Purifying and hybridising categories in healthcare decision-making: the clinic, the home and the multidisciplinary team meeting

References

• Blok, A., & Jensen, T. (2011). Bruno Latour: Hyrbid thoughts in a hybrid world. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Broom, A. (2005). Medical specialists’ accounts of the impact of the internet on the doctor/patient relationship. Health, 9, 319–338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dew, K., Chamberlain, K., Hodgetts, D., Norris, P., Radley, A., & Gabe, J. (2014). Home as a hybrid centre of medication practice. Sociology of Health & Illness, 36, 28–43. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dew, K., Norris, P., Gabe, J., Chamberlain, K., & Hodgetts, D. (2015). Moral discourses and pharmaceuticalised governance in housholds. Social Science & Medicine, 131, 272–279. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.03.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dew, K., Plumridge, E., Stubbe, M., Dowell, A., Macdonald, L., & Major, G. (2008). “You just got to eat healthy”: The topic of CAM in the general practice consultation. Health Sociology Review, 17, 396–409. doi: 10.5172/hesr.451.17.4.396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dew, K., Signal, L., Davies, C., Tavite, H., Hooper, C., Safati, D., … Cunningham, C. (2015a). Dissonant roles: The experience of Māori in cancer care. Social Science & Medicine, 138, 144–151. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.06.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dew, K., Stubbe, M., Macdonald, L., & Dowell, A. (2012). Side effects talk in general practice consultations. In B. Bates & R. Ahmed (Eds.), Medical communication in clinical contexts (pp. 95–126). Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt.
   Google Scholar
• Dew, K., Stubbe, M., Signal, L., Stairmand, J., Dennett, E., Koea, J., … Holdaway, M. (2015b). Cancer care decision making in multidisciplinary meetings. Qualitative Health Research, 25, 397–407. doi: 10.1177/1049732314553010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, J. D. (1970). Understanding everday life. In J. D. Douglas (Ed.), Understanding everyday life: Toward the reconstruction of sociological knowledge (pp. 3–44). Chicago, IL: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, V., & Maynard, D. W. (2006). Explaining illness: Patients’ proposals and physician’ responses. In J. Heritage & D. W. Maynard (Eds.), Communication in medical care: Interaction between primary care physicians and patients (pp. 115–150). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heidegger, M. (1977). The question concerning technology. In D. F. Krell (Ed.), Martin Heidegger: Basic writing from being and time (1927) to the task of thinking (1964) (pp. 287–317). New York, NY: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J., & Maynard, D. W. (2006). Introduction: Analyzing interactions between doctors and patients in primary care encounters. In J. Heritage & D. W. Maynard (Eds.), Communication in medical care: Interaction between primary care physicians and patients (pp. 1–21). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. New York, NY: Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lepper, G. (2000). Categories in text and talk: A practical introduction to categorization analysis. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lindemann, G. (2011). On Latour’s social theory and theory of society, and his contribution to saving the world. Human Studies, 34, 93–110. doi: 10.1007/s10746-011-9178-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipman, T. (2000). Power and influence in clinical effectiveness and evidence-based medicine. Family Practice, 17, 557–563. doi: 10.1093/fampra/17.6.557
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez-Gonzalez, E., Herdeiro, M. T., & Figueiras, A. (2009). Determinants of under-reporting of adverse drug reactions: A systematic review. Drug Safety, 32, 19–31. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200932010-00002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClean, S., & Shaw, A. (2005). From schism to continuum? The problematic relationship between expert and lay knowledge – An exploratory conceptual synthesis of two qualitative studies. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 729–749. doi: 10.1177/1049732304273927
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishler, E. G. (1984). The discourse of medicine: Dialectics of medical interviews. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Patkar, V., Acosta, D., Davidson, T., Jones, A., Fox, J., & Keshtgar, M. (2011). Cancer multidisciplinary team meetings: Evidence, challenges, and the role of clinical decision support technology. International Journal of Breast Cancer, 1–7. doi:10.4061/2011/831605
   Google Scholar
• Prior, L. (2003). Belief, knowledge and expertise: The emergence of the lay expert in medical sociology. Sociology of Health & Illness, 25 (3), 41–57. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.00339
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokoe, E. (2012). Moving forward with membership categorization analysis: Methods for systematic analysis. Discourse Studies, 14, 277–303. doi: 10.1177/1461445612441534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ten Have, P. (2004). Understanding qualitative research and ethnomethodology. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, R. (2015). De-reifying categories. In R. Fitzgerald & W. Housley (Eds.), Advances in membership categorisation analysis (pp. 23–49). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar