420
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Regular articles

The self in prejudice

References

  • Adorno, T., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D., & Sandford, R. (Eds.). (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper.
  • Akhtar, S. (2001). A note on the ontogenetic origins of prejudice. Samiksa (Calcutta), 55, 7–13.
  • Allport, G. (1954). The nature of prejudice. New York: Doubleday.
  • Allport, G. W. (1962). Prejudice: Is it societal or personal? The Journal of Social Issues, 18(2), 120–134. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1962.tb02205.x doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1962.tb02205.x
  • Aron, L. (1996). A meeting of minds: Mutuality in psychoanalysis. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
  • Atwood, G., & Stolorow, R. (1984). Structures in subjectivity. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
  • Aviram, R. B. (2002). An object relations theory of prejudice: Defining pathological prejudice. Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society, 7, 305–312.
  • Aviram, R. B. (2005). The social object and the pathology of prejudice. In J. Scharff & D. Scharff (Eds.), The legacy of Fairbairn and Sutherland (pp. 227–236). New York: Routledge.
  • Aviram, R. B. (2007). Object relations and prejudice: From in-group favoritism to out-group hatred. International Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies, 4(1), 4–14. doi: 10.1002/aps.121
  • Bion, W. R. (1967). Second thoughts. New York: Jason Aronson.
  • Bettelheim, B., & Janowitz, M. (1963). Social change and prejudice. Glencoe: Free Press.
  • Bird, B. (1957). A consideration of the etiology of prejudice. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 5(3), 490–513. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/000306515700500308 doi: 10.1177/000306515700500308
  • Blascovich, J., Mendes, W. B., Hunter, S. B., Lickel, B., & Kowai-Bell, N. (2001). Perceiver threat in social interactions with stigmatized others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(2), 253–267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.2.253 doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.80.2.253
  • Bogardus, E. S. (1925). Measuring social distance. Journal of Applied Sociology, 9, 299–308.
  • Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and loss: Vol. II. Separation, anxiety and anger. New York: Basic Books.
  • Bowlby, J. (1980). Attachment and loss: Vol. III. Loss, sadness and depression. New York: Basic Books.
  • Bowlby, J. (1982). Attachment and loss: Vol. I. Attachment (2nd ed.). New York: Basic Books.
  • Bowlby, J. (1988). A secure base: Parent-child attachment and healthy human development. New York: Basic Books.
  • Brewer, M. B. (1999). The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love or outgroup hate? The Journal of Social Issues, 55(3), 429–444. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00126 doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00126
  • Brown, R. (1995). Prejudice: Its social psychology. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
  • Dovidio, J. F., Glick, P., & Rudman, L. A. (Eds.). (2005). On the nature of prejudice: Fifty years after Allport. Oxford: Blackwell. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470773963
  • Ekehammar, B., Akrami, N., & Araya, T. (2003). Gender differences in implicit prejudice. Personality and Individual Differences, 34(8), 1509–1523. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00132-0 doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00132-0
  • Erikson, E. H. (1959). Identity and the life cycle. New York: Norton. Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. New York: Norton.
  • Fairbairn, W. R. D. (1935). The sociological significance of communism considered in light of psychoanalysis. British Journal of Medical Psychology, XV: Part 3. Reprinted in Psychoanalytic Studies of the Personality, 1952, 233-246. New York: Routledge.
  • Fairbairn, W. R. D. (1943). The repression and the return of bad objects (with special reference to the ‘war neuroses’). In Psychoanalytic studies of the personality (pp. 59–81). New York: Routledge.
  • Fairbairn, W. R. D. (1952). The sociological significance of communism considered in light of psychoanalysis. In Psychoanalytic studies of the personality (pp. 233–246). New York: Routledge.
  • Fosshage, J. (1994). Toward reconceptualizing transference: Theoretical and clinical considerations. The International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 75(2), 265–280.
  • Fosshage, J. (2003). Contextualizing self psychology and relational psychoanalysis: Bi-directional influence and proposed syntheses. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 39(3), 411–448. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00107530.2003.10747214 doi: 10.1080/00107530.2003.10747214
  • Fosshage, J. (2009). Some key features in the evolution of Self psychology and psychoanalysis.Self and Systems. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1159(1), 1–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2008.04346.x doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2008.04346.x
  • Friedman, C. (2007). An object relations approach to studying prejudice with specific reference to anti-Semitism: The long-term use of a lethal apocalyptic projection. International Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies, 4(1), 31–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aps.120 doi: 10.1002/aps.120
  • Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., Banker, B. S., Rust, M. C., Nier, J. A., Mottola, G. R., & Ward, C. M. (1997). Does racism necessarily mean anti-Blackness? Aversive racism and pro-Whiteness. In M. Fine, L. Powell, L. Weis, & M. Wong (Eds.), Off white: Readings on race, power, and society (pp. 167–178). London: Routledge.
  • Guimond, S., Dambrun, M., Michinov, N., & Duarte, S. (2003). Does social dominance generate prejudice? Integrating individual and contextual determinants of intergroup cognitions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 697–721. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.697 doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.697
  • Heilman, M. E., & Haynes, M. C. (2008). Subjectivity in the appraisal process: A facilitator of gender bias in work settings. In E. Borgida & S. T. Fiske (Eds.), Beyond common sense: Psychological science in the courtroom (pp. 127–155). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
  • Hodson, G., Dovidio, J. F., & Gaertner, S. L. (2002). Processes in racial discrimination: Differential weighting of conflicting information. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(4), 460–471. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167202287004 doi: 10.1177/0146167202287004
  • Hogg, M. A., & Abrams, D. (1988). Social identifications: A psychology of intergroup relations and group processes London: Routledge.
  • Hollander, C. N. (2009). A psychoanalytic perspective on the paradox of prejudice: Understanding US policy toward Israel and the Palestinians. International Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies, 6(3), 167–177. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aps.205 doi: 10.1002/aps.205
  • Hollander, C. N. (2010). Anti-Muslim prejudice and the psychic use of the ethnic other. International Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies, 7(1), 73–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aps.193 doi: 10.1002/aps.193
  • Klein, M. (1935). A contribution to the psychogenesis of manic-depressive states. In P. Buckley (Ed.), Essential papers on object relations (pp. 40–70). New York: New York University Press.
  • Kohut, H. (1959). Introspection, empathy, and psychoanalysis. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 7(3), 459–483. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/000306515900700304 doi: 10.1177/000306515900700304
  • Kohut, H. (1966). Forms and transformations of narcissism. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 14(2), 243–272. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/000306516601400201 doi: 10.1177/000306516601400201
  • Kohut, H. (1971). The analysis of the self. New York: International Universities Press.
  • Kohut, H. (1977). The restoration of the self. New York: International Universities Press.
  • Kohut, H. (1984). How does analysis cure? Chicago: University of Chicago Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226006147.001.0001
  • Kohut, H., & Wolf, E. S. (1978). Disorders of the self and their treatment. The International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 59, 413–425.
  • Levenson, H. (2010). Brief dynamic therapy. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Lichtenberg, J. (1991). What is a selfobject? Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 1(4), 455–479. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10481889109538915 doi: 10.1080/10481889109538915
  • Lichtenberg, J., Lachmann, F., & Fosshage, J. (1992). Self and motivational systems: Toward a theory of technique. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
  • Mahler, M., Pine, F., & Bergman, A. (1975). The psychological birth of the human infant: Symbiosis and individuation. New York: Basic Books.
  • Mitchell, S. (1988). Relational concepts in psychoanalysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Mitchell, S. (1993). Hope and dread in psychoanalysis. New York: Basic Books.
  • Mitchell, S. (1997). Influence and autonomy in psychoanalysis. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
  • Nier, J. A., & Gaertner, S. L. (2012a). The challenge of detecting contemporary forms of discrimination. The Journal of Social Issues, 68(2), 207–220. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2012.01745.x doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2012.01745.x
  • Nier, J. A., & Gaertner, S. L. (Eds.). (2012b). The reality of contemporary discrimination in the United States: The consequences of hidden bias in real world contexts [Special issue]. The Journal of Social Issues, 68(2).
  • Parens, H. (2007a). Toward understanding prejudice - benign and malignant. In H. Parens, A. Mahfouz, S. Twemlow, & D. Scharff (Eds.), The future of prejudice: Psychoanalysis and the prevention of prejudice (pp. 21–36). New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
  • Parens, H. (2007b). Malignant prejudice - guidelines toward its prevention. In H. Parens, A. Mahfouz, S. Twemlow, & D. Scharff (Eds.), The future of prejudice: Psychoanalysis and the prevention of prejudice (pp. 269–289). New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
  • Parens, H. (2012). Attachment, aggression, and the prevention of malignant prejudice. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 32(2), 171–185. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07351690.2011.592742 doi: 10.1080/07351690.2011.592742
  • Parens, H., Mahfouz, A., Twemlow, S., & Scharff, D. (Eds.). (2007). The future of prejudice: Psychoanalysis and the prevention of prejudice. New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
  • Paolini, S., Hewstone, M., Cairns, E., & Voci, A. (2004). Effects of direct and indirect cross-group friendships on judgments of Catholics and Protestants in Northern Ireland: The mediating role of an anxiety-reduction mechanism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(6), 770–786. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167203262848 doi: 10.1177/0146167203262848
  • Pettigrew, T. F. (Ed.). (1975). Racial discrimination in the United States. New York: Harper & Row.
  • Pettigrew, T. F. (1979). Racial change and social policy. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 441, 114–131. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/000271627944100109
  • Pettigrew, T. F. (1991). Normative theory in intergroup relations: Explaining both harmony and conflict. Psychology and Developing Societies, 3(1), 3–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/097133369100300102 doi: 10.1177/097133369100300102
  • Pettigrew, T. F. (1998). Prejudice and discrimination on the college campus. In J. L. Eberhardt & S. T. Fiske (Eds.), Confronting racism: The problem and the response (pp. 263–279). Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage. (Reprinted from the Higher Education Extension Service Review, 1994, 6(1), 1–9).
  • Pettigrew, T. F. (2011). Toward sustainable psychological interventions for change. Peace and Conflict, 17(2), 179–192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10781919.2010.536758 doi: 10.1080/10781919.2010.536758
  • Pettigrew, T. F., & Meertens, R. (1995). Subtle and blatant prejudice in Western Europe. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25(1), 57–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420250106 doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2420250106
  • Pettigrew, T. F., & Taylor, M. C. (2002). Discrimination. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia for the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 3762–3766). Oxford, England: Pergamon.
  • Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751–783. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751 doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751
  • Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. (2008). How does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Meta-analytic tests of three mediators. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(6), 922–934. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.504 doi: 10.1002/ejsp.504
  • Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2011). When groups meet: The dynamicsof intergroup contact. New York: Psychology Press.
  • Reynolds, K. J., Turner, J. C., Haslam, A., & Ryan, M. K. (2001). The role of personality and group factors in explaining prejudice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37(5), 427–434. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jesp.2000.1473 doi: 10.1006/jesp.2000.1473
  • Saucier, D. A., Miller, C. T., & Doucet, N. (2005). Differences in helping Whites and Blacks: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9(1), 2–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0901_1 doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0901_1
  • Stephan, W. G., & Stephan, C. W. (1985). Intergroup anxiety. The Journal of Social Issues, 41(3), 157–175. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1985.tb01134.x doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1985.tb01134.x
  • Stephan, W. G., Stephan, C. W., & Gudykunst, W. B. (1999). Anxiety in intergroup relations: A comparison of anxiety/uncertainty management theory and integrated threat theory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 23(4), 613–628. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0147-1767(99)00012-7 doi: 10.1016/S0147-1767(99)00012-7
  • Stephan, W. G., Boniecki, K. A., Ybarra, O., Bettencourt, A., Ervin, K. S., Jackson, L. A., … Renfro, C. L. (2002). The role of threats in the racial attitudes of Blacks and Whites. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(9), 1242–1254. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/01461672022812009 doi: 10.1177/01461672022812009
  • Sullivan, H. S. (1953). The interpersonal theory of psychiatry. New York: Norton.
  • Sullivan, H. S. (1954). The psychiatric interview. New York: Norton.
  • Tajfel, H. (1969). Cognitive aspects of prejudice. The Journal of Social Issues, 25(4), 79–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1969.tb00620.x doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1969.tb00620.x
  • Tajfel, H. (1970). Experiments in intergroup discrimination. Scientific American, 223(5), 96–102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican1170-96 doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican1170-96
  • Tajfel, H. (1978). Social categorization, social identity and social comparison. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 61–67) London: Academic Press.
  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
  • Tajfel, H. (1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33(1), 1–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.33.020182.000245 doi: 10.1146/annurev.ps.33.020182.000245
  • Thurstone, L. L. (1928). An experimental study of nationality preferences. The Journal of General Psychology, 1(3-4), 405–425. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00221309.1928.9918018 doi: 10.1080/00221309.1928.9918018
  • Voci, A., & Hewstone, M. (2003). Intergroup contact and prejudice toward immigrants in Italy: The mediational role of anxiety and the moderational role of group salience. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 6, 37–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1368430203006001011 doi: 10.1177/1368430203006001011
  • Wagner, U., Christ, O., & Pettigrew, T. F. (2008). Prejudice and grouprelated behavior in Germany. The Journal of Social Issues, 64(2), 403–416. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2008.00568.x doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2008.00568.x
  • Winnicott, D. W. (1975a). Primitive emotional development. In Through paediatrics to psychoanalysis (pp. 145–156) London: Hogarth Press.
  • Winnicott, D. W. (1975b). Primary maternal preoccupation. In Through paediatrics to psycho-analysis (pp. 300–305) London: Hogarth Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.