Occupational justice in direct-funded attendant services: Possibilities and constraints

References

• Alakeson, V. (2010). International developments in self-directed care. Commonwealth Fund Issue Brief, 78, 1–11. PMID: 20232527
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alvesson, M., & Sköldberg, K. (2000). Reflexive methodology: New vistas for qualitative research. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Arksey, H., & Baxter, K. (2012). Exploring the temporal aspects of direct payments. British Journal of Social Work, 42(1), 147–164. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcr039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailliard, A. L. (2016). Justice, difference, and the capability to function. Journal of Occupational Science, 23(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2014.957886
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, C. (2007). Direct payments and their future: An ethical concern? Ethics and Social Welfare, 1(3), 348–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/17496530701603095
   Google Scholar
• Bisaillon, L. (2012). An analytic glossary to social inquiry using institutional and political activist ethnography. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 11(5), 607–627. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691201100506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman, C., Carey, A. C., & Ben-Moshe, L. (2014). Reconsidering confinement: Interlocking locations and logics of incarceration. In L. Ben-Moshe, C. Chapman, & A. C. Carey (Eds.), Disability incarcerated: Imprisonment and disability in the United States and Canada (pp. 3–24). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, K. (2012). Towards sustainable hybrid relationships in cash-for-care systems. Disability & Society, 27(3), 399–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2012.654990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Church, K., Frazee, C., Panitch, M., Luciani, T., & Bowman, V. (2007). Doing disability at the bank: Discovering the work of learning/teaching done by disabled bank employees. RBC Foundation Institute for Disability Studies, Research and Education.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, M. J., Hagglund, K. J., & Sherman, A. K. (2008). A longitudinal comparison of consumer-directed and agency-directed personal assistance service programmes among persons with physical disabilities. Disability & Rehabilitation, 30(9), 689–695. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280701463878
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cranford, C. J. (2005). From precarious workers to unionized employees and back again? The challenges of organizing personal-care workers in Ontario. In C. J. Cranford, J. Fudge, E. Tucker & L. F. Vosko (Eds.), Self-employed workers organize: Law, unions and policy (pp. 96–135). McGill-Queens University Press.
   Google Scholar
• DeJong, G. (1983/2001). Defining and implementing the independent living concept. In N. M. Crewe & I. K. Zola (Eds.), Independent living for physically disabled people (pp. 4–27). People with Disabilities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K. (2003). Performing [auto] ethnography politically. Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies, 25(3), 257–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714410390225894
   Google Scholar
• DeVault, M. L. (2014). Mapping invisible work: Conceptual tools for social justice projects. Sociological Forum, 29(4), 775–790. https://doi.org/10.1111/socf.12119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dierckx de Casterlé, B., Gastmans, C., Bryon, E., & Denier, Y. (2012). QUAGOL: A guide for qualitative data analysis. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 49(3), 360–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.09.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doty, P., Simon-Rusinowitz, L., Mahoney, K. J., & Sciegaj, M. (2012). How does cash and counseling affect the growth of participant-directed services? Generations, 36(1), 28–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durocher, E., Gibson, B. E., & Rappolt, S. (2014). Occupational justice: A conceptual review. Journal of Occupational Science, 21(4), 418–430. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2013.775692
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, C., & Bochner, A. P. (2003). Autoethnography, personal narrative, reflexivity: Researcher as subject. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (2nd ed., pp. 199–258). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fritsch, K. (2010). Intimate assemblages: Disability, intercorporeality, and the labour of attendant care. Critical Disability Discourse, 2, 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Galvaan, R. (2012). Occupational choice: The significance of socio-economic and political factors. In G. E. Whiteford & C. Hocking (Eds.), Occupational science: Society, inclusion, participation (pp. 150–162). Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Goodley, D., Lawthom, R., & Runswick-Cole, K. (2014). Dis/ability and austerity: Beyond work and slow death. Disability & Society, 29(6), 980–984. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2014.920125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammell, K. R. W., & Beagan, B. (2017). Occupational injustice: A critique. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 84(1), 58–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008417416638858
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hande, M. J., & Kelly, C. (2015). Organizing survival and resistance in austere times: Shifting disability activism and care politics in Ontario, Canada. Disability & Society, 30(7), 961–975. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2015.1069731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The managed heart. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hochschild, A. R. (1997). The time bind: When work becomes home and home becomes work. Metropolitan Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hocking, C. (2012). Working for citizenship: The dangers of occupational deprivation. Work, 41(4), 391–395. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-2012-1316
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hocking, C. (2017). Occupational justice as social justice: The moral claim for inclusion. Journal of Occupational Science, 24(1), 29–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2017.1294016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobsen, K. (2004). If work doesn’t work: How to enable occupational justice. Journal of Occupational Science, 11(3), 125–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2004.9686540
   Google Scholar
• Kafer, A. (2013). Feminist, queer, crip. Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Katzman, E. (2016). Self-management and the government of disability: Reinforcing normalcy through the construction of able-disabled subjectivities. In J. Polzer & E. Power (Eds.), Neoliberal governance and health: Duties, risks and vulnerabilities (pp. 307–329). McGill-Queen’s University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Katzman, E. (2021). Nothing about “us” without whom? (Re)cognizing alliance between disabled people and care workers in direct-funded attendant services. In A. C. Carey, J. M. Ostrove & T. Fannon (Eds.), Disability alliances and allies (Research in Social Science and Disability, 12, pp. 133–153). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-354720200000012010
   Google Scholar
• Katzman, E., & Kinsella, E. A. (2018). ‘It’s like having another job’: The invisible work of self-managing attendant services. Disability & Society, 33(9), 1436–1459. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2018.1497949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katzman, E., Kinsella, E. A., & Polzer, J. (2020). ‘Everything is down to the minute’: Clock time, crip time and the relational work of self-managing attendant services. Disability & Society, 35(4), 517–541. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2019.1649126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, C. (2016). Disability politics and care: The challenge of direct funding. UBC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kinsella, E. A., & Durocher, E. (2016). Occupational justice: Moral imagination, critical reflection and political praxis. OTJR: Occupation, Participation & Health, 36(4), 163–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1539449216669458
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinsella, E. A., & Whiteford, G. (2009). Knowledge generation and utilization in occupational therapy: Toward epistemic reflexivity. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 56(4), 249–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1630.2007.00726.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kittay, E. F. (1999). Love’s labour: Essays on women, equality and dependency. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Krogh, K., & Johnson, J. (2006). A life without living: Challenging medical and economic reductionism in home support policy for people with disabilities. In D. Pothier & R. F. Devlin (Eds.), Critical disability theory: Essays in philosophy, politics, policy, and law (pp. 151–176). UBC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kronenberg, F., & Pollard, N. (2005). Overcoming occupational apartheid: A preliminary exploration of the political nature of occupational therapy. In F. Kronenberg, S. Algado, & N. Pollard (Eds.), Occupational therapy without borders: Learning from the spirit of survivors (pp. 58–86). Elsevier/Churchill Livingstone.
   Google Scholar
• Ladau, E. (2014). What should you call me? I get to decide. In C. Wood (Ed.), Criptiques (pp. 47–55). May Day Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lather, P. (2001a). Postbook: Working the ruins of feminist ethnography. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 27(1), 199–227. https://doi.org/10.1086/495677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lather, P. (2001b). Postmodernism, post-structuralism, and post(critical) ethnography: Of ruins, aporias and angels. In P. Atkinson (Ed.), Handbook of ethnography (pp. 477–492). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Leece, J. (2004). Money talks, but what does it say? Direct payments and the commodification of care. Practice, 16(3), 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950315042000306688
   Google Scholar
• Leece, D., & Leece, J. (2006). Direct payments: Creating a two-tiered system in social care? British Journal of Social Work, 36(8), 1379–1393. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bch394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S. (1995). Emerging criteria for quality in qualitative and interpretive research. Qualitative Inquiry, 1(3), 275–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780049500100301
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., Lynham, S. A., & Guba, E. G. (2018). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences, revisited. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (5th ed., pp. 108–150). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lord, J. (2010). Impact: Changing the way we view disability – the history, perspective and vision of the independent living movement in Canada. Independent Living Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Lord, J., Lomotey, J., Walker, J., Armes, D., Janzen, R., & Malleck, G. (2012). An evaluation of the expansion to the direct funding program. Centre for Community Based Research.
   Google Scholar
• Marfisi, C. (2002). Personally speaking: A critical reflection of factors which blur the original vision of personal assistance services. Disability Studies Quarterly, 22(1), 1–7. http://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v22i1.333
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Mladenov, T. (2015). Neoliberalism, postsocialism, disability. Disability & Society, 30(3), 445–459. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2015.1021758
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mladenov, T. (2017). Governing through personal assistance: A Bulgarian case. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 19(2), 91–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/15017419.2016.1178168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, J. (1992). Personal and political: A feminist perspective on researching physical disability. Disability, Handicap & Society, 7(2), 157–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/02674649266780181
   Google Scholar
• Morris, J. (1997). Care or empowerment? A disability rights perspective. Social Policy & Administration, 31(1), 54–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9515.00037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, J. (2004). Independent living and community care: A disempowering framework. Disability & Society, 19(5), 427–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/0968759042000235280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson, I., & Townsend, E. (2010). Occupational justice: Bridging theory and practice. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 17(1), 57–63. https://doi.org/10.3109/11038120903287182
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Byrne, P. (2007). The advantages and disadvantages of mixing methods: An analysis of combining traditional and autoethnographic approaches. Qualitative Health Research, 17(10), 1381–1391. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732307308304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Keefe, J. (2009). Implementing self-direction programs with flexible individual budgets: Lessons learned from the cash and counseling replication states. Cash & Counselling. http://www.nasuad.org/sites/nasuad/files/hcbs/files/153/7636/CC_Replication_Report_final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Piepzna-Samarasinha, L. L. (2018). Care work: Dreaming disability justice. Arsenal Pulp Press.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, L. (1994). Writing: A method of inquiry. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 516–529). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Scourfield, P. (2005). Implementing the community care (direct payments) act: Will the supply of personal assistants meet the demand and at what price? Journal of Social Policy, 34(3), 469–488. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279405008871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scourfield, P. (2007). Social care and the modern citizen: Client, consumer, service user, manager and entrepreneur. British Journal of Social Work, 37(1), 107–122. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bch346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sethi, C. (2020). Mothering as a relational role: Re-evaluating everyday parenting occupations. Journal of Occupational Science, 27(2), 158–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2019.1666423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shakespeare, T. (2006). Disability rights and wrongs. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shakespeare, T. (2013). Disability rights and wrongs revisited. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315887456
   Google Scholar
• Shildrick, M. (2009). Dangerous discourses of disability, subjectivity and sexuality. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Simon-Rusinowitz, L., Schwartz, A., Loughlin, D., Sciegaj, M., Mahoney, K. J., & Donkoh, Y. (2014). Where are they now? Cash and counseling successes and challenges over time. Care Management Journals, 15(3), 104–110. https://doi.org/10.1891/1521-0987.15.3.104
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Slasberg, C., & Beresford, P. (2015). Building on the original strengths of direct payments to create a better future for social care. Disability & Society, 30(3), 479–483. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2015.1007672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slasberg, C., Beresford, P., & Schofield, P. (2012). Can personal budgets really deliver better outcome for all at no cost? Reviewing the evidence, costs and quality. Disability & Society, 27(7), 1029–1034. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2012.736671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, D. (1987). The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology. Northeastern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D. (2002). Institutional ethnography. In T. May (Ed.), Qualitative research in action (pp. 17–52). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Spalding, K., Watkins, J. R., & Williams, A. P. (2006). Self-managed care programs in Canada: A report to Health Canada. https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/publications/health-system-services/self-managed-care-programs-canada-report-to-health-canada.html
   Google Scholar
• Spandler, H. (2004). Friend or foe? Towards a critical assessment of direct payments. Critical Social Policy, 24(2), 187–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018304041950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srivastava, P., & Hopwood, N. (2009). A practical iterative framework for qualitative data analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(1), 76–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690900800107
   Google Scholar
• Stadnyk, R., Townsend, E., & Wilcock, A. (2010). Occupational justice. In C. H. Christiansen & E. A. Townsend (Eds.), Introduction to occupation: The art and science of living (2nd ed., pp. 329–358). Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Stainton, T., & Boyce, S. (2004). I have got my life back: Users’ experiences of direct payments. Disability & Society, 19(5), 443–454. https://doi.org/10.1080/0968759042000235299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomar, N., & Bailliard, A. L. (2020). Understanding the moral economics of occupational engagement. Journal of Occupational Science, 27(1), 82–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2019.1591297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend, E., & Wilcock, A. (2004). Occupational justice and client-centered practice: A dialogue in progress. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 71(2), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/000841740407100203
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tsolidis, G. (2008). The (im)possibility of poststructuralist ethnography: Researching identities in borrowed spaces. Ethnography and Education, 3(3), 271–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457820802305501
   Google Scholar
• Ungerson, C. (1997). Social politics and the commodification of care. Social Politics, 4(3), 362–381. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/4.3.362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ungerson, C. (2004). Whose empowerment and independence? A cross-national perspective on ‘cash for care’ schemes. Ageing & Society, 24(2), 189–212. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X03001508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varpio, L., Ajjawi, R., Monrouxe, L., O’Brien, B., & Reese, C. (2017). Shedding the cobra effect: Problematising thematic emergence, triangulation, saturation and member checking. Medical Education, 51(1), 40–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiteford, G. (2000). Occupational deprivation: Global challenge in the new millennium. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63(5), 200–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/030802260006300503
   Google Scholar
• Wilcock, A. A. (2006). An occupational perspective on health (2nd ed.). Slack.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcock, A. A., & Hocking, C. (2015). An occupational perspective on health (3rd ed.). Slack.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcock, A. A., & Townsend, E. (2009). Occupational justice. In E. B. Crepeau, E. S. Cohn, & B. A. B. Schell (Eds.), Willard and Spackman’s occupational therapy (11th ed., pp. 192–199). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Withers, A. J. (2012). Disability politics and theory. Fernwood Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Yoshida, K., Willi, V., Parker, I., & Locker, D. (2004). The emergence of self-managed attendant services in Ontario: Direct funding pilot project – an independent living model for Canadians requiring attendant services. In J. J. Kronenfeld (Ed.), Chronic care, health care systems and services integration (Research in the Sociology of Health Care, 22, 177–204). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0275-4959(04)22010-5
   Google Scholar