References
- AlHeresh, R., Bryant, W., & Holm, M. (2013). Community-based rehabilitation in Jordan: Challenges to achieving occupational justice. Disability and Rehabilitation, 35(21), 1848–1852. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2012.756944
- Anees, S. (2014). Disability in India: The role of gender, family, and religion. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 45(2), 32–38.
- Bailliard, A. (2016). Justice, difference, and the capability to function. Journal of Occupational Science, 23(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2014.957886
- Bailliard, A. L. (2015). Video methodologies in research: Unlocking the complexities of occupation. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 82(1), 35–43. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0008417414556883
- Benjamin, T. E. (2019). Enacting occupation-based transformative research through participatory filmmaking with children with disabilities (Publication No. 6362) [Doctoral dissertation, Western University]. Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository, Scholarship@Western.
- Benjamin-Thomas, T. E., Corrado, A. M., McGrath, C., Laliberte Rudman, D., & Hand, C. (2018). Working towards the promise of participatory action research: Learning from ageing research exemplars. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 17(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406918817953
- Benjamin-Thomas, T. E., & Laliberte Rudman, D. (2018). A critical interpretive synthesis: Use of the occupational justice framework in research. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 65(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12428
- Benjamin-Thomas, T. E., Laliberte Rudman, D., Gunaseelan, J., Abraham, V. J., Cameron, D., McGrath, C., & Vinoth Kumar, S. P. (2019). A participatory filmmaking process with children with disabilities in rural India: Working towards inclusive research. Methodological Innovations, 12(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/2059799119890795
- Buckingham, J. (2011). Writing histories of disability in India: Strategies of inclusion. Disability & Society, 26(4), 419–431. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2011.567792
- Byrne, S., Clarke, M. A., & Rahman, A. (2018). Colonialism and peace and conflict studies. Peace and Conflict Studies, 25(1), Article 1. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/pcs/vol25/iss1/1
- Cammarota, J., & Fine, M. (Eds.). (2008). Revolutionalizing education: Youth participatory action research in motion. Routledge.
- Devlin, R., & Pothier, D. (2006). Introduction: Toward a critical theory of dis-citizenship. In D. Pothier & R. Devlin (Eds.), Critical disability theory: Essays in philosophy, politics, policy, and law (pp. 1–24). UBC Press.
- Durocher, E., Rappolt, S., & Gibson, B. E. (2014). Occupational justice: Future directions. Journal of Occupational Science, 21(4), 431–442. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2013.775693
- Farias, L., & Laliberte Rudman, D. (2016). A critical interpretive synthesis of the uptake of critical perspectives in occupational science. Journal of Occupational Science, 23(1), 33–50. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2014.989893
- Farias, L., Laliberte Rudman, D., & Magalhães, L. (2016). Illustrating the importance of critical epistemology to realize the promise of occupational justice. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health, 36(4), 234–243. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1539449216665561
- Farias, L., Laliberte Rudman, D., Magalhães, L., & Gastaldo, D. (2017). Reclaiming the potential of transformative scholarship to enable social justice. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917714161
- Freire, P. (1993). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Penguin Books.
- Galvaan, R. (2015). The contextually situated nature of occupational choice: Marginalised young adolescents’ experiences in South Africa. Journal of Occupational Science, 22(1), 39–53. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2014.912124
- Galvaan, R., Peters, L., Smith, T., Brittain, M., Menegaldo, A., Rautenbach, N., &., Wilson-Poe, A. (2015). Employers’ experiences of having a live-in domestic worker: Insights into the relationship between privilege and occupational justice. South African Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45(1), 41–46. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17159/2310-3833/2015/v45no1a7
- Goodley, D. (2013). Dis/entangling critical disability studies. Disability & Society, 28(5), 631–644. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2012.717884
- Gubrium, A., & Harper, K. (2013). Participatory visual and digital methods. Left Coast Press.
- Gulati, S., Paterson, M., Medves, J., & Luce-Kapler, R. (2011). Reflection on the methodological aspects of a critical ethnographic approach used to inform change for adolescents with disabilities. The Qualitative Report, 16(2), 523–562.
- Gupta, A., & Singhal, N. (2004). Positive perceptions in parents of children with disabilities. Asia Pacific Disability Rehabilitation Journal, 15(1), 22–35.
- Hammell, K. W. (2011). Resisting theoretical imperialism in the disciplines of occupational science and occupational therapy. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 74(1), 27–33. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4276/030802211X12947686093602
- Hammell, K. W. (2015). Quality of life, participation and occupational rights: A capabilities perspective. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 62(2), 78–85. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12183
- Hocking, C. (2012). Occupations through the looking glass: Reflecting on occupational scientists’ ontological assumptions. In G. E. Whiteford & C. Hocking (Eds.), Occupational science: Society, inclusion, participation (pp. 54–66). Wiley-Blackwell.
- Hocking, C., & Whiteford, G. E. (2012). Introduction to critical perspectives in occupational science. In G. E. Whiteford & C. Hocking (Eds.), Occupational science: Society, inclusion, participation (pp. 3–8). Wiley-Blackwell.
- Hosking, D. L. (2008, September). Critical disability theory [Paper presentation]. 4th Biennial Disability Studies Conference, Lancaster University, UK.
- Kembhavi, G. (2009). Perceptions of participation and inclusion among adolescents with disabilities: Experiences from South India. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University College London, London, United Kingdom.
- Kiepek, N. C., Beagan, B., Laliberte Rudman, D., & Phelan, S. (2018). Silences around occupations framed as unhealthy, illegal, and deviant. Journal of Occupational Science, 26(3), 341–353. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2018.1499123
- Kiepek, N., Phelan, S. K., & Magalhães, L. (2014). Introducing a critical analysis of the figured world of occupation. Journal of Occupational Science, 21(4), 403–417. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2013.816998
- Kinsella, E. A., & Durocher, E. (2016). Occupational justice: Moral imagination, critical reflection, and political praxis. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health, 36(4), 163–166. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1539449216669458
- Laliberte Rudman, D. (2010). Occupational terminology: Occupational possibilities. Journal of Occupational Science, 17(1), 55–59. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2010.9686673
- Laliberte Rudman, D. (2012). Governing through occupation: Shaping expectations and possibilities. In G. E. Whiteford & C. Hocking (Eds.), Occupational science: Society, inclusion, participation (pp. 100–116). Wiley-Blackwell.
- Laliberte Rudman, D. (2013). Enacting the critical potential of occupational science: Problematizing the ‘individualizing of occupation’. Journal of Occupational Science, 20(4), 298–313. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2013.803434
- Laliberte Rudman, D. (2014). Embracing and enacting an ‘occupational imagination’: Occupational science as transformative. Journal of Occupational Science, 21(4), 373–388. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2014.888970
- Laliberte Rudman, D. (2018). Occupational therapy and occupational science: Building critical and transformative alliances. Cadernos Brasileiros de Terapia Ocupacional, 26(1), 241–249. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4322/2526-8910.ctoEN1246
- Laliberte Rudman, D., Pollard, N., Craig, C., Kantartzis, S., Piškur, B., Algado Simó, S., van Bruggen, H., & Schiller, S. (2019). Contributing to social transformation through occupation: Experiences from a think tank. Journal of Occupational Science, 26(2), 316–322. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2018.1538898
- Law, M., Haight, M., Milroy, B., Willms, D., Stewart, D., & Rosenbaum, P. (1999). Environmental factors affecting the occupations of children with physical disabilities. Journal of Occupational Science, 6(3), 102–110. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.1999.9686455
- Magalhães, L., Farias, L., Rivas-Quarneti, N., Alvarez, L., & Malfitano, A. P. S. (2019). The development of occupational science outside the Anglophone sphere: Enacting global collaboration. Journal of Occupational Science, 26(2), 181–192. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2018.1530133
- Meekosha, H., & Dowse, L. (2007). Integrating critical disability studies into social work education and practice: An Australian perspective. Practice, 19(3), 169–183. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09503150701574267
- Meekosha, H., & Shuttleworth, R. (2009). What’s so ‘critical’ about critical disability studies? Australian Journal of Human Rights, 15(1), 47–75. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1323238X.2009.11910861
- Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Sage.
- Murthi, K., & Hammell, K. W. (2021). ‘Choice’ in occupational therapy theory: A critique from the situation of patriarchy in India. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 28(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/11038128.2020.1769182
- Njelesani, J., Gibson, B. E., Nixon, S., Cameron, D., & Polatajko, H. (2013). Toward a critical occupational approach to research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 12, 207–220.
- Njelesani, J., Hashemi, G., Cameron, C., Cameron, D., Richard, D., & Parnes, P. (2018). From the day they are born: A qualitative study exploring violence against children with disabilities in West Africa. BMC Public Health, 18(1), 153–159. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5057-x
- Parnes, P., Cameron, D., Christie, N., Cockburn, L., Hashemi, G., & Yoshida, K. (2009). Disability in low-income countries: Issues and implications. Disability and Rehabilitation, 31(14), 1170–1180. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280902773778
- Phelan, S. K., & Kinsella, E. A. (2014). Occupation and identity: Perspectives of children with disabilities and their parents. Journal of Occupational Science, 21(3), 334–356. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2012.755907
- Rahman, A., Ali, M., & Kahn, S. (2018). The British art of colonialism in India: Subjugation and division. Peace and Conflict Studies, 25(1), 1–26.
- Ramugondo, E. L. (2015). Occupational consciousness. Journal of Occupational Science, 22(4), 488–501. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2015.1042516
- Ramugondo, E. L., & Kronenberg, F. (2015). Explaining collective occupations from a human relations perspective: Bridging the individual-collective dichotomy. Journal of Occupational Science, 22(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2013.781920
- Rivas-Quarneti, N., Movilla-Fernández, M. J., & Magalhães, L. (2018). Immigrant women’s occupational struggles during the socioeconomic crisis in Spain: Broadening occupational justice conceptualization. Journal of Occupational Science, 25(1), 6–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2017.1366355
- Rodríguez, L. F., & Brown, T. M. (2009). From voice to agency: Guiding principles for participatory action research with youth. New Directions for Youth Development, 2009(123), 19–34. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/yd.312
- Rylko-Bauer, B., & Farmer, P. (2016). Structural violence, poverty, and social suffering. In D. Brady & L. M. Burton (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of the social science of poverty (pp. 47–74). Oxford University Press.
- Singal, N. (2010). Doing disability research in a Southern context: Challenges and possibilities. Disability & Society, 25(4), 415–426. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09687591003755807
- Singh, V., & Ghai, A. (2009). Notions of self: Lived realities of children with disabilities. Disability & Society, 24(2), 129–145. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09687590802652363
- Temple, B., & Young, A. (2004). Qualitative research and translation dilemmas. Qualitative Research, 4(2), 161–178. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794104044430
- Tonkin, B. L., Ogilvie, B. D., Greenwood, S. A., Law, M. C., & Anaby, D. R. (2014). The participation of children and youth with disabilities in activities outside of school: A scoping review. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 81(4), 226–236. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0008417414550998
- Townsend, E. (2015). Critical occupational literacy: Thinking about occupational justice, ecological sustainability, and aging in everyday life. Journal of Occupational Science, 22(4), 389–402. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2015.1071691
- Townsend, E., & Wilcock, A. A. (2004). Occupational justice and client-centred practice: A dialogue in progress. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 71(2), 75–87. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/000841740407100203
- United Nations. (1989). Convention on the Rights of the Child. Author.
- Vehmas, S., & Watson, N. (2014). Moral wrongs, disadvantages, and disability: A critique of critical disability studies. Disability & Society, 29(4), 638–650. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2013.831751
- Wang, C. C., Cash, J. L., & Powers, L. S. (2000). Who knows the streets as well as the homeless? Promoting personal and community action through photovoice. Health Promotion Practice, 1(1), 81–89. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/152483990000100113
- Watson, N. (2012). Theorising the lives of disabled children: How can disability theory help? Children & Society, 26(3), 192–202. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-0860.2012.00432.x
- Wilcock, A. A. (1998). Reflections on doing, being and becoming. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 65(5), 248–256. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/000841749806500501
- Wolbring, G., & Ghai, A. (2015). Interrogating the impact of scientific and technological development on disabled children in India and beyond. Disability and the Global South, 2(2), 667–685.