Critical reflections about plural law, Western constructions of human rights, and occupational justice: From Indigenous and African cosmovisions

References

• Adad, C. J. C. (2015). Candomblé e direito: o encontro de duas cosmovisões na problematização da noção de sujeito de direito [Candomblé and law: Two cosmovisions matching and the problematization of subject of law; Master’s thesis, Universidade de Brasília]. Repositório Institucional da UnB. https://repositorio.unb.br/handle/10482/19046.
   Google Scholar
• Andrade, D. D., & Teodoro, M. C. (2020). A colonialidade do poder na perspectiva da interseccionalidade de raça e gênero: Análise do caso das empregadas domésticas no Brasil [The coloniality of power from an intersectionality perspective of race and gender: Analysis of the case of domestic servants in Brazil]. Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas, 10(2), 565–586. https://doi.org/10.5102/rbpp.v10i2.6855
   Google Scholar
• Barbosa, R., & Vieira, F. (2021). A mulher indígena e a formação do povo brasileiro [The indigenous woman and the formation of the Brazilian people]. Cadernos Camilliani, 15(3-4), 331–344. https://www.saocamilo-es.br/revista/index.php/cadernoscamilliani/article/view/303
   Google Scholar
• Bispo, N. (2022). Começo, meio e começo. Entrevista conceida a André Gonçalves, Maurício Pokemon, Samária Andrade, Wellington Soares. e Maria Sueli Rodrigues de Sousa [Beginning, middle and beginning. Interview with André Gonçalves, Maurício Pokemon, Samária Andrade, Wellington Soares, and Maria Sueli Rodrigues de Sousa]. Revista Revetres (vol. 50). Edição Paulo de Tarso Moraes. https://revistarevestres.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Revestres50_online.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Calhoun, A. D. (2021). The development and future of occupational science: A budding occupational scientist’s reflections and assertions about the discipline. Journal of Occupational Science, 28(2), 193–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2020.1801492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Córdoba, A. G. (2021). A propósito de nuevas formas de colonización en terapia ocupacional. Reflexiones sobre la idea de Justicia Ocupacional desde la perspectiva de una filosofía política crítica [About new forms of colonization in occupational therapy. Reflections on the idea of occupational justice from the perspective of a critical political philosophy]. Cadernos Brasileiros De Terapia Ocupacional, 28(4), 1365–1381. https://doi.org/10.4322/2526-8910.ctoARF2175
   Google Scholar
• da Silva, J. P. (2017). Nota crítica sobre (in)condicionalidade [Critical note on (un)conditionality]. Revista Brasileira de Sociologia, 5(10). https://doi.org/10.20336/rbs.203
   Google Scholar
• da Silva, J. P. L. (2018). Imperialismo Cultural e Direitos Humanos: uma análise crítica [Cultural imperialism and human rights: A critical analysis]. Ponto-E-Vírgula, 23, 27–43. https://doi.org/10.23925/1982-4807.2018i23p27-43
   Google Scholar
• de Brito, C. M., Silva, L. B., Guimarães, L. C., Lara, B. A. S., Martinez, M. O. Z., & Monteiro, C. F. (2021). Cotidianos vividos e cotidiano imaginado: queremos ser floresta [Lived everyday life and imagined everyday life: We want to be a forest]. In P. H. B. Rocha, J. L. Q. Magalhães, & S. G. Teixeira, (Eds.), Decolonialidade a partir do Brasil [Decoloniality from Brazil] (8th ed., pp. 181–183). Dialética.
   Google Scholar
• Durocher, E., Gibson, B. E., & Rappolt, S. (2014) Occupational justice: A conceptual review. Journal of Occupational Science, 21(4), 418–430. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2013.775692
   Google Scholar
• Ferrazzo, D. (2015). Pluralismo jurídico e descolonização constitucional na América Latina [Legal pluralism and constitutional decolonization in Latin America; Master’s thesis, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina]. Banco de Teses e Dissertações do IPRI. https://repositorio.ufsc.br/bitstream/handle/123456789/133231/333654.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fulgêncio, C. A., & Nascimento, W. F. (2012) Bioética de intervenção e justiça: olhares desde o sul [Bioethics of intervention and justice: Perspectives from the south]. Revista Brasileira de Bioética - SBB, 8(1-4), 47–56.
   Google Scholar
• Galheigo, S. M., Braga, C. P., Arthur, M. P., & Matsuo, C. M. (2018). Produção de conhecimento, perspectivas e referências teórico práticas na terapia ocupacional brasileira: marcos e tendências em uma linha do tempo [Knowledge production, perspectives and theoretical-practical references in Brazilian occupational therapy: Milestones and tendencies in a timeline]. Cadernos Brasileiros de Terapia Ocupacional, 26(4), 723–738. https://doi.org/10.4322/2526-8910.ctoAO1773
   Google Scholar
• Gonçalves, M. V., & Malfitano, A. P. S. (2020). Brazilian youth experiencing poverty: Everyday life in the favela. Journal of Occupational Science, 27(3), 311–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2020.1757495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammell, K. R. W. (2020). Ações nos determinantes sociais de saúde: avançando na equidade ocupacional e nos direitos ocupacionais [Actions on the social determinants of health: Advancing occupational equity and occupational rights]. Cadernos Brasileiros de Terapia Ocupacional, 28(1), 378–400. https://doi.org/10.4322/2526-8910.ctoARF2052
   Google Scholar
• Hammell, K. R. W., & Beagan, B. (2017). Occupational injustice: A critique. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy. 84(1), 58–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008417416638858
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammell, K. R. W., & Iwama, M. K. (2012). Well-being and occupational rights: An imperative for critical occupational therapy. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 19(5), 385–394. https://doi.org/10.3109/11038128.2011.611821
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hocking, C. (2017). Occupational justice as social justice: The moral claim for inclusion, Journal of Occupational Science, 24(1), 29–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2017.1294016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krenak, A. (2020). A vida não é útil [Life is not useful]. Companhia das Letras.
   Google Scholar
• Magalhães, J. L. Q. (2012). O estado plurinacional e o direito internacional moderno [The plurinational state and modern international law]. Juruá Editora.
   Google Scholar
• Magalhães, L., Farias, L., Rivas-Quarneti, N., Alvarez, L., & Malfitano, A. P. S. (2019). The development of occupational science outside the Anglophone sphere: Enacting global collaboration. Journal of Occupational Science, 26(2), 181–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2018.1530133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magalhães, L., & Galheigo, S. M. (2010). Enabling international communication among Brazilian occupational therapists: Seeking consensus on occupational terminology. Occupational Therapy International, 17(3), 113–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/oti.292
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molke, D., Laliberte Rudman, D., & Polatajko, H. (2004). The promise of occupational science: A developmental assessment of an emerging academic discipline. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 71(5), 269–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/000841740407100506
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Motimele, M. (2022). Engaging with occupational reconstructions: A perspective from the Global South. Journal of Occupational Science, 29(4), 478–481. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2022.2110659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noguera, R. (2012). Ubuntu como modo de existir: elementos gerais para uma ética afroperspectiva [Ubuntu as a way of existing: General elements for an Afro-perspective ethic]. Revista da Associação Brasileira de Pesquisadores/as Negros/As (ABPN), 3(6), 147–150. https://abpnrevista.org.br/site/article/view/358
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, C. J. S. (2010). Jusnaturalismo: alvorecer e ocaso da ideia de direitos naturais [Jusnaturalism: Dawn and sunset of the idea of natural rights]. Argumentos Revista de Filosofia, Fortaleza, 2(3), 161–168. https://repositorio.ufc.br/bitstream/riufc/3549/1/2010_Art_CJSOliveira.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ramugondo, E. L. (2015). Occupational consciousness. Journal of Occupational Science, 22(4), 488–501. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2015.1042516
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. (2008). Uma teoria da justiça [A theory of justice] (3rd ed.). Martins Fontes.
   Google Scholar
• Santos, B. S. (2009). Direitos humanos: o desafio da interculturalidade [Human rights: The challenge of interculturality]. Revista Direitos Humanos, 2, 11–18.
   Google Scholar
• Santos, B. S. (2010). Refundación del Estado en América Latina: Perspectivas desde uma episemología del Sur [Refoundation of the State in Latin America: Perspectives from a Southern epistemology]. GTZ e Fundación Ford.
   Google Scholar
• Santos, B. S. (2019). O fim do império cognitivo: A afirmação das epistemologias do Sul [The end of the cognitive empire: The affirmation of the Southern epistemologies]. Autêntica Editora.
   Google Scholar
• Santos, M. G. (2015). A plurinacionalidade em disputa: Sumak Kawsay, autonomia indígena e Estado plurinacional no Equador [Plurinationality in dispute: Sumak Kawsay, Indigenous autonomy and plurinational state in Ecuador; Master’s thesis, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo]. Repositorio PUCSP. https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/3685
   Google Scholar
• Soares, L. B. T. (1991). Terapia ocupacional: lógica do capital ou do trabalho? Retrospectiva histórica da profissão no Estado brasileiro de 1950 a 1980 [Occupational therapy: Logic of capital or work? Profession historical retrospective in Brazilian State from 1950 to 1980]. Huitec.
   Google Scholar
• Tosi, G. (2005). Direitos humanos: história, teoria e prática [Human rights: History, theory and practice]. Universidade Federal da Paraíba.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations General Assembly. (1948). Universal Declaration of Human Rights. https://www.ohchr.org/en/human-rights/universal-declaration/translations/english?LangID=eng
   Google Scholar
• Van den Berg, A. (2018). The end of the world as we know it: Social science for the twenty-first century. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 29(2), 324–328. https://doi.org/10.1353/cjs.2004.0018
   Google Scholar
• Wilcock, A., & Townsend, E. (2000). Occupational terminology interactive dialogue: Occupational justice. Journal of Occupational Science, 7(2), 84–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2000.9686470
   Google Scholar
• Wolkmer, A. C. (2014). Pluralismo jurídico: fundamentos de uma nova cultura no Direito [Legal pluralism: Foundations of a new culture in law] (4th ed.). Saraiva.
   Google Scholar
• Wolkmer, A. C., & Ferrazzo, D. (2016). Sistemas Plurais de Direito: Desde Práticas Sociais e Insurgências Latino-Americanas [Plural legal systems: From social practices and Latin American insurgencies]. Estado e Sociedade, 48, 47–75. https://revistades.jur.puc-rio.br/index.php/revistades/article/view/528
   Google Scholar
• World Federation of Occupational Therapists. (2006). WFOT Position statement on human rights (withdrawn 2019).
   Google Scholar
• World Federation of Occupational Therapists. (2019). WFOT Position statement: Occupational therapy and human rights. https://www.wfot.org/resources/occupational-therapy-and-human-rights
   Google Scholar