References
- Bernhard, B. J. (2010). This audience is weird: Reflections what we know now in gambling research. UNLV Gaming Research & Review Journal, 14, 69–73.
- Delfabbro, P., & King, D. L. (2017). Gambling is not a capitalist conspiracy: A critical commentary of literature on the ‘industry state gambling complex’. International Gambling Studies. doi:10.1080/14459795.2017.1281994.
- Gainsbury, S., Russell, A., & Blaszczynski, A. (2014). Are psychology university student gamblers representative of non-university students and general gamblers? a comparative analysis. Journal of Gambling Studies, 30, 11–25. doi:10.1007/s10899-012-9334-9.
- Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). Most people are not WEIRD. Nature, 466, 29. doi:10.1038/466029a.
- Mitroff, I. I. (1972). The myth of objectivity or why science needs a new psychology of science. Management Science, 18, B-613–B-618. 10.1287/mnsc.18.10.B613
- Planzer, S. (2017, February 27). National policymakers versus internationally minded researchers? Lessons from a case study. The Brief Addiction Science Information Source (BASIS). Retrieved from http://www.basisonline.org/2017/02/national-policymakers-versus-internationally-minded-researchers-lessons-from-a-case-study.html
- Popper, K. R. (2002). Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge (2nd ed.). London: UK: Routledge.
- Sagan, C. (1995). Wonder and skepticism. Skeptical Inquirer, 19(1). Retrieved from http://www.csicop.org/si/show/wonder_and_skepticism
- Shaffer, H. J. (2014). Science, public policy, and law: Considering the case of gambling. In S. Planzer (Ed.), Empirical views on european gambling law and addiction (pp. v–ix). New York, NY: Springer International Publishing.