240
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Balancing the scales of property rights: improving security of tenure for Queensland tenants – how and why

ORCID Icon
Pages 285-302 | Received 28 Oct 2018, Accepted 25 Nov 2018, Published online: 11 Dec 2018

References

  • Adams v Scowcroft [2012] QCATA 25. (2012, February 15). (‘Adams v Scowcroft’)
  • Adkins, B., Guthrie, D., Mead, E., & Summerville, J. (2002, January 16-20). “Tenure security and its impact on private renters in Queensland’ (Position Paper No. 21), Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute Queensland Research Centre.
  • Alikhan v Mian Prestige Real Estate trading as Ray White Runaway Bay [2010] QCATA 21. (2010, June1). (‘Alikhan v Mian’).
  • Bamfield v Zanfan Pty Ltd [2010] QCAT 1. (2010, February 22). (‘Bamfield v Zanfan’).
  • Bauer v McMillan & Anor [2013] QCATA 140. (2013, May 20). (‘Bauer v McMillan’).
  • Bennett, M. (2016). Security of tenure for generation rent: Irish and Scottish approaches. Victoria University of Wellington Law Review, 47, 363–384.
  • Bradbrook, A. (1975). Poverty and the residential landlord-tenant relationship. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
  • Briginshaw v Briginshaw [1938] HCA 34. (1938). 60 CLR 336 (‘Briginshaw’)
  • Canendo v Biddi Biddi Advancement Co-op Society Ltd [2012] QCATA 103. (2012, May 28). (‘Canendo v Biddi’).
  • Choice (2017,February). Unsettled: Life in Australia’s private rental market. Report by Choice, National Shelter and NATO.
  • Cuda v Moriconi [2014] QCAT 083. (2014, February 28). (‘Cuda v Moriconi’).
  • Cummings v Cairns and District Regional Housing Corporation Ltd [2013] QCATA 161 (2013, May 31). (‘Cummings v Cairns’).
  • de Brenni, M. (2018, September 16). The Palaszczuk government opening the doors to renting reform. Media Statement. Retrieved October 12, 2018, From http://statements.qld.gov.au/Statement/2018/9/30/the-palaszczuk-government-opening-the-doors-to-renting-reform
  • Du Preez v Linda’s Homes Pty Ltd [2010] QCATA 2. (2010, March 22). (‘Du Preez v Linda’s’).
  • Fitzpatrick, S., & Pawson, H. (2014). Ending security of tenure for social renters: Transitioning to ‘ambulance service’ social housing? Housing Studies, 29(5), 597–615.
  • Fitzpatrick, S., & Watts, B. (2017). Competing visions: Security of tenure and the welfarisation of English social housing. Housing Studies, 32(8), 1021–1038.
  • Grimshaw v YMCA [2010] QCATA 88. (2010, November 29). (‘Grimshaw v YMCA’).
  • Hare v Nicoll [1966] 2 WLR 441 ('Hare v Nicoll')
  • Hoolachan, J., McKee, K., Moore, T., & Mihaela Soaita, A. (2017). ‘Generation rent’ and the ability to ‘settle down’: Economic and geographical variation in young people’s housing transitions. Journal of Youth Studies, 20(1), 63–78.
  • Housing Legislation (Building Better Futures) Amendment Act 2017 (Qld).
  • Hulse, K., & Milligan, V. (2014). Secure occupancy: A new framework for analysing security in rental housing. Housing Studies, 29(5), 638–656.
  • Koothari, J. (2007, May 11). Report of the Special Rapporteur on Adequate Housing as a Component of the Right to an Adequate Standard of Living: Addendum – Mission to Australia, 31 July to 15 August 2006, UN Doc A/HRC?4?Add.2.
  • Levy, A. (2018,May 16). Apartment glut prompts massive discounting in Brisbane, research reveals. ABC News. http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-05-16/apartment-glut-offers-massive-discounts-brisbane-properties/9764558
  • Lindenberg v Kalwun Development Corporation (No 2) [2011] QCAT 535. (2011, October 27). (‘Lindenberg v Kalwun (No 2)’).
  • Lindenberg v Kalwun Development Corporation [2011] QCAT 287. (2011, May 19). (‘Lindenberg v Kalwun’).
  • McLachlan v Real Tenants - Real Property Management CAN 130683297 [2011] QCAT 665. (2011, December 13). (‘McLachlan v Real’).
  • Morris, A. (2006). Living on the margins: The worlds of older private renters in Sydney. Australian Journal of Human Rights, 205–221.
  • Morris, A. (2018). Housing tenure and the health of older Australians dependent on the age pension for their income. Housing Studies, 33(1), 77–95.
  • Property Agents and Motor Dealers Act 2000 (Qld) (superseded).
  • Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009 (Qld). ('QCATA')
  • Queensland Government. (2017, June 13). Queensland housing strategy 2017-2017. Retrieved October 16, 2018, From https://www.qld.gov.au/housing/public-community-housing/have-your-say-housing-strategy
  • Queensland Labor. (2017). ‘Putting Queenslanders first – state platform 2017ʹ, 28-29 July, 2018. Retrieved October 16, 2018, From https://www.queenslandlabor.org/media/20088/alp_state_platform_2017_02.pdf
  • Ray, D. (2018). Valuing data. New York: Taylor & Francis.
  • Residential Tenancies Act (NT).
  • Residential Tenancies Act 1987 (NSW).
  • Residential Tenancies Act 1987 (WA).
  • Residential Tenancies Act 1995 (SA).
  • Residential Tenancies Act 1997 (ACT).
  • Residential Tenancies Act 1997 (Tas).
  • Residential Tenancies Act 1997 (Vic) (‘RTAV’).
  • Residential Tenancies Amendment Act 2018 (Vic) (‘RTAAV’).
  • Residential Tenancies and Rooming Accommodation Act 2008 (Qld) (‘RTRAA’).
  • Residential Tenancies Rooming Accommodation Regulation 2009 (Qld).
  • Retail Shop Leases Act 1994(Qld).
  • Spence v Davies and Ors [2011] QCATA 152. (2011, June 14). (‘Spence v Davies’).
  • Stewart, A. (1994). Rethinking housing law: A contribution to the debate on tenure. Housing Studies, 9(2), 263–279.
  • Tenants Union of Victoria (2015, May). Online survey of Victorian private market renters: 2015, Retrieved October 16, 2018, From https://www.tuv.org.au/articles/files/housing_statistics/tenure-security-2015-survey-report.pdf
  • Victoria State Government (‘VSG’). (2015, November). Security of tenure – Issues Paper Residential Tenancies Act Review.
  • Webster v Smith [2012] QCATA 163. (2012, August 27). (‘Webster v Smith’).
  • Wharton, N., & Cradduck, L. (2011). A comparison of security of tenure in Queensland and Western Europe. Monash University Law Review, 37(2), 16–46.
  • Wiesel, I., & Pawson, H. (2015). Why do tenants leave social housing? Exploring residential and social mobility at the lowest rungs of Australia’s socioeconomic ladder. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 50(4), 397–417.
  • Wilks v Integrated Family and Youth Service Ltd [2015] QCAT 322. (2015, August 19). (‘Wilks v Integrated’)

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.