224
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
WFOT 2022 Congress Keynote Address

An anthropophagic proposition in occupational therapy knowledge: Driving our actions towards social life

ORCID Icon

References

  • Ab’Saber, T. (2022). 1922, o mundo é aqui, o mundo não é aqui [1922, world is here, world is not here]. Revista Cult. Acesso em: Março 10, 2022. https://revistacult.uol.com.br/home/1922-o-mundo-e-aqui/.
  • Andrade, M. (2017). Pauliceia desvairada [Frenzied Pauliceia]. Novo século editora. [Original: 1922].
  • Andrade, O. (1924). Manifesto da Poesia Pau-Brasil [Manifesto of Brazilwood poetry]. Correio da Manhã.
  • Andrade, O. (1928). Manifesto Antropófago [Anthropophagic Manifesto]. Revista Antropofagia, 1(1), 3–4.
  • AOTA. American Occupational Therapy Association. (2002). Occupational therapy practice framework: Domain and process. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 56(6), 609–639. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.56.6.609
  • Barros, D. D. (2004). Terapia ocupacional social: o caminho se faz ao caminhar [Notes for a social occupational therapy: The way is done by the way we go]. Revista de Terapia Ocupacional da Universidade de São Paulo, 15(3), 90–97. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2238-6149.v15i3p90-97
  • Barros, D. D., Ghirardi, M. I. G., & Lopes, R. E. (1999). Terapia ocupacional e sociedade [Occupational therapy and society]. Revista de Terapia Ocupacional da Universidade de São Paulo, 10(2/3), 71–76.
  • Barros, D. D., Ghirardi, M. I. G., & Lopes, R. E. (2002). Terapia ocupacional social [Social occupational therapy]. Revista de Terapia Ocupacional da Universidade de São Paulo, 13(3), 95–103. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2238-6149.v13i3p95-103
  • Barros, D. D., Ghirardi, M. I. G., & Lopes, R. E. (2005). Social occupational therapy: A socio-historical perspective. In F. Kronenberg, S. S. Algado, & N. Pollard (Eds.), Occupational therapy without borders: Learning from the spirit of survivors (pp. 140–151). Elsevier Science/Churchill Livingstone.
  • Barros, J. D’. A. (2016). Os conceitos: Seus usos nas ciências humanas [The concepts: Their use in human sciences]. Editora Vozes.
  • Barros, J. D’. A. (2021). O uso dos conceitos – uma abordagem interdisciplinar [The use of concepts: - na interdisciplinar approach]. Editora Vozes.
  • Basaglia, F., & Ongaro-Basaglia, F. (1977). Los crimines de la paz: investigación sobre los intelectuales y los técnicos como servidores de la opresión [The crimes of the Peace: investigation about intellectuals and practitioners as oppression servers]. Siglo XXI.
  • Bastos, P. N. (2020). Dialética do engajamento: Uma contribuição crítica ao conceito [Dialectics of engagement: A critical contribution to the concept]. MATRIZes, 14(1), 193–220. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1982-8160.v14i1p193-220
  • Bemdita! Antropofagia em pesquisa. (2022). #01 – Modernismo, Pau-Brasil e Antropofagia [Research in anthropophagy #01 – Modernismo Pau-Brasil e anthropophagy]. Santa Cia. Retrieved February 15, 2022, from https://youtu.be/dPhnPHX4xuY
  • Bezerra, W. C., Lopes, R. E., & de Souza Basso, A. C. (2022). The structures of everyday life and occupational therapy: Tensioning limits and possibilities in/of the professional practice. Brazilian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 30(30), e3031. https://doi.org/10.1590/2526-8910.ctoEN22983031
  • Black, M. H., Milbourn, B., Desjardins, K., Sylvester, V., Parrant, K., & Buchanan, A. (2019). Understanding the meaning and use of occupational engagement: Findings from a scoping review. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 82(5), 272–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308022618821580
  • Bourdieu, P. (1993). Sociology in question. Theory, culture & society, Vol. 18. Sage.
  • Castel, R. (2003). From manual workers to wage laborers: Transformation of the social question (R. Boyd, Trans.). Transaction.
  • Escorel, S. (1999). Exclusão social: em busca de uma categoria [Social exclusion: Looking for a category]. In S. Escorel (Ed.), Vidas ao léu [Lives at random] (pp. 23–81). Fiocruz.
  • Farias, L., & Laliberte-Rudman, D. (2019). Challenges in enacting occupation-based social transformative practices: A critical dialogical study. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 86(3), 243–252. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008417419828798
  • Farias, M. N., & Lopes, R. E. (2021). Everyday circulation and social occupational therapy praxis. Interface – Comunicação, Saúde, Educação, 25, e200717. https://doi.org/10.1590/interface.200717
  • Francisco, B. (1988). Terapia ocupacional [Occupational therapy]. Papirus.
  • Fransen, H., Pollard, N., Kantartzis, S., & Viana-Moldes, I. (2015). Participatory citizenship: Critical perspectives on client-centred occupational therapy. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 22(4), 260–266. https://doi.org/10.3109/11038128.2015.1020338
  • Fraser, N. (2003). A justiça social na globalização: Redistribuição, reconhecimento e participação [Social justice in globalization: Redistribution, recognition, and participation]. Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociais, 63(65), 7–20. http://rccs.revues.org/1250.
  • Fraser, N. (2004). Repensando a questão do reconhecimento: superar a substituição e a reificação na política cultural [Rethinking knowledge recognition: Overcoming substitution and reification in cultural politics]. In C. A. Baldi (Org.), Direitos humanos na sociedade cosmopolita [Human rights in the cosmopolitan society] (pp. 601–621). Renovar. Trad. Roberto Cataldo Costa.
  • Galheigo, S. M. (1997). Da adaptação psicossocial à construção do coletivo: a cidadania enquanto eixo [From psychosocial adaptation to the construction of the collective: Citizenship as an axis]. Revista de Ciências Médicas PUCCAMP, 6(2/3), 105–108.
  • Galheigo, S. M. (2020). Occupational therapy, everyday life and the fabric of life: Theoretical-conceptual contributions for the construction of critical and emancipatory perspectives. Brazilian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 28(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.4322/2526-8910.ctoAO2590
  • Gallie, D., Paugam, S., & Jacobs, S. (2003). Unemployment, poverty and social isolation: Is there a vicious circle of social exclusion? European Societies, 5(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461669032000057668
  • Garcia, L. F. (2018). Only anthropophagy unites us – Oswald de Andrade’s decolonial Project. Cultural Studies, 34(1), 122–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2018.1551412
  • Garcia, L. F. (2020). Oswald de Andrade / anthropophagy. In Thorsten Botz-Bornstein (Ed.), ODIP: The online dictionary of intercultural philosophy. Retrieved March 10, 2022, from www.Odiphilosophy.com/Anthropophagy
  • Gerlach, A. J., Teachman, G., Laliberte-Rudman, D., Aldrich R. M., & Huot, S. (2018). Expanding beyond individualism: Engaging critical perspectives on occupation. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 25(1), 35–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/11038128.2017.1327616
  • Ghirardi, M. I. G. (2012). Terapia Ocupacional em processos econômico-sociais [Socioeconomic processes in occupational therapy]. Cadernos de Terapia Ocupacional da UFSCar, 20(1), 17–20.;
  • Goffman, E. (1961). Asylums: Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. Anchor Books Doubleday & Company, Inc.
  • Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks. International Publishers.
  • Guajardo, A., Kronenberg, F., & Ramugondo, E. L. (2015). Southern occupational therapies: Emerging identities, epistemologies and practices. South African Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45(1), 3–10. 10.17159/2310-3833/2015/v45no1a2
  • Gupta, J., & Taff, S. D. (2015). The illusion of client-centred practice. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 22(4), 244–251. https://doi.org/10.3109/11038128.2015.1020866
  • Hammel, J., Magasi, S., Heinemann, A., Whiteneck, G., Bogner, J., & Rodriguez, E. (2008). What does participation mean? An insider perspective from people with disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation, 30(19), 1445–1460. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280701625534
  • Heller, A. (1984). Everyday life. Broadway House.
  • Kennedy, J., & Davis, J. A. (2017). Clarifying the construct of occupational engagement for occupational therapy practice. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health, 37(2), 98–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/1539449216688201
  • Kielhofner, G. (2008). Model of human occupation: Theory and application. 5th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
  • Kinsella, E. A., & Whiteford, G. E. (2009). Knowledge generation and utilisation in occupational therapy: Towards epistemic reflexivity. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 56(4), 249–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1630.2007.00726.x
  • Lewis, H., Dwyer, P., Hodkinson, S., & Waite, L. (2015). Hyper-precarious lives: Migrants, work and forced labour in the Global North. Progress in Human Geography, 39(5), 580–600. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132514548303
  • Lima, E. M. F. A. (2020). Activities, common world, and forms of life: Contributions of Hannah Arendt’s thought to occupational therapy. Brazilian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 28(3), 1037–1050. https://doi.org/10.4322/2526-8910.ctoARF1995
  • Lobo, E. S. (1992). Caminhos da Sociologia no Brasil: Modos de vida e experiência [Sociological path in Brazil: Ways of life and experiences]. Tempo Social, 4(1-2), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1590/ts.v4i1/2.84907
  • Lopes, R. E. (1990). Currículo mínimo para terapia ocupacional: uma questão técnico-ideológica [Minimum curriculum for occupational therapy education: A technical-ideological issue]. Revista de Terapia Ocupacional da Universidade de São Paulo, 1(1), 33–41.
  • Lopes, R. E. (2013). No pó da estrada [On the road]. Cadernos de Terapia Ocupacional da UFSCar, 21(1), 171–186. https://doi.org/10.4322/cto.2013.022
  • Lopes, R. E. (2021). Citizenship, rights, and social occupational therapy. In: R. E. Lopes, & A. P. S. Malfitano (Eds.), Social occupational therapy: Theoretical and practical designs. Elsevier.
  • Lopes, R. E., & Borba, P. L. O. (2022). Em defesa da terapia ocupacional na educação para a inclusão radical [Defending occupational therapy in education for radical inclusion]. In R. E. Lopes, & P. L. O. Borba (Eds.), Terapia ocupacional, educação e juventudes: Conhecendo práticas e reconhecendo saberes [Occupational therapy, education and youth: Knowing practices and recognizing knowledge] (pp. 33–48). EdUFSCar.
  • Lopes, R. E., & Malfitano, A. P. S. (2021). Social occupational therapy: Theoretical and practical designs. Elsevier.
  • Lopes, R. E., Malfitano, A. P. S., Silva, C. R., & Borba, P. L. O. (2021). Resources and technologies in social occupational therapy: Actions with poor urban youth. In R. E. Lopes, & A. P. S. Malfitano (Eds.), Social occupational therapy: Theoretical and practical designs (pp. 169–176). Elsevier.
  • Lussi, I. A. O. (2020). Social emancipation and occupational therapy: Approaches from epistemologies of the south and the ecology of knowledges. Cadernos Brasileiros de Terapia Ocupacional, 28(4), 1335–1345. https://doi.org/10.4322/2526-8910.ctoEN2015
  • Magalhães, L. V., & Galheigo, S. M. (2010). Enabling international communication among Brazilian occupational therapists: Seeking consensus on occupational terminology. Occupational Therapy International, 17(3), 113–124. https://doi.org/10.1002/oti.292
  • Malfitano, A. P. S. (2021). Social context and social action: Generalizations and specificities in occupational therapy. In R. E. Lopes, & A. P. S. Malfitano (Org.), Social occupational therapy: Theoretical and practical designs (pp. 48–56). Elsevier.
  • Malfitano, A. P. S., & Lopes, R. E. (2021). Preface. In R. E. Lopes, & A. P. S. Malfitano (Org.), Social occupational therapy: Theoretical and practical designs (pp. 13–21). Elsevier.
  • Malfitano, A. P. S., Whiteford, G., & Molineux, M. (2021). Transcending the individual: The promise and potential of collectivist approaches in occupational therapy. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 28(3), 188–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/11038128.2019.1693627
  • Marcolino, T. Q., Benetton, J., Cestari, L. M. Q., & Mello, A. C. C. (2020). Dialogues with Benetton and Latour: Possibilities for an understanding of social insertion. Brazilian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 28(4), 1322–1334. https://doi.org/10.4322/2526-8910.ctoARF2032.
  • Matsukura, T. S., & Salles, M. (2016). Cotidiano, atividade humana e ocupação [Everyday life, human activity and occupation]. EduFSCar.
  • Melo, K. M. M. (2021). Entre rupturas e permanências: modos de vida e estratégias de enfrentamento à vida nas margens no cotidiano de pessoas trans [Between ruptures and permanences: Ways of life and strategies to face life on the margins in the daily life of trans people] [Doctoral thesis]. Programa de Pós-graduação em Terapia Ocupacional. Universidade Federal de São Carlos. https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/15263
  • Morris, K., & Cox, D. (2017). Developing a descriptive framework for “occupational engagement”. Journal of Occupational Science, 24(2), 152–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2017.1319292
  • Nascimento, B. A. (1990). O mito da atividade terapêutica [The myth of the therapeutic activity]. Revista de Terapia Ocupacional da Universidade de São Paulo, 1(1), 17–21.
  • Nascimento, B. A. (1991). Loucura, trabalho e ordem: O uso do trabalho em instituições psiquiátricas [Madness, work and order: The use of work in psychiatric institutions] [Dissertação de Mestrado em Ciências Sociais – Dissertation in Social Science Master]. Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo.
  • Oliveira, L. (1997). Os excluídos “existem”? Notas sobre a elaboração de um novo conceito [Do the excluded “exist”? Notes on developing a new concept]. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais, 12(33), 49–61.
  • Oxford Dictionary. (2021). Retrieved March 10, 2022, from https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/american_english/modernism
  • Pan, L. C., Borba, P. L. O., & Lopes, R. E. (2022). Recursos e metodologias para o trabalho de terapeutas ocupacionais na e em relação com a escola pública [Resources and methodologies for the work of occupational therapists in and in relation to public schools]. In R. E. Lopes, & P. L. O. Borba (Org.), Terapia ocupacional, educação e juventudes: Conhecendo Práticas e Reconhecendo Saberes [Occupational therapy, education and youth: Knowing practices and recognizing knowledge] (pp. 97–126). EdUFSCar.
  • Pereira, R. B. (2017). Towards inclusive occupational therapy: Introducing the CORE approach for inclusive and occupation-focused practice. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 64(6), 429–435. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12394
  • Richards, L., & Galvaan, R. (2018). Developing a socially transformative focus in occupational therapy: Insights from South African practice. South African Journal of Occupational Therapy, 48(1), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.17159/2310-3833/2017/vol48n1a2
  • Safatle, V. (2019). Crítica da autonomia: liberdade como heteronomia sem servidão [Criticism of autonomy: Freedom as heteronomy without servitude]. Discurso, 49(2), 21–41. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2318-8863.discurso.2019.165473
  • Salles, M. M., & Matsukura, T. S. (2013). Estudo de revisão sistemática sobre o uso do conceito de cotidiano no campo da terapia ocupacional no Brasil [Systematic review study on the use of the concept of daily life in the field of occupational therapy in Brazil]. Cadernos de Terapia Ocupacional da UFSCar, 21(2), 265–273. https://doi.org/10.4322/cto.2013.028
  • Santos, B. S. (2005). Reinventing social emancipation: Toward new manifestos. In B. S. Santos (Org.), Democratizing democracy. Beyond the liberal democratic canon (pp. xvii–xxiii). Verso.
  • Schwarcz, L. M. (2022). Negrismo e as vanguardas nos modernismos brasileiros: presenças e ausências [Negrismo and the avant-gardes in Brazilian modernisms: Presences and absences]. In G. Andrade (Ed.), Modernismos 1922-2022 [Modernism: 1922–2022] (pp. 297–322). Companhia das Letras.
  • Silva, A. C. C., & Oliver, F. C. (2021). Social participation in occupational therapy: Is it possible to establish a consensus? Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 68(6), 535–545. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12763
  • Silva, C. R. (2019). Atividades humanas & terapia ocupacional: Saber-fazer, cultura, política e outras resistências [Human activities and occupational therapy: Know-how, culture, politics and other resistances]. Hucitec.
  • Simioni, A. P. C. (2013). Modernismo brasileiro: entre a consagração e a contestação [Brazilian modernism: Between consecration and contestation]. Perspective, 2(2), 325–342. https://doi.org/10.4000/perspective.5539
  • Soares, L. B. T. (1991). Terapia ocupacional. Lógica do capital ou do trabalho? [Occupational therapy. Logic of capital or of work?]. Hucitec.
  • Sousa, J. R. B., Borba, P. L. O., Pan, L. C., & , R. E. (2021). ‘Inclusion’ and ‘democracy’ in education: An exploration of concepts and ideas for occupational therapists. World Federation of Occupational Therapists Bulletin, 77(2), 107–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/14473828.2021.1921929
  • Taff, S. D., & Putnam, L. (2022). Northern philosophies and professional neocolonialism in occupational therapy: A historical review and critique. Brazilian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 30(30), e2986. https://doi.org/10.1590/2526-8910.ctoAO22642986
  • Townsend, E. A. (1993). Muriel driver memorial lecture: Occupational therapy’s social vision. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 60(4), 174–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/000841749306000403
  • USP. Universidade de São Paulo. (1997). Definição de Terapia Ocupacional [Definition of Occupational Therapy]. (Mimeo).
  • Vaz, S. (2007). Manifesto da Antropofagia Periférica. https://brooklynrail.org/2021/02/criticspage/Manifesto-da-Antropofagia-Periferica.
  • Von Poellnitz, J. C., & Silva, C. R. (2019). Sobre a linguagem: sentidos para uso de termos e conceitos [About language: Meanings for the use of terms and concepts]. In C. R. Silva (Ed.), Atividades humanas & terapia ocupacional: saber-fazer, cultura, política e outras resistências [Human activities and occupational therapy: Know-how, culture, politics and other resistances] (pp. 80–96). Hucitec.
  • WFOT. World Federation of Occupational Therapists. (2012). Statement on occupational therapy. Retrieved March 10, 2022, from https://www.wfot.org/about/about-occupational-therapy
  • Whiteford, G., & Townsend, E. (2011). Participatory Occupational Justice Framework (POJF 2010): Enabling occupational participation and inclusion. In F. Kronenberg, N. Pollard, & D. Sakellariou (Eds.), Occupational therapy without borders, Vol. 2: Towards an ecology of occupation-based practices (pp. 65–84). Elsevier.
  • Whiteford, G., Townsend, E., & Hocking, C. (2000). Reflections on a renaissance of occupation. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 67(1), 61–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/000841740006700109
  • Wilcock, A., & Townsend, E. (2000). Occupational terminology interactive dialogue. Journal of Occupational Science, 7(2), 84–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2000.9686470
  • Willard, H. S., & Spackman, C. S. (1973). Terapéutica ocupacional [Occupational therapy]. Editorial JIMS.
  • Wirth, L. (1938). Urbanism as a way of life. American Journal of Sociology, 44(1), 1–24.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.