Envisioning better opportunities for young-system-survivors: A critical dialogical study among occupational therapists promoting inclusive practices in Germany

References

• Bakhtin, M. M., Emerson, C., & Holquist, M. (1994). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barros, D. D., Ghirardi, M. I. G., & Lopes, R. E. (2006). Social occupational therapy: A socio-historical perspective. In F. Kronenberg, S. Simó Algado, & N. Pollard (Eds.), Occupational therapy without borders: Learning from the spirit of survivors (pp. 140–151) Elsevier Churchill Livingstone.
   Google Scholar
• Baumann, M. (2010). Kinder, die Systeme sprengen. Band 1: Wenn Jugendliche und Erziehungshilfe aneinander scheitern / von Menno Baumann [Children who crash systems: Volume 1: When adolescents and educational support fail each other]. Schneider Verl. Hohengehren.
   Google Scholar
• Baumann, M. (2014). Jugendliche Systemsprenger—Zwischen Jugendhilfe und Justiz (und Psychiatrie) [Juvenile system crashers—Between youth welfare and justice (and psychiatry)]. Zeitschrift für Jugendkriminalrecht und Jugendhilfe: ZJJ [Journal of Juvenile Criminal Law and Youth Welfare], 2/2014, 162–167.
   Google Scholar
• Baumann, M. (2019). Kinder, die Systeme sprengen: Band 2: Impulse, Zugangsweg und hilfreiche Settingbedingungen für Jugendliche und Schule [Children who crash systems: Volume 2: Impulses, access pathways and helpful setting conditions for young people and schools]. Schneider-Verlag Hohengehren GmbH.
   Google Scholar
• Baumann, M. (2021). Wer sprengt hier was und wen? - Zur Notwendigkeit der Sprengung unserer Störungskonzepte [Who is blowing up what and whom? - On the necessity of blowing up our disruption concepts]. In D. Kieslinger, M. Dressel, & R. Haar (Eds.), Systemsprenger*innen: Ressourcenorientierte Ansätze zu einer defizitären Begrifflichkeit (1. Auflage, S. 58–71). Lambertus.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, L. A. (2011). Voicing relationships: A dialogic perspective. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, U. (2015). Die Inklusionslüge: Behinderung im flexiblen Kapitalismus [The inclusion lie: Disability in flexible capitalism]. Transcript.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide to understanding and doing. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., Clarke, V., Hayfield, N., & Terry, G. (2019). Thematic analysis. In P. Liamputtong (Ed.), Handbook of research methods in health social sciences (pp. 843-860). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4
   Google Scholar
• Brinkmann, S., & Kvale, S. (2018). Doing interviews. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529716665
   Google Scholar
• Bruggen, H. van, Kantartzis, S., & Pollard, N. (Eds.). (2020). And a seed was planted: Occupation based approaches for social inclusion. Volume 1, theoretical views and shifting perspectives. Whiting & Birch.
   Google Scholar
• Bundesministerium der Justiz [Federal Ministry of Justice] (1990) SGB VIII, §1, subsection 3. https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/sgb_8/__1.html
   Google Scholar
• Bundesministerium der Justiz [Federal Ministry of Justice] (1988) SGBV, § 39, subsection 1 https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/sgb_5/__39.html
   Google Scholar
• Cisco Systems. (2022). Cisco Webex Meetings | Video Conferencing and Group Messaging. https://www.webex.com/de/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Connelly, L. M. (2016). Understanding research. Trustworthiness in qualitative research. Medical-Surgical Nursing, 25(6), 435–436.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cutchin, M. P., & Dickie, V. A. (Eds.). (2013). Transactional perspectives on occupation. Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4429-5
   Google Scholar
• Darder, A., Macedo, D. P., Freire, A. M. A., Freire, P., & Freire, P. (2018). The student guide to Freire’s pedagogy of the oppressed. Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• DePoy, E., & Gilson, S. F. (2014). Branding and designing disability: Reconceptualising disability studies. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Deutscher Verband der Ergotherapeuten. (Ed.). (2017a). Die Ergotherapie in Zahlen—Zahlen. Daten. Fakten [Occupational therapy in figures—Numbers, data, facts]. https://dve.info/resources/pdf/service/bundestagswahl-2017/2969-facts-ergotherapie/file
   Google Scholar
• Deutscher Verband der Ergotherapeuten. (Ed.). (2017b). Indikationskatalog Ergotherapie: Neue Rahmenempfehlung: neue ICF-basierte Leistungsbeschreibung: umfassende Kommentierungen des DVE: Diagnoseliste mit Zuordnung von ICD-10-Codes, langfristigen Heilmittelbedarfen und besonderen Verordnungsbedarfen: aktualisierte Assessment-Instrumente [Indication catalogue for occupational therapy: New framework recommendation: New ICF-based description of services: Comprehensive comments by the DVE: List of diagnoses with assignment of ICD-10 codes, long-term therapeutic needs and special prescription needs: Updated assessment instruments] (1. Auflage, vollständig aktualisierte Neuausgabe). Schulz-Kirchner Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Esser, K. (2021). Systemsprenger zeigen auf, wo das Jugendhilfesystem reformbedürftig ist [System crashers show where the youth welfare system is in need of reform]. In D. Kieslinger, M. Dressel, & R. Haar (Hrsg.), Systemsprenger*innen: Ressourcenorientierte Ansätze zu einer defizitären Begrifflichkeit (1. Auflage, S. 72–90). Lambertus.
   Google Scholar
• Farias, L. (2017). Advancing social transformation through occupation: A critical examination of epistemological foundations, discourses and contextual factors shaping research and practice. 293. Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository.4955. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/4955
   Google Scholar
• Farias, L., & Laliberte Rudman, D. (2016). A critical interpretive synthesis of the uptake of critical perspectives in occupational science. Journal of Occupational Science, 23(1), 33–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2014.989893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farias, L., Laliberte Rudman, D., Pollard, N., Schiller, S., Serrata Malfitano, A. P., Thomas, K., & van Bruggen, H. (2019). Critical dialogical approach: A methodological direction for occupation-based social transformative work. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 26(4), 235–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/11038128.2018.1469666
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flieger, P., & Schönwiese, V. (Eds.). (2011). Menschenrechte - Integration - Inklusion: Aktuelle Perspektiven aus der Forschung [Human rights - integration - inclusion: current perspectives from research]. Klinkhardt.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, P., Ramos, M. B., & Macedo, D. (2014). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Galheigo, S. M. (2011). What needs to be done? Occupational therapy responsibilities and challenges regarding human rights. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 58(2), 60–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1630.2011.00922.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galvaan, R. (2015). The contextually situated nature of occupational choice: Marginalised young adolescents’ experiences in South Africa. Journal of Occupational Science, 22(1), 39–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2014.912124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez, A., Puigvert, L., & Flecha, R. (2011). Critical communicative methodology: Informing real social transformation through research. Qualitative Inquiry, 17(3), 235–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410397802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Götsch, M., & Bliemetsrieder, S. (2021). “Systemsprenger*innen” als kapitalistisch durchdrungene Subjektivierungsweise—Soziologische und sozialphilosophische Reflexionen der Kinder- und Jugendhiife [“System crashers” as a capitalistically permeated mode of subjectivation—Sociological and socio-philosophical reflections on child and youth life]. In D. Kieslinger, M. Dressel, & R. Haar (Eds.), Systemsprenger*innen: Ressourcenorientierte Ansätze zu einer defizitären Begrifflichkeit (1. Auflage, S. 21–42). Lambertus.
   Google Scholar
• Guajardo, A., & Mondaca, M. (2017). Human rights, occupation therapy and the centrality of social ractices. In D. Sakellariou & N. Pollard (Eds.), Occupational therapies without borders: Integrating justice with practice (2nd ed., pp. 102–108). Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Hammell, K. W. (2021). Securing occupational rights by addressing capabilities: A professional obligation. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 29(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/11038128.2021.1895308
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopman, B. (2021). Welche Grenzen? Inklusive Perspektiven auf das Narrativ der “Systemsprenger*innen” [What boundaries? Inclusive perspectives on the narrative of the “system breaker”]. In D. Kieslinger, M. Dressel, & R. Haar (Eds.), Systemsprenger*innen: Ressourcenorientierte Ansätze zu einer defizitären Begrifflichkeit (pp. 189–203). Lambertus.
   Google Scholar
• Huff, S., Laliberte Rudman, D., Magalhães, L., Lawson, E., & Kanyamala, M. (2022). Enacting a critical decolonising ethnographic approach in occupation-based research. Journal of Occupational Science, 29(1), 115–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2020.1824803
   Google Scholar
• Hyett, N., Kenny, A., & Dickson-Swift, V. (2019). Re-imagining occupational therapy clients as communities: Presenting the community-centred practice framework. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 26(4), 246–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/11038128.2017.1423374
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Izat, Y. (2020). Kinder-und jugendpsychiatrischer Kommentar zum Film “Systemsprenger” [Child and adolescent psychiatric commentary on the film „Systemcrasher“]. Zeitschrift für Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie und Psychotherapie, 48(3), 248–252. https://doi.org/10.1024/1422-4917/a000729
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kieslinger, D., Dressel, M., & Haar, R. (Eds.). (2021). Systemsprenger*innen: Ressourcenorientierte Ansätze zu einer defizitären Begrifflichkeit [Systemic crashers: resource-oriented approaches to a deficit-based conceptualisation] (1. Auflage). Lambertus.
   Google Scholar
• Kincheloe, J., L., McLaren, P., Steinberg, S. R., & Monzó, L. D. (2018). Critical pedagogy and qualitative research: Advancing the bricolage. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Klasen, F., Meyrose, A.-K., Otto, C., Reiss, F., & Ravens-Sieberer, U. (2017). Psychische Auffälligkeiten von Kindern und Jugendlichen in Deutschland: Ergebnisse der BELLA-Studie [Mental disorders in children and adolescents in Germany: Results of the BELLA study]. Monatsschrift Kinderheilkunde, 165(5), 402–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00112-017-0270-8
   Google Scholar
• Kronenberg, F., Kathard, H., Laliberte Rudman, D., & Ramugondo, E. L. (2015). Can post-apartheid South Africa be enabled to humanise and heal itself ? South African Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45(1), 20–27. https://doi.org/10.17159/2310-3833/2015/v45no1a4
   Google Scholar
• Kronenberg, F., Pollard, N., Sakellariou, D., & Kronenberg, F. (Eds.). (2011). Occupational therapies without borders: Towards an ecology of occupation-based practices. Churchill Livingstone/Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Kronenberg, F., Simó Algado, S., & Pollard, N. (2006). Occupational therapy without borders: Learning from the spirit of survivors. Elsevier Churchill Livingstone.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger, R. A. (1998). Moderating focus groups. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Labonte, R. (2004). Social inclusion/exclusion: Dancing the dialectic. Health Promotion International, 19(1), 115–121. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dah112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laliberte Rudman, D. (2010). Occupational terminology: Occupational possibilities. Journal of Occupational Science, 17(1), 55–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2010.9686673
   Google Scholar
• Laliberte Rudman, D. (2013). Enacting the critical potential of occupational science: Problematising the ‘individualising of occupation’. Journal of Occupational Science, 20(4), 298–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2013.803434
   Google Scholar
• Laliberte Rudman, D. (2018). Occupational therapy and occupational science: Building critical and transformative alliances. Cadernos Brasileiros de Terapia Ocupacional, 26(1), 241–249. https://doi.org/10.4322/2526-8910.ctoEN1246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laliberte Rudman, D., Pollard, N., Craig, C., Kantartzis, S., Piškur, B., Algado Simó, S., van Bruggen, H., & Schiller, S. (2019). Contributing to social transformation through occupation: Experiences from a think tank. Journal of Occupational Science, 26(2), 316–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2018.1538898
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laliberte Rudman, D., Simaan, J., & Nayar, S. (2020). Special issue: Illuminating occupations at the heart of social problems. Journal of Occupational Science, 27(3), 289–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2020.1783990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lopes, R. E., & Malfitano, A. P. S. (Eds.). (2021). Social occupational therapy: Theoretical and practical designs. Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Magalhães, L. (2012). What would Paulo Freire think of occupational science? In G. E. Whiteford & C. Hocking (Eds.), Occupational science: Society, participation, inclusion (pp. 8–19). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118281581.ch2
   Google Scholar
• Maher, C., Hadfield, M., Hutchings, M., & De Eyto, A. (2018). Ensuring rigor in qualitative data analysis: A design research approach to coding combining NVivo with traditional material methods. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 17(1), 160940691878636. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406918786362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malfitano, A. P. S. (2022). An anthropophagic proposition in occupational therapy knowledge: Driving our actions towards social life. World Federation of Occupational Therapists Bulletin, 78, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/14473828.2022.2135065
   Google Scholar
• Malfitano, A. P. S., & Lopes, R. E. (2018). Social occupational therapy: Committing to social change. New Zealand Journal of Occupational Therapy, 65(1), 20–26.
   Google Scholar
• Malfitano, A. P. S., Lopes, R. E., Magalhães, L., & Townsend, E. A. (2014). Social occupational therapy: Conversations about a Brazilian experience. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy. Revue Canadienne D’ergotherapie, 81(5), 298–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008417414536712
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menk, S., Schnorr, V., & Schrapper, C. (2013). „Woher die Freiheit bei all dem Zwange?”: Langzeitstudie zu (Aus-)Wirkungen geschlossener Unterbringung in der Jugendhilfe [“How can there be freedom in the face of all this coercion?” Long-term study on the effects of closed placement in youth welfare services]. Beltz Juventa.
   Google Scholar
• Meysen, T. (2010). Kinder- und Jugendhilfe und Schnittstellen: Wenn das Recht Kinder, Jugendliche und ihre Familien (auf)teilt [Child and youth welfare and interfaces: When the law (divides) children, youths and their families]. Recht der Jugend und des Bildungswesens, 58(3), 306–323. https://doi.org/10.5771/0034-1312-2010-3-306
   Google Scholar
• Mondaca, M. (2021). “Doing hope” as a possible way towards a responsive occupational science. Journal of Occupational Science, 28(1), 19–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2020.1797858
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. L., Krueger, R. A., & King, J. A. (Eds.). (1998). Focus group kit. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mumby, D. K. (2004). Discourse, power and ideology: Unpacking the critical approach. In D. Grant (Ed.), Sage handbook of organisational discourse (pp. 237-258). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pereira, R. B. (2017). Towards inclusive occupational therapy: Introducing the CORE approach for inclusive and occupation-focused practice. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 64(6), 429–435. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12394
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira, R. B., Whiteford, G., Hyett, N., Weekes, G., Di Tommaso, A., & Naismith, J. (2020). Capabilities, Opportunities, Resources and Environments (CORE): Using the CORE approach for inclusive, occupation-centred practice. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 67(2), 162–171. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12642
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollard, N., Kantartzis, S., & van Bruggen, H. (2020). Occupation-based approaches for social inclusion. In H. van Bruggen, S. Kantartzis, & N. Pollard (Eds.), And a seed was planted. Volume 1: Theoretical views and shifting perspectives (pp. 36–54). Whiting & Birch Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Pollard, N., & Sakellariou, D. (2017). Occupational therapy on the margins. World Federation of Occupational Therapists Bulletin, 73(2), 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/14473828.2017.1361698
   Google Scholar
• Ramugondo, E. L. (2015). Occupational consciousness. Journal of Occupational Science, 22(4), 488–501. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2015.1042516
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichel, K., Marotzki, U., & Schiller, S. (2009). Ethische Standards für ergotherapeutische Forschung in Deutschland, Teil 1 – eine nationale und internationale Bestandsaufnahme [Ethical standards for occupational therapy research in Germany, part 1—A national and international review]. Ergoscience, 4(2), 56–70. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1109375
   Google Scholar
• Reiß, F., Schlack, R., Otto, C., Meyrose, A.-K., & Ravens-Sieberer, U. (2021). Zur Rolle des sozioökonomischen Status bei der Inanspruchnahme fachspezifischer Versorgung von psychisch auffälligen Kindern und Jugendlichen in Deutschland: Ergebnisse der BELLA-Studie [The role of socioeconomic status in the utilisation of specialised care for mentally disturbed children and adolescents in Germany: Results of the BELLA study]. Das Gesundheitswesen, a-1335-4212. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1335-4212
   Google Scholar
• Richter, D. (2019). Soziale Inklusion und Recovery [Social inclusion and recovery]. In G. Zuaboni, C. Burr, A. Winter, & M. Schulz (Hrsg.), Recovery und psychische Gesundheit: Grundlagen und Praxisprojekte [Recovery and mental health: Basic principles and practical projects] (1. Auflage, S. 88–101). Psychiatrie Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Robert Koch-Institut, R. (Ed.). (2017). Methodische Studie zur Durchführung von Mixed-Mode-Befragungen zur Gesundheit von Kindern und Jugendlichen (Pilotstudie KiGGS Welle 2) [Methodological study on the implementation of mixed-mode surveys on the health of children and adolescents (pilot study KiGGS wave 2)]. 67.
   Google Scholar
• Rotthaus, W. (2014). Der Beitrag der Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie zum Kinderschutz [The contribution of child and adolescent psychiatry to child protection]. Kontext, 45(3), 265-278. https://doi.org/10.13109/kont.2014.45.3.265
   Google Scholar
• Schiller, S., van Bruggen, H., Kantartzis, S., Laliberte Rudman, D., Lavalley, R., & Pollard, N. (2022). “Making change by shared doing”: An examination of occupation in processes of social transformation in five case studies. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/11038128.2022.2046153
   Google Scholar
• Schrödter, J. (2021). “Systemsprenger”-Ende: Das bedeutet der Schluss [“System crasher” end: This is what the containment means]. www.kino.de/artikel/systemsprenger-ende–6m8qpg4fr3
   Google Scholar
• Schwabe, M. (2001). Was tun mit den Schwierigsten? Brauchen wir neue, besondere pädagogische Konzepte für sogenannte maßnahme-resistente Kinder und Jugendliche ? [What to do with the most difficult? Do we need new, special educational concepts for so-called measure-resistant / therapy-resistant children and adolescents?]. Evangelische Jugendhilfe, 78(Nr. 1), S. 3-22. ORLIS/Difu.
   Google Scholar
• Schwandt, T. A. (2001). Dictionary of qualitative inquiry (2nd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Straßburger, G., & Rieger, J. (Eds.). (2019). Partizipation kompakt: Für Studium, Lehre und Praxis sozialer Berufe [Participation in compact form: For the study, teaching and practice of social professions] (2nd ed., rev.). Beltz Juventa.
   Google Scholar
• The World Medical Association (WMA)-Declaration of Helsinki. (2021, October 19). https://www.wma.net/what-we-do/medical-ethics/declaration-of-helsinki/
   Google Scholar
• UN Department of Social and Economic Affairs (UN DESA). (2009). Creating an inclusive society: Practical strategies to promote social integration. https://www.un.org/esa/socdev/egms/docs/2009/Ghana/inclusive-society.pdf
   Google Scholar
• van Bruggen, H., Kantartzis, S., Pollard, N. (Eds.). (2020). And a seed was planted. Volume 1: Theoretical views and shifting perspectives. Whiting & Birch.
   Google Scholar
• van Nes, F., Abma, T., Jonsson, H., & Deeg, D. (2010). Language differences in qualitative research: Is meaning lost in translation? European Journal of Ageing, 7(4), 313–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-010-0168-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VERBI GmbH. (2022). MAXQDA | All-In-One Qualitative & Mixed Methods Data Analysis Tool. MAXQDA. https://www.maxqda.com/
   Google Scholar
• Vetten, J. (2022). Die Kinder haben Besseres verdient [The children deserve better]. https://www.n-tv.de/leute/tv/Die-Kinder-haben-Besseres-verdient-article23314147.html
   Google Scholar
• Wansing, G. (2006). Teilhabe an der Gesellschaft: Menschen mit Behinderung zwischen Inklusion und Exklusion [Participation in society: People with disabilities between inclusion and exclusion] (1. Aufl., unveränd. Nachdr). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Wasmund, S. (2021). Sozialgesetzbuch (SGB) SGB I bis XII [Social Code (SGB) SGB I to XII]. https://www.sozialgesetzbuch-sgb.de/
   Google Scholar
• Wengraf, T. (2001). Qualitative research interviewing: Biographic narrative and semi-structured methods. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Whiteford, G. E., & Hocking, C. (Eds.). (2012). Occupational science: Society, inclusion, participation. Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Whiteford, G., Jones, K., Rahal, C., & Suleman, A. (2018). The Participatory Occupational Justice Framework as a tool for change: Three contrasting case narratives. Journal of Occupational Science, 25(4), 497–508. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2018.1504607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiteford, G., & Pereira, R. B. (2012). Occupation, inclusion and participation. In G. E. Whiteford & C. Hocking (Eds.), Occupational science: Society, inclusion, participation (pp. 187-207). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcock, A. A., & Hocking, C. (2015). An occupational perspective of health (3rd ed.). Slack.
   Google Scholar
• World Federation of Occupational Therapists. (2016). WFOT code of ethics revised. https://www.ilota.org/assets/WFOT%20Code%20of%20Ethics%20revised%20CM2016%201.pdf
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization (WHO). (1946). Constitution of the World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/about/governance/constitution
   Google Scholar
• Zick, A., & Küpper, B. (Hrsg.). (2021). Die geforderte Mitte: Rechtsextreme und demokratiegefährdende Einstellungen in Deutschland 2020/21 [The demanded centre: Right-wing extremist and democratic attitudes in Germany 2020/2021]. Dietz.
   Google Scholar