Shifting solutions: tracking transformations of drugs, health and the ‘human’ through human rights processes in Australia

References

• AIHW. (2022). Epilepsy in Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Arendt, H. (1958). The origins of totalitarianism. Meridian Books.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2018). Arthritis and osteoporosis. ABS.
   Google Scholar
• Bacchi, C. (2009). Analysing policy: What is the problem represented To Be? Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Barratt, M. J., Seear, K., & Lancaster, K. (2017). A critical examination of the definition of ‘psychoactive effect’ in Australian drug legislation. International Journal of Drug Policy, 40, 16–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.10.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bone, M. (2020). Human rights and drug control: A new perspective. Routledge
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. (2019). Posthuman knowledge. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carhart-Harris, R. L., Bolstridge, M., Day, C. M. J., Rucker, J., Watts, R., Erritzoe, D. E., & Nutt, D. J. (2018). Psilocybin with psychological support for treatment-resistant depression: Six-month follow-up. Psychopharmacology (Berlin), 235(2), 399–408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-017-4771-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cianciardo, J. (2010). The principle of proportionality: The challenges of human rights. Journal of Civil Law Studies, 3, 177–186.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R. W. (1995). Symposium: Human rights and the sociological project (introduction). Aust. N. Z. J. Sociol, 31, 1–44.
   Google Scholar
• Douzinas, C. (1996). Justice and human rights in postmodernity. In C. Gearty, & A. Tomkins (Eds.), Understanding human rights (pp. 115–137). Mansell.
   Google Scholar
• Douzinas, C. (2007). Human rights and empire: The political philosophy of cosmopolitanism. Routledge-Cavendish.
   Google Scholar
• Erni, J. (2019). Law and cultural studies: A critical rearticulation of human rights. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ezard, N. (2001). Public health, human rights and the harm reduction paradigm: From risk reduction to vulnerability reduction. International Journal of Drug Policy, 12(3), 207–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0955-3959(01)00093-7
   Google Scholar
• Farmer, P. (2005). Pathologies of power: Health, human rights and the new war on the poor. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flacks, S. (2021). Law, drugs and the politics of childhood. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, S. (2023). The right to privacy in the decriminalization of psilocybin mushrooms in South Africa. Law, Democracy and Development, 27, 1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1985). In J. Pearson (Ed.), Discourse and truth: The problematization of parrhesia. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1988). The concern for truth (A. Sheridan, Translator). In L. D. Kritzman (Ed.), Michel Foucault: Politics, philosophy, culture. Interviews and other writings, 1977– 1984 (pp. 255–267). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, S., & Moore, D. (Eds.) (2011). The drug effect: Health crime and society. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, S., Moore, D., & Keane, H. (2014). Habits: Remaking addiction. Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Frezzo, M. (2019). Critical, theory, sociology and human rights. In B. Schippers (Ed.), Critical perspectives on human rights (pp. 179–189). Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Gregg, B. (2012). Human rights as social construction. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hofmann, A. (2005). LSD, my problem child: Reflections on sacred drugs, mysticism, and science. Multidisciplinary Association for Psychedelic Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, C., Seear, K., Ritter, A., & Mazerolle, L. (2019). Criminal justice responses relating to personal use and possession of illicit drugs: the reach of Australian drug diversion programs and barriers and facilitators to expansion. Drug Policy Modelling Program Monograph Series; National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, P. (2008). Human rights, health and harm reduction: States’ amnesia and parallel universes. International Harm Reduction Association 19th International Conference, Barcelona, Spain, 11 May.
   Google Scholar
• Hynes, P., Lamb, M., Short, D., & Waites, M. (2012). Editorial foreword. Sociology, 46(5), 787–796. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038512455996
   Google Scholar
• Keane, H. (2003). Critiques of harm reduction, morality and the promise of human rights. International Journal of Drug Policy, 14(3), 227–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0955-3959(02)00151-2
   Google Scholar
• Lancaster, K., Seear, K., & Ritter, A. (2017). Making medicine; producing pleasure: A critical examination of medicinal cannabis policy and law in Victoria, Australia. International Journal of Drug Policy, 49, 117–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.07.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancaster, K., Seear, K., & Treloar, C. (2015). Laws prohibiting peer distribution of injecting equipment in Australia: A critical analysis of their effects. International Journal of Drug Policy, 26(12), 1198–1206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2015.05.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law Reform, Road and Community Safety Committee. (2018). Parliament of Victoria, Inquiry into Drug Law Reform (Final Report, March 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Levine, H. G. (1978). The discovery of addiction: Changing conceptions of habitual drunkenness in America. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 39(1), 143–174. https://doi.org/10.15288/jsa.1978.39.143
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lines, R. (2017). Drug control and human rights in international Law. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manderson, D. (1994). From Mr Sin to Mr Big: A history of Australian drug laws. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manderson, D. (2022). Thresholds: First gradually, then suddenly? International Journal of Drug Policy, 39(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2022.103753
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marx, K. (1978). On the Jewish question. In R. Tucker (Ed.), The Marx-Engels reader (pp. 26–52). Norton and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, D., & Fraser, S. (2013). Producing the ‘problem’ of addiction in drug treatment. Qualitative Health Research, 23(7), 916–923. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732313487027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Byrne, D. (2012). On the sociology of human rights: Theorising the language-structure of rights. Sociology, 46(5), 829–843.
   Google Scholar
• Petersmann, M. (Forthcoming). In the break (of rights and representation) – sociality beyond the non/human subject. International Journal of Drug Policy. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13642987.2023.2227124
   Google Scholar
• Pienaar, K., & Savic, M. (2016). Producing alcohol and other drugs as a policy ‘problem’: A critical analysis of South Africa’s ‘national drug master plan’ (2013–2017). International Journal of Drug Policy, 30, 35–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2015.12.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowlands, I. J., Abbott, J. A., Montgomery, G. W., Hockey, R., Rogers, P., & Mishra, G. D. (2021). Prevalence and incidence of endometriosis in Australian women: A data linkage cohort study. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 128(4), 657–665. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.16447
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, A., & Heiss, A. (2016). The intervention: An anthology. University of New South Wales.
   Google Scholar
• Sedgwick, E. (1993). Epidemics of the will. In E. Sedgwick (Ed.), Tendencies (pp. 130–142). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Seear, K. (2020). Drug policy’s past, present and future: Where should Australia head now? Alternative Law Journal, 45(4), 254–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/1037969X20938488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seear, K., & Fraser, S. (2014a). Beyond criminal law: The multiple constitution of addiction in Australian legislation. Addiction Research & Theory, 22(5), 438–450. https://doi.org/10.3109/16066359.2014.910511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seear, K., & Fraser, S. (2014b). The addict as victim: Producing the ‘problem’ of addiction in Australian victims of crime compensation laws. International Journal of Drug Policy, 25(5), 826–835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.02.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seear, K., & Mulcahy, S. (In press). Forging new habits: Critical drugs scholarship as an otherwise to rights. International Journal of Human Rights, 45(4). https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13642987.2023.2227104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Select committee into alternate approaches to reducing illicit drug use and its effects on the community, Parliament of Western Australia. (2019). Help, Not Handcuffs: Evidence-based approaches to reducing harm from illicit drug use (Final Report. (November 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Shah, N. C. (2004). Indigenous uses and ethnobotany of cannabis sativa L. (hemp) in Uttaranchal (India). Journal of Industrial Hemp, 9(1), 69–77. https://doi.org/10.1300/J237v09n01_07
   Google Scholar
• Sokhi-Bulley, B. (2016). Governing (through) rights. Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Special Commission of Inquiry into crystal methamphetamine and other amphetamine-type stimulants. (2020).
   Google Scholar
• Stolberg, V. B. (2011). The use of coca: Prehistory, history, and ethnography. Journal of Ethnicity in Substance Abuse, 10(2), 126–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332640.2011.573310
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Takahashi, S. (2019). Human rights and drug control: The false dichotomy. Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• TGA. (2023). Change to classification of psilocybin and MDMA to enable prescribing by authorised psychiatrists. 3 February. Retrieved February 5, 2023, from https://www.tga.gov.au/news/media-releases/change-classification-psilocybin-and-mdma-enable-prescribing-authorised-psychiatrists.
   Google Scholar
• Tupper, K. (2012). Psychoactive substances and the English language: “Drugs”, discourses, and public policy. Contemporary Drug Problems, 39(3), 461–492. https://doi.org/10.1177/009145091203900306
   Google Scholar
• Turner, B. S. (1993). Outline of a theory of human rights. Sociology, 27(3), 489–512. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038593027003009
   Google Scholar
• Turner, B. S. (2006). Vulnerability and human rights. Penn. State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Chief Executives Board for Coordination. (2019). Summary of deliberations. United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Valverde, M. (1998). Diseases of the will: Alcohol and the dilemmas of freedom. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Victorian Law Reform Commission. (2015). Medicinal cannabis: Report.
   Google Scholar
• Waters, M. (1996). Human rights and the universalisation of interests: Towards a social constructionist approach. Sociology, 30(3), 593–600. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038596030003011
   Google Scholar
• Young, S. (2020). The temporal trap of human rights. In K. McNeilly, & B. Warwick (Eds.), The times and temporalities of international human rights law (pp. 67–84). Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ziegler, S. (2008). Inventing the addict: Drugs, race, and sexuality in nineteenth-century British and American literature. University of Massachusetts Press.
   Google Scholar