Dialogicality in teaching process drama: three narratives, three frameworks

References

• Anderson, R., and K. N. Cissna. 2012. “Martin Buber. Bearing Witness to an Experience.” In Philosophical Profiles in the Theory of Communication, edited by J. Hannan, R. J. Bernstein, and J. D. Peters, 127–158. New York: P. Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, M., C. Squire, and M. Tamboukou. 2008. Doing Narrative Research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. 1984. Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics. Translated by C. Emerson. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. 1991. Dostojevskin poetiikan ongelmia [Problemy Poetiki Dostojevskogo]. Translated by P. Nieminen and T. Laine. Helsinki: Orient Express.
   Google Scholar
• Boal, A. 1995. The Rainbow of Desire. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bolton, G. 1999. Acting in Classroom Drama. A Critical Analysis. Portland, Maine: Calendar Islands Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Bowell, P., and B. Heap. 2001. Planning Process Drama. London: David Fulton.
   Google Scholar
• Buber, M. 1923. Minä ja Sinä [I and Thou]. Translated by J. Pietilä 1995. Juva: WSOY.
   Google Scholar
• Clandinin, D. J., and J. Huber. 2002. “Narrative Inquiry: Toward Understanding Life’s Artistry.” Curriculum Inquiry 32 (2): 161–169. doi:10.1111/1467-873X.00220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connelly, M. F., and D. J. Clandinin. 2006. “Narrative Inquiry.” In Handbook of Complementary Methods in Education Research, edited by J. L. Green, G. Camilli, and P. B. Elmore, 477–487. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Deppermann, A. 2013. “Editorial: Positioning in Narrative Interaction.” Narrative Inquiry 23 (1): 1–15. doi:10.1075/ni.23.1.01dep.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, J. 2016. “Demystifying Process Drama: Exploring the Why, What and How.” NJ Drama Australia Journal 40 (2): 127–140. doi:10.1080/14452294.2016.1276738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freebody, K. 2010. “Exploring Teacher- Student Interactions and Moral Reasoning Practices in Drama Classrooms.” Research in Drama Education: the Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance 15 (2): 209–225. doi:10.1080/13569781003700094.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood, J. 2001. “Within a Third Space.” Research in Drama Education: the Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance 6 (2): 193–205. doi:10.1080/13569780120070731.
   Google Scholar
• Hepplewhite, K. 2015. “The Applied Theatre Practitioner as Dialogic Hero.” Research in Drama Education: the Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance 20 (2): 182–185. doi:10.1080/13569783.2015.1021322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lähteenmäki, M. 1998. “On Dynamics and Stability: Saussure, Voloshinov, and Bakhtin.” In Dialogues on Bakhtin: Interdisciplinary Readings, edited by M. Lähteenmäki and H. Dufva, 52–71. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.
   Google Scholar
• Lähteenmäki, M. 2002. “Dialoginen näkökulma kieleen: Mihail Bahtin ja Valentin Vološinov.” [Dialogical Viewpoint to Language: Mihail Bakhtin and Valentin Vološinov]. In Kielentutkimuksen klassikoita [The Classics of Language Research], edited by H. Dufva and M. Lähteenmäki, 179–200. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän yliopisto.
   Google Scholar
• Lähteenmäki, M. 2009. “Dialogisuuden lähteillä: oppihistoriallinen näkökulma Bahtinin dialogiseen kielikäsitykseen” [On the Sources of Dialogicality: The Viewpoint of Conceptual History to Bakhtin’s Dialogical Theory of Language]. Puhe Ja Kieli 29 (2): 63–74. https://journal.fi/pk/article/view/4786.
   Google Scholar
• Leiman, M. 1998. “Words as Intersubjective Mediators in Psychotherapeutic Discourse: The Presence of Hidden Voices in Patient Utterances.” In Dialogues on Bakhtin: Interdisciplinary Readings, edited by M. Lähteenmäki and H. Dufva, 106–117. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.
   Google Scholar
• Linell, P. 2009. Rethinking Language, Mind, and World Dialogically: Interactional and Contextual Theories of Human Sense-Making. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Pub.
   Google Scholar
• Märtsin, M. 2011. Dialogicality in Focus: Challenges to Theory, Method and Application. New York: Nova Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholson, H. 2005. Applied Drama: A Gift of Theatre. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholson, H. 2014. Applied Drama: A Gift of Theatre. 2nd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill, C. 1995. Drama Worlds: A Framework for Process Drama. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• O’Toole, J. 1992. The Process of Drama: Negotiating Art and Meaning. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Østern, A., and H. Heikkinen. 2001. “The Aesthetic Doubling.” In Nordic Voices. In Drama, Theatre and Education, edited by B. Rasmussen, T. Kjølner, V. Rasmusson, and H. Heikkinen, 110–123. Bergen: IDEA Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Squire, C. 2008. “Experience-Centered and Culturally Oriented Approaches to Narrative.” In Doing Narrative Research, edited by M. Andrews, C. Squire, and M. Tamboukou, 41–63. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, P., and C. D. Warner. 2006. Structure and Spontaneity. The Process Drama of Cecily O’Neill. Staffordshire: Trentham Books.
   Google Scholar
• Wales, P. 2009. “Positioning the Drama Teacher: Exploring the Power of Identity in Teaching Practices.” Research in Drama Education: the Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance 14 (2): 261–278. doi:10.1080/13569780902868911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, K. 2011. Narrative Inquiry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar