Regulation and the management of risk in commercial gambling in Great Britain

References

• Ayres, I., & Braithwaite, J. (1992). Responsive regulation: Transcending the deregulation debate. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Better Regulation Delivery Office. (2014). Regulator's code. London: Department for Business, Innovation & Skills.
   Google Scholar
• Black, J. (1998). Talking about regulation. Public Law, 77–105.
   Google Scholar
• Black, J., & Baldwin, R. (2010). Really responsive risk-based regulation. Law & Policy, 32, 181–213. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9930.2010.00318.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, J., & Baldwin, R. (2012). When risk-based regulation aims low: Approaches and challenges. Regulation & Governance, 6, 2–22. doi:10.1111/j.1748-5991.2011.01124.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaszczynski, A., & Gainsbury, S. (2014). Editors' notes. International Gambling Studies, 14, 354–356. doi:10.1080/14459795.2014.971585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaszczynski, A., Ladouceur, R., & Shaffer, H. J. (2004). A science-based framework for responsible gambling: The Reno model. Journal of Gambling Studies, 20, 301–317. doi:10.1023/B:JOGS.0000040281.49444.e2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borrell, J. (2008). The ‘public accountability approach’: Suggestions for a framework to characterise, compare, inform and evaluate gambling regulation. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 6, 265–281. doi:10.1007/s11469-007-9131-3.
   Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, J. (2002). Restorative justice and responsive regulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, V. (2003). Dancing with tax authorities: Motivational postures and non-compliant actions. In V. Braithwaite (Ed.), Taxing democracy (pp. 15–40). Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Broomhill, R. (2001). Neoliberal globalism and the local state: A regulation approach. Journal of Australian Political Economy, 48, 115–140.
   Google Scholar
• Cassidy, R. (2014). Fair game? Producing and publishing gambling research. International Gambling Studies, 14, 345–353. doi:10.1080/14459795.2014.971420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DCMS. (2001). Gambling review report (Cm. 5206, July 2001). London: The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• DCMS. (2002). A safe bet for success: Modernising Britain's gambling law (Cm. 5397, 22 March 2002). London: The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• DCMS. (2012). Summary of Responses to Proposals for Gambling Commission Fees from 6 April 2012. (30 July 2012).
   Google Scholar
• DCMS. (2013). Gambling Act 2005: Triennial review of gaming machine stake and prize limits: Proposals for changes to maximum stake and prize limits for Category B, C and D gaming machines. (15 January 2013).
   Google Scholar
• DCMS. (2014). Gambling protections and controls. London: The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Business, Innovation & Skills. (2015). Better Regulation Framework Manual: Practical Guidance for UK Government Officials. (March 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Excell, D., Bobashev, G., Wardle, H., Gonzalez-Ordonez, D., Whitehead, T., Morris, R., & Ruddle, P. (2014). Predicting problem gamblers: analysis of industry data. http://www.responsiblegamblingtrust.org.uk/user_uploads/report%203%20-%20predicting%20problem%20gambling%20-%20final.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Gambling Commission. (2009). Annual Report and Accounts 2008/09. (HC. 701, 2 November 2009).
   Google Scholar
• Gambling Commission. (2013a). Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13. (HC. 344, 10 July 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Gambling Commission. (2013b). Written Evidence the Joint Committee on the Draft Deregulation Bill. (Cm. 8642; 26 July 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Gambling Commission. (2014a). What constitutes bingo?  (Advice note, January 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Gambling Commission. (2014b). Proposed amendments to the social responsibility provisions in the licence conditions and codes of practice for all operators (the LCCP) Consultation document. (August 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Gambling Commission. (2014c). Annual report and accounts 2013/14. (HC. 300, 10 July 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Gambling Commission. (2014d). Consultation on amendments to the Gambling Commission's Statement of principles for licensing and regulation and Licensing, compliance and enforcement policy statement, Appendix A. (July 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Gambling Commission. (2015a). Licence conditions and codes of practice. (February 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Gambling Commission. (2015b). Strengthening social responsibility: Amendments to the social responsibility provisions in the licence conditions and codes of practice (LCCP) for all operators. (February 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Gambling Commission. (2015c). Statement of principles for licensing and regulation. (March 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Gambling Commission. (2015d). Licensing, compliance and enforcement under the Gambling Act 2005: policy statement. (March 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Gambling Commission. (2015e). Industry statistics April 2009 to March 2014. (November 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Gambling Commission. (2015f). Supplementary consultation on the introduction of an annual assurance statement. (February 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Hancher, L., & Moran, M. (1989a). Introduction: Regulation and deregulation. European Journal of Political Research, 17, 129–136. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.1989.tb00186.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancher, L., & Moran, M. (1989b). Organizing regulatory space. In L. Hancher & M. Moran (Eds.), Capitalism, culture and economic regulation (pp. 271–300). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, K. (1984). Environment and enforcement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, K. (2003). Law as last resort. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C., Rothstein, H., & Baldwin, R. (2001). The government of risk. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghiemstra, R., & van Ees, H. (2011). Uniformity as response to soft law: Evidence from compliance and non-compliance with the Dutch corporate governance code. Regulation & Governance, 5, 480–498. doi:10.1111/j.1748-5991.2011.01118.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutter, B. (2001). Regulation and risk. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (2002). Liberalism, neoliberalism, and urban governance: A state-theoretical perspective. Antipode, 34, 452–472. doi:10.1111/1467-8330.00250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M., & Ward, K. (2002). Excavating the logic of British urban policy: neoliberalism as the ‘crisis of crisis-management’. Antipode, 34, 473–494. doi:10.1111/1467-8330.00251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, P. J. (2007). Regulatory regimes and accountability. Regulation & Governance, 1, 8–26. doi:10.1111/j.1748-5991.2007.00002.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miers, D. (2013). The relationship between the regulatory environment governing commercial gambling and the shape of the market in the supply and game parameters of gaming machines. The Journal of Gambling Business and Economics, 7, 55–92.
   Google Scholar
• Miers, D. (2014a). The gambling market in Great Britain. In M. Schiller & F. Gobert (Eds.), Problem gambling: Cognition, prevention and treatment (pp. 140–155). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Miers, D. (2014b). Implementing a social responsibility agenda in the regulation of gambling in Great Britain. In M. Schiller & F. Gobert (Eds.), Problem gambling: Cognition, prevention and treatment (pp. 188–218). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, K., Tyler, T. R., & Curtis, A. (2009). Nurturing regulatory compliance: Is procedural justice effective when people question the legitimacy of the law? Regulation & Governance, 3(1), 1–26. doi:10.1111/j.1748-5991.2009.01043.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, V. L., & Parker, C. (2009). Testing responsive regulation in regulatory enforcement. Regulation & Governance, 3, 376–399. doi:10.1111/j.1748-5991.2009.01064.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Hara, P. A. (2010). After neoliberalism: A social structure of accumulation or mode of regulation for global or regional performance? Journal of Economic Issues, 44, 369–384. doi:10.2753/JEI0021-3624440209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orford, J., Wardle, H., & Griffiths, M. (2013). What proportion of gambling is problem gambling? Estimates from the 2010 British gambling prevalence survey. International Gambling Studies, 13, 4–18. doi:10.1080/14459795.2012.689001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, C. (2013). Twenty years of responsive regulation: An appreciation and appraisal. Regulation & Governance, 7, 2–13. doi:10.1111/rego.12006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RGSB. (2015). http://www.rgsb.org.uk/.
   Google Scholar
• RGT. (2015). http://www.responsiblegamblingtrust.org.uk/.
   Google Scholar
• Skolnick, J. (1978). House of cards: The legalisation and control of casino gaming. Boston, Mass. Little Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Winter, S. C., & May, P. J. (2001). Motivation for compliance with environmental regulations. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 20, 675–698. doi:10.1002/pam.1023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar