Developing the transactional perspective of occupation for communities: “How well are we doing together?”

References

• Angell, A. M. (2014). Occupation-centred analysis of social difference: Contributions to a socially responsive occupational science. Journal of Occupational Science, 21(2), 104–116. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2012.711230
   Google Scholar
• Bailliard, A. (2016). Justice, difference, and the capability to function. Journal of Occupational Science, 23(1), 3–16. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2014.957886
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber, M. D. (2006). Occupational science and the first-person perspective. Journal of Occupational Science, 13(1), 94–96. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2006.9686574
   Google Scholar
• Boisvert, R. (1997). John Dewey: Rethinking our time. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bratun, U., & Asaba, E. (2008). From individual to communal experiences of occupation: Drawing upon Qi Gong practices. Journal of Occupational Science, 15(2), 80–86. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2008.9686613
   Google Scholar
• Christiansen, C. H., & Townsend, E. (2010). The occupational nature of social groups. In C. H. Christiansen & E. Townsend (Eds.), Introduction to occupation: The art and science of living (pp. 175–210). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Cutchin, M. P., Dickie, V., & Humphry, R. (2006). Transaction versus interpretation, or transaction and interpretation? A response to Michael Barber. Journal of Occupational Science, 13(1), 97–99. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2006.9686575
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1984). The public and its problems. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey: The later works, 1925–1953 vol. 2 (pp. 237–373). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. Original work published 1927.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1998). Conduct and experience. In L. Hickman & T. Alexander (Eds.), The essential Dewey, vol. 2, (pp. 67–77). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. Original work published 1930.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1998). Nature, communication and meaning. In L. Hickman & T. Alexander (Eds.), The essential Dewey, vol. 2 (pp. 50–66). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. Original work published 1925.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1998). The good of activity. In L. Hickman & T. Alexander (Eds.), The essential Dewey, vol. 2, (pp. 321–327). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. Original work published 1922.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1998). The reflex arc concept in psychology. In L. Hickman & T. Alexander (Eds.), The essential Dewey, vol. 2 (pp. 3–10). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. Original work published 1896.
   Google Scholar
• Dickie, V., Cutchin, M. P., & Humphry, R. (2006). Occupation as transactional experience: A critique of individualism in occupational science. Journal of Occupational Science, 13(1), 83–93. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2006.9686573
   Google Scholar
• Doble, S. E., & Magill-Evans, J. (1992). A model of social interaction to guide occupational therapy practice. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 59(3), 141–150. doi: 10.1177/000841749205900304
   Google Scholar
• Eakman, A. (2007). Occupation and social complexity. Journal of Occupational Science, 14(2), 82–91. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2007.9686588
   Google Scholar
• Fanchiang, S. P. C. (1999). Participation in occupation and quality of life in individuals with Parkinson’s disease. Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertation Express. (9933815)
   Google Scholar
• Farias, L., & Asaba, E. (2013). “The family knot”: Negotiating identities and cultural values through the everyday occupations of an immigrant family in Sweden. Journal of Occupational Science, 20(1), 36–47. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2013.764580
   Google Scholar
• Fogelberg, D., & Frauwirth, S. (2010). A complexity science approach to occupation: Moving beyond the individual. Journal of Occupational Science, 17(3), 131–139. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2010.9686687
   Google Scholar
• Frank, G., & Muriithi, B. A. K. (2015). Theorising social transformation in occupational therapy: The American civil rights movement and South African struggle against apartheid as ‘occupational reconstructions’. South African Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45(1), 11–19. doi:10.17159/2310–3833/2015/v45n1a3 doi: 10.17159/2310-3833/2015/v45no1a3
   Google Scholar
• Hemmingsson, H., & Jonsson, H. (2005). An occupational perspective of the concept of participation in the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: Some critical remarks. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 59(5), 569–576. doi: 10.5014/ajot.59.5.569
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hocking, C. (2009). The challenge of occupation: Describing the things people do. Journal of Occupational Science, 16(3), 140–150. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2009.9686655
   Google Scholar
• Hocking, C., & Whiteford, G. (2012). Introduction to critical perspectives in occupational science. In G. E. Whiteford & C. Hocking (Eds.), Occupational science: Society, inclusion, participation (pp. 3–7). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hugman, R. (1999). Ageing, occupation and social engagement: Towards a lively later life. Journal of Occupational Science, 6(2), 61–67. doi: 10.1080/14427591.1999.9686452
   Google Scholar
• Kantartzis, S. (2017). Exploring occupation beyond the individual: Family and collective occupation. In D. Sakellariou & N. Pollard (Eds.), Occupational therapies without borders: Integrating justice with practice (2nd ed., pp. 19–28). Elsevier Health Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Kantartzis, S., & Molineux, M. (2011). The influence of western society’s construction of a healthy daily life on the conceptualisation of occupation. Journal of Occupational Science, 18(1), 62–80. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2011.566917
   Google Scholar
• Kantartzis, S., & Molineux, M. (2014). Occupation to maintain the family as ideology and practice in a Greek town. Journal of Occupational Science, 21(3), 277–295. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2014.908480
   Google Scholar
• Larson, E. A., & Zemke, R. (2003). Shaping the temporal patterns of our lives: The social coordination of occupation. Journal of Occupational Science, 10(2), 80–89. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2003.9686514
   Google Scholar
• Law, M., Cooper, B., Strong, S., Stewart, D., Rigby, P., & Letts, L. (1996). The person-environment-occupation model: A transactive approach to occupational performance. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63(1), 9–23. doi: 10.1177/000841749606300103
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney, W., & Roberts, E. (2009). Co-occupation in a day program for adults with developmental disabilities. Journal of Occupational Science, 16(3), 170–179. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2009.9686659
   Google Scholar
• Pierce, D. (2003). Occupation by design. Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis.
   Google Scholar
• Pickens, N. D., & Pizur-Barnekow, K. (2009). Co-occupation: Extending the dialogue. Journal of Occupational Science, 16(3), 151–156. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2009.9686656
   Google Scholar
• Primeau, L. (2000). Divisions of household work, routines, and child occupations in families. Journal of Occupational Science, 7(1), 19–28. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2000.9686461
   Google Scholar
• Ramugondo, E., & Kronenberg, F. (2015). Explaining collective occupations form a human relations perspective: Bridging the individual-collective dichotomy. Journal of Occupational Science, 22(1), 3–16. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2013.781920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudman, D. L. (2013). Enacting the critical potential of occupational science: Problematizing the ‘individualizing of occupation’. Journal of Occupational Science, 20(4), 298–313. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2013.803434
   Google Scholar
• Savage, D. M. (2002). John Dewey’s liberalism: Individual, community, and self-development. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Segal, R. (1999). Doing for others: Occupations within families with children with special needs. Journal of Occupational Science, 6(2), 53–60. doi: 10.1080/14427591.1999.9686451
   Google Scholar
• Stadnyk, R. L., Townsend, E. A., & Wilcock, A. A. (2010). Occupational justice. In C. H. Christiansen & E. A. Townsend (Eds.), Introduction to occupation: The art and science of living (2nd ed., pp. 329–358). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, L. (2016). Re-thinking Dewey’s democracy: Shifting from a process of participation to an institution of association. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 48(1), 77–93. doi: 10.1080/00220272.2015.1088068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend, E. (1997). Occupation: Potential for personal and social transformation. Journal of Occupational Science, 4(1), 18–26. doi: 10.1080/14427591.1997.9686417
   Google Scholar
• White, D. R., Owen-Smith, J., Moody, J., & Powell, W. W. (2004). Networks, fields and organizations: Micro-dynamics, scale and cohesive embeddings. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory, 10(1), 95–117. doi: 10.1023/B:CMOT.0000032581.34436.7b
   Google Scholar
• Yerxa, E. J. (2000). Occupational science: A renaissance of service to humankind through knowledge. Occupational Therapy International, 7(2), 87–98. doi: 10.1002/oti.109
   Google Scholar
• Zemke, R., & Clark, F. (Eds.). (1996). Occupational science: The evolving discipline. Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis.
   Google Scholar