Assessing the effectiveness of a responsible gambling behavioural feedback tool for reducing the gambling expenditure of at-risk players

References

• Auer, M., & Griffiths, M. D. (2013). Voluntary limit setting and player choice in most intense online gamblers: An empirical study of gambling behaviour. Journal of Gambling Studies, 29, 647–660. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-012-9332-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auer, M., & Griffiths, M. D. (2014). An empirical investigation of theoretical loss and gambling intensity. Journal of Gambling Studies, 30, 879–887. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-013-9376-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernhard, B. J. (2007). The voices of vices: Sociological perspectives on the pathological gambling entry in the diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. American Behavioral Scientist, 51, 8–32. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764207304869.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernhard, B. J., Lucas, A. F., & Jang, D. (2006). Responsible gaming device research report. Las Vegas: University of Nevada, Las Vegas International Gaming Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Blaszczynski, A., Ladouceur, R., Nower, L., & Shaffer, H. (2005). Informed choice and gambling: Principles for consumer protection. Report prepared for the Australian Gaming Council, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Blaszczynski, A., Ladouceur, R., & Shaffer, H. J. (2004). A science-based framework for responsible gambling: The Reno model. Journal of Gambling Studies, 20, 301–317. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOGS.0000040281.49444.e2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale. NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, J. A., Hodgins, D. C., Toneatto, T., Rai, A., & Cordingley, J. (2009). Pilot study of a personalized feedback intervention for problem gamblers. Behavior Therapy, 40, 219–224. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2008.06.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delfabbro, P., King, D. L., & Griffiths, M. D. (2012). Behavioural profiling of problem gamblers: A summary and review. International Gambling Studies, 12, 349–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dragicevic, S., Tsogas, G., & Kudic, A. (2011). Analysis of casino online gambling data in relation to behavioural risk markers for high-risk gambling and player protection. International Gambling Studies, 11, 377–391. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14459795.2011.629204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferris, J. & Wynne, H. (2001). The Canadian problem gambling index. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse.
   Google Scholar
• Gainsbury, S. (2011). Player account-based gambling: Potentials for behaviour-based research methodologies. International Gambling Studies, 11, 153–171. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14459795.2011.571217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffiths, M. D., Wood, R. T. A., & Parke, J. (2009). Social responsibility tools in online gambling: A survey of attitudes and behavior among internet gamblers. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 12, 413–421. doi: https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2009.0062.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• LaBrie, R. A., & Shaffer, H. J. (2011). Identifying behavioral markers of disordered internet sports gambling. Addiction Research & Theory, 19, 56–65. doi: https://doi.org/10.3109/16066359.2010.512106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam, D., & Mizerski, R. (2009). An investigation into gambling purchases using the NBD and NBD-Dirichlet models. Marketing Letters, 20, 263–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesieur, H. R., & Blume, S.B. (1987).The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS): A new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 144, 1184–1188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monaghan, S. (2008). Review of pop-up messages on electronic gaming machines as a proposed responsible gambling strategy. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 6, 214–222. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-007-9133-1.
   Google Scholar
• Monaghan, S. (2009). Responsible gambling strategies for internet gambling: The theoretical and empirical base of using pop-up messages to encourage self-awareness. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 202–207. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.08.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monaghan, S., & Blaszczynski, A. (2007). Recall of electronic gaming machine signs: A static versus a dynamic mode of presentation. Journal of Gambling Issues, 20, 253–267. doi: https://doi.org/10.4309/jgi.2007.20.8.
   Google Scholar
• Monaghan, S., & Blaszczynski, A. (2010a). Electronic gaming machine warning messages: Information versus self-evaluation. The Journal of Psychology, 144, 83–96. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980903356081.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monaghan, S., & Blaszczynski, A. (2010b). Impact of mode of display and message content of responsible gambling signs for electronic gaming machines on regular gamblers. Journal of Gambling Studies, 26, 67–88. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-009-9150-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisbet, S. (2005). Responsible gambling features of card-based technologies. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 3, 54–63.
   Google Scholar
• Parke, J., & Griffiths, M. D. (2007). The role of structural characteristics in gambling. In G. Smith, D. Hodgins, & R. Williams (Eds.), Research and measurement issues in gambling studies (pp. 211–243). New York, NY: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Philander, K. S., & Mackay, T. (2014). Online gambling participation and problem gambling severity: Is there a causal relationship? International Gambling Studies, 14, 214–227. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14459795.2014.893585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reith, G. (2008). Reflections on responsibility. Journal of Gambling Issues, 22, 149–155. doi: https://doi.org/10.4309/jgi.2008.22.12.
   Google Scholar
• Sharpe, L., Walker, M., Coughlan, M., Enersen, K., & Blaszczynski, A. (2005). Structural changes to electronic gaming machines as effective harm minimization strategies for non-problem and problem gamblers. Journal of Gambling Studies, 21, 503–520. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-005-5560-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, M. J., & Wohl, M. J. A. (2013). Pop-up messages, dissociation, and craving: How monetary limit reminders facilitate adherence in a session of slot machine gambling. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 27, 268–273. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029882.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, R. J., West, B. L., & Simpson, R. I. (2007). Prevention of problem gambling: A comprehensive review of the evidence. Report prepared for the Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Wohl, M. J. A., Christie, K., Matheson, K., & Anisman, H. (2010). Animation-based education as a gambling prevention tool: Correcting erroneous cognitions and reducing the frequency of exceeding limits among slots players. Journal of Gambling Studies, 26, 469–486. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-009-9155-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wohl, M. J. A., Parush, A., Kim, H. S., & Warren, K. (2014). Building it better: Applying human–computer interaction and persuasive system design principles to a monetary limit tool improves responsible gambling. Computers in Human Behavior, 37, 124–132. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wohl, M. J. A., Sztainert, T., & Young, M. M. (2013). The CARE Model: How to improve Industry Government-Health Care Provider linkages. In D. Richards, L. Nower, & A. Blaszczynski (Eds.), Handbook of disordered gambling (pp. 263–282). New York, NY: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, R.T.A. & Bernhard, B.J. (2010, October) Found in translation: A multi-method examination of responsible gambling perceptions. Halifax: The Nova Scotia Gaming Corporation, Responsible Gambling Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, R.T.A. & Griffiths, M.D. (2008). Why Swedish people play online poker and factors that can increase or decrease trust in poker websites: A qualitative investigation. Journal of Gambling Issues, 21, available at https://doi.org/http://www.camh.net/egambling/issue21/pdfs/06wood.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, R. T. A., & Griffiths, M. D. (2014). Understanding positive play: An exploration of playing experiences and responsible gambling practices. Journal of Gambling Studies, 1–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, R. T. A., Shorter, G. W., & Griffiths, M. D. (2014a). Rating the suitability of responsible gambling features for specific game types: A resource for optimizing responsible gambling strategy. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 12, 94–112. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-013-9473-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, R. T. A., Shorter, G. W., & Griffiths, M. D. (2014b). Selecting appropriate gambling features for a specific portfolio of games. The Responsible Gambling Review, 1, 51–63.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, R. T. A., & Wood, S. A. (2009). An evaluation of two United Kingdom online support forums designed to help people with gambling issues. Journal of Gambling Issues, 23, 5–30. doi: https://doi.org/10.4309/jgi.2009.23.1.
   Google Scholar