Embracing and Enacting an ‘Occupational Imagination’: Occupational Science as Transformative

REFERENCES

• Aldrich, R. M., & Dickie, V. A. (2013). “It's hard to plan your day when you have no money”: Discouraged workers’ occupational possibilities and the need to reconceptualize routine. Work: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment and Rehabilitation, 45(1), 5–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldrich, R., & Marterella, A. (2012). Community-engaged research: A path for occupational science in the changing university landscape. Journal of Occupational Science. doi:10.1080/14427591.2012.714077
   Google Scholar
• Angell, A. M. (2012). Occupational-centred analysis of social difference: Contributions to a socially responsive occupational science. Journal of Occupational Science. doi:10.1080/14427591.2012.711230
   Google Scholar
• Allen, D., & Hardin, P. K. (2001). Discourse analysis and the epidemiology of meaning. Nursing Philosophy, 2(2), 163–176. doi:10.1046/j.1466-769X.2001.00049.x
   Google Scholar
• Bailliard, A. (2013). Laying low: Fear and injustice for Latino migrants to Smalltown, USA. Journal of Occupational Science, 20(4), 342–356. doi:10.1080/14427591.2013.799114
   Google Scholar
• Blustein, D. L., Medvide, M. B., & Wan, C. M. (2012). A critical perspective of contemporary unemployment policy and practices. Journal of Career Development, 39(4), 341–356. doi:10.1177/0894845310397545
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cannella, G. S., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2004). Epilogue: Claiming a critical public social science – Reconceptualizing and redeploying research. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(2), 298–309. doi:10.1177/1077800404263418
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cannella, G. S., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2009). Deploying qualitative methods for critical social purposes. In N. K. Denzin & M. D. Giardina (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry and social justice: Towards a politics of hope (pp. 53–72). Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cannella, G. S., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2011). Ethics, research regulations and critical social science. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 81–90). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Christians, C. G. (2011). Ethics and politics in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 61–90). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, F. (2006). 2005 Ruth Zemke Lecture in Occupational Science. One person's thoughts on the future of occupational science. Journal of Occupational Science, 13(2–3), 167–179. doi:10.1080/14427591.2006.9726513
   Google Scholar
• Cutchin, M. (2012). 2012 Ruth Zemke Lecture in Occupational Science. The art and science of occupation: Nature, inquiry and the aesthetics of living. Journal of Occupational Science, 20(4), 286–297. doi:10.1080/14427591.2012.744290
   Google Scholar
• Cutchin, M. P., & Dickie, V. A. (2012). Transactionalism: Occupational science and the pragmatic attitude. In G. E. Whiteford & C. Hocking (Eds.), Occupational science: Society, inclusion, participation (pp. 23–37). West Sussex, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Cutchin, M. P., & Dickie, V. A. (Eds.). (2013). Transactional perspectives on occupation. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Dennhardt, S., & Laliberte Rudman, D. (2012). When occupation goes ‘wrong’: A critical reflection on risk discourses and their relevance in shaping occupation. In G. E. Whiteford & C. Hocking (Eds.), Occupational science: Society, inclusion, participation (pp. 117–133). West Sussex, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K., & Giardina, M. D. (2009). Introduction. In N. K. Denzin & M. D. Giardina (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry and social justice: Towards a politics of hope (pp. 11–50).Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1984). The Copernican revolution. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey, The later works, 1925–1953 (Vol. 4, pp. 229–250). Carbondale: Southern Illinois Press. ( Original work published 1929)
   Google Scholar
• Fine, M. (2006). Bearing witness: Methods for researching oppression and resistance: A textbook for critical research. Social Justice Research, 19(1), 83–108.
   Google Scholar
• Fine, M., & Barreras, R. (2001). To be of use. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 1, 175–182. doi:10.1111/1530-2415.00012
   Google Scholar
• Frank, G. (2012). 2010 Ruth Zemke Lecture in Occupational Science. Occupational therapy/occupational science/occupational justice: Moral commitments and global assemblages. Journal of Occupational Science, 19(1), 25–35. doi:10.1080/14427591.2011.607792
   Google Scholar
• Frank, G., & Polkinghorne, D. (2010). Qualitative research in occupational therapy: From the first to the second generation. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health, 30(2), 51–57. doi:10.3928/15394492-20100325-02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galheigo, S. M. (2011). What needs to be done? Occupational therapy responsibilities and challenges regarding human rights. Australian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 58, 60–66. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1630.2011.00922.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galvaan, R. (2012). Occupational choice: The significance of socio-economic and political factors. In G. E. Whiteford & C. Hocking (Eds.), Occupational science: Society, inclusion, participation (pp. 152–162). West Sussex, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Gane, M., & Back, L. (2012). C. Wright Mills 50 years on: The promise and craft of sociology revisited. Theory, Culture & Society, 29(7/8), 399–421. doi:10.1177/0263276412459089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harding, S. (2006). Science and social inequality: Feminist and postcolonial issues. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hocking, C. (2009). 2008 Ruth Zemke Lecture in Occupational Science. The challenge of occupation: Describing the things that people do. Journal of Occupational Science, 16(3), 140–150. doi:10.1080/14427591.2009.9686655
   Google Scholar
• Hocking, C. (2012). Occupations through the looking glass: Reflecting on occupational scientists’ ontological assumptions. In G. E. Whiteford & C. Hocking (Eds.), Occupational science: Society, inclusion, participation (pp. 54–68). West Sussex, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hocking, C., & Whiteford, G. E. (2012). Introduction to critical perspectives in occupational science. In G. E. Whiteford & C. Hocking (Eds.), Occupational science: Society, inclusion, participation (pp. 3–7). West Sussex, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Holstein, J. A., & Gubrium, J. F. (2011). The constructionist analysis of interpretive practice. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 341–358). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Huot, S., Laliberte Rudman, D., Dodson, B., & Magalhães, L. (2013). Expanding policy-based conceptualizations of successful integration: Negotiating integration through occupational engagement. Journal of Occupational Science, 20(1), 6–22. doi:10.1080/14427591.2012.717497
   Google Scholar
• Kantartzis, S., & Molineux, M. (2012). Understanding the discursive development of occupation: Historico-political perspectives. In G. E. Whiteford & C. Hocking (Eds.), Occupational science: Society, inclusion, participation (pp. 38–53). West Sussex, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Kiepek, N., Phelan, S.K., & Magalhães, L. (2013). Introducing a critical analysis of the figured world of occupation. Journal of Occupational Science. doi:10.1080/14427591.2013.816998
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Laliberte Rudman, D. (2010). Occupational possibilities. Journal of Occupational Science, 17(1), 55–59. doi:10.1080/14427591.2010.9686673
   Google Scholar
• Laliberte Rudman, D. (2013a). Critical discourse analysis: Adding a political dimension to inquiry. In M. P. Cutchin & V. A. Dickie (Eds.), Transactional perspectives on occupation (pp. 169–182). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Laliberte Rudman, D. (2013b). 2012 Townsend & Polatajko lectureship. Enacting the critical potential of occupational science: Problematizing the ‘individualizing of occupation’. Journal of Occupational Science, 20(4), 298–313. doi:10.1080/14427591.2013.803434
   Google Scholar
• Laliberte Rudman, D. (2014). Reflecting on the socially situated and constructed nature of occupation: A research program addressing the contemporary restructuring of retirement. In D. Pierce (Ed.), Occupational science for occupational therapy (pp. 143–156). Thorofare, NJ: Slack.
   Google Scholar
• Laliberte Rudman, D., Dennhardt, S., Fok, D., Huot, S., Molke, D., Park, A., & Zur, B. (2008). A vision for occupational science: Reflecting on our disciplinary culture. Journal of Occupational Science, 15(3), 136–146. doi:10.1080/14427591.2008.9686623
   Google Scholar
• Laliberte Rudman, D., & Forwell, S. (2013). Special issue on social policy and occupational science [Editorial]. Journal of Occupational Science, 20(4), 283–284. doi:10.1080/14427591.2013.819598
   Google Scholar
• Laliberte Rudman, D., & Huot, vS. (2013). Conceptual insights for expanding thinking regarding the situated nature of occupation. In M. P. Cutchin & V. A. Dickie (Eds). Transactional perspectives on occupation (pp. 51–64). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lather, P. (1986). Research as praxis. Harvard Educational Review, 56(3), 257–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., Lynham, S. A., & Guba, E. G. (2011). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions and emerging confluences, revisited. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 97–128). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Magalhães, L. (2012). What would Paulo Freire think of occupational science? In G. E. Whiteford & C. Hocking (Eds.), Occupational science: Society, inclusion, participation (pp. 8–22). West Sussex, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Mertens, D. M. (2010). Transformative mixed methods research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16, 469–474. doi:10.1177/1077800410364612
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mertens, D. M., Sullivan, M., & Stace, H. (2011). Disability communities: Transformative research on social justice. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 227–242). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, C. W. (1959). The sociological imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mir, R., & Mir, A. (2002). The organizational imagination: From paradigm wars to praxis. Organizational Research Methods, 5(1), 105–125. doi:10.1177/1094428102051007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Njelesani, J., Gibson, B. E., Nixon, S., Cameron, D., & Polatajko, H. (2013). Toward a critical occupational approach to research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 12, 207–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Njelesani, J., Tang, A., Jonsson, H., & Polatajko, H. (2012). Articulating an occupational perspective. Journal of Occupational Science. doi:10.1080/14427591.2012.717500
   Google Scholar
• Payton, C. R. (1984). Who must do the hard things? American Psychologist, 39, 391–397. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.39.4.391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierce, D. (2012). 2011 Ruth Zemke Lecture in Occupational Science. Promise. Journal of Occupational Science, 19(4), 298–311. doi:10.1080/14427591.2012.667778
   Google Scholar
• Pollard, N., Kronenberg, F., & Sakellariou, D. (2009). A political practice of occupational therapy. In N. Pollard, D. Sakellariou & F. Kronenberg (Eds.), The political practice of occupational therapy (pp. 3–20). London, UK: Churchill Livingstone.
   Google Scholar
• Prodinger, B., & Turner, S. M. (2013). Using institutional ethnography to explore how social policies infiltrate into daily life. Journal of Occupational Science, 20(4), 370–381. doi:10.1080/14427591.2013.808728
   Google Scholar
• Ramugondo, E. L. (2012). Intergenerational play within family: The case for occupational consciousness. Journal of Occupational Science, 19(4), 326–340. doi:10.1080/14427591.2012.710166
   Google Scholar
• Ramugondo, E. L., & Kronenberg, F. (2013). Explaining collective occupations from a human relations perspective: Bridging the individual-collective dichotomy. Journal of Occupational Science. doi:10.1080/14427591.2013.781920
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rubin, B. A. (2012). Shifting social contracts and the sociological imagination. Social Forces, 91(2), 327–345. doi:10.1093/sf/sos122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sellar, B. (2012). Occupation and ideology. In G. E. Whiteford & C. Hocking (Eds.), Occupational science: Society, inclusion, participation (pp. 86–99). West Sussex, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Sprague, J., & Zimmerman, M. K. (1993). Overcoming dualisms: A feminist agenda for sociological methodology. In P. England (Ed.), Theory on gender: Feminism on theory (pp. 255–280). Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Stadnyk, R., Townsend, E. A., & Wilcock, A. (2010). Occupational justice. In C. H. Christiansen & E. A. Townsend (Eds.), Introduction to occupation: The art and science of living (2nd ed., pp. 329–358). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Summers, J. H. (2008). New man of power. In J. H. Summers (Ed.), The politics of truth: Selected writings of C. Wright Mills (pp. 1–12). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thibeault, R. (2013). Occupational justice's intents and impacts: From personal choices to community consequences. In M. P. Cutchin & V. A. Dickie (Eds.), Transactional perspectives on occupation (pp. 245–256). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Townsend, E. (2012). 2011 Townsend & Polatajko Lectureship. Boundaries and bridges to adult mental health: Critical occupational and capabilities perspectives. Journal of Occupational Science, 19(1), 8–24. doi:10.1080/14427591.2011.639723
   Google Scholar
• Urbanowski, R., Shaw, L., & Chemmuttut, L. C. (2013). Occupational science value propositions in the field of public policy. Journal of Occupational Science, 20(4), 314–325. doi:10.1080/14427591.2013.806208
   Google Scholar
• Whiteford. G. E., & Pereira, R. (2012). Occupation, inclusion and participation. In G. E. Whiteford & C. Hocking (Eds.), Occupational science: Society, inclusion, participation (pp. 187–207). West Sussex, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Wicks, A. (2012). The International Society for Occupational Science. In G. E. Whiteford & C. Hocking (Eds.), Occupational science: Society, inclusion, participation (pp. 163–186). West Sussex, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar