References
- Ba, S., Stallaert, J., & Whinston, A. B. (2001). Research commentary: Introducing a third dimension in information systems design—the case for incentive alignment. Information Systems Research, 12(3), 225–239. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.12.3.225.9712
- Baturay, M. H. (2015). An overview of the world of MOOCs. Procedia: Social and Behavioural Sciences, 174(1), 427–433. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.685
- Bock, G. W., Zmud, R. W., Kim, Y. G., & Lee, J. N. (2005). Behavioural intention formation in knowledge sharing: Examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social- psychological forces, and organisational climate. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 29(1), 87–111. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/25148669
- Boland, M., Lehman, E., & Stroade, J. (2001). A comparison of curriculum in baccalaureate degree programs in agribusiness management. The International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 4(3), 225–235. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7508(01)00083-0
- Çakici, D. (2007). The attitudes of university students towards English within the scope of common compulsory courses. Gazi University Journal of Gazi Educational Faculty, 2007(3), 21–35. https://tezarsivi.com/the-attitudes-of-university-students-towards-english-within-the-scope-of-common-compulsory-courses
- Chan, K. W., Li, S. Y., Ni, J., & Zhu, J. J. (2021). What feedback matters? The role of experience in motivating crowdsourcing innovation. Production and Operations Management, 30(1), 103–126. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13259
- Chang, T. J., Yeh, S. P., & Yeh, I. J. (2007). The effects of joint reward system in new product development. International Journal of Manpower, 28(3/4), 276–297. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/01437720710755254
- Cheng, J. H., Hou, H. T., & Wu, S. Y. (2014). Exploring students’ emotional responses and participation in an online peer assessment activity: A case study. Interactive Learning Environments, 22(3), 271–287. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2011.649766
- Chi, M. T. H., De Leeuw, N., Chiu, M. H., & LaVancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18(3), 439–477.
- Cho, K., Chung, T. R., King, W. R., & Schunn, C. D. (2008). Peer-based computer-supported knowledge refinement: An empirical investigation. Communications of the ACM, 51(3), 83–88. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/1325555.1325571
- Cho, K., & MacArthur, C. (2011). Learning by reviewing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(1), 73–84. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021950
- Coleman, J. S. (1990). Commentary: Social institutions and social theory. American Sociological Review, 55(3), 333–339. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2095759
- Craney, T. A., & Surles, J. G. (2002). Model-dependent variance inflation factor cutoff values. Quality Engineering, 14(3), 391–403. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1081/QEN-120001878
- Davey, K. R. (2011). Student peer assessment: Research findings from a case study in a master of chemical engineering coursework-program. Education for Chemical Engineers, 6(4), e122–e131. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2011.08.004
- De Guerrero, M. C. M., & Villamil, O. S. (1994). Social- cognitive dimensions of interaction in L2 peer revision. Modern Language Journal, 78(4), 484–496. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1994.tb02065.x
- De Long, D. W., & Fahey, L. (2000). Diagnosing cultural barriers to knowledge management. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 14(4), 113–127. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2000.3979820
- Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (2001). Extrinsic rewards and intrinsic motivation in education: Reconsidered once again. Review of Educational Research, 71(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543071001001
- Goffman, E. (1959). The moral career of the mental patient. Psychiatry, 22(2), 123–142. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1959.11023166
- Hsu, M. H., Ju, T. L., Yen, C. H., & Chang, C. M. (2007). Knowledge sharing behaviour in virtual communities: The relationship between trust, self-efficacy, and outcome expectations. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65(2), 153–169. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.09.003
- Jin, J., Li, Y., Zhong, X., & Zhai, L. (2015). Why users contribute knowledge to online communities: An empirical study of an online social Q&A community. Information & Management, 52(7), 840–849. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2015.07.005
- Kankanhalli, A., Tan, B. C., & Wei, K. K. (2005). Contributing knowledge to electronic knowledge repositories: An empirical investigation. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 29(1), 113–143. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/25148670
- Kaufman, J. H., & Schunn, C. D. (2011). Students’ perceptions about peer assessment for writing: Their origin and impact on revision work. Instructional Science, 39(3), 387–406. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-010-9133-6
- Komárek, J., Dočkal, J., Markovič, P., Barbora, N. B., & Rigel, F. (2017). Higher education for higher competitiveness. Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science, 10(2), 34–43. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7160/eriesj.2017.100201
- Kwok, J. S., & Gao, S. (2004). Knowledge sharing community in P2P network: A study of motivational perspective. Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(1), 94–102. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270410523934
- Leki, I. (1990). Coaching from the margins: Issues in written response. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second Language Writing: Research Insights for the Classroom (pp. 57–68). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524551.008
- Liu, N. F., & Carless, D. (2006). Peer feedback: The learning element of peer assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 11(3), 279–290. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510600680582
- Lundstrom, K., & Baker, W. (2009). To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewer’s own writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18(1), 30–43. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2008.06.002
- Mangelsdorf, K. (1992). Peer reviews in the ESL composition classroom: What do the students think? ELT Journal, 46(3), 274–285. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/46.3.274
- Ohly, S., Plückthun, L., & Kissel, D. (2017). Developing students’ creative self-efficacy based on design-thinking: Evaluation of an elective university course. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 16(1), 125–132. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725716681714
- Pohlmann, J. T. (1975). A multivariate analysis of selected class characteristic and student rating of instruction. Multivariate Behavioural Research, 10(1), 81–91. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr1001_5
- Roscoe, R. D., & Chi, M. T. H. (2007). Understanding tutor learning: Knowledge-building and knowledge-telling in peer tutors’ explanations and questions. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 534–574. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307309920
- Sager, C. (1973). Improving the quality of written composition through pupil use of rating scale. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED089304.pdf
- Sharkie, R. (2005). Precariousness under the new psychological contract: The effect on trust and the willingness to converse and share knowledge. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 3(1), 37–44. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.kmrp.8500051
- Smith, H., Cooper, A., & Lancaster, L. (2002). Improving the quality of undergraduate peer assessment: A case for student and staff development. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 39(1), 71–81. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13558000110102904
- Steiner, S. D., & Hyman, M. R. (2010). Improving the student experience: Allowing students enrolled in a required course to select online or face-to-face instruction. Marketing Education Review, 20(1), 29–34. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2753/MER1052-8008200105
- Thompson, T., Lamont-Robinson, C., & Younie, L. (2010). ‘Compulsory creativity’: Rationales, recipes, and results in the placement of mandatory creative endeavour in a medical undergraduate curriculum. Medical Education Online, 15(1): 5394. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3402/meo.v15i0.5394
- Tong, Y., Wang, X., Tan, C. H., & Teo, H. H. (2013). An empirical study of information contribution to online feedback systems: A motivation perspective. Information & Management, 50(7), 562–570. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2013.02.009
- Topping, K. J. (1996). The effectiveness of peer tutoring in further and higher education: A typology and review of the literature. Higher Education, 32(3), 321–345. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138870
- Topping, K. J. (1998). Peer assessment between students in College and Universities. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 249–276. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543068003249
- Tsivitanidou, O. E., Constantinou, C. P., Labudde, P., Rönnebeck, S., & Ropohl, M. (2018). Reciprocal peer assessment as a learning tool for secondary school students in modeling-based learning. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 33(1), 51–73. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-017-0341-1
- Valenzano, J. M., III, Wallace, S. P., & Morreale, S. P. (2014). Consistency and change: The (r) evolution of the basic communication course. Communication Education, 63(4), 355–365. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2014.911928
- Vickerman, P. (2009). Student perspectives on formative peer assessment: An attempt to deepen learning? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(2), 221–230. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930801955986
- Villamil, O. S., & De Guerrero, M. C. M. (1998). Assessing the impact of peer revision on L2 writing. Applied Linguistics, 19(4), 491–514. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/19.4.491
- Wasko, M. M. L., & Faraj, S. (2000). “It is what one does”: Why people participate and help others in electronic communities of practice. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 9(2-3), 155–173. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0963-8687(00)00045-7
- Wen, M. L., & Tsai, C. (2006). University students’ perceptions of and attitudes toward (online) peer assessment. Higher Education, 51(1), 27–44. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-6375-8
- Wichmann, A., Funk, A., & Rummel, N. (2018). Leveraging the potential of peer feedback in an academic writing activity through sense-making support. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 33(1), 165–184. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-017-0348-7
- Wu, Y., & Schunn, C. D. (2021). The effects of providing and receiving peer feedback on writing performance and learning of secondary school students. American Educational Research Journal, 58(3), 492–526. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.3102/0002831220945266
- Zou, Y., Schunn, C. D., Wang, Y., & Zhang, F. (2018). Student attitudes that predict participation in peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(5), 800–811. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1409872