Commentary on: Peters & Galvaan (2020) A scoping review exploring ‘opportunity’ in occupational science: Possibilities for conceptual development

References

• Bach, M. (2002). Social inclusion as solidarity: Rethinking the child rights agenda, working paper series: Perspectives on social inclusion. The Laidlaw Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Bailliard, A. L., Dallman, A. R., Carroll, A., Lee, B. D., & Szendrey, S. (2020). Doing occupational justice: A central dimension of everyday occupational therapy practice. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 87(2), 144–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008417419898930
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown T. L., Pereira, R. B., Byrnes, J., Guida, A., Gielen, C., & Stevens J. (2019). Exploring clinician and consumer experiences of integrated, values-based care within the Hospital Admission Risk Program. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 28(S1), 7–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.12646
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Deranty, J-P. (2009). Beyond communication: A critical study of Axel Honneth’s social philosophy. Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Drolet, M-J., Désormeaux-Moreau, M., Soubeyran, M., & Thiébaut, S. (2020). Intergenerational occupational justice: Ethically reflecting on climate crisis. Journal of Occupational Science, 27(3), 417–431. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2020.1776148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammell, K. R. W. (2016). Empowerment and occupation: A new perspective. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 83(5), 281–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008417416652910
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammell, K. R. W. (2017a). Critical reflections on occupational justice: Toward a rights-based approach to occupational opportunities. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 84(1), 47–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008417416654501
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammell, K. W. (2017b). Opportunities for well-being: The right to occupational engagement. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 84(4-5), 209–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008417417734831
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammell, K. W. (2020). Engagement in living: Critical perspectives on occupation, rights, and wellbeing. Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists.
   Google Scholar
• Heidegren, C-G. (2002). Anthropology, social theory, and politics: Axel Honneth’s theory of recognition. Inquiry, 45(4), 433–436. https://doi.org/10.1080/002017402320947531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hitch, D., Pépin, G., & Stagnitti, K. (2014a). In the footsteps of Wilcock, part one: The evolution of doing, being, becoming, and belonging. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 28(3), 231–246. https://doi.org/10.3109/07380577.2014.898114
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hitch, D., Pépin, G., & Stagnitti, K. (2014b). In the footsteps of Wilcock, part two: The interdependent nature of doing, being, becoming and belonging. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 28(3), 247–263. https://doi.org/10.3109/07380577.2014.898115
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hocking, C. (2000). Occupational science: A stock take of accumulated insights. Journal of Occupational Science, 7(2), 58–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2000.9686466
   Google Scholar
• Honneth, A. (1992). Integrity and disrespect: Principles of a conception of morality based on the theory of recognition. Political Theory, 20(2), 187–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591792020002001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honneth, A. (1995). Struggle for recognition: The moral grammar of social conflicts (J. Anderson, Trans.). Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Honneth, A. (2001). Recognition or redistribution? Changing perspectives on the moral order of society. Theory, Culture & Society, 18(2-3), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/02632760122051779
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kantartzis, S. (2018). Perspectives on occupation-based social inclusion: Collective occupation in the local, social world. Japanese Journal of Occupational Science, 12(1), 14–37. https://doi.org/10.32191/jjos.12.1_14
   Google Scholar
• Kayess, R., & French, P. (2008). Out of the darkness into light? Introducing the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Human Rights Law Review, 8(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngm044
   Google Scholar
• Krishnakumar, J., & Nogales, R. (2015). Public policies for wellbeing with justice: A theoretical discussion based on capabilities and opportunities. International Journal of Wellbeing, 5(3), 44–62. https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v5i3.3
   Google Scholar
• Murthi, K., & Hammell, K. W. (2020). ‘Choice’ in occupational therapy theory: A critique from the situation of patriarchy in India. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/11038128.2020.1769182
   Google Scholar
• Njelesani, J., Tang, A., Jonsson, H., & Polatajko, H. (2014). Articulating an occupational perspective. Journal of Occupational Science, 21(2), 226–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2012.717500
   Google Scholar
• Pereira, R. B. (2013). The politics of participation: A critical occupational science analysis of social inclusion policy and entrenched disadvantage [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Macquarie University, Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Pereira, R. B. (2014). Using critical policy analysis in occupational science research: Exploring Bacchi’s methodology. Journal of Occupational Science, 21(4), 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2013.806207
   Google Scholar
• Pereira, R. B. (2017). Towards inclusive occupational therapy: Introducing the CORE approach for inclusive and occupation-focused practice. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 64(6), 429–435. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12394
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira, R. B., Brown, T. L., Guida, A., Hyett, N., Nolan, M., Oppedisano, L., Riley, K., & Walker, G. (in press). Consumer experiences of care coordination for people living with chronic conditions and other complex needs: An inclusive and co-produced research study. Australian Health Review.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira, R. B., Byrnes, J., Brown, T. L., & Stevens, J. (2018, June 28–29). A mixed-methods study into the quality and effectiveness of a regional care coordination service for people living with complex needs: Implications for inclusive occupational therapy [Paper presentation]. Occupational Therapy Australia VIC-TAS Regional Conference Melbourne, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Pereira, R. B., & Naismith, J. (2018, June 28–29). Applying the Capabilities, Opportunities, Resources and Environments (CORE) approach to the inclusive occupational therapy process: Introducing a new Australian values-based practice model [Paper presentation]. Occupational Therapy Australia VIC-TAS Regional Conference, Melbourne, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Pereira, R. B., Whiteford, G., Hyett, N., Weekes., G, Di Tommaso, A., & Naismith, J. (2020). Capabilities, Opportunities, Resources and Environments (CORE): Using the CORE approach for inclusive, occupation-centred practice. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 67(2), 162–171. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12642
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira, R. B., & Whiteford, G. E. (in press a). Advancing understandings of inclusion and participation through situated research. In H. van Bruggen, S. Kantartzis, & N. Pollard (Eds.), And a seed was planted: Occupation based approaches for social inclusion (Critical Studies in Occupational Therapy and Occupational Science). Whiting & Birch.
   Google Scholar
• Pereira, R. B., & Whiteford, G. E. (in press b). Enabling inclusive occupational therapy through the Capabilities, Opportunities, Resources and Environments (CORE) approach. In P. Liamputtong (Ed), Handbook of social inclusion: Research and Practices in Health and Social Sciences. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, L., & Galvaan, R. (2020). A scoping review exploring “opportunity” in occupational science: Possibilities for conceptual development. Journal of Occupational Science, Early online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2020.1832906
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, K., Hounsgaard, L., Borg, T., & Nielsen, C. V. (2012). User involvement in mental health rehabilitation: A struggle for self-determination and recognition. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 19(1), 59–67. https://doi.org/10.3109/11038128.2011.556196
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phelan, S., & Kinsella, E. A. (2009). Occupational identity: Engaging socio-cultural perspectives. Journal of Occupational Science, 16(2), 85–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2009.9686647
   Google Scholar
• Rivas-Quarneti, N., Movilla-Fernández, M-J., & Magalhães, L. (2018). Immigrant women’s occupational struggles during the socioeconomic crisis in Spain: Broadening occupational justice conceptualization. Journal of Occupational Science, 25(1), 6–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2017.1366355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sellar, B. (2012). Occupation and ideology. In G. E. Whiteford & C. Hocking (Eds.), Occupational science: Society, inclusion, participation (pp. 86–99). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stadnyk, R. L., Townsend, E. A., & Wilcock, A. A. (2010). Occupational justice. In C. H. Christiansen & E. A. Townsend (Eds.), Introduction to occupation: The art and science of living (2nd ed., pp. 328–358). Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Venkatapuram, S. (2011). Health justice: An argument from the capabilities approach. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Whiteford, G. E. (2003). Enhancing occupational opportunities in communities: Politics’ third way and the concept of the enabling state. Journal of Occupational Science, 10(1), 40–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2003.9686509
   Google Scholar
• Whiteford, G. E., & Hocking, C. (Eds.). (2012). Occupational science: Society, inclusion, participation. Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Whiteford, G. E., & Pereira, R. B. (2012). Occupation, inclusion and participation. In G. E. Whiteford & C. Hocking (Eds.), Occupational science: Society, inclusion, participation (pp. 187–207). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcock, A. A. (1998a). An occupational perspective of health. Slack.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcock, A. A. (1998b). Reflections on doing, being and becoming. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 65(5), 248–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/000841749806500501
   Google Scholar
• Wilcock, A., & Townsend, E. (2000). Occupational terminology interactive dialogue: Occupational justice. Journal of Occupational Science, 7(2), 84–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2000.9686470
   Google Scholar
• Wilcock, A. A., & Townsend, E. A. (2009). Occupational justice. In E. B. Crepeau, E. S. Cohn, & B. A. Boyt Schell (Eds.), Willard & Spackman’s occupational therapy (11th ed., pp. 192–199). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
   Google Scholar