Exploring pathways into and out of amphetamine type stimulant use at critical turning points: a qualitative interview study

References

• Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs (ACMD). (2017). Funding cuts are the single biggest threat to drug treatment recovery outcomes, a report published by the ACMD has warned. London: Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Alm, S. (2017). Drug abuse and life-chances—do childhood conditions matter? Results from a Swedish life course study. Advances in Life Course Research, 32, 1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.alcr.2016.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahora, M., Sterk, C. E., & Elifson, K. W. (2009). Understanding recreational ecstasy use in the United States: A qualitative inquiry. International Journal of Drug Policy, 20(1), 62–69. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2007.10.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, D., Beckwith, M., Haslam, C., Alexander Haslam, S., Jetten, J., Mawson, E., & Lubman, D. I. (2016). Overcoming alcohol and other drug addiction as a process of social identity transition: The social identity model of recovery (SIMOR). Addiction Research and Theory, 24(2), 111–123. doi: 10.3109/16066359.2015.1075980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beynon, C. M. (2009). Drug use and ageing: Older people do take drugs!. Age and Ageing, 38(1), 8–10. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afn251
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boshears, P., Boeri, M., & Harbry, L. (2011). Addiction and sociality: Perspectives from methamphetamine users in suburban USA. Addiction Research & Theory, 19(4), 289–301. doi: 10.3109/16066359.2011.566654
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsson, C. (2012). Using ‘turning points’ to understand processes of change in offending: Notes from a Swedish study on life courses and crime. British Journal of Criminology, 52(1), 1–16. doi: 10.1093/bjc/azr062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caruana, R., Glozer, S., & Eckhardt, G. M. (2019). ‘Alternative hedonism’: Exploring the role of pleasure in moral markets. Journal of Business Ethics. doi: 10.1007/s10551-019-04123-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciketic, S., Hayatbakhsh, M. R., Doran, C. M., Najman, J. M., & McKetin, R. (2012). A review of psychological and pharmacological treatment options for methamphetamine dependence. Journal of Substance Use, 17(4), 363–383. doi: 10.3109/14659891.2011.592900
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clinical Guidelines on Drug Misuse and Dependence Update 2017 Independent Expert Working Group. (2017). Drug misuse and dependence: UK guidelines on clinical management. London: Department of Health.
   Google Scholar
• Duff, C., & Moore, D. (2015). Evading and embracing normality: Estrangement and ambivalence in the accounts of methamphetamine consumers. Critical Public Health, 25(4), 488–503. doi: 10.1080/09581596.2014.913785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwyer, R., & Moore, D. (2013). Enacting multiple methamphetamines: The ontological politics of public discourse and consumer accounts of a drug and its effects. International Journal of Drug Policy, 24(3), 203–211. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2013.03.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ersche, K. D., Jones, P. S., Williams, G. B., Smith, D. G., Bullmore, E. T., & Robbins, T. W. (2013). Distinctive personality traits and neural correlates associated with stimulant drug use versus familial risk of stimulant dependence. Biological Psychiatry, 74(2), 137–144. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.11.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction. (2018). European drug report 2018: Trends and developments.
   Google Scholar
• Fast, D., Kerr, T., Wood, E., & Small, W. (2014). The multiple truths about crystal meth among young people entrenched in an urban drug scene: A longitudinal ethnographic investigation. Social Science and Medicine, 110, 41–48. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.03.029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasner-Edwards, S., Mooney, L. J., Marinelli-Casey, P., Hillhouse, M., Ang, A., Rawson, R. A., & The Methamphetamine Treatment Project Corporate Authors. (2010). Psychopathology in methamphetamine-dependent adults 3 years after treatment. Drug and Alcohol Review, 29(1), 12–20. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-3362.2009.00081.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gossop, M., Darke, S., Griffiths, P., Hando, J., Powis, B., Hall, W., & Strang, J. (1995). The Severity of Dependence Scale (SDS): Psychometric properties of the SDS in English and Australian samples of heroin, cocaine and amphetamine users. Addiction, 90(5), 607–614. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.1995.9056072.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haight, W. L., Carter-Black, J. D., & Sheridan, K. (2009). Mothers’ experience of methamphetamine addiction: A case-based analysis of rural, Midwestern women. Children and Youth Services Review, 31(1), 71–77. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2008.05.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, M., & Rhodes, T. (2018). “It’s not much of a life”: The benefits and ethics of using life history methods with people who inject drugs in qualitative harm reduction research. Qualitative Health Research, 28(7), 1123–1134. doi: 10.1177/1049732318764393
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heyman, G. M. (2013). Addiction: An emergent consequence of elementary choice principles. Inquiry (United Kingdom), 56(5), 428–445.
   Google Scholar
• Home Office. (2017). Drug strategy 2017. London.
   Google Scholar
• Ilieva, I., & Farah, M. J. (2013). Cognitive enhancement with amphetamine: History repeats itself. AJOB Neuroscience, 4(1), 24–25. doi: 10.1080/21507740.2012.762069
   Google Scholar
• Klee, H., Wright, S., Carnwath, T., & Merrill, J. (2001). The role of substitute therapy in the treatment of problem amphetamine use. Drug and Alcohol Review, 20(4), 417–429. doi: 10.1080/09595230120092715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klee, H., Wright, S., & Morris, J. (1999). Amphetamine users in treatment: Factors associated with sustained abstinence from street drugs. Addiction Research, 7(3), 239–265. doi: 10.3109/16066359909004386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laub, J. H., & Sampson, R. J. (1993). Turning points in the life course: Why change matters to the study of crime*. Criminology; An interdisciplinary Journal, 31(3), 301–325. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1993.tb01132.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, K. B., Arria, A. M., O’Grady, K. E., & Wish, E. D. (2005). An in-depth qualitative examination of the ecstasy experience: Results of a focus group with ecstasy-using college students. Substance Use & Misuse, 40(9–10), 1427–1441. doi: 10.1081/JA-200066810
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maher, L., & Dertadian, G. (2017). Qualitative research. Addiction, 113, 167–172. doi: 10.1111/add.13931
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Measham, F., Newcombe, R., & Parker, H. (1994). The normalization of recreational drug use amongst young people in north-west England. The British Journal of Sociology, 45(2), 287–312. doi:10.2307/591497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Measham, F., & Stevens, A. (2014). Widening the debate on the drug policy ratchet: Response to commentaries. Addiction, 109(8), 1235–1236. doi: 10.1111/add.12617
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minozzi, S., Saulle, R., De Crescenzo, F., & Amato, L. (2016). Psychosocial interventions for psychostimulant misuse. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 9(9), CD011866. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011866.pub2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nagelhout, G. E., Hummel, K., de Goeij, M. C. M., de Vries, H., Kaner, E., & Lemmens, P. (2017). How economic recessions and unemployment affect illegal drug use: A systematic realist literature review. International Journal of Drug Policy, 44, 69–83. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.03.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Donnell, A., Addison, M., Spencer, L., Zurhold, H., Rosenkranz, M., McGovern, R., Gilvarry, E., Martens, M., Verthein, U., & Kaner, E. (2018). Which individual, social and environmental influences shape different pathways of amphetamine type stimulant use over the life course? A systematic review and thematic synthesis of the qualitative literature. Addiction, 114(1), 24–47. doi: 10.1111/add.14434
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Gorman, A., Driscoll, A., Moore, K., & Roantree, D. (2016). Outcomes: Drug Harms, Polcy Harms, Poverty and Inequality. Dublin.
   Google Scholar
• Pope, C., Ziebland, S., & Mays, N. (2000). Analysing qualitative data. BMJ, 320(7227), 114–116. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7227.114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Public Health England. (2017). Health matters: Preventing drug misuse deaths. London: Public Health England.
   Google Scholar
• Reinarman, C. (2005). Addiction as accomplishment: The discursive construction of disease. Addiction Research & Theory, 13(4), 307–320. doi: 10.1080/16066350500077728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie, J., & Spencer, L. (1994). Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In A. Bryman, & R. G. Burgess (Eds.), Analyzing qualitative data (pp. 173–194). Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenkranz, M., O’Donnell, A., Verthein, U., Zurhold, H., Addison, M., Liebregts, N., … Martens, M.-S. (2019). Understanding pathways to stimulant use: A mixed-methods examination of the individual, social and cultural factors shaping illicit stimulant use across Europe (ATTUNE): Study protocol. BMJ Open, 9(8), e029476. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029476
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schinkel, M. (2019). Rethinking turning points: Trajectories of parenthood and desistance. Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology, 5(3), 366–386. doi: 10.1007/s40865-019-00121-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seddon, T. (2006). Drugs, crime and social exclusion: Social context and social theory in British drugs-crime research. The British Journal of Criminology, 46(4), 680–703. doi: 10.1093/bjc/azi079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seddon, T. (2011). Explaining drug policy: Towards an historical sociology of policy change. International Journal of Drug Policy, 22(6), 415–419. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2011.06.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, H., & Daly, M. (2017). Highways and buyways: A snapshot of UK drug scenes 2016. London. www.drugwise.org.uk.
   Google Scholar
• Teixeira-Gomes, A., Costa, V. M., Feio-Azevedo, R., Bastos, M. d. L., Carvalho, F., & Capela, J. P. (2015). The neurotoxicity of amphetamines during the adolescent period. International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience, 41, 44–62. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2014.12.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teruya, C., & Hser, Y.-I. (2010). Turning points in the life course: Current findings and future directions in drug use research. Current Drug Abuse Reviews, 3(3), 189–195. doi: 10.2174/1874473711003030189
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wakeman, S. (2016). The moral economy of heroin in ‘Austerity Britain’. Critical Criminology, 24, 363–377. doi: 10.1007/s10612-015-9312-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wojciechowski, T. W. (2018). The development of ecstasy use among Juvenile offenders and risk factors for predicting heterogeneity: A group-based approach. Journal of Drug Issues, 48(4), 546–559. doi: 10.1177/0022042618781100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, S., & Klee, H. (1999). A profile of amphetamine users who present to treatment services and do not return. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 6(2), 226–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, S., & Klee, H. (2000). Developing drug services for amphetamine users: Taking account of gender-specific factors. Journal of Substance Use, 5(2), 122–130. doi: 10.3109/14659890009053076
   Google Scholar