Framework for measuring research and innovation impact

References

• A*STAR. (2002–2011). National Survey of R&D. Agency for Science, Technology and Research.
   Google Scholar
• Acs, Z., Audretsch, D., & Feldman, M. (1994). R&D spillovers and recipient firm size. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 76, 336–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, J. (2002). Comparative localization of academic and industrial spillovers. Journal of Economic Geography, 2, 253–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agrawal, A., & Cockburn, I. (2003). The anchor tenant hypothesis: Exploring the role of large, local, R&D-intensive firms in regional innovation systems. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21, 1227–1253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agrawal, A., & Henderson, R. (2002). Putting patents in context: Exploring knowledge transfer from MIT. Management Science, 48, 44–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anselin, L., Varga, A., & Acs, Z. (1997). Local geographic spillovers between university research and high technology innovations. Journal of Urban Economics, 42, 422–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, H. (1993). The local income and employment impact of Lancaster University. Urban Studies, 30, 1653–1668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, H., Darrall, J., & Grovewhite, R. (1994). Building Lancaster’s future: Economic and environmental implications of Lancaster University’s expansion to 2001. Lancaster University.
   Google Scholar
• Arundel, A., & Bordoy, C. (2006). Final report: The 2006 ASTP survey. Report produced for the Association of European Science and Technology Transfer Professionals, MERIT. Maastricht, the Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Arundel, A., & Bordoy, C. (2008). Developing internationally comparable indicators for the commercialization of publicly-funded research. Working Papers Series 2008-075, Maastricht: UNU-MERIT.
   Google Scholar
• AUTM. (1991–2014). The AUTM Licensing Survey: Fiscal Year 1991–2012. Norwalk, CT: Association of University Technology Managers.
   Google Scholar
• Bach, L., & Llerena, P. (2007). Indicators of higher-education institutes and public-research organizations technology transfer activities: Insights from France. Science and Public Policy, 34, 709–721.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, J., & McCracken III, W. (2013). Justifying the ivory tower: Higher education and state economic growth. Journal of Education Finance, 38, 181–209.
   Google Scholar
• Bania, N., Eberts, R., & Fogarty, M. (1993). Universities and the startup of new companies: Can we generalize from Route 128 and Silicon Valley? The Review of Economics and Statistic, 75, 761–766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barajas, A., Huergo, E., & Moreno, L. (2012). Measuring the economic impact of research joint ventures supported by the EU Framework Programme. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 37, 917–942.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baryla Jr., & Dotterweich, D. (2001). Student migration: Do significant factors vary by region? Education Economics, 9, 269–280.
   Google Scholar
• Beise, M., & Stahl, H. (1999). Public research and industrial innovations in Germany. Research Policy, 28, 397–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berman, E. (1990). The economic impact of industry-funded university R&D. Research Policy, 19, 340–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beugelsdijk, S., & Cornet, M. (2002). ‘A far friend is worth more than a good neighbour’: Proximity and innovation in a small country. Journal of Management and Governance, 6, 169–188.
   Google Scholar
• Bleaney, M., Binks, M., Greenaway, D., Reed, G., & Whynes, D. (1992). What does a university add to its local economy. Applied Economics, 24, 305–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B. (2000). Technology transfer and public policy: A review of research and theory. Research Policy, 29, 627–655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, B., West, G., Harvie, C., & Hartgerink, N. (2013). Leading locally, competing globally: Measuring the University of Wollongong's contribution to economic and social prosperity. Wollongong: University of Wollongong.
   Google Scholar
• Brownrigg, M. (1973). The economic impact of a new university. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 20, 123–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Candell, A., & Jaffe, A. (1999). The regional economic impact of public research funding: A case study of Massachusetts. In L. M. Branscomb, F. Kodama, & R. Florida (Eds.), Industrializing knowledge: University-industry linkages in Japan and the United States (pp. 510–530). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carlsson, B., & Fridh, A. (2002). Technology transfer in United States universities: A survey and statistical analysis. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 12, 199–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheah, S., & Zalan, T. (2013). Why are some firms more successful than others in commercial adoption of technologies licensed from Public Research Institutes in Singapore? The Proceedings of XXIV ISPIM Conference, Helsinki, Finland, June 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Chesbrough, H. (2007). The market for innovation: Implications for corporate strategy. California Management Review, 49, 45–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crépon, B., Duguet, E., & Mairesse, J. (1998). Research and development, innovation and productivity: An econometric analysis at the firm level. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 7, 115–158.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, M., & Levinthal (1989). Innovation and learning: The two faces of R&D. Economic Journal, 99, 569–596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, W., Nelson, R., & Walsh, J. (2002). Links and impacts: The influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Science, 48, 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colombo, M., D’Adda, D., & Piva, E. (2010). An empirical analysis. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 35, 113–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregorio, D., & Shane, S. (2003). Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others? Research Policy, 32, 209–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drucker, J., & Goldstein, H. (2007). Assessing the regional economic development impacts of universities: A review of current approaches. International Regional Science Review, 30, 20–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H., Mello, J., & Almeida, M. (2005). Towards ‘meta-innovation’ in Brazil: The evolution of the incubator and the emergence of a triple helix. Research Policy, 34, 411–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2009). Metrics for knowledge transfer from public research organisations in Europe. Report from the European Commission's Expert Group on Knowledge Transfer Metrics. Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. (2012). Retrieved February 20, 2012, from http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/
   Google Scholar
• Evangelista, R., & Vezzani, A. (2010). The economic impact of technological and organizational innovations. A firm-level analysis. Research Policy, 39, 1253–1263.
   Google Scholar
• Faems, D., Van Looy, B., & Debackere, K. (2005). The role of interorganizational collaboration within innovation strategies: Towards a portfolio approach. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22, 238–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felsenstein, D. (1996). The university in the metropolitan arena: Impacts and public policy implications. Urban Studies, 33, 1565–1580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, M., & Varga, A. (2003). Spatial knowledge spillovers and university research: Evidence from Austria. Annals of Regional Science, 37, 303–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florax, R., & Folmer, H. (1992). Knowledge impacts of universities on industry: An aggregate simultaneous investment model. Journal of Regional Science, 32, 437–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, P., Fong, A., & Huang, R. (2010). Measuring the impact of knowledge transfer from public research organisations: A comparison of metrics used around the world. International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, 7, 318–327.
   Google Scholar
• Glasson, J. (2003). The widening local and regional development impacts of the modern universities—A tale of two cities (and North-South perspectives). Local Economy, 18, 21–37.
   Google Scholar
• Godin, B., & Doré, C. (2004). Measuring the impacts of science: Beyond the economic dimension.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, H. (1989). Estimating the regional economic impact of universities: An application of input-output analysis. Planning for Higher Education, 18, 51–64.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, H., & Drucker, J. (2006). The economic development impacts of universities on regions: Do size and distance matter? Economic Development Quarterly, 20, 22–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, H., & Luger, M. (1992). Impact Carolina: The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and the state’s economy. Final report prepared for the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Bicentennial Observance.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, H., & Renault, C. (2004). Contributions of universities to regional economic development: A quasi-experimental approach. Regional Studies, 38, 733–746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, H., Maier, G., & Luger, M. (1995). The university as an instrument for economic and business development: U.S. and European comparisons. In: D.D. Dill & B. Sporn (Eds.), Emerging patterns of social demand and university reform: Through a glass darkly. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, R. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 109–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagiu, A., Yoffie, D., & Wagonfeld, A. (2011). Intellectual ventures. Harvard Business School.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, B., Jaffe, A., & Trajtenberg, M. (2005). Market value and patent citations. The RAND Journal of Economics, 36(1), 16–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harhoff, D. (1999). Firm formation and regional spillovers. The Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 8, 27–55.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, R. (1997). The impact of the University of Portsmouth on the local economy. Urban Studies, 34, 605–626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemmert, M. (2004). The influence of institutional factors on the technology acquisition performance of high-tech firms: Survey results from Germany and Japan. Research Policy, 33, 1019–1040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• House of Commons. (2013). Bridging the valley of death: Improving the commercialisation of research. Eighth Report of Session 2012–13, II, London.
   Google Scholar
• Huffman, D., & Quigley, J. (2002). The role of the university in attracting high tech entrepreneurship: A Silicon Valley tale. Annals of Regional Science, 36, 403–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huggins, R., & Cooke, P. (1997). The economic impact of Cardiff University: Innovation, learning and job generation. GeoJournal, 41, 325–337.
   Google Scholar
• Huggins, R., & Johnston, A. (2009). The economic and innovation contribution of universities: A regional perspective. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffe, A. (1989). Real effects of academic research. The American Economic Review, 79, 957–970.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffe, A., & Trajtenberg, M. (1996). Flows of knowledge from universities and federal laboratories: Modeling the flow of patent citations over time and across institutional and geographic boundaries. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, USA, 93, 12671–12677.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffe, A., Trajtenberg, M., & Henderson, R. (1993). Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108, 577–598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamison, D., & Jansen, C. (2000). Technology transfer and economic growth. Journal of the Association of University Technology Managers, 12, 23–45.
   Google Scholar
• Keane, J., & Allison, J. (1999). The intersection of the learning region and local and regional economic development: Analysing the role of higher education. Regional Studies, 33, 896–902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirchhoff, B., Armington, C., Hasan, I., & Newbert, S. (2002). The influence of R&D expenditures on new firm formation and economic growth. Washington, DC: National Commission on Entrepreneurship 27.
   Google Scholar
• Klevorick, A., Levin, R., Nelson, R., & Winter, S. (1995). On the sources and significance of inter-industry differences in technological opportunities. Research Policy, 24, 185–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer, P., Scheibe, S., Reavis, D., & Berneman, L. (1997). Induced investments and jobs produced by exclusive patent licenses: A confirmatory study. Journal of the Association of University Technology Managers, 9, 79–100.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, J. A. (1988). Assessing the effect of the Polytechnic, Wolverhampton, on the local community. Urban Studies, 25, 53–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Link, A., & Scott, J. (2013). Bending the arc of innovation: Public support of R&D in small, entrepreneurial firms. Department of Economics Working Paper Series, The University of North Carolina.
   Google Scholar
• Lööf, H., & Broström, A. (2008). Does knowledge diffusion between university and industry increase innovativeness? Journal of Technology Transfer, 33, 73–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lööf, H., & Heshmati, A. (2002). Knowledge capital and performance heterogeneity: A firm-level innovation study. International Journal of Production Economics, 76(1), 61–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansfield, E. (1991). Academic research and industrial innovation. Research Policy, 20, 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansfield, E. (1995). Academic research underlying industrial innovations: Sources, characteristics, and financing. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 77, 55–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansfield, E. (1998). Academic research and industrial innovation: An update of empirical findings. Research Policy, 26, 773–776.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, F. (1998). The economic impact of Canadian university R&D. Research Policy, 27, 677–687.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, F., & Trudeau, M. (1998). The economic impact of university research. Association of Universities and Colleges of Canada, 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, S. (2003). The evaluation of strategic research partnerships. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 15, 159–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Science Board, Science and Engineering Indicators. (2008). and Science and Engineering Indicators (2010). National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, A. J. (2009). Measuring knowledge spillovers: What patents, licenses and publications reveal about innovation diffusion. Research Policy, 38, 994–1005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. R. (1986). Institutions supporting technical advance in industry. American Economic Review, 76, 186–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Shea, R., Allen, T., Chevalier, A., & Roche, F. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spinoff performance of US universities. Research Policy, 34, 994–1009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pakes, A., & Griliches, Z. (1984). Patents and R&D at the firm level: A first look. In Z. Griliches (Ed.), R&D, patents and productivity (pp. 55–71). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pastor, J., Pérez, F., & de Guevara, J. (2013). Measuring the local economic impact of universities: An approach that considers uncertainty. Higher Education, 65, 539–564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitkethly. (1997). The valuation of patents. Judge Institute Working Paper WP21/97, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Bacharach, D., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2005). The influence of management journals in the 1980s and 1990s. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 473–488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powers, J., & McDougall, P. (2005a). Policy orientation effects on performance with licensing to start-ups and small companies. Research Policy, 34, 1028–1042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powers, J., & McDougall, P. (2005b). University start-up formation and technology licensing with firms that go public: A resource-based view of academic entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 20, 291–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pressman, L., Guterman, S., Abrams, I., Geist, D., & Nelsen, L. (1995). Pre-production investment and jobs induced by MIT exclusive patent licenses: A preliminary model to measure the economic impact of university licensing. Journal of the Association of University Technology Managers, 7, 49–82.
   Google Scholar
• ProTon. (1991–2012). The ProTon Europe annual survey reports. Brussels: ProTon Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Riddel, M., & Schwer, R. (2003). Regional innovative capacity with endogenous employment: Empirical evidence from the U.S. Review of Regional Studies, 33, 73–84.
   Google Scholar
• Robson, B., Deas, I., Topham, N., & Twomey, J. (1995). The economic and social impact of Greater Manchester’s universities. Salford University Business Services Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Roessner, D., Bond, J., Okubo, S., & Planting, M. (2012). The economic impact of licensed commercialized inventions originating in university research. Research Policy, 42, 23–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, E., Hall, B., Hashimoto, M., Steffensen, M., Speakman, K., & Timko, M. (1999). Technology transfer from university-based research centers: The University of New Mexico experience. Journal of Higher Education, 70, 687–705.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, E., Yin, J., & Hoffmann, J. (2000). Assessing the effectiveness of technology transfer offices at U.S. research universities. Journal of the Association of University Technology Managers, 12, 47–80.
   Google Scholar
• Romer, P. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94, 1002–10037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, N., & Nelson, R. (1994). American universities and technical advance in industry. Research Policy, 23, 325–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sáez, C., Marco, T., & Arribas, E. (2002). Collaboration in R&D with universities and research centres: An empirical study of Spanish firms. R&D Management, 32, 321–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salter, A., & Martin, B. (2001). The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: A critical review. Research Policy, 30, 509–532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saxenian, A. (1994). Regional advantage: Culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sivitanidou, R., & Sivitanides, P. (1995). The intrametropolitan distribution of R&D activities: Theory and empirical evidence. Journal of Regional Science, 35, 391–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer, J. (2001). How relevant is university-based scientific research to private high-technology firms? A United States-Japan comparison. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 432–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinacker, A. (2005). The economic effect of urban colleges on their surrounding communities. Urban Studies, 42, 1161–1175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swann, P., & Prevezer, M. (1996). A comparison of the dynamics of industrial clustering in computing and biotechnology. Research Policy, 25, 1139–1157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thursby, J. G., & Thursby, M. C. (2002). Who is selling the Ivory tower? Sources of growth in university licensing. Management Science, 48(1), 90–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tornquist, K., & Hoenack, S. (1996). Firm utilization of university scientific research. Research in Higher Education, 37, 509–534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14, 207–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varga, A. (1997). Regional economic effects of university research: A survey. Morgantown, WV: Regional Research Institute, West Virginia University.
   Google Scholar
• Varga, A. (2000). Local academic knowledge transfers and the concentration of economic activity. Journal of Regional Science, 40, 289–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincett, P. (2010). The economic impacts of academic spin-off companies, and their implications for public policy. Research Policy, 39, 736–747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiler, S. (2000). Information and market failure in local economic development: A new role for universities? Economic Development Quarterly, 14, 194–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5, 171–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zucker, L., Darby, M., & Brewer, M. (1998). Intellectual human capital and the birth of the U.S. biotechnology enterprises. The American Economic Review, 88, 290–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar