosnan, M.J. (1998). The impact of computer anxiety and self-efficacy upon performance. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 14, 223–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chua, S. C., Chen, D. T., & Wong, A. F. (1999). Computer anxiety and its correlates: A meta-analysis. Computers in human behaviour, 15, 609–623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chua, S. C., Drasgow, F., & Roberts, B. W. (2006). Personality assessment: Does the medium matter? No. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 359–376.
   Google Scholar
• Coetzee, N., & Vosloo, H. N. (2000). Manual for the Differential Aptitude Tests Form K. Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• De Beer, M., & Visser, D. (1998). Comparability of the pa- per-and-pencil and computerised adaptive versions of the General Scholastic Aptitude Test (GSAT) Senior. South African Journal of Psychology, 28, 21–27.
   Google Scholar
• Durndell, A., & Haag, Z. (2002). Computer self efficacy, computer anxiety, attitudes towards the internet and reported experience with the Internet, by gender, an East European sample. Computers in Human Behaviour, 8, 521–535.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, R.S. (1996). Understanding Psychology. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, S. (1986). Stress and strategy. London, England: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, B. D. (1997). Psychological type and cognitive style as antecedents of computer attitude component (Unpublished master's thesis). University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Gaillard, A. W. K. (1993). Comparing the concepts of mental load and stress. Ergonomics, 36, 991–1005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, N. G. (2000). Introduction to the special section on the use of computers for making judgments and decisions. Psychological Assessment, 12, 3–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Loyd, B. H., & Gressard, V. (1984). The Effects of sex, age and computer experience on computer attitudes. Association for Educational Data Systems Journal, 18, 67–77.
   Google Scholar
• Mahar, D., Henderson, R., & Deane, F. (1997). The effects of computer anxiety, state anxiety and computer experience on users’ performance of computer-based tasks. Personality and Individual Differences, 22, 683–692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, R. M. (1998). Antecedents and moderator relationships of computer anxiety (Unpublished master's thesis). University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Parasuraman, S., & Igbaria, M. (1990). An examination of gender differences in the determinants of computer anxiety and attitudes toward microcomputers among managers. International Journal of Man-Machine, 32, 327–340.
   Google Scholar
• Ray, N. M., & Minch, R. P. (1990). Computer anxiety and alienation: Toward a definitive and parsimonious measure. Human Factors, 32, 477–491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozell, E. J., & Gardner, W. L. (1999). Computer-related success and failure: A longitudinal field study of the factors influencing computer-related performance. Computer in Human Behaviour, 15, 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shuttleworth-Edwards, A. B., Kemp, R., Rust, A., Muirhead, J., Hartman, N., & Radloff, S. (2004). Cross-cultural effects on IQ test performance: A review and preliminary normative indications on WAIS-III test performance. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 26, 903–920.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tapscott, D. (1998). Growing up digital: The rise of the net generation. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Tredoux, N. (in press). Computerised testing in South Africa. In S. Laher & K. Cockcroft (Eds.), Psychological assessment in South Africa: Research and applications. Johannesburg, South Africa: Wits.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, J., & Compeau, D. (1996). Computer-assisted versus paper-and-pencil administration of questionnaires. Behaviour Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 28, 567–576.
   Google Scholar
• Weil, M. M., & Rosen, L. D. (1997). Technostress: Coping with technology at work, at home, at work. New York, NY: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Whitaker, B. G. (2007). Internet-based attitude assessment: Does gender affect measurement equivalence? Computers in Human Behaviour, 23, 1183–1194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitley, B. (1996). Gender differences in computer related attitudes: it depends on what you ask. Computers in Human Behaviour, 12, 275–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeidner, M. (1991). Test anxiety and aptitude test performance in an actual college admissions testing situation: Temporal considerations. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 101–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar