Discerning the social in individual stories of occupation through critical narrative inquiry

References

• Ainsworth, S., & Hardy, C. (2004). Critical discourse analysis and identity: Why bother? Critical Discourse Studies, 1(2), 225–259. doi: 10.1080/1740590042000302085
   Google Scholar
• Aldrich, R. (2008). From complexity theory to transactionalism: Moving occupational science forward in theorizing the complexities of behavior. Journal of Occupational Science, 15(3), 147–156. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2008.9686624
   Google Scholar
• Aldrich, R. M., & Dickie, V. A. (2013). “It’s hard to plan your day when you have no money”: Discouraged workers’ occupational possibilities and the need to reconceptualize routine. Work, 45(1), 5–15. doi: 10.3233/WOR-131596
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aldrich, R. M., & Laliberte Rudman, D. (2016). Situational analysis: A visual analytic approach that unpacks the complexity of occupation. Journal of Occupational Science, 23(1), 51–66. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2015.1045014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldrich, R. M., Laliberte Rudman, D., & Dickie, V. A. (2017). Resource seeking as occupation: A critical and empirical exploration. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 71(3), 1–9. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2017.021782
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, D., & Hardin, P. K. (2001). Discourse analysis and the epidemiology of meaning. Nursing Philosophy, 2(2), 163–176. doi: 10.1046/j.1466-769X.2001.00049.x
   Google Scholar
• Angell, A. M. (2014). Occupation-centered analysis of social difference: Contributions to a socially responsive occupational science. Journal of Occupational Science, 21(2), 104–116. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2012.711230
   Google Scholar
• Asaba, E., & Jackson, J. (2011). Social ideologies embedded in everyday life: A narrative analysis about disability, identities, and occupation. Journal of Occupational Science, 18(2), 139–152. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2011.579234
   Google Scholar
• Bonsall, A. (2012). An examination of the pairing between narrative and occupational science. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 19(1), 92–103. doi: 10.3109/11038128.2011.552119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady, M. (2014). Ethnographies of neoliberal govermentalities: From the neoliberal apparatus to neoliberalism and governmental assemblages. Foucault Studies, 18, 11–33. doi: 10.22439/fs.v0i18.4649
   Google Scholar
• Brodkin, E. Z. (2011). Policy work: Street-level organizations under new managerialism. Journal of Public Administration, 21(S2), i253–i277. doi: 10.1093/jopart/muq093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2016). Labor force statistics from the current population survey: Number unemployed for 27 weeks or over. Retrieved from https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS13008636
   Google Scholar
• Canella, G. S., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2009). Deploying qualitative methods for critical social purposes. In N. K. Denzin & M. D. Giardina (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry and social justice: Towards a politics of hope (pp. 53–72). Walnut Creek, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Chase, S. E. (2011). Narrative inquiry: Still a field in the making. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp.421–434). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, F. (2006). One person’s thoughts on the future of occupational science. Journal of Occupational Science, 13(2–3), 167–179. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2006.9726513
   Google Scholar
• Cutchin, M. P. (2004). Using Deweyan philosophy to rename and reframe adaptation-to-environment. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 58(3), 303–312. doi: 10.5014/ajot.58.3.303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutchin, M. P., Aldrich, R. M., Bailliard, A. L., & Coppola, S. (2008). Action theories for occupational science: The contributions of Dewey and Bourdieu. Journal of Occupational Science, 15(3), 157–165. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2008.9686625
   Google Scholar
• Cutchin, M. P., & Dickie, V. A. (2012). Transactionalism: Occupational science and the pragmatic attitude. In G. E. Whiteford & C. Hocking (Eds.), Occupational science: Society, inclusion, participation (pp. 23–37). Oxford, UK: Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Dickie, V. A. (2003). The role of learning in quilt making. Journal of Occupational Science, 10(3), 120–129. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2003.9686519
   Google Scholar
• Dickie, V. A., Cutchin, M. P., & Humphry, R. (2006). Occupation as transactional experience: A critique of individualism in occupational science. Journal of Occupational Science, 13(1), 83–93. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2006.9686573
   Google Scholar
• Durocher, E., Gibson, B. E., & Rappolt, S. (2014). Occupational justice: A conceptual review. Journal of Occupational Science, 21(4), 418–430. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2013.775692
   Google Scholar
• Farias, L., & Laliberte Rudman, D. (2016). A critical interpretive synthesis of the uptake of critical perspectives in occupational science. Journal of Occupational Science, 23(1), 33–50. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2014.989893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, G. (2012). The 2010 Ruth Zemke lecture in occupational therapy/occupational science/occupational justice: Moral commitments and global assemblages. Journal of Occupational Science, 19(1), 25–35. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2011.607792
   Google Scholar
• Frank, G., & Polkinghorne, D. (2010). Qualitative research in occupational therapy: From the first to the second generation. OTJR: Occupation, Participation, and Health, 30(2), 51–57. doi: 10.3928/15394492-20100325-02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerlach, A. (2015). Sharpening our critical edge: Occupational therapy in the context of marginalized populations. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 82(4), 245–253. doi: 10.1177/0008417415571730
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerlach, A. J., Teachman, G., Laliberte Rudman, D., Aldrich, R. M., & Huot, S. (2017). Expanding beyond individualism: Engaging critical perspectives on occupation. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy [Epub ahead of print]. doi: 10.1080/11038128.2017.1327616
   Google Scholar
• Galvaan, R. (2015). The contextually situated nature of occupational choice: Marginalised young adolescents’ experiences in South Africa. Journal of Occupational Science, 22(1), 39–53. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2014.912124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grundy, J. (2015). Performance measurement in Canadian employment service delivery, 1996–2000. Canadian Public Administration, 58(1), 161–182. doi: 10.1111/capa.12104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grusky, D. B., Western, B., & Wimer, C. (2011). The great recession. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Hammell, K. W. (2008). Reflections on … wellbeing and occupational rights. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 75(1), 61–64. doi:10.2182/cjot.07007 doi: 10.2182/cjot.07.007
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hardin, P. K. (2001). Theory and language: Locating agency between free will and discursive marionettes. Nursing Inquiry, 8(1), 11–18. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1800.2001.00084.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hardin, P. K. (2003). Constructing experience in individual interviews, autobiographies and on-line accounts: A poststructuralist approach. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 41(6), 536–544. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02565.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hocking, C. (2000). Occupational science: A stock take of accumulated insights. Journal of Occupational Science, 7(2), 58–67. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2000.9686466
   Google Scholar
• Hocking, C. (2012). Occupations through the looking glass: Reflecting on occupational scientists’ ontological assumptions. In G. E. Whiteford & C. Hocking (Eds.), Occupational science: Society, inclusion, participation (pp. 54–66). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Huot, S., & Laliberte Rudman, D. (2015). Extending beyond interviewing to illuminate the tacit nature of occupation: Occupational mapping and participatory occupations. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health, 35(3), 142–150. doi: 10.1177/1539449215576488
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson, K., Cutchin, M. P., & Lilja, M. (2012). Place integration: A conceptual tool to understand the home modification process. In M. P. Cutchin & V. A. Dickie (Eds.), Transactional perspectives on occupation (pp. 107–117). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Josephsson, S., & Alsaker, S. (2015). Narrative methodology: A tool to access unfolding and situated meaning in occupation. In S. Nayar & M. Stanley (Eds.), Qualitative research methodologies for occupational science and occupational therapy (pp. 70–83). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kirby, A. V. (2015). Beyond independence: Introducing Deweyan philosophy to dialogue on occupation and independence. Journal of Occupational Science, 22(1), 17–25. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2013.803297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laliberte Rudman, D. (2010). Occupational terminology: Occupational possibilities. Journal of Occupational Science, 17(1), 55–59. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2010.9686673
   Google Scholar
• Laliberte Rudman, D. (2012). Governing through occupation: Shaping expectations and possibilities. In G. E. Whiteford & C. Hocking (Eds.), Occupational science: Society, inclusion and participation (pp. 100–116). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Laliberte Rudman, D. (2013). Enacting the critical potential of occupational science: Problematizing the individualizing of occupation. Journal of Occupational Science, 20(4), 298–313. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2013.803434
   Google Scholar
• Laliberte Rudman, D. (2014). Embracing and enacting an occupational imagination: Occupational science as transformative. Journal of Occupational Science, 21(4), 373–388. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2014.888970
   Google Scholar
• Laliberte Rudman, D. (2015a). Embodying positive aging and neoliberal rationality: Talking about the aging body within narratives of retirement. Journal of Aging Studies, 34(1), 10–20. doi: 10.1016/j.jaging.2015.03.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laliberte Rudman, D. (2015b). Situating occupation in social relations of power: Occupational possibilities, ageism and the retirement choice. South African Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45(1), 27–33. doi: 10.17159/2310-3833/2015/v45no1a5
   Google Scholar
• Laliberte Rudman, D., & Aldrich, R. (2016). ‘Activated, but stuck’: Applying a critical occupational lens to examine the negotiation of long-term unemployment in contemporary socio-political contexts. Societies, 6(3), 1–17. doi: 10.3390/soc6030028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laliberte Rudman, D., Aldrich, R. M., Grundy, J., Stone, M., Huot, S., & Aslam, A. (2017). “You got to make the numbers work”: Negotiating managerial reforms in the provision of employment support service. Alternate Routes: A Journal of Critical Social Inquiry, 28, 47–79.
   Google Scholar
• Laliberte Rudman, D., & Huot, S. (2013). Conceptual insights for expanding thinking regarding the situated nature of occupation. In M. P. Cutchin & V. A. Dickie (Eds.), Transactional perspectives on occupation (pp. 51–64). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lavender, B., & Parent, N. (2012). The US recovery from the great recession: A story of debt and deleveraging. Bank of Canada Review, 2012 (Winter), 13–26.
   Google Scholar
• Lightman, E., Mitchell, A., & Herd, D. (2010). Cycling off and on welfare in Canada. Journal of Social Policy, 39(4), 523–542. doi: 10.1017/S0047279410000279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., Lynham, S. A., & Guba, E. G. (2011). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences, revisited. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 97–128). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. (1980/2010). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Magalhães, L. (2012). What would Paulo Freire think of occupational science? In G. E. Whiteford & C. Hocking (Eds.), Occupational science: Society, inclusion and participation (pp. 8–19). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Molineux, M., & Whiteford, G. (2011). Occupational science: Genesis, evolution and future contribution. In E. A. S. Duncan (Ed.), Foundations for practice in occupational therapy (pp. 243–243). Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Mumby, D. K. (2014). Critical theory and postmodernism. In L. L. Putnam & D. K. Mumby (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods (pp. 101–126). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Nasedan, M. H. (2008). Governmentality, biopower and everyday life. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nayar, S., & Stanley, M. (2015). Occupational adaptation as a social process in everyday life. Journal of Occupational Science, 22(1), 26–38. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2014.882251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen, G. M. (2008). Labour market policy in the United States, Canada and Sweden: Addressing the issue of convergence. Social Policy & Administration, 42(4), 323–341. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9515.2008.00607.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierce, D. (2014). Occupational science for occupational therapy: A look into the future. In D. Pierce (Ed.), Occupational science for occupational therapy (pp. 347–350). Thorofare, NJ: Slack.
   Google Scholar
• Pollard, N., Kronenberg, F., & Sakellariou, D. (2008). A political practice of occupational therapy. In N. Pollard, D. Sakellariou, & F. Kronenberg (Eds.), A political practice of occupational therapy (pp. 3–19). Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, A. (2015). Austerity, social restructuring and the erosion of democracy: Examining the 2012 Employment Insurance Reforms. Canadian Review of Social Policy, 71(1), 21–52.
   Google Scholar
• Ramugondo, E. L. (2015). Occupational consciousness. Journal of Occupational Science, 22(4), 488–501. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2015.1042516
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, N., O’Malley, P., & Valverde, M. (2006). Governmentality. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 2, 83–104. doi: 10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.2.081805.105900
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sellar, B. (2015). Interrogating power and reason: Critical theory and philosophy. In S. Nayar & M. Stanley (Eds.), Qualitative methodologies for occupational science and occupational therapy (pp. 208–224). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Soss, J., Fording, R. C., & Schram, S. F. (2011). Disciplining the poor: Neoliberal paternalism and the persistent power of race. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Canada. (2016). Table282–0048. Labour Force Survey estimates (LFS), duration of unemployment by sex and age group, annual (persons unless otherwise noted). CANSIM (database). Retrieved from http://www5.statcan.gc.ca/cansim/a26?lang=eng&id=2820048
   Google Scholar
• Tanggaard, L. (2009). The research interview as a dialogical context for the production of social life and personal narratives. Qualitative Inquiry, 15(9), 1498–1515. doi: 10.1177/1077800409343063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend, E. (1997). Occupation: Potential for personal and social transformation. Journal of Occupational Science: Australia, 4(1), 18–26. doi: 10.1080/14427591.1997.9686417
   Google Scholar
• Vickerstaff, S., & Cox, J. (2005). Retirement and risk: The individualization of retirement experiences? The Sociological Review, 53(1), 77–95. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.2005.00504.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wengraf, T. (2001). Qualitative research interviewing. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Whiteford, G. E., & Hocking, C. (Eds.). (2012). Occupational science: Society, inclusion, participation. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Wiggan, J. (2012). Telling stories of 21st century welfare: The UK coalition government and the neo-liberal discourse of worklessness and dependency. Critical Social Policy, 32(3), 383–405. doi: 10.1177/0261018312444413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolford, A., & Nelund, A. (2013). The responsibilities of the poor: Performing neoliberal citizenship within the bureaucratic field. Social Service Review, 87(2), 292–318. doi: 10.1086/671072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright-St. Clair, V. A. (2012). The case for multiple research methodologies. In G. E. Whiteford & C. Hocking (Eds.), Occupational science: Society, inclusion and participation (pp. 131–151). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar